On Friday, September 29, 2000 at 12:45:00 PM UTC+5:45, Mike Brenner wrote:
> Myk> ... Has anyone got a fast routine for calculating the fractal
> dimension of a set of points in 2 or 3D space? Thanks.
>
> According to the inventor of fractals (Hausdorff in the year 1899), you
>
On 8/26/18 5:40 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
> But their definition is still confusing as it is formulated with a
> expression as the argument to a().
>
> Taken literally, it says for n+4 to call a() with an argument of 8 (2n)
> AND to call it with an argument of 7 (2n-1) (returning
On Sunday, August 26, 2018 at 3:13:00 PM UTC-5, Oscar Benjamin wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 20:52, Musatov wrote:
> >
> > Thank you, Richard. If anyone is interested further, even in writing a
> > Python code to generate the sequence or further preparing of an animation I
> > would be
On Sun, 26 Aug 2018 at 20:52, Musatov wrote:
>
> Thank you, Richard. If anyone is interested further, even in writing a Python
> code to generate the sequence or further preparing of an animation I would be
> delighted.
It would not take long to write code to plot your sequence if you
first
by:
> >>>>
> >>>> For 1 <= n <= 3, a(n) = n; thereafter, a(2n) = a(n) + a(n+1), a(2n-1) =
> >>>> a(n) + a(n-2).
>
> >>> I am not sure what 'fractal' property this sequence has that he
> >>> wants to
> >> display
(n) + a(n+1), a(2n-1) =
>>>> a(n) + a(n-2).
>>> I am not sure what 'fractal' property this sequence has that he
>>> wants to
>> display.
> I'm sorry, let me try to explain:
>
> Here is my output:
> 1, 2, 3, 5, 4, 8, 7, 9, 7, 12, 13, 15, 11, 16, 17
o, it is not a strict function. I'd also write it
> > as
>
> I think they intend that a(n) is defined for n being an integer (or
> maybe just the Natural Numbers, since it isn't defined for values below 1)
>
> The two provided definitions provide the recursive definition for e
t;=4 you are
> returning TWO values? If so, it is not a strict function. I'd also write it
> as
I think they intend that a(n) is defined for n being an integer (or
maybe just the Natural Numbers, since it isn't defined for values below 1)
The two provided definitions provide the recursive definition for e
I have an integer sequence of a fractal nature and want to know if it is
possible to write a program to illustrate it in a manner similar to the many
animated Mandelbrot illustrations.
The sequence is defined by:
For 1 <= n <= 3, a(n) = n; thereafter, a(2n) = a(n) + a(n+1), a(2n-1)
Am 16.05.2013 02:00, schrieb alex23:
My favourite is this one:
http://preshing.com/20110926/high-resolution-mandelbrot-in-obfuscated-python
Not only is this blog entry an interesting piece of art, there's other
interesting things to read there, too.
Thanks!
Uli
--
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:11 PM, Ulrich Eckhardt
ulrich.eckha...@dominolaser.com wrote:
Am 16.05.2013 02:00, schrieb alex23:
My favourite is this one:
http://preshing.com/20110926/high-resolution-mandelbrot-in-obfuscated-python
Not only is this blog entry an interesting piece of art,
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:04 AM, Sharon COUKA sharon_co...@hotmail.com wrote:
I have to write the script, and i have one but the zoom does not work
That doesn't answer my question. Perhaps if you would share with us
what you already have, then we could point out what you need to do and
where to
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Sharon COUKA sharon_co...@hotmail.com wrote:
# Register events
c.bind('i', zoom)
c.bind('i', unzoom)
c.bind('i', mouseMove)
I'm not an expert at Tkinter so maybe one of the other residents can
help you better with that. The code above looks wrong to me,
Hello, I'm new to python and i have to make a Mandelbrot fractal image for
school but I don't know how to zoom in my image.
Thank you for helping me.
Envoyé de mon iPad
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 13/05/2013 11:41 AM, Sharon COUKA wrote:
Hello, I'm new to python and i have to make a Mandelbrot fractal image for
school but I don't know how to zoom in my image.
Thank you for helping me.
Envoyé de mon iPad
Google is your friend. Try Mandelbrot Python
Colin W.
