On Monday, January 6, 2014 12:02:31 PM UTC-5, blis...@gmail.com wrote:
> I love programming in python but I'm having trouble deciding over a framework
> for a single player MUD like game I'm making for fun. Ideally it's a
> cross-platform free framework in case I want make it open source later wi
On 06/01/2014 19:07, bliss...@gmail.com wrote:
Would you please read and action this
https://wiki.python.org/moin/GoogleGroupsPython to prevent us seeing
double line spacing, thanks.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
M
On Monday, January 6, 2014 12:37:24 PM UTC-5, blis...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Monday, January 6, 2014 12:09:28 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, wrote:
>
> >
>
> > > I love programming in python but I'm having trouble deciding over a
> > > framework for a si
On Monday, January 6, 2014 12:09:28 PM UTC-5, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, wrote:
>
> > I love programming in python but I'm having trouble deciding over a
> > framework for a single player MUD like game I'm making for fun. Ideally
> > it's a cross-platform free fram
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 4:02 AM, wrote:
> I love programming in python but I'm having trouble deciding over a framework
> for a single player MUD like game I'm making for fun. Ideally it's a
> cross-platform free framework in case I want make it open source later with
> good capabilities of cus
I love programming in python but I'm having trouble deciding over a framework
for a single player MUD like game I'm making for fun. Ideally it's a
cross-platform free framework in case I want make it open source later with
good capabilities of customizing the GUI look/style.
Currently I'm using
being able to plug in to
> our dedicated server infrastructure.
>
>
>
> Since I am not experienced with Python frameworks (though learning curve is
> not much of an issue for me) I look to the community to understand which
> Python framework can rival or surpass
rver infrastructure.
>
> Since I am not experienced with Python frameworks (though learning curve
> is not much of an issue for me) I look to the community to understand which
> Python framework can rival or surpass Codeigniter in terms of performance
> in heavy traffic backend solutions (over
of an issue for me) I look to the community to understand which Python
framework can rival or surpass Codeigniter in terms of performance in heavy
traffic backend solutions (over 1M requests per day, with up to 100 req/sec at
peak). I really want to make the switch from PHP to Python as I
In article ,
Alec Taylor wrote:
> Which Python framework has benchmarked the highest?
>
> I am looking for a solution to initially run on Heroku or OpenShift;
> but eventually run on a pure IaaS.
>
> Will expose the interfaces RESTfully as JSON, purposed to act as the
&g
Which Python framework has benchmarked the highest?
I am looking for a solution to initially run on Heroku or OpenShift;
but eventually run on a pure IaaS.
Will expose the interfaces RESTfully as JSON, purposed to act as the
"glue" between the endpoints, databases (incl. caches) and q
On Mar 19, 1:38 am, Victor Hooi wrote:
> We currently use a collection of custom Python scripts to validate various
> things in our production environment/configuration.
>
> Many of these are simple XML checks (i.e. validate that the value of this XML
> tag here equals the value in that file ove
- Original Message -
> HI,
>
> NB: I've posted this question on Reddit as well (but didn't get many
> responses from Pythonistas) - hope it's ok if I post here as well.
>
> We currently use a collection of custom Python scripts to validate
> various things in our production environment/co
HI,
NB: I've posted this question on Reddit as well (but didn't get many responses
from Pythonistas) - hope it's ok if I post here as well.
We currently use a collection of custom Python scripts to validate various
things in our production environment/configuration.
Many of these are simple XM
MRAB schreef:
On 2012-10-14 23:38, Dave Angel wrote:
On 10/14/2012 08:48 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article <507a3365$0$6574$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Remember using PEEK and POKE commands with BASIC back in
1978? Pretty much impossible in Python.
But, trivia
On 2012-10-14 23:38, Dave Angel wrote:
On 10/14/2012 08:48 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
In article <507a3365$0$6574$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Remember using PEEK and POKE commands with BASIC back in
1978? Pretty much impossible in Python.
But, trivial to implement
On 10/14/2012 08:48 AM, Roy Smith wrote:
> In article <507a3365$0$6574$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
> Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>
>> Remember using PEEK and POKE commands with BASIC back in
>> 1978? Pretty much impossible in Python.
> But, trivial to implement as an extension :-)
PEEK and
In article <507a3365$0$6574$c3e8da3$54964...@news.astraweb.com>,
Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Remember using PEEK and POKE commands with BASIC back in
> 1978? Pretty much impossible in Python.
But, trivial to implement as an extension :-)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Steven D'Aprano
wrote:
> On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 05:33:40 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>> Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usually not the
>> job of the language/framework/library.
>
> Have you actually programmed before?
>
> *grin*
>
> I've nev
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 05:33:40 +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usually not the
> job of the language/framework/library.
Have you actually programmed before?
*grin*
I've never come across a language/framework/library that DOESN'T force
progra
On 2012-10-14 03:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:24:04 -0700, nbvfour wrote:
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:33:43 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
Nice theory, but this is the bit that I fundamentally disagree with.
Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usua
On 10/13/12 21:25, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> Not being Dutch, I don't know whether the obvious way to do command line
> argument handling is the getopt module or argparse. But there certainly
> isn't *only one way* to do command line argument handling.
As an aside, I just watched a fascinating vi
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 15:24:04 -0700, nbvfour wrote:
> On Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:33:43 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Nice theory, but this is the bit that I fundamentally disagree with.
>> Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usually not the
>> job of the language/fr
On 13 October 2012 17:48, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> The only way to support *absolutely everything* is to do nothing - to
> be a framework so thin you're invisible. (That's not to say you're
> useless; there are bridge modules that do exactly this - ctypes can
> call on any library function from P
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 9:24 AM, wrote:
> On Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:33:43 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>> Nice theory, but this is the bit that I fundamentally disagree with.
>> Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usually not the
>> job of the language/framework/lib
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 2:33:43 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
> Nice theory, but this is the bit that I fundamentally disagree with.
> Forcing programmers to work in one particular style is usually not the
> job of the language/framework/library. That should be up to the
> programmer, or
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 5:18 AM, wrote:
> On Saturday, October 13, 2012 12:48:23 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> No, I don't, because I haven't tried to use it. But allow me to give
>> two examples, one on each side of the argument.
>>
>> The 'tee' utility is primarily for writing a pipe to di
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 12:48:23 PM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> No, I don't, because I haven't tried to use it. But allow me to give
> two examples, one on each side of the argument.
>
> The 'tee' utility is primarily for writing a pipe to disk AND to
> further pipelining, for instance:
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 2:57 AM, wrote:
> Do you have an example of a task that giotto can't handle that other
> frameworks can? One of my goals is to have this framework "turing complete"
> in the sense that everything that other frameworks can do, giotto should be
> able to do. I think my co
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 08:57:47 -0700 (PDT)
nbvf...@gmail.com wrote:
> Do you have an example of a task that giotto can't handle that other
> frameworks can? One of my goals is to have this framework "turing complete"
> in the sense that everything that other frameworks can do, giotto should be
>
On Saturday, October 13, 2012 10:13:22 AM UTC-4, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, wrote:
>
> > Basically its a framework that forces the developer(s) to strictly separate
> > the model from the view and controller. You can 'hook up' multiple
> > controllers to a project
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 01:12:30 +1100
Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, wrote:
> > Basically its a framework that forces the developer(s) to strictly separate
> > the model from the view and controller. You can 'hook up' multiple
> > controllers to a project. The model lay
On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:49 PM, wrote:
> Basically its a framework that forces the developer(s) to strictly separate
> the model from the view and controller. You can 'hook up' multiple
> controllers to a project. The model layer can be completely mocked out so
> front end designers don't hav
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 21:49:55 -0700 (PDT)
nbvf...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://giotto.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorial.html
>
> Can someone give me some feedback on what they think of this framework? I
> came up with the idea of this framework a few months ago. I gave a talk at a
> local python u
http://giotto.readthedocs.org/en/latest/tutorial.html
Can someone give me some feedback on what they think of this framework? I came
up with the idea of this framework a few months ago. I gave a talk at a local
python user group regarding these ideas, but no one seemed to think I was onto
anyth
> Does this technical problem go beyond the lack of 64 bit safe tcl/tk,
> which is what I understood used to be part of the problem?
Yes, it does. See the python-dev archives for details.
Regards,
Martin
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
provided fromwww.python.orgare
> > still not full universal builds. That is, that the Python framework
> > component only contains 32 bit architecture images and not also 64 bit
> > architecture images.
>
> Yes, that is still the case.
>
> > If this still is an iss
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> I'd rather not have to download and install them as I don't want to be
> installing them into my actual system, so can someone please tell me
> whether the MacOS X dmg installers provided from www.python.org are
> still not full universal builds. Th
I'd rather not have to download and install them as I don't want to be
installing them into my actual system, so can someone please tell me
whether the MacOS X dmg installers provided from www.python.org are
still not full universal builds. That is, that the Python framework
comp
2008/1/7, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> At my work we have a framework writen in python which allows us to
> test our equipment. This framework is quite large and uses a Singelton
> called frameworkExec which we pass around between objects in order to
> share functionailty. For e
Hi,
At my work we have a framework writen in python which allows us to
test our equipment. This framework is quite large and uses a Singelton
called frameworkExec which we pass around between objects in order to
share functionailty. For example, frameWorkExec stores an instance of
the BatteryManag
mp wrote:
> Hello, I have a couple general questions.
>
> First, how do most web frameworks serve html? I'm coding in python and
> I want to keep all my html seperate from my python stuff. I can serve
> these html files from a mysql database or just from the file system, do
> people use both these
mp wrote:
> Hello, I have a couple general questions.
>
> First, how do most web frameworks serve html? I'm coding in python and
> I want to keep all my html seperate from my python stuff. I can serve
> these html files from a mysql database or just from the file system, do
> people use both thes
Hello, I have a couple general questions.
First, how do most web frameworks serve html? I'm coding in python and
I want to keep all my html seperate from my python stuff. I can serve
these html files from a mysql database or just from the file system, do
people use both these options? Are there ot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd like to find a web framework that works with IIS and SQL Server on
> Windows(I know-but I didn't make that decision). Anyhow, I've
> looked at Turbogears, Django, subway and didn't see any evidence
> that anyone had made these work in that configuration.
> Any sugges
I'd like to find a web framework that works with IIS and SQL Server on
Windows(I know-but I didn't make that decision). Anyhow, I've looked at
Turbogears, Django, subway and didn't see any evidence that anyone had
made these work in that configuration. Any suggestions?
--
http://mail.python.org/m
>what's the best python framework to create web applications?
Let us try a different question: what is the best way to get help from a
newsgroup?
Step 1: do some research. Read throught the past postings still available
on your newssource for threads on your topic. And/or, use
hi !
what's the best python framework to create web applications?
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
48 matches
Mail list logo
