On behalf of the Python development team, I'm pleased to announce
the second beta release of Python 3.4.
This is a preview release, and its use is not recommended for
production settings.
Python 3.4 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, including
hundreds of small improvements
On Monday, January 6, 2014 8:57:22 PM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote:
Yes, exactly. There's nothing magic about a django view. It's just a
function which is passed an instance of HttpRequest (and possibly a few
other things, depending on your url mapping), and which is expected to
return an
Hello all.
I have some questions again. :-)
I wish to be able to place a function within a data structure. I would like to
use a dictionary because I could pass it a key and then the function could be
called. I couldn't find anything on the net to show me how to do this. More
then likely,
- Original Message -
Hello all.
I have some questions again. :-)
I wish to be able to place a function within a data structure. I
would like to use a dictionary because I could pass it a key and
then the function could be called. I couldn't find anything on the
net to show me
On 1/6/14 5:30 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/01/2014 22:22, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 1/6/14 5:08 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 06/01/2014 21:42, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 1/6/14 4:33 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
That strikes me as being as useful as The PEP 393 FSR is completely
wrong but I'm not
Thanks for that. It resolved the issue and it was so simple compared to
everything else I saw on the net.
Only outstanding thing I have to work out is how to execute functions from a
dictionary. I will continue searching on the net.
Sean
On 07/01/2014, at 9:21 PM, Jean-Michel Pichavant
Sean Murphy wrote:
Only outstanding thing I have to work out is how to execute functions from
a dictionary. I will continue searching on the net.
I don't quite understand this question. Do you mean something like this?
def spam(n):
return spam*n
def eggs(n):
return eggs*n
d = {1:
Does anyone know what the rationale behind making byte-string indexing
return an int rather than a byte-string of length one?
That is, given b = b'xyz', b[1] returns 121 rather than b'y'.
This is especially surprising when one considers that it's easy to extract
the ordinal value of a byte:
On 1/6/14 11:01 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Mon, 06 Jan 2014 16:32:01 -0500, Ned Batchelder wrote:
On 1/6/14 12:50 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ned Batchelder wrote:
You are still talking about whether Armin is right, and whether he
writes well, about flaws in his statistics, etc. I'm
Sean Murphy mhysnm1...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:0cf6151e-e063-4252-9ac3-4fd4698eb...@gmail.com...
Hello all.
I have some questions again. :-)
I wish to be able to place a function within a data structure. I would
like to use a dictionary because I could pass it a key and then the
hi,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:13:29PM +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Does anyone know what the rationale behind making byte-string indexing
return an int rather than a byte-string of length one?
That is, given b = b'xyz', b[1] returns 121 rather than b'y'.
This is especially surprising
Ervin Hegedüs wrote:
hi,
On Tue, Jan 07, 2014 at 10:13:29PM +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Does anyone know what the rationale behind making byte-string indexing
return an int rather than a byte-string of length one?
That is, given b = b'xyz', b[1] returns 121 rather than b'y'.
This is
- Original Message -
Thanks for that. It resolved the issue and it was so simple compared
to everything else I saw on the net.
Only outstanding thing I have to work out is how to execute functions
from a dictionary. I will continue searching on the net.
Sean
This may help you
On 01/07/2014 01:19 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
Can we get a run-down of everything that actually must be broken in
2.7 - 3.3, that can't be backported via __future__, so we can start
cherry-picking which bits to break in 2.8? The biggest one is going to
be Unicode strings, for a large number of
Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 23:14:07 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 1/5/2014 9:23 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le samedi 4 janvier 2014 23:46:49 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :
On 1/4/2014 2:10 PM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
And I could add, I *never* saw once one soul, who is
On 1/7/2014 6:13 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Does anyone know what the rationale behind making byte-string indexing
return an int rather than a byte-string of length one?
That is, given b = b'xyz', b[1] returns 121 rather than b'y'.
This former is the normal behavior of sequences, the latter
On 1/7/2014 8:34 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 23:14:07 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Memory: Point 2. A *design goal* of FSR was to save memory relative to
UTF-32, which is what you apparently prefer. Your examples show that FSF
successfully met its design goal.
treating bytes as chars considered harmful?
