passes all
sub-tests.
Again, not a python bug - but a suggestion for improving what is tested.
I can open an issue, and with a bit of assistance/interest from others
I'll even do a PR.
Michael
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
ht
this horribly break things if only '!' was returned, rather than
the shadow password?
It does not look terribly hard - but how do you deal with defaults such
as 0 or -1 for the numeric values?
Regards,
Michael
___
Python-Dev mailing li
verwriting files and/or mixed versions. Sigh.
On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 08:40 Michael wrote:
I have a build_bot running (yeah me!), and was surprised to see
test_zlib fail on AIX.
There is not an issue with test_zlib, but I do have a suggestion.
I was getting an error with test_flushes(). On python2-
On 03/08/2018 03:22, Larry Hastings wrote:
On 08/02/2018 07:17 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
3.4.9 and 3.5.6 have no more known security vulnerabilities :-)
Well, not to be a complete pill, but...
https://bugs.python.org/issue17180
https://bugs.python.org/issue17239
https://bugs.python
in understanding the tests, and probably better python
coding criticism. Michael
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
On 09/08/2018 00:52, Michael Felt wrote:
> Change by Michael Felt :
>
>
> --
> pull_requests: +8196
>
> ___
> Python tracker
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue11191>
> ___
>
Don&#x
My idea would be to focus on a "fix" for 3.8, and then decide if it can,
in one form or another, be backported. And also how far. IMHO - the
discussion about breakage is holding back even an attempt for a
resolution for 3.8.
Michael
signature.a
lse also experiences this,
and feels capable of makeing it more flexible - you will get thanks from
me, in any case!
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.
nk"
aka Thanks in Advance.
So, hoping this helps - I'll continue as I can. Time and resources are
limited. And, I am very curious re: point c) above.
Great Days! everyone,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
P
On 28/08/2018 09:57, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Michael Felt (aixtools) writes:
>
> > When building out of tree there is no .git reference. If I
> > understand the process it uses git to see what files have changed,
> > and does further processing on those.
>
>
I read the discussion related to issue32374. That seems to be sure that
other events that could
cause the test to fail (i.e., the program executes successfully) are
caught early, and/or ignored
so that the program fails - and the test succeeds.
I am having trouble figuring out why the script below
l test_tix test_tk
test_ttk_guionly test_ttk_textonly test_turtle test_unicode_file
test_unicode_file_functions test_winconsoleio test_winreg
test_winsound test_zipfile64
1 re-run test:
test_importlib
Awaiting comments and suggestions. Many thanks for your time.
Mi
On 17/09/2018 09:39, Michael wrote:
> I read the discussion related to issue32374. That seems to be sure that
> other events that could
> cause the test to fail (i.e., the program executes successfully) are
> caught early, and/or ignored
> so that the program fails - and the test s
On 17/09/2018 12:50, Michael wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> The last two months I have spent nearly all my free time to cleanup "a
> frustration" - from my side - the long list of failing tests for AIX
> (there were nearly 20 when I started).
== Tests result: SUCCESS ==
393 test
s://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+author%3Aaixtools+sort%3Aupdated-desc
But I'll add the combined one to get it through grinder and see if there
are unexpected surprises.
Michael
>
> Cheers,
> Nick.
signature.asc
Descriptio
On 05/10/2018 16:15, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> being on a similar road with Gentoo Prefix, I really do appreciate
> your AIX related work!
>
> However, for two (not so minor) topics I've got a little different
> experience, which I think should be men
On 05/10/2018 22:01, Rob Boehne wrote:
> On 10/5/18, 10:33 AM, "Python-Dev on behalf of Michael Haubenwallner"
> michael.haubenwall...@ssi-schaefer.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >... I build everything myself, using xlc
> >(gcc introd
pproval.
I could not have gotten this far without help!
