Clovis Fabricio nosklo+pyt...@gmail.com added the comment:
UGH! Sorry for that, I mispasted something and didn't notice, since it filled
the comment entry box perfectly :(
This is the real message I meant to paste:
vijay,
The workaround I provided above takes
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment:
I realize the ship's already sailed on this issue [1], but isn't it a problem
that editing this code makes it more difficult to apply patches from Gay's
original code? What do we do if Gay releases a new version of his code with bug
fixes?
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Gay's changes tend to be very small; any bugfixes he releases can likely be
applied by hand, if they're relevant.
I did originally want to keep close to Gay's code, but frankly I'm not very
happy with the quality of that code; and in
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's the section of the 'bigcomp' code that I was referring to above:
/* Now b/d = exactly half-way between the two floating-point values */
/* on either side of the input string. Compute first digit of b/d. */
if
Eric Smith e...@trueblade.com added the comment:
Just to be clear: I'm okay with this divergence, as long as we've made it
clear we're explicitly doing so and we've given our reasons. Mark's done
that, and of course he's the expert in the subject.
--
Changes by Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org:
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5712
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
vijay vijay.psaib...@gmail.com added the comment:
Hi Clovis
Ok, I did not check if your split string function check for spaces or not,
sorry for that.
In my first post I mentioned this:-
2. We have different versions of Python installed in our Lab machines, some
have 2.5 and others got
New submission from Renato Cunha ren...@renatocunha.com:
PyObject_HEAD's documentation in py3k
(http://docs.python.org/dev/py3k/c-api/structures.html#PyObject_HEAD) uses the
same content used in the python 2.x's docs which is wrong, as there were some
API changes.
PyObject_HEAD is actually
Gerald Dalley dall...@deshaw.com added the comment:
Another use case: for distributed processing, it's handy to be able to pickle
interactive functions and functions that are part of a script. The user can
then remotely execute a broader set of functions than can be pickled by
default. This
Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com added the comment:
Here's an updated version of the parsing patch, with rewritten comments, but no
significant code changes.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17689/dtoa_parsing2.patch
___
Python tracker
Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:
Thanks for your report and patch. I’m editing the versions field: New features
and bug fixes go to the active branch, py3k (future 3.2), while only security
and documentation fixes are allowed to go in stable branches (2.6 and 3.1).
Current
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Patch version 4:
- encode_mbcs() uses WC_NO_BEST_FIT_CHARS flag in strict mode. Examples: ğ and
ł are not more replaced by g and l
- encode_mbcs() doesn't set *repr to NULL on encode error: the caller does
anyway destroy it
-
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Mark,
It is great to see you doing this. I looked at this code on several occasions
before and each time ran away scared! I sincerely hope I will understand how
it works after your rewrite.
Just a small suggestion at
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org added the comment:
Could this be related to issue 8077?
--
nosy: +gvanrossum
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4953
___
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org added the comment:
Could this be related to issue 4953?
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8077
___
Alexander Belopolsky belopol...@users.sourceforge.net added the comment:
Committed in r82034.
--
stage: commit review - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9012
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4953
___
___
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Reopen: r82034 broke Windows build
http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/x86%20Windows7%203.x/builds/802/steps/compile/logs/stdio
---
Build started: Project: pythoncore, Configuration: Debug|Win32
Linking...
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
Reopen: r82034 broke Windows build
Fixed by r82035.
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9012
New submission from Bill Steinmetz bill.steinm...@gmail.com:
Here's my Python version info:
Python 2.6.5 (r265:79096, Mar 19 2010, 18:02:59) [MSC v.1500 64 bit (AMD64)] on
win32
Here's my code that won't return (Start with a file 4GB hugefile.bin):
siz = (132)
print making array (%d) bytes
STINNER Victor victor.stin...@haypocalc.com added the comment:
I commited the last patch to py3k: r82037. Let see how the buildbots react :-)
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue850997
Bill Steinmetz bill.steinm...@gmail.com added the comment:
Looks like the issue is Microsoft's fwrite
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9015
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Should this be closed or is this still a problem in 2.7 (release candidate out
now, final soon) or 3.1?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2475
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
FreeBSD/Qemu: ipv6 is ok, but this fails:
[...]
That failure refers to this test:
# by specifying http we expect all returned sockets have
# STREAM type
infos = socket.getaddrinfo(HOST, http)
for _,
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file17516/getaddrinfotest.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8857
___
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file17691/getaddrinfotest.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8857
___
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17692/getaddrinfotest.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8857
___
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
Forgot to include socket.gaierror in the list of exceptions.