I don't know the answer to your question but the behavior seems right to me.
Python 3 grudgingly allows the abomination of byte strings (is that
what they're called? I haven't fully embraced Python3 yet). If you
want a substring you use a slice.
b =
Sorry for top-posting. I thought I'd mastered gmail.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Hi there,
I just tried this out with the future module to see what it actually
does, and I got this:
On 01/07/2014 01:54 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
First the Python 3 behavior:
py3str + py3str = py3str
Yup, of course.
py3bytes + py3bytes = py3bytes
Again of course.
py3str +
David Robinow wrote:
treating bytes as chars considered harmful?
Who is talking about treating bytes as chars? You're making assumptions that
aren't justified by my question.
I don't know the answer to your question but the behavior seems right to
me.
This issue was raised in an earlier
On 01/05/2014 04:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
In short: Everything that was good about OpenOffice is now called
LibreOffice, which had to change its name only because the owners of
that name refused to let it go.
Your information is a year or two out of date. OpenOffice.org is alive
and well,
On 01/06/2014 08:53 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
Yea, I think laying out a book with something like MS Word or
LibreOffice is nuts. Depending on her formatting needs, a
lighter-weight mark-up language (something like asciidoc) might suite:
I've laid out a book with LibreOffice and it actually is
Hi,
I've posted a documentation issue to the 'future' module which includes
a further evolution of my thinking. As I expected, the author of the
'future' module has thought this through more than I had:
https://github.com/PythonCharmers/python-future/issues/27
To get back to a hypothetical
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to add my own [styles]
for quotes, captions, etc. After composing the document,
then you modify the styles to set the spacings, fonts, indentations,
border lines, etc. The workflow is very similar to using LyX, or
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:38 AM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
[OpenOffice v4] is mostly feature identical to
LibreOffice 4, and even has a couple of features that LibreOffice lacks.
They really need to merge back into one project again, but I suspect
they won't either for
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:42 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
To get back to a hypothetical Python 2.8, it could implement this kind of
behavior, and I think it would help support incremental upgrades. As long as
you're using Py 3 bytes and str in your code, you'll be aware of
On 01/07/2014 09:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
I tend to add my own [styles]
for quotes, captions, etc. After composing the document,
then you modify the styles to set the spacings, fonts, indentations,
border lines, etc.
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
LO does reference images if you would like. But I find embedding the
whole works is just more self-contained. And with multiple file
documents the chances of losing data or messing with pagination are
contained to
On 01/07/2014 10:14 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 4:10 AM, Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com wrote:
LO does reference images if you would like. But I find embedding the
whole works is just more self-contained. And with multiple file
documents the chances of losing data or
Apologies to the list for the noise! Should have replied off-list.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 01/07/2014 07:19 AM, David Robinow wrote:
Python 3 grudgingly allows the abomination of byte strings (is that
what they're called?)
No, that is *not* what they're called. If you find any place in the Python3 docs that does call them bytestrings please
submit a bug report.
On
On 2014-01-07 17:46, Andrew Barnert wrote:
I think Stephen's name 7-bit is confusing people. If you try to
interpret the name sensibly, you get Steven's broken interpretation.
But if you read it as a nonsense word and work through the logic, it
all makes sense.
On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:44,
On 01/07/2014 10:22 AM, MRAB wrote:
On 2014-01-07 17:46, Andrew Barnert wrote:
On Jan 7, 2014, at 7:44, Steven D'Aprano st...@pearwood.info wrote:
I was thinking about Ethan's suggestion of introducing a new bytestring
class and a lot of these suggestions are what I thought the bytestring
07.01.14 18:12, Steven D'Aprano написав(ла):
In Python 2.7, if you have a
chunk of binary data, you can easily do this:
data = b'\xE1\xE2\xE3\xE4'
data[0] == b'\xE1'
and it returns True just as expected.
data[0] == b'\xE1'[0] works as expected in both Python 2.7 and 3.x.