Sincerely,
Michael aka aixtools
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pytho
On 20/02/2019 18:58, Victor Stinner wrote:
> If Python 3.4 was the current version when a bug was reported, I would
> expect the version field of the bug set to Python 3.4. Maybe the bug
> has been fixed in the meanwhile, maybe not. Closing all bugs affected
> to 3.4 is a risk of loosing useful inf
PyStructSequence_SET_ITEM(v, 2, _PyLong_FromDev(st->st_dev));
+2046 #endif
+711 #define _PyLong_FromDev PyLong_FromLongLong
It seems so - however, Is there something such as PyUnsignedLong and is
that large enough for a "long long"? and if it exists, would that make
th
On 16/02/2019 23:34, Steve Dower wrote:
> I like that we're taking (small) steps to reduce the size of our API.
I consider myself - an "outsider", so an "outsider's" view is that
anything that makes it more clear about what is intended aka supported
as the Python API is an improvement.
Without c
On 04/03/2019 04:30, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Hello all,
> I'm pleased to announce the immediate availability of Python 2.7.16 for
> download at https://www.python.org/downloads/release/python-2716/.
Congratulations!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
ue-tracker and PR conversation indicate to me that documentation of
different
approaches to organizing code dependencies is vital. And that it is not
easily available. Devguide is one area - but 'core' documentation is
more important imho - I read, and compare, the Python docu
On 02/08/2019 04:12, Inada Naoki wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 10:21 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
>> Hi INADA-san,
>>
>> Is it supported on macOS, FreeBSD, AIX, Android, etc.?
>>
>> My notes on platforms supported by Python:
>> https://pythondev.readthedocs.io/platforms.html
>>
>> For example, xlc C
. Just have to say CC=c99 or CC=xlc or
one of the other variants.
If more documentation is desired - just let me know.
Michael
Standards and specifications XL
C is designed to support the following standards and specifications. You
can refer to these standards for precise definitions of some
hon will be delivering "a
promise", being decisive, being clear. Not following through only
creates insecurity - will they ever do it? Nah - no guts (these are
3rd-party developers chatting). Users are your friend. If they really
want Python3.8+ and they get lots of warning messages - THEY wi
On 05/08/2019 11:16, Inada Naoki wrote:
> https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/1213123005d9f94bb5027c0a5256ea4d3e97b61d/Include/pyport.h#L158-L168
>
> This can be changed to this:
>
> #ifndef PY_FORMAT_SIZE_T
> /* "z" is defined C99 and portable enough. We can use "%zd" instead of
>"%" PY_FO
whl
(111kB)
|| 112kB 23.3MB/s
Saved ./pycparser-2.19-py2.py3-none-any.whl
Successfully downloaded cffi pycparser
Regards,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubs
rhaps create
"issues" that specify the "paragraphs", or whatever you think are
appropriate 'chunks' to make review sensible (if not also easier).
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
P
On 31/10/2019 00:17, Larry Hastings wrote:
>
>
> Due to awkward CDN caching, some users who downloaded the source code
> tarballs of Python 3.5.8 got a preliminary version instead of the
> final version. As best as we can tell, this only affects the .xz
> release; there are no known instances of u
).
A program has exactly - zero (0) of something, one (1) of something, or
infinite. The moment it gets set to X, the case for X+1 appears.
Since we are not talking about zero, or one - I guess my comment is make
sure it can be used to infinity.
Regards,
Michael
p.s. If this has already been
single -longer term- issue - and multiple PR's to work
through corrections and additions during 2020. Focus on Python 3.9 and
beyond yet where appropriate backlevel to Python 3.8 or even 3.7.
Sincerely,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_
be? Based on that we can decide if something like AIX build instructions
> makes sense or if we should just gut the directory.
>
> For me personally, I'm torn. While helping out other folks using AIX through
> that text file might be good due to the work you put in, Michael, whi
x27;_extend_dict',
'_generate_posix_vars', '_get_default_scheme',
'_get_sysconfigdata_name', '_getuserbase', '_init_non_posix',
'_init_posix', '_is_python_source_dir', '_main', '_parse_makefile',
'_print_
On 09/01/2020 13:16, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Hi Michael, and welcome!
