On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 at 02:09 Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-06-05, 15:03 GMT, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > I was actually looking into this recently to see if the
> > repository import feature could be used to run a regularly
> > updated repository mirror that included all issues and PR
> > comments in
On 2018-06-05, 15:03 GMT, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> I was actually looking into this recently to see if the
> repository import feature could be used to run a regularly
> updated repository mirror that included all issues and PR
> comments in addition to the code,
Good, thank you very much. I
On 5 June 2018 at 23:10, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-06-04, 23:38 GMT, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > No, but Guido is right: neither is anyone else.
> >
> > In that regard, Microsoft is probably *more* likely to keep pumping
> > money into a failing business if it gives them a strategic advantage,
On 5.6.2018 15:10, Matěj Cepl wrote:
On 2018-06-04, 23:38 GMT, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
No, but Guido is right: neither is anyone else.
In that regard, Microsoft is probably *more* likely to keep pumping
money into a failing business if it gives them a strategic advantage,
compared to other
On 2018-06-04, 23:38 GMT, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> No, but Guido is right: neither is anyone else.
>
> In that regard, Microsoft is probably *more* likely to keep pumping
> money into a failing business if it gives them a strategic advantage,
> compared to other investors with no long-term
Something that may change is the way they treat Github
accounts, after all, MS is very much a sales driven company.
But then there's always the possibility to move to Gitlab
as alternative (hosted or run on PSF VMs), so I would
worry too much.
Do note, however, that the value in Github is not so
On Mon, Jun 04, 2018 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2018-06-04, 16:06 GMT, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > I don't see how this *increases* the uncertainty. Surely if
> > GitHub had remained independent there would have been be
> > similar concerns about how it would make enough money
On 04.06.2018 21:46, Ethan Furman wrote:
On 06/04/2018 10:49 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
I think we shouldn't be speculating or making guesses.
We should have contingency plans and be prepared. More than one
bought-out competitor has simply disappeared, or been hamstrung in its
On 2018-06-04, 16:06 GMT, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't see how this *increases* the uncertainty. Surely if
> GitHub had remained independent there would have been be
> similar concerns about how it would make enough money to stay
> in business.
Beacuse Microsoft is known to keep a money
Ethan Furman writes:
> On 06/04/2018 10:49 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
>
> > I think we shouldn't be speculating or making guesses.
>
> We should have contingency plans and be prepared. More than one
> bought-out competitor has simply disappeared, or been hamstrung in its
> effectiveness.
Yes.
On 06/04/2018 10:49 AM, Mariatta Wijaya wrote:
I think we shouldn't be speculating or making guesses.
We should have contingency plans and be prepared. More than one bought-out competitor has simply disappeared, or been
hamstrung in its effectiveness.
--
~Ethan~
Le 04/06/2018 à 19:49, Mariatta Wijaya a écrit :
> I think we shouldn't be speculating or making guesses.
> If people are concerned with how Microsoft will manage GitHub, please
> talk to Microsoft or GitHub representative, and not gossip in python-dev.
What would talking to a MS or GH
I think we shouldn't be speculating or making guesses.
If people are concerned with how Microsoft will manage GitHub, please talk
to Microsoft or GitHub representative, and not gossip in python-dev.
If there is actual news or announcement of how GitHub will change, and how
it will affect our
That's true, but Microsoft has a lot of stakes in the ecosystem.
For example, since it has its own CI service that it tries to promote
(VSTS), is it in Microsoft's best interest to polish and improve
integrations with other CI services?
Regards
Antoine.
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 09:06:28 -0700
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 8:40 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:03:27 +0200
> Victor Stinner wrote:
> >
> > At this point, I have no opinion about the event :-) I just guess that
> > it should make GitHub more sustainable since Microsoft is a big
> > company with money and
On Mon, 4 Jun 2018 17:03:27 +0200
Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> At this point, I have no opinion about the event :-) I just guess that
> it should make GitHub more sustainable since Microsoft is a big
> company with money and interest in GitHub. I'm also confident that
> nothing will change soon.
16 matches
Mail list logo