--
http
On 2013-05-13, Sharon COUKA sharon_co...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm new to python and i have to make a Mandelbrot fractal image for
school but I don't know how to zoom in my image.
Thank you for helping me.
It's a fractal image, so you zoom in/out with the following Python
instruction
On Mon, May 13, 2013 at 9:41 AM, Sharon COUKA sharon_co...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello, I'm new to python and i have to make a Mandelbrot fractal image for
school but I don't know how to zoom in my image.
Thank you for helping me.
Is this a GUI application or does it just write the image
On May 15, 10:07 pm, Colin J. Williams c...@ncf.ca wrote:
Google is your friend. Try Mandelbrot Python
My favourite is this one:
http://preshing.com/20110926/high-resolution-mandelbrot-in-obfuscated-python
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 29, 3:17 am, greg g...@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
But that depends on what you call things... if electron shells are real
(and they seem to be) and discontinuous, and the shells are predicted/
specified
On Thu, 25 Jun 2009 12:23:07 +0100, Robin Becker wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
[...]
No really, it is just set theory, which is a pretty bogus subject in
some sense. There aren't many discontinuous functions in nature.
Depends on how you define discontinuous. Catastrophe theory is full of
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
Depends on how you define discontinuous.
The mathematical way, of course. For any epsilon 0, etc.
Catastrophe theory is full of discontinuous changes in state. Animal
(by which I include human) behaviour often displays
On Sat, 27 Jun 2009 23:52:02 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
Depends on how you define discontinuous.
The mathematical way, of course. For any epsilon 0, etc.
I thought we were talking about discontinuities in *nature*, not in
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
I thought we were talking about discontinuities in *nature*, not in
mathematics. There's no of course about it.
IIRC we were talking about fractals, which are a topic in mathematics.
This led to some discussion of mathematical
On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 03:28:51 -0700, Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
I thought we were talking about discontinuities in *nature*, not in
mathematics. There's no of course about it.
IIRC we were talking about fractals, which are a topic in
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
But that depends on what you call things... if electron shells are real
(and they seem to be) and discontinuous, and the shells are predicted/
specified by eigenvalues of some continuous function, is the continuous
function part of
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
one
minute the grenade is sitting there, stable as can be, the next it's an
expanding cloud of gas and metal fragments.
I'm not sure that counts as discontinuous in the mathematical
sense. If you were to film the grenade exploding and play it
back slowly enough, the
Paul Rubin wrote:
Steven D'Aprano st...@remove-this-cybersource.com.au writes:
But that depends on what you call things... if electron shells are real
(and they seem to be) and discontinuous, and the shells are predicted/
specified by eigenvalues of some continuous function, is the continuous
greg wrote:
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
one minute the grenade is sitting there, stable as can be, the next
it's an expanding cloud of gas and metal fragments.
I'm not sure that counts as discontinuous in the mathematical
sense. If you were to film the grenade exploding and play it
back slowly
Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com writes:
There is a philosophy of mathematics (intuitionism) that says...
there are NO discontinuous functions.
so does this render all the discreteness implied by quantum theory
unreliable? or is it that we just cannot see(measure) the continuity
that
pdpi wrote:
...
But yeah, Log2 and LogE are the only two bases that make natural
sense except in specialized contexts. Base 10 (and, therefore, Log10)
is an artifact of having that 10 fingers (in fact, whatever base you
use, you always refer to it as base 10).
someone once explained to me
Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com writes:
someone once explained to me that the set of systems that are
continuous in the calculus sense was of measure zero in the set of all
systems I think it was a fairly formal discussion, but my
understanding was of the hand waving sort.
That is very
Paul Rubin wrote:
.
That is very straightforward if you don't mind a handwave. Let S be
some arbitrary subset of the reals, and let f(x)=0 if x is in S, and 1
otherwise (this is a discontinuous function if S is nonempty). How
many different such f's can there be? Obviously one for
On Jun 25, 12:23 pm, Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com wrote:
Paul Rubin wrote:
so does this render all the discreteness implied by quantum theory unreliable?
or is it that we just cannot see(measure) the continuity that really happens?