--
I am trying to run ez_setup.py on a fresh installation of Python 2.7.6
in a Win XP environment, but I keep getting an error. Here's the traceback:
C:\Python27\Libpython ez_setup.py
Extracting in c:\docume~1\dick\locals~1\temp\tmpkjidy0
Now working in
Django is great
On Tuesday, January 7, 2014 12:55:07 AM UTC-7, CM wrote:
On Monday, January 6, 2014 8:57:22 PM UTC-5, Roy Smith wrote:
Yes, exactly. There's nothing magic about a django view. It's just a
function which is passed an instance of HttpRequest (and possibly a few
Michael Torrie torr...@gmail.com writes:
On 01/05/2014 04:30 PM, Ben Finney wrote:
In short: Everything that was good about OpenOffice is now called
LibreOffice, which had to change its name only because the owners of
that name refused to let it go.
Your information is a year or two out
On 8 January 2014 00:34, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Point 2: This Flexible String Representation does no
effectuate any memory optimization. It only succeeds
to do the opposite of what a corrrect usage of utf*
do.
UTF-8 is a variable-width encoding that uses less memory to encode code
REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION (RFD)
unmoderated group pt.comp.lang.python
This is a formal Request for Discussion (RFD) for the creation of the
unmoderated newsgroup pt.comp.lang.python.
NEWSGROUPS LINE:
pt.comp.lang.python Portuguese version of
On 1/7/2014 9:54 AM, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 1/7/2014 8:34 AM, wxjmfa...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 23:14:07 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :
Memory: Point 2. A *design goal* of FSR was to save memory relative to
UTF-32, which is what you apparently prefer. Your examples show
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 8:54 AM, Ben Finney ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au wrote:
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com writes:
Sad. This is yet another of those politically-charged distinctions
that, quite frankly, I have no interest in.
I raised the point because you're giving advice to others on
Ethan Furman wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:19 AM, David Robinow wrote:
Python 3 grudgingly allows the abomination of byte strings (is that
what they're called?)
No, that is *not* what they're called. If you find any place in the
Python3 docs that does call them bytestrings please submit a bug
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Why decide that the bytes type is best considered as a list of
bytes rather than a string of bytes? It doesn't have any list methods, it
looks like a string and people use it as a string. As you have
On 01/07/2014 04:15 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Ethan Furman wrote:
On 01/07/2014 07:19 AM, David Robinow wrote:
Python 3 grudgingly allows the abomination of byte strings (is that
what they're called?)
No, that is *not* what they're called. If you find any place in the
Python3 docs that
On 2014-01-08, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 11:15 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
Why decide that the bytes type is best considered as a list of
bytes rather than a string of bytes? It doesn't have any list methods, it
looks like
Programing Challenge: Constructing a Tree Given Its Edges.
Show you are the boss.
http://xahlee.info/perl-python/python_construct_tree_from_edge.html
here's plain text.
── ── ── ── ──
Problem: given a list of edges of a tree: [child, parent], construct the
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Grant Edwards invalid@invalid.invalid wrote:
On 2014-01-08, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that, in hindsight, this was a major screw-up in Python 3.
Which part was?
The fact that b'ASDF'[0] in Python2 yeilds something different than it
does
PyQt5 v5.2 has been released and is available from
http://www.riverbankcomputing.com/software/pyqt/download5.
PyQt5 is a comprehensive set of bindings for v5 of Digia's Qt
cross-platform application framework. It supports Python v3, v2.7 and
v2.6.
The highlights of this release include full
On 08/01/2014 00:32, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2014 11:04:11 +1100, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com
declaimed the following:
Python finance could also be interpreted in many other ways,
including I want to write a finance application in Python, and How
does the PSF get its money?.
Victor Varvariuc added the comment:
Maybe I should have created another issue for this, but without this issue
being solved, the new issue will not help much.
Here it is:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/file/37caaf21f827/Lib/concurrent/futures/thread.py#l63
After running an work item
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
For the default keyword parameter Argument Clinic generates wrong name
default_value in the _keywords array.
/*[clinic]
module spam
spam.ham
default: int = 1
[clinic]*/
...
static PyObject *
spam_ham(PyModuleDef *module, PyObject *args, PyObject
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset e09644eb6b20 by Gregory P. Smith in branch '2.7':
Should fix the issue19081 fix on Windows. Don't let the previous
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e09644eb6b20
--
___
Python tracker
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
It will be helpful to add the --clean option for the clinic tool, which removes
all Argument Clinic generated code.