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:37:33AM +0100, Michael wrote:
>
>> I am not questioning the demands of the lint checker - rather - I am
>> offering my services (aka time) to work through core
ified) from glibc
which means that this part is GPL code.
Thanks
Michael Zimmermann
On Thu, Nov 2, 2017 at 8:37 PM, Blibbet wrote:
> On 11/02/2017 09:41 AM, Jayaprakash, N wrote:
>> Would you consider adding thread support in this port of Python for
> EDK2 shell?
>
> FYI, this li
Am I correct in saying that the consensus is +1 for inclusion in v3.8?
The last point in the thread was INADA Naoki researching various
implementations and deciding that it's OK to include this feature in 3.8.
As I understand it, Guido was in agreement with INADA's advice to wait for
MicroPython's
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:09 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Thank you. Personally, I'd like to see feedback from
> educators/teachers after they take the time to read the PEP and take
> some time to think about its consequences.
>
I've started testing the proposed syntax when I teach. I don't have
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:02 AM Michael Selik wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:09 AM Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
>
>> Thank you. Personally, I'd like to see feedback from
>> educators/teachers after they take the time to read the PEP and take
>> some time to thi
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:19 AM Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 3:02 AM, Michael Selik wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 8:09 AM Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thank you. Personally, I'd like to see feedback from
> >> educato
y, we may wake up and Python won't be recommended
as a beginner's language.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 7:48 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 10:59:43AM -0700, Michael Selik wrote:
>
> Of course they do -- they're less fluent at reading cod
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:57 PM Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 2:41 PM Michael Selik wrote:
>
>> This thread started with a request for educator feedback, which I took to
>> mean observations of student reactions. I've only had the chance to test
k, misspelled (usually
misremembered) assert methods silently did nothing.
With this fix in place several failing tests were revealed in code bases!
As for assret, it's the common misspelling people have told me about. It
seems a ridiculous thing for people to get worked up about, but people
enjoy
ht - the bad API goes back to the very beginning. I'm not planning
I disagree it's a bad api. It's part of why mock was so easy to use and
part of why it was so successful. With the new check for non-existent
assert methods it's no longer dangerous and so doesn't need
> I'm not suggesting restarting at the top (I've elsewhere suggested that
> many such methods would be better as an *iterable* that can be restarted
> at the top by calling iter() multiple times, but that's not the same
> thing). I'm suggesting raising an exception other than StopIteration, so
> th
Raymond,
I think you made a typographical error in your Counter.update example.
>>> from collections import Counter
>>> c = Counter(a=4, b=2, c=0, d=-2)
>>> d = Counter(a=1, b=-5, c=-2, d=6)
>>> c.update(d)
>>> c
Counter({'a': 5, 'd': 4, 'c': -2, 'b': -3})
Pair programming
You may also be interested in a project I've been working on, airspeed
velocity, which will automatically benchmark historical versions of a git
or hg repo.
http://github.com/spacetelescope/asv
astropy, scipy, numpy and dask are already using it.
Cheers,
Mike
27;, '/opt/lib/python2.7',
'/opt/lib/python2.7/plat-aix5', '/opt/lib/python2.7/lib-tk',
'/opt/lib/python2.7/lib-old', '/opt/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload',
'/opt/lib/python2.7/site-packages']
michael@ipv4:~$ python
Python 2.7.9 (default,
Title:
Upgrade OpenSSL shipped with python installers, it reminded me I need to
start looking at LibreSSL again - and that, if not already done - might
be something "secure" for python as well.
Michael
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@
Can look at it. There has been a lot of discussion, iirc, between
OpenSSL and LibreSSL re: version identification.
Thx for the reference.
On 08-Mar-16 14:55, Hasan Diwan wrote:
On 8 March 2016 at 00:49, Michael Felt <mailto:mich...@felt.demon.nl>> wrote:
As a relative newco
64:[/data/prj/aixtools/python/python-2.7.11.2]
So, my question: how do I make the 'compile' of
/var/aixtools/aixtools/python/2.7.11.2/opt/lib/python2.7/zipfile.py more
verbose?