Certainly there are people like Wolfram who seem to think
On Jun 25, 10:38 am, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Robin Becker ro...@reportlab.com writes:
someone once explained to me that the set of systems that are
continuous in the calculus sense was of measure zero in the set of all
systems I think it was a fairly formal
On Jun 24, 10:12 am, pdpi pdpinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding inf ** 0, why does IEEE745 define it as 1, when there is a
perfectly fine NaN value?
Have a look at:
http://www.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/ieee754.ps
(see particularly page 9).
Mark
--
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:43:19 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
In my universe the standard definition of log is different froim what
log means in a calculus class
Now I'm curious what the difference is.
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Jun 24, 10:12 am, pdpi pdpinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding inf ** 0, why does IEEE745 define it as 1, when there is a
perfectly fine NaN value?
Other links: the IEEE 754 revision working group mailing list
archives are public; there was extensive discussion about
special values of pow
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.c...com.au wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:43:19 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
In my universe the standard definition of log is different froim what
log means in a calculus class
Now I'm curious what the difference is.
Maybe he is a lumberjack, and quite
On Jun 24, 2:58 pm, Hendrik van Rooyen m...@microcorp.co.za wrote:
Steven D'Aprano ste...@remove.this.c...com.au wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:43:19 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
In my universe the standard definition of log is different froim what
log means in a calculus class
Now I'm
On Jun 24, 1:32 pm, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 24, 10:12 am, pdpi pdpinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
Regarding inf ** 0, why does IEEE745 define it as 1, when there is a
perfectly fine NaN value?
Other links: the IEEE 754 revision working group mailing list
archives are
On Jun 23, 3:52 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:43:19 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
In my universe the standard definition of log is different froim what
log means in a calculus class
Now I'm curious what the difference is.
It's just
Mark Dickinson wrote:
On Jun 23, 3:52 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:43:19 -0500, David C. Ullrich wrote:
In my universe the standard definition of log is different froim what
log means in a calculus class
Now I'm curious what the
In article b64766a2-fd6f-4aa9-945f-381c0692b...@w40g2000yqd.googlegroups.com,
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 7:43=A0pm, David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu wrote:
Surely you don't say a curve is a subset of the plane and
also talk about the integrals of verctor
of a continuous one-to-one
function from R/Z to R2. [...]
- Tom Hales, in 'Jordan's Proof of the Jordan Curve Theorem'.
We say that Gamma is a curve if it is the image in
the plane or in space of an interval [a, b] of real
numbers of a continuous function gamma.
- Claude Tricot, 'Curves and Fractal
On Jun 22, 2009, at 8:46 AM, pdpi wrote:
On Jun 19, 8:13 pm, Charles Yeomans char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:43 PM, David C. Ullrich wrote:
snick
Hmm. You left out a bit in the first definition you cite:
A simple closed curve J, also called a Jordan curve, is the
numbers of a continuous function gamma.
- Claude Tricot, 'Curves and Fractal Dimension' (Springer, 1995).
Perhaps your definition of curve isn't as universal or
'official' as you seem to think it is?
Perhaps not. I'm very surprised to see those definitions; I've
been a mathematician for 25
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:31:26 -0400, Charles Yeomans
char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 8:46 AM, pdpi wrote:
On Jun 19, 8:13 pm, Charles Yeomans char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:43 PM, David C. Ullrich wrote:
snick
Hmm. You left out a bit in the first
On Fri, 19 Jun 2009 12:40:36 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 7:43 pm, David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu wrote:
Evidently my posts are appearing, since I see replies.
I guess the question of why I don't see the posts themselves
\is ot here...
Judging by
On Jun 22, 7:43 pm, David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu wrote:
Surely you don't say a curve is a subset of the plane and
also talk about the integrals of verctor fields over _curves_?
[snip rest of long response that needs a decent reply, but
possibly not here... ]
I wonder whether we
On Jun 22, 2009, at 2:16 PM, David C. Ullrich wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 10:31:26 -0400, Charles Yeomans
char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 22, 2009, at 8:46 AM, pdpi wrote:
On Jun 19, 8:13 pm, Charles Yeomans char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 19, 2009, at 2:43 PM, David C. Ullrich
in
the plane or in space of an interval [a, b] of real
numbers of a continuous function gamma.
- Claude Tricot, 'Curves and Fractal Dimension' (Springer, 1995).