--
messages: 207515
nosy: larry, serhiy.storchaka
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Argument Clinic: add --clean
Larry Hastings added the comment:
When would you want this?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20158
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I'll fix this but it's low priority for today.
It's not a release blocker; we could release Python 3.4 with this bug.
--
assignee: - larry
priority: release blocker - normal
___
Python tracker
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
Here is a patch which converts xml.etree.ElementTree accelerator module to use
Argument Clinic. 34 methods are converted. Not converted __init__ methods (is
Argument Clinic support it?) and the SubElement function which seems can't be
converted.
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +Argument Clinic generates wrong keyword parameter name for
default, Argument Clinic: broken support for 'O!'
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Gregory P. Smith added the comment:
updated 3.3 patch based off the changes made to the 2.7 one.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9/issue19081-33-gps05.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19081
Changes by Gregory P. Smith g...@krypto.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file33323/issue19081-33-gps04.diff
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19081
___
New submission from Mark Dickinson:
The argument-passing code for passing structs larger than 8 bytes is broken on
64-bit Windows, leading to potential segmentation faults or other unpredictable
behaviour. According to
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/zthk2dkh.aspx
structs not of
New submission from Serhiy Storchaka:
inspect.signature fails on some functions which use Argument Clinic. For
example after applying issue20133 or issue20151 it fails for audioop.ratecv and
binascii.a2b_qp.
inspect.signature(audioop.ratecv)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin,
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +inspect.signature fails on some functions which use Argument
Clinic
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20151
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +inspect.signature fails on some functions which use Argument
Clinic
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20148
Changes by Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
--
dependencies: +inspect.signature fails on some functions which use Argument
Clinic
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20133
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I already noticed this; it'll be fixed in the patch for #20144. But thanks for
the report!
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20161
___
Larry Hastings added the comment:
For the record, I'd be very happy to accept a patch for this into 3.4 at any
time.
--
nosy: +larry
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20160
___
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
As fast as it is possible. This shouldn't be hard task, Argument Clinic
already clean old generated code before inserting new code.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20158
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I meant, under what circumstances would you want to use this?
I don't know why you would ever want --clean. Removing the output from the
Argument Clinic blocks would break any file using it. And Argument Clinic is
sufficiently fast, if you were worried
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Here's a second patch; I think this is ready to go in
I cleaned up the node parsing a lot. It now knows how to parse the following
types of default values:
* Number (this applies to both ints and floats)
* String ('hello')
* Attribute (sys.maxsize)
*
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Oops! I forgot to actually attach the new patch. I'm dumb.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file33340/larry.simple.symbolic.constant.default.values.diff.2.txt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Antoine just suggested that, if we used this accumulator thing, we'd want a
convention for where the generated text should go. I actually have an answer
for that: near the end, below the implementations of the module / class
methods, but above the
Stefan Krah added the comment:
I think maybe I only showed it to Stefan Krah, who said it wouldn't help his
use case so I dropped it.
I think we were talking about _decimal, where any tool will interfere with the
100% code coverage patches. But that's a special case.
--
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
This would just make sources more readable and editable. While I read, write
or edit code, I don't want generated code distract me.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20158
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2263
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Changes by STINNER Victor victor.stin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +haypo
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9307
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Larry Hastings added the comment:
I don't think Argument Clinic should do this. It would leave the file in a
broken state. But if it's an option on clinic.py it might tempt somebody into
using it, then they'd be confused.
If you want this functionality, please hack it up yourself locally.
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Attached is a new, simpler approach for supporting O!. The object() converter
now takes two arguments:
* type, which is the type you want the parameter declared as
(e.g. PyUnicodeObject *)
* subclass_of, which is the PyTypeObject you want to enforce
New submission from Yury V. Zaytsev:
Hi,
When I try the following:
./python -m test -v test_hash
on a self-compiled Python 3.4.0b2 on RHEL 6.5 / ppc64, it fails. Please let me
know which additional information I can supply to diagnose the problem.