I tried "make V=1 DESTDIR=/var/aixtools/aixtools/python/2.7.11
On 2016-03-02 18:45, Thomas Wouters wrote:
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 3:50 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
Hello all,
1) There are many lists to choose from - if this is the wrong one for
questions about packaging - please forgive me, and point me in the right
direction.
It's hard to say where
a) hope this is not something you expect to be on -list, if so - my
apologies!
Getting this message (here using c99 as compiler name, but same issue
with xlc as compiler name)
c99 -qarch=pwr4 -qbitfields=signed -DNDEBUG -O -I. -IInclude -I./Include
-I/data/prj/aixtools/python/python-2.7.11.2/I
est/test_bitfields.py",
line 48, in test_shorts
self.assertEqual((name, i, getattr(b, name)), (name, i,
func(byref(b), name)))
AssertionError: Tuples differ: ('M', 1, -1) != ('M', 1, 1)
First differing element 2:
-1
1
- ('M', 1, -1)
? -
+ (&#x
On 2016-03-18 05:57, Andrew Barnert via Python-Dev wrote:
Yeah, C99 (6.7.2.1) allows "a qualified or unqualified version of _Bool, signed int, unsigned
int, or some other implementation-defined type", and same for C11. This means that a compiler
could easily allow an implementation-defined ty
(msiexec /l*v python.log python.msi OR
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/223300), sit on the prompt for network
access so you can uniquely identify the log's timestamps, and try to
identify at what point of the installation the network access occurs.
Once that is known, more steps can be taken to
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 8:45 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Fine, if you're worried about bytes.format() overstepping by implicitly
> calling str.encode() on the return value of __format__() then you will need
> __bytes__format__() to get equivalent support.
Could we just re-use PEP-3101's note (easil
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 11:13 AM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> A TypeError exception is what we want if the object does not support
> bytes formatting. Some possible problems:
>
> - It could be hard to provide a helpful exception message since it
> is generated inside the __format__ method rather
f the language and its
implementation. Topics include Python design issues, release
mechanics, and maintenance of existing releases."
(from https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev)
Unless you're offering all the core-devs free robots. In which case it's
fine.
lels CPython's C API buffer
protocol. This provided the basis for support of buffer() and memoryview(). The
work was done with Jython3 in mind and will be a huge boost to that eventual
effort.
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Jim Baker
> Subject: Re: Jython Report
> Date: 7 Apr
(2, 'c')]
'd'
>>> it = iter(string.ascii_letters); list(zip(it, range(3))); next(it)
[('a', 0), ('b', 1), ('c', 2)]
'e'
This seems like a potentially nasty gotcha, but I'm unclear what real
use cases would be impacted.
Michae
Hello!
Stumbling over problems on AIX (Modules/python.exp not found) building libxml2
as python module
let me wonder about the intended use-cases for 'python-config' and 'pkg-config
python'.
FWIW, I can see these distinct use cases here, and I'm kindly asking if I got
them right:
* Build an a
Hi,
following up myself with a patch proposal:
On 05/28/2014 04:51 PM, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Stumbling over problems on AIX (Modules/python.exp not found) building
> libxml2 as python module
> let me wonder about the intended use-cases for 'python-config' and
&
style comparison
recommendation that is common to languages that use = for assignment
expressions. I understand the reluctance for such a major change to the
appearance of Python code, but it would avoid the laundry list of
exclusions. There's some value in parsimony.
Anyway, we've got some ti
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 12:39 AM Tim Peters wrote:
> So, ya, when someone claims [assignment expressions will] make Python
> significantly harder to teach, I'm skeptical of that claim.
>
I don't believe anyone is making that claim. My worry is that assignment
expressions will add about 15 to 20 m
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 5:28 PM Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 01, 2018 at 08:35:08AM -0700, Michael Selik wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 12:39 AM Tim Peters wrote:
> >
> > > So, ya, when someone claims [assignment expressions will] make Python
> > &
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 11:36 PM Tim Peters wrote:
> [Michael Selik]
> > My worry is that assignment expressions will add about 15 to 20
> > minutes to my class and a slight discomfort.