Perhaps your definition of curve isn't as universal or
'official' as you seem to think it is?
Perhaps not. I'm very surprised to see those
'.
We say that Gamma is a curve if it is the image in
the plane or in space of an interval [a, b] of real
numbers of a continuous function gamma.
- Claude Tricot, 'Curves and Fractal Dimension' (Springer, 1995).
Perhaps your definition of curve isn't as universal or
'official' as you seem to think
On Jun 19, 7:43 pm, David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu wrote:
Evidently my posts are appearing, since I see replies.
I guess the question of why I don't see the posts themselves
\is ot here...
Judging by this thread, I'm not sure that much is off-topic
here. :-)
Perhaps not. I'm very
On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
P.S. The snowflake curve, on the other hand, is uniformly continuous, right?
The definition of uniform continuity is that, for any epsilon 0,
there is a delta 0 such that, for any x and y, if x-y delta, f(x)-f
(y)
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com writes:
It looks as though you're treating (a portion of?) the Koch curve as
the graph of a function f from R - R and claiming that f is
uniformly continuous. But the Koch curve isn't such a graph (it
fails the 'vertical line test',
I think you treat it as a
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:46:22 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mark Dickinsondicki...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe James is thinking of the standard theorem
that says that
a fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think the idea is you assume uniform continuity of the set (as
expressed by a parametrized curve). That should let you approximate
the fractal dimension.
Fractals are, by definition, not uniform in that sense
a fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think the idea is you assume uniform continuity of the set (as
expressed by a parametrized curve). That should let you approximate
the fractal dimension.
Fractals are, by definition, not uniform in that sense
a fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think the idea is you assume uniform continuity of the set (as
expressed by a parametrized curve). That should let you approximate
the fractal dimension.
Fractals are, by definition, not uniform in that sense
writes:
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have
a fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think the idea is you assume uniform continuity of the set (as
expressed by a parametrized curve). That should let you
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:37:32 -0400, Charles Yeomans
char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com writes:
I am pretty sure that a continuous sequence of
curves that converges to a continuous curve, will do so
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:18:52 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:46 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com writes:
It looks as though you're treating (a portion of?) the Koch curve as
the graph of a function f from
On Jun 18, 2009, at 2:19 PM, David C. Ullrich wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 07:37:32 -0400, Charles Yeomans
char...@declaresub.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com writes:
I am pretty sure that a continuous sequence of
curves
David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu writes:
On Wed, 17 Jun 2009 08:18:52 -0700 (PDT), Mark Dickinson
dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:46 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com writes:
It looks as though you're treating (a portion
Proof of the Jordan Curve Theorem'.
We say that Gamma is a curve if it is the image in
the plane or in space of an interval [a, b] of real
numbers of a continuous function gamma.
- Claude Tricot, 'Curves and Fractal Dimension' (Springer, 1995).
Perhaps your definition of curve isn't as universal
David C. Ullrich ullr...@math.okstate.edu writes:
obviously converges to f, but not uniformly. On a closed interval,
any continuous function is uniformly continuous.
Isn't (-?, ?) closed?
What is your version of the definition of closed?
I think the whole line is closed, but I hadn't
Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com writes:
I am pretty sure that a continuous sequence of
curves that converges to a continuous curve, will do so uniformly.
I think a typical example of a curve that's continuous but not
uniformly continuous is
f(t) = sin(1/t), defined when t 0
On Jun 17, 2009, at 2:04 AM, Paul Rubin wrote:
Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com writes:
I am pretty sure that a continuous sequence of
curves that converges to a continuous curve, will do so uniformly.
I think a typical example of a curve that's continuous but not
uniformly
On Jun 17, 7:04 am, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
I think a typical example of a curve that's continuous but not
uniformly continuous is
f(t) = sin(1/t), defined when t 0
It is continuous at every t0 but wiggles violently as you get closer
to t=0. You wouldn't be able
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mark Dickinsondicki...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe James is thinking of the standard theorem
that says that if a sequence of continuous functions
on an interval converges uniformly then its limit
is continuous?
