On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:11:05PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> >>On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> >>wrote:
> >>>Do you think it'd
So excited to see this coming along so well!
o/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 28.7.2017 22:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 05:51:39PM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> > renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> >
On 28.7.2017 20:11, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 01:53 PM, Randy Barlow wrote:
On Fri, 2017-07-28 at 12:41 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
I'm opposed to switching the meaning of `/usr/bin/python` for AH
anytime soon. It's just going to break stuff, and to me the gain is
quite
On 28.7.2017 18:41, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:16 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
It's up to the maintainers of Atomic Host to decide what's there. I
don't see how that relates to this thread. We have never said anything
about what is supposed to be or not to be in the Atomic
On 28 July 2017 at 11:42, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
>
>> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
>> going to repeat it.
>>
>
> Yes, we hear you.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated
On 28.7.2017 17:51, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The change has to
start somewhere and even though I cannot really speak about RHEL,
I would think that changing it in Fedora first makes more sense.
There hasn't been a single "Fedora" since we
On 28.7.2017 16:25, John Dennis wrote:
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Yes, we hear you.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
It is. However it is hard to coordinate a future change with RHEL7 that
On 28.7.2017 16:17, Colin Walters wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 07:47 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 11:48 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with
On 28.7.2017 14:29, Brian Exelbierd wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017, at 12:48 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again? That really seems like a nonstarter; previous
On 28.7.2017 12:48, Colin Walters wrote:
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017, at 12:07 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
* Switch /usr/bin/python to Python 3 in cooperation with Python upstream.
That again?
Seems like a never ending story, right? :(
> That really seems like a nonstarter; previous> discussion
On 28.7.2017 09:51, Nick Coghlan wrote:
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
do it in rawhide now and get the
On 29 July 2017 at 00:25, John Dennis wrote:
> I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm going
> to repeat it.
>
> Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
>
> Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but
I made this comment previously but because I think it's important I'm
going to repeat it.
Fedora's Python version migration needs to be coordinated with RHEL.
Yes I know Fedora is independent of both Red Hat and RHEL but the real
world reality is spec files are shared between both. At the
On Fri, Jul 28, 2017 at 09:49:42AM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> >Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> >renaming?
>
> May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't
> think it would be
On 28 July 2017 at 03:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
> renaming? If yes, then maybe it'd make sense to just get some pps to
> do it in rawhide now and get the "easy" part done with? That should
>
On 27.7.2017 19:15, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Do you think it'd be possible to script the python-foo to python2-foo
renaming?
May be possible but given the variety in the spec files, we didn't think
it would be easy. IMHO taking a bunch of provenpackagers and updating
the packages
18 matches
Mail list logo