Dan Stromberg drsali...@gmail.com:
Please don't add multiline lambdas to Python.
Agree.
Multiline lambdas give rise (in a big way) to the
computer-language-equivalent of run-on sentences.
Lambdas are perfect in Scheme because they are idiomatic in it. They
carry a visual meaning and flow
Travis Griggs wrote:
I do not like the python lambda. For two reasons.
One: In a language that sought to be approachable by simple people (i.e.
non computer science graduates who would use it in addition to their
scientific/education background), I can’t believe they threw in a 6
character
On Aug 21, 2014, at 12:55 AM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, just wanting to do a shot in the dark,but maybe this syntax is Pythonic
(in a we-are-all-grown-ups fashion, ahem)enough to get its way into the
language
this is what yours truly thinks: don't we all know that : means the next
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:55 AM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, just wanting to do a shot in the dark,but maybe this syntax is Pythonic
(in a we-are-all-grown-ups fashion, ahem)enough to get its way into the
language
this is what yours truly thinks: don't we all know that : means the next
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:55 AM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, just wanting to do a shot in the dark,but maybe this syntax is Pythonic
(in a we-are-all-grown-ups fashion, ahem)enough to get its way into the
language
this is what yours truly thinks: don't we all know that : means the next
Ah, here we go again! It's multi-line lambda season. Comes around as
regularly as duck-typing season, rabbit seasoning, baseball season,
and other Looney Tunes references. :)
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 5:55 PM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
doFunc(def():
print( anon )
return gvr)
What I'm
reasonable, but I don't like the close parens on the same line; even
if this syntax is allowed, I'd frown on it in style guides,
thanks, bu what exactly do you find unlikeable in this syntax? the ) is no
new syntax, but simply a match for a previous (; and you can put it anywhere
because
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 6:59 PM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
thanks, bu what exactly do you find unlikeable in this syntax? the ) is no
new syntax, but simply a match for a previous (; and you can put it
anywhere because the ( contents are space-insensitive:
this would be a syntax error:
a
reasonable, but I don't like the close parens on the same line; even
if this syntax is allowed, I'd frown on it in style guides,
thanks, bu what exactly do you find unlikeable in this syntax? the ) is no
new syntax, but simply a match for a previous (; and you can put it anywhere
because
it is simply a matter of convenience:
def a():
print( gvr )
func(a);
or
func( def():
print(gvr)
)
it would be great if others could further share their opinions
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
icefap...@gmail.com:
it is simply a matter of convenience:
def a():
print( gvr )
func(a);
or
func( def():
print(gvr)
)
it would be great if others could further share their opinions
In practice, your proposal would not make life easier for Python
programmers.
Marko
--
tag_handler = {
span: lambda content: content,
div: lambda content: \n+content+\n,
p: lambda content: \n+content+\n,
br: lambda content: \n,
}
If you wanted to expand one of those to have statements in it, you'd
have to take it out-of-line and break the
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:27:08 AM UTC-7, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
In practice, your proposal would not make life easier for Python
programmers.
Marko
neither did the lambda, yours truly supposes?
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 8/21/2014 5:14 AM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
it is simply a matter of convenience:
def a():
print( gvr )
func(a);
or
func( def():
print(gvr)
)
it would be great if others could further share their opinions
I have, multiple time in previous threads. A bad idea. Unnecessary.
On 21/08/2014 7:30 PM, icefap...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thursday, August 21, 2014 2:27:08 AM UTC-7, Marko Rauhamaa wrote:
In practice, your proposal would not make life easier for Python
programmers.
neither did the lambda, yours truly supposes?
alex23 disagrees. alex23 finds the lambda
15 matches
Mail list logo