Jaime was simply plain wrong... The example that
On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 1:52 PM, Mark Dickinsondicki...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe James is thinking of the standard theorem
that says that if a sequence of continuous functions
on an interval converges uniformly then its
On Jun 17, 2:18 pm, pdpi pdpinhe...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 1:26 pm, Jaime Fernandez del Rio jaime.f...@gmail.com
wrote:
P.S. The snowflake curve, on the other hand, is uniformly continuous, right?
The definition of uniform continuity is that, for any epsilon 0,
there is a delta 0
On Jun 17, 3:46 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com writes:
It looks as though you're treating (a portion of?) the Koch curve as
the graph of a function f from R - R and claiming that f is
uniformly continuous. But the Koch curve isn't such
On Jun 17, 4:18 pm, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jun 17, 3:46 pm, Paul Rubin http://phr...@nospam.invalid wrote:
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com writes:
It looks as though you're treating (a portion of?) the Koch curve as
the graph of a function f from R - R and claiming
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have a
fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think the idea is you assume uniform continuity of the set
On 15 Jun 2009 04:55:03 GMT, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:29:04 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
On 14 Jun., 16:00, Steven D'Aprano
st...@removethis.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Incorrect. Koch's snowflake, for example, has a fractal dimension
In message 7x63ew3uo9@ruckus.brouhaha.com, wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have
a fractal dimension. It's got to be uncountably infinite, and therefore
uncomputable.
I think
On Wed, Jun 17, 2009 at 4:50 AM, Lawrence
D'Oliveirol...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand wrote:
In message 7x63ew3uo9@ruckus.brouhaha.com, wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have
a fractal
On Jun 15, 5:55 am, Steven D'Aprano
ste...@remove.this.cybersource.com.au wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:29:04 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
On 14 Jun., 16:00, Steven D'Aprano
st...@removethis.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Incorrect. Koch's snowflake, for example, has a fractal dimension of
log
In message slrnh33j2b.4bu.pe...@box8.pjb.com.au, Peter Billam wrote:
Are there any modules, packages, whatever, that will
measure the fractal dimensions of a dataset, e.g. a time-series ?
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have a
fractal dimension. It's got
Lawrence D'Oliveiro l...@geek-central.gen.new_zealand writes:
In message slrnh33j2b.4bu.pe...@box8.pjb.com.au, Peter Billam wrote:
Are there any modules, packages, whatever, that will
measure the fractal dimensions of a dataset, e.g. a time-series ?
I don't think any countable set, even
Arnaud Delobelle arno...@googlemail.com writes:
I think there are attempts to estimate the fractal dimension of a set
using a finite sample from this set. But I can't remember where I got
this thought from!
There are image data compression schemes that work like that, trying
to detect self
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
In message slrnh33j2b.4bu.pe...@box8.pjb.com.au, Peter Billam wrote:
Are there any modules, packages, whatever, that will
measure the fractal dimensions of a dataset, e.g. a time-series ?
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can have
In message slrnh33j2b.4bu.pe...@box8.pjb.com.au, Peter Billam wrote:
Are there any modules, packages, whatever, that will
measure the fractal dimensions of a dataset, e.g. a time-series ?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
I don't think any countable set, even a countably-infinite set, can
have
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 14:29:04 -0700, Kay Schluehr wrote:
On 14 Jun., 16:00, Steven D'Aprano
st...@removethis.cybersource.com.au wrote:
Incorrect. Koch's snowflake, for example, has a fractal dimension of
log 4/log 3 ≈ 1.26, a finite area of 8/5 times that of the initial
triangle
Greetings. Are there any modules, packages, whatever, that will
measure the fractal dimensions of a dataset, e.g. a time-series ?
Like the Correlation Dimension, the Information Dimension, etc...
Peter
--
Peter Billam www.pjb.com.auwww.pjb.com.au/comp/contact.html
--
http
Hello there,
I am studying programming at University and we are basing the course on Python. We are currently looking at fractal curves and I was wondering if you could email me code for a dragon curve please, or a similar fractal curve.
Thank you
Steve
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman
Steve Heyburn wrote:
Hello there,
I am studying programming at University and we are basing the course on
Python.
We are currently looking at fractal curves and I was wondering if you could
email me code for a dragon curve please, or a similar fractal curve.
http://www.google.com
88 matches
Mail list logo