The complete traceback below:
==
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr:
--
components: +Interpreter Core
nosy: +David.Edelsohn, christian.heimes, dmalcolm
priority: normal - high
type: crash - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20162
Yury V. Zaytsev added the comment:
As requested by Victor Stinner:
./python -c 'import sys; print(sys.hash_info)'
sys.hash_info(width=64, modulus=2305843009213693951, inf=314159, nan=0,
imag=103, algorithm='siphash24', hash_bits=64, seed_bits=128, cutoff=0)
--
components:
Yury V. Zaytsev added the comment:
Sorry for accidentally rolling back your changes to the bug, Antoine!
--
components: +Interpreter Core -Tests
type: crash - behavior
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20162
Changes by Yury V. Zaytsev y...@shurup.com:
--
components: +Tests
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20162
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset 81f8b4744f1a by Victor Stinner in branch 'default':
Issue #20162: test_hash_distribution() uses subTest() to mention the prefix in
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/81f8b4744f1a
--
nosy: +python-dev
___
Yury V. Zaytsev added the comment:
==
FAIL: test_hash_distribution (test.test_hash.HashDistributionTestCase)
(prefix='abc')
--
Traceback (most recent call
Serhiy Storchaka added the comment:
It is marked crash because Argument Clinic generates code which crashes. It
is assigned to docs because this feature documentation is misleading.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Yury V. Zaytsev added the comment:
To check whether the problem is in the _le64toh() macro as suggested by Victor
Stinner, I've tried the attached patch and the problem is gone.
As it turns out, there actually seem to be two problems:
First, HAVE_ENDIAN_H is properly defined, because the
Yury V. Zaytsev added the comment:
I was also asked to mention this:
https://github.com/majek/csiphash/blob/master/csiphash.c
as an alternative implementation of siphash and platform checks.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Patch attached. I tweaked the punctuation in the last line, from this:
/*[clinic end generated code; checksum: {checksum}]*/
^ ^
to this: | |
v v
New submission from dellair jie:
Hello,
We are using Python 3.3.2 for HPUX11.31.
The following error happens only on HPUX, works on SunOS, RHEL, AIX.
python
Python 3.3.2 (default, Dec 9 2013, 14:04:25) [C] on hp-ux11
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
from
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
I don't think this should be documented as personally I wouldn't expect this
use case to be working in the first place.
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
STINNER Victor added the comment:
Try to isolate which field fails. Example:
import time
time.strptime (10-Dec-13.20:07:49, %d-%b-%y.%H:%M:%S)
time.struct_time(tm_year=2013, tm_mon=12, tm_mday=10, tm_hour=20, tm_min=7,
tm_sec=49, tm_wday=1, tm_yday=344, tm_isdst=-1)
time.strptime
Larry Hastings added the comment:
Consider: if you ran clinic.py --clean on a C file, then tried to use make
clinic, the makefile would first try to build the C file. But since the C
file is now broken, the make would fail. And you can't use make clinic to
regenerate the Clinic output.
Larry Hastings added the comment:
There are lots of ways you can crash Python by giving erroneous input to
Argument Clinic. Clinic has no visibility into the C type system, so it has no
way of verifying whether or not the type objects you pass in are correct.
That's unfixable and not really
Larry Hastings added the comment:
At Antoine's suggestion, I added a custom function to testcapi that exercises
all the different possible types for default values in a text signature. Also
the docs have been updated. LGTU?
--
Added file:
dellair jie added the comment:
Victor,
Thanks for the comment.
Isolated, the error happens at:
import time
time.strptime (Dec, %b)
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File /python/lib/python3.3/_strptime.py, line 494, in _strptime_time
tt =
dellair jie added the comment:
The output of command:
$ date +'%b'
Jan
$ uname -a
HP-UX test5 B.11.31 U ia64 4201936010 unlimited-user license
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20163
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
The new syntax is fine; I was only giving an example.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue19723
___
STINNER Victor added the comment:
time.strptime (Dec, %b)
ValueError: unconverted data remains: Dec
Ok, so what is the name of the December month?
import time
time.strftime(%b, time.gmtime(1387036705))
'Dec'
--
___
Python tracker
New submission from Chris Adams:
This is a more general version of #10496: os.path.expanduser is documented as
returning the unmodified string if it cannot be expanded
(http://docs.python.org/3/library/os.path.html#os.path.expanduser) but there's
one edge case where this can fail: when
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