New patch in attachment.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17693/getaddrinfotest.patch
___
Python tracker
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
While it could be argued that it is 'obvious' that changing the stdin, stdout,
stderr, and pid of a processes cannot work, I agree that a small addition would
be good. In 17.1.2. Popen Objects, after The following attributes are also
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
This request is slightly confusing. The first sentence implies that you want
offset to be a requirement (as opposed to being an option). That would not be
acceptable. Later it seems that you want it added as an option (as opposed to
not
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Documentation issues should be component: documentation rather than library.
When submitting one, please at least indicate the module or class concerned. I
have never heard of 'unknown_decl' function.
Preferably, indicate the specific section
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Does this issue apply to 3.1/2?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3709
___
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com:
--
nosy: +benjamin.peterson
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9011
___
___
Terrence Cole terre...@zettabytestorage.com added the comment:
Alright, I've added several tests. I also modified update_wrapper to not copy
missing attributes (like __annotations__ on builtin methods) -- see issue
1576241.
(I also finally see what you mean with removing 3.3 from the
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
3.1, WinXP, works fine.
I am inclined to close this as idiosyncratic to a particular 2.5 installation,
which is beyond patching now anyway.
OP, respond if you have a problem with new 2.7, and include version splash line
like Python 3.1.2
Legoll Vincent vincent.leg...@gmail.com added the comment:
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 2:34 AM, Terry J. Reedy rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
While it could be argued that it is 'obvious'
What is obvious for someone maybe is not for others, if I tried to modify it,
that was on the (false)
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Is this still an issue for current trunks?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3290
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
In the absence of a claim otherwise, I am assuming that this is now either
fixed or out-of-date
--
nosy: +tjreedy
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: -Python 2.4, Python 2.5, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3990
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Was the fix forward ported or is this an issue for 3.1/2?
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: open - pending
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue3862
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue1633863
___
___
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: +Python 2.7 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4099
___
___
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
This appears to be a feature request that could now go into 3.2 at the
earliest, or even 3.3 if it were to violate the core change moratorium. But I
do not know if it even applies to the 3.x series.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
type: - feature
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
The be an issue, tests with currents interpreters are needed. You may be right,
but it may be that no one ever uses readline with subinterpreters.
--
nosy: +tjreedy
status: open - pending
versions: -Python 2.5
Collin Winter coll...@gmail.com added the comment:
I tried making this work early last year as part of Unladen Swallow, and even
though I got it working and it does speed up certain builtin calls, it didn't
move overall application performance at all. I believe this was due to cache
effects,
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
This report is a bit hard to interpret. In 3.1, the mailbox module has a
Maildir class with a private _dump_message method. Since the method is
undocumented and not part of the public API, there cannot be a conflict between
the doc and
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
components: +Demos and Tools -Tests
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.5, Python 2.6, Python 3.0
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4280
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
os.setpgrp is unix only, I am windows only ;-(.
However, the 3.1 manual says Call the system call setpgrp() or setpgrp(0, 0)()
depending on which version is implemented (if any).
Given the name of the function and the above, I suspect the OP
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
Martin said: I also wonder whether it is really necessary to complicate the
code just so that gcc 2.95 stops producing some warnings. So I propose to close
this as won't fix.
Is 2.95 still used much? If not, the above sounds good.
--
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
versions: +Python 3.2 -Python 2.5
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue4502
___
___
R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com added the comment:
I've applied the patch to trunk in r82039, to py3k in r82041, and 3.1 in r82042.
Holger, I'm not really familiar with the linecache module and its uses, so I'm
not sure what your proposal is aimed at. Perhaps you could flesh out your
Changes by Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu:
--
resolution: - out of date
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue2102
___
Rick Harris rconradhar...@gmail.com added the comment:
Are compatibility concerns the main reason this patch has yet to be applied?
If so, could we allay those fears by keeping the default seek-y behavior and
only introducing the new seek-less style when a 'noseek' flag is passed?
--
Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:
From the comments, it seems like this should be changed to a doc issue.
Given that I do not know a 'synchronous' from an 'asynchronous' signal, I would
want an expanded list if I were using this module.
Strengthening 'little sense' to 'do not
Senthil Kumaran orsent...@gmail.com added the comment:
Yes, it is applicable to 3.1 and 3.2 as well. This is definitely a good to have
performance improvement.
--
nosy: +orsenthil
versions: +Python 3.1, Python 3.2
___
Python tracker
New submission from Jon Seger se...@biology.utah.edu:
I upgraded from 2.5.2 to 2.6.5 on a WinXP system. Console interpreter worked
fine, but IDLE would not launch (quit without displaying anything on screen).
Same with 2.6.4. Finally tried 2.5.4, which works as expected (like the old
201 - 256 of 256 matches
Mail list logo