>
> So not intractable - which is my high-order bit ;-)
>
> For those who want more
On Sun, Jul 1, 2018 at 8:21 PM Matt Arcidy wrote:
> [...] Can anyone adequately explain why this specific modality of
> learning, a student-in-a-seat based educator, must outweigh all other
> modalities [...]?
1. It doesn't.
2. It's a proxy for the other modes.
I hope this was an adequate exp
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:57 PM Jussi Judin wrote:
> Quick answer: undocumented billion laughs/exponential entity expansion
> type of an attack that is accessible through web through any library that
> uses fractions module to parse user input (that are actually available on
> Github).
>
Are you
All,
My excuse if this is not the appropriate list for a question essentially
concerning the AIX port of Python.
The current port of Python for AIX includes composing an export file
(/lib/python2.7/config/python.exp) in which there are a number of functions
starting "Py_" or "_Py_".
The Vim p
Would it be possible to normalize by the number of mailing list members and
also by "active" members? The latter would be tricky to define.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 3:29 PM Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I wrote a basic script to compute the number of emails per PEP. It
> requires to downloa
On 8/6/2018 11:38 AM, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> A side note on your side note. Different distro's have different
> standards, use/customer cases to address etc. In enterprise
> distributions the usual scheme is that the version that you see is the
> minimum one and many fixes coming from ups
10:59 PM, Michael wrote:
>
> As I have time, I'll dig into these.
>
> I have a couple of PR already 'out there', which I hope someone will
> be looking at when/as he/she/they have time. My time will also be
> intermittent.
>
> My next test - and I hope not t
FAIL: test_copy_remove_setuid (test.test_shutil.TestShutil)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/data/prj/python/git/python3-3.8/Lib/test/test_shutil.py", line
1491, in
On Wed, Sep 5, 2018 at 3:13 AM Evpok Padding
wrote:
> According to the [doc][1], `collections.Counter` convenience intersection
> and union functions are meant to help it represent multisets. However, it
> currently lacks comparisons, which would make sense and seems
> straightforward to implemen
First, this sounds like it belongs on python-ideas, not python-dev.
Second, when you do send a message to python-ideas, it'll help to
accompany it with a realistic example usage that motivates your
proposal.
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 11:18 AM wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A humble proposal for a switch-like st
Not critical - but I note a difference between Python3 3.6.7 and 3.7.1 -
no support for the configure option --with-openssl.
On AIX I was able to run both configure and "make install" without incident.
I also ran the "make test" command.
v3.7.1:
9 tests failed again:
test_ctypes test_distut
On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 2:11 PM Sean Harrington wrote:
> kwarg on Pool.__init__ called `expect_initret`, that defaults to False. When
> set to True:
> Capture the return value of the initializer kwarg of Pool
> Pass this value to the function being applied, as a kwarg.
The parameter name you cho
On Sat, Sep 29, 2018 at 5:24 AM Sean Harrington wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 4:39 PM Sean Harrington wrote:
>> > My simple argument is that the developer should not be constrained to make
>> > the objects passed globally available in the process, as this MAY break
>> > encapsulation for la
intended
as a last resort variable that can be modified in Makefile.
Thanks!
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe
On 9/30/2018 2:17 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> (It's also called Dutch Rounding.)
Ah - as to why - and from school! (as so-called intuitive! rather desired!).
A test score goes from 5.5 to 6.0 - which becomes passing.
Oh, do I recall my children's frustrations when they had a X.4Y score -
tha
.
And, while you may not give a damn about anything other than Windows,
macos and/or Linux - there are other platforms that would like a stable
Python.
Sincerely,
Michael
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
mime-attachment
Description: application/pgp-encrypted
encrypted.asc
Description: Binary data
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/
I am willing to assist as best I can with AIX - I seem to have the core
requirements re: time available: (i.e., over-comitted at work, but
'work' evenings and weekends on OSS :p)
On 10/2/2018 6:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could col
On 10/2/2018 4:45 PM, Erik Bray wrote:
> Michael, if there are any PRs you want to point me to that I might be
> able to help review please do.
