I see no reason to hold up this PEP's approval any longer, so I hereby
approve PEP 476. It looks like a fair amount of work is still needed to
backport this to Python 2.7 (and a smaller amount for 3.4) but I trust that
this will all happen before the next releases of these two. Congrats Alex!
On
On 13 Oct 2014 08:58, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I see no reason to hold up this PEP's approval any longer, so I hereby
approve PEP 476. It looks like a fair amount of work is still needed to
backport this to Python 2.7 (and a smaller amount for 3.4) but I trust that
this will all
Guido van Rossum guido at python.org writes:
OK, I'll hold off a bit on approving the PEP, but my intention is to approve
it. Go Alex go!
A patch for the environmental variable overrides on Windows has landed; thanks
Benjamin!
Alex
___
On 21.09.2014 01:03, Nick Coghlan wrote:
We may also need some clarification from Ned regarding the status of
OpenSSL and the potential impact switching from dynamic linking to
static linking of OpenSSL may have in terms of the
OPENSSL_X509_TEA_DISABLE setting.
You may want to ask Hynek, too.
On 09/20/2014 11:05 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 21 September 2014 03:05, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make it
into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly
On 19.09.2014 18:53, Alex Gaynor wrote:
Hi all,
I've just updated the PEP to reflect the API suggestions from Nick, and the
fact that the necessary changes to urllib were landed.
I think this is ready for pronouncement, Guido?
There is still the issue with SSL_CERT_DIR and SSL_CERT_FILE
Done and done.
Alex
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
+1 on Nick's suggestion. (Might also mention that this is the reason why
both functions should exist and have compatible signatures.)
Also please, please, please add explicit mention of Python 2.7,
Nice. I just realized the release candidate for 3.4.2 is really close (RC1
Monday, final Oct 6, see PEP 429). What's your schedule for 3.4? I see no
date for 2.7.9 yet (but that could just be that PEP 373 hasn't been
updated). What about the Apple and Microsoft issues Christian pointed out?
That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make
it into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly missing documentation.
Alex
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:46 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Nice. I just
On 21 September 2014 03:05, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
That sounds reasonable to me -- at this point I don't expect this to make it
into 3.4.2; Nick has some working code on the ticket:
http://bugs.python.org/issue22417 it's mostly missing documentation.
I also think it's more
Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted releases in PEP
476?
Nick, do Christian's issues need to be mentioned in the PEP or should we
just keep those in the corresponding tracker items?
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 3:05 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 September
On 21 September 2014 08:22, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted releases in PEP
476?
Nick, do Christian's issues need to be mentioned in the PEP or should we
just keep those in the corresponding tracker items?
They should be
OK, I'll hold off a bit on approving the PEP, but my intention is to
approve it. Go Alex go!
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 4:03 PM, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21 September 2014 08:22, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
Sounds good. Maybe we should put the specifically targeted
Hi all,
I've just updated the PEP to reflect the API suggestions from Nick, and the
fact that the necessary changes to urllib were landed.
I think this is ready for pronouncement, Guido?
Cheers,
Alex
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
The PEP doesn't specify any of the API changes for Python 2.7. I feel it is
necessary for the PEP to show a few typical code snippets using urllib in
Python 2.7 and how one would modify these in order to disable the cert
checking.
There are also a few typos; especially this paragraph puzzled me:
Pushed a new version which I believe adresses all of these. I added an
example of opting-out with urllib.urlopen, let me know if there's any other
APIs you think I should show an example with.
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:06 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
The PEP doesn't specify any
On 20 September 2014 08:34, Alex Gaynor alex.gay...@gmail.com wrote:
Pushed a new version which I believe adresses all of these. I added an
example of opting-out with urllib.urlopen, let me know if there's any other
APIs you think I should show an example with.
It would be worth explicitly
+1 on Nick's suggestion. (Might also mention that this is the reason why
both functions should exist and have compatible signatures.)
Also please, please, please add explicit mention of Python 2.7, 3.4 and 3.5
in the Abstract (for example in the 3rd paragraph of the abstract).
On Fri, Sep 19,
18 matches
Mail list logo