A little trick I learned:
https://github.com/python/cpython/pulls?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Apr+author%3Aaixtools+sort%3Aupdated-desc
lists them all.
Yes, unintended. It was only supposed to be signed, but "Send Later"
encrypts it.
Unpacked version:
On 10/2/2018 1:07 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2018, at 12:12, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Before I submit a patch to increase the
On 10/2/2018 11:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
>> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate with?
>> Rather than rely on adhoc patch review from random core developers.
>
> You two might collaborate with each o
On 10/3/2018 2:48 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> On 10/2/2018 7:16 PM, Michael Felt wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 10/2/2018 11:34 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>>> On 10/2/2018 12:41 PM, Simon Cross wrote:
>>>> Are there any core devs that Michael or Erik could collaborate
On 10/3/2018 1:46 AM, Neil Schemenauer wrote:
> On 2018-10-02, Michael Felt wrote:
>> I am sorry, for myself obviously - but also for Python. Obviously, I am
>> doing it all wrong - as I see lots of other issues being picked up
>> immediately.
> I'm not sure that&#x
l tests
mean less if they are not merged, for whatever reason.
However, maybe there is another way, or even something additional
needed. Maybe something I cannot provide and then I can adjust my
expectations and goals.
Regards,
Michael
___
Python-Dev
process, from a different module, testing w/o globals, etc...)..
>
> This would essentially be an efficient implementation of Pool.starmap(),
> where kwargs are static, and passed to each application of "func" over our
> iterable.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> On Sat, S
over 20
minutes, and I had to go. Of the 419, 17 or 18 had failed. Roughly where
AIX plus xlc was at last July without my PRs for tests.
So, while it worked - money stopped and Solaris is in no better
numerical shape (test wise) than AIX.
> Michael explicitly said this is a personal effo
ndard (valid when release came out, so AIX 5.3
confirms to a different standard than AIX 7.2)
* While Linux affinity is recognized - GNU (or GNP - GNU not POSIX)
integration is not guaranteed. - GNU rte is not provided under support.
There is a so-called Toolbox, GNU an other OSS utilities supplied by
Hi Michael,
being on a similar road with Gentoo Prefix, I really do appreciate
your AIX related work!
However, for two (not so minor) topics I've got a little different
experience, which I think should be mentioned here for completion:
On 10/04/2018 11:13 AM, Michael Felt wrote:
> On 1
Would this change the other pool method behavior in some way if the user,
for whatever reason, mixed techniques?
imap_unordered will only block when nexting the generator. If the user
mingles nexting that generator with, say, apply_async, could the change
you're proposing have some side-effect?
O
If imap_unordered is currently re-pickling and sending func each time it's
called on the worker, I have to suspect there was some reason to do that
and not cache it after the first call. Rather than assuming that's an
opportunity for an optimization, I'd want to be certain it won't have edge
case n
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:35 AM Sean Harrington
wrote:
> The most common use case comes up when passing instance methods (of really
> big objects!) to Pool.map().
>
This reminds me of that old joke: "A patient says to the doctor, 'Doctor,
it hurts when I ...!' The doctor replies, 'Well, don't do
27;m still worried about unintended consequences.
On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 9:00 AM Michael Selik
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 8:35 AM Sean Harrington
> wrote:
>
>> The most common use case comes up when passing instance methods (of
>> really big objects!) to Pool.map().
On Fri, Oct 19, 2018 at 5:01 AM Sean Harrington
wrote:
> I like the idea to extend the Pool class [to optimize the case when only
> one function is passed to the workers].
>
Why would this keep the same interface as the Pool class? If its workers
are restricted to calling only one function, that
This thread seems more appropriate for python-ideas than python-dev.
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 5:28 AM Sean Harrington
wrote:
> Michael - the initializer/globals pattern still might be necessary if you
> need to create an object AFTER a worker process has been instantiated (i.e.
> a
1 - 100 of 1851 matches
Mail list logo
