[snip]
Could you make the program name unique just by combining it with the
repository name in a single string?
In my case I cannot. But there is a larger reason why I wouldn't do this: It
would mean adding a special character that could not be included in the
repository name, that is,
I'm curious what these practical reasons are. One my smallest source files
has 870 lines in it, my largest nearly 9000.
If the problem is your editor, you should seriously consider switching.
I think that the main reasons for doing so are as follows:
git status provides much more
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 5:21 PM, tim.thel...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
Could you make the program name unique just by combining it with the
repository name in a single string?
In my case I cannot. But there is a larger reason why I wouldn't do this:
It would mean adding a special
ANNOUNCING
eGenix.com mxODBC Connect
Python ODBC Database Interface
Version 2.0.5
mxODBC Connect is our commercially supported client-server product
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:21:18 -0700, tim.thelion wrote:
[snip]
Could you make the program name unique just by combining it with the
repository name in a single string?
In my case I cannot. But there is a larger reason why I wouldn't do
this: It would mean adding a special character
[This announcement is in German since it targets a local user group
meeting in Düsseldorf, Germany]
ANKÜNDIGUNG
Python Meeting Düsseldorf
http://pyddf.de/
Ein Treffen
Hi,
Wingware has released version 5.0.6 of Wing IDE, our cross-platform
integrated
development environment for the Python programming language.
Wing IDE includes a professional quality code editor with vi, emacs,
visual studio,
and other key bindings, auto-completion, call tips,
length power wrote:
When cur.execute be used, i get right output.
import sqlite3
con=sqlite3.connect(:memory:)
cur=con.cursor()
sql1=attach database 'g:\\workspace\\data\\Cinfo.sqlite' as Cinfo;
sql2=select * from Cinfo.ipo;
cur.execute(sql1)
cur.execute(sql2)
con.commit()
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 9:37:44 PM UTC+5:30, Eam onn wrote:
Perhaps this isn't the right place to post this, but it's the only place I
could find.
I asked yesterday or the day before about Python Game Development, and have
found a few tutorials on PyGame. Now I have a bigger problem:
A reasonable compromise might be to keep the *data* assocated
with a SubuserProgram in a class, maybe together with a few
methods that are tightly coupled to it, but have the major
pieces of functionality such as install() implemented by
separate functions that operate *on* the class,
On 4/24/2014 11:32 AM, rohit782...@gmail.com wrote:
When you post, please do more than just quote. If you are relaying a
private email, please say so.
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 9:37:44 PM UTC+5:30, Eam onn wrote:
I did not see the original post, if indeed there was a public one.
[snip
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:15:09 -0400, Terry Reedy wrote:
On 4/24/2014 11:32 AM, rohit782...@gmail.com wrote:
When you post, please do more than just quote. If you are relaying a
private email, please say so.
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 9:37:44 PM UTC+5:30, Eam onn wrote:
I did not see the
rohit782...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 8, 2013 9:37:44 PM UTC+5:30, Eam onn wrote:
Now I have a bigger problem: HOW THE HECK
DO I INSTALL PYGAME!?!?! System Details:
I've tried using MacPorts, Fink, the Mac DMG,
source installing, installing NumPY, just about every way possible.
My
Terry Reedy wrote:
Idle depends on tkinter. Tkinter depends on having a tcl/tk that works,
at least for tkinter. The following page has essential info about
getting the right tcl/tk installed.
https://www.python.org/download/mac/tcltk
Also keep in mind that you don't *have* to use IDLE at
In article brtt0jf10j...@mid.individual.net,
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
My advice would be to steer clear of things like Fink and MacPorts
and do things the native MacOSX way wherever possible. That means
using a framework installation of Python and framework versions of
On Thursday, April 24, 2014 1:53:38 PM UTC+8, Gregory Ewing wrote:
Alternatively you could create a .pyc file out of the code
object and then use Easy Python Decompiler on that. The
following snippet of code should do that:
(Taken from:
On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Ned Deily n...@acm.org wrote:
In article brtt0jf10j...@mid.individual.net,
Gregory Ewing greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz wrote:
My advice would be to steer clear of things like Fink and MacPorts
and do things the native MacOSX way wherever possible. That means
New submission from Steinn Steinsen:
In the documentation of multiprocessing the locks, RLock and Lock,
are said to be clones of their respective threading synchronization primitives.
There is an inconsistency in what exceptions are raised when an
unlocked lock is released. According to the
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
Added a new version of the patch which incorporates suggestions made by Jim.
Thanks for the review!
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35018/issue16104_8.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
New submission from Matt Bachmann:
I noticed an issue passing in unicode to os.path.relpath.
Specifically that in some cases when passing in unicode I would get back
unicode and others I would get back a string. Below I demonstrate the issue. I
also attached a patch.
Is this an issue or am I
Charles-François Natali added the comment:
A useful parameter instead would be to support sending only part of the file,
so adding a count argument.
Have you read my patch? This is already provided by the offset parameter.
Of course I read your patch ;-)
I mean I'd like a parameter for the
akira added the comment:
use_fallback parameter is mostly a debugging tool. If it helps to avoid the
indecision; I would side with neologix' remarks and also suggest to drop
the use_fallback parameter.
It seems the patch assumes *offset == nbytes_sent* that is false in general
e.g., if offset
Milan Oberkirch added the comment:
Updated the last patch according to the review comments at
https://bugs.python.org/review/20098/.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35020/mangle_from_20140424.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35021/mangle_from_20140424.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20098
___
Changes by Milan Oberkirch milan...@oberkirch.org:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35020/mangle_from_20140424.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue20098
___
New submission from Russell Ballestrini:
The current implementation of difflib's get_close_matches() function computes
computationally complex scores (ratios) but then tosses them out without giving
the end-user the chance to have at them.
This patch adds an optional scores boolean argument
Changes by Russell Ballestrini russell.ballestr...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35022/difflib.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
___
Changes by Russell Ballestrini russell.ballestr...@gmail.com:
--
keywords: +patch
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file35023/difflib-patch-to-save-scores-in-get-close-matches.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
It would be easier to review your patch if you'll upload it as a proper patch.
Usually for these cases (modifying the return by passing a specific argument)
it's best to provide a new function with this functionality, by having
get_close_matches and
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
Ah, nevermind my first comment.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
___
___
Python-bugs-list
Russell Ballestrini added the comment:
Claudiu.Popa,
Yes, that was my first idea on how to tackle this issue.
I will create another proper patch that prepares two separate functions:
* get_close_matches
* get_scored_close_matches
Where each are basically wrapper / API functions around a
Russell Ballestrini added the comment:
New function in difflib: get_scored_matches()
This function acts just like the existing get_close_matches()
function however instead of returning a list of words, it
returns a list of tuples (score, word) pairs.
This gives the end-user the ability to
Giampaolo Rodola' added the comment:
[...] I'd like a parameter for the offset, and another one for the
number of bytes to send.
To sum up, I think there's a fundamental confusion between blocksize
and count in this API.
Ah OK, I see what you mean now. If seems we didn't understand each
New submission from Johannes Baiter:
While testing a module that uses multiprocessing.Pool to distribute load across
multiple processes, I noticed that my test suite was copmleting very quickly
(~0.15s) on Python 2.6, while Python 2.7 and above took around 10x as long
(~1.6s).
Upon debugging
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
Your patch needs tests and documentation update. For examples, you could look
in test_difflib.py and see how get_close_matches is tested.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
Russell Ballestrini added the comment:
get_close_matches() doesn't seem to have any tests... I suppose I should write
them considering I'm changing the functionality a bit.
TODO: write tests for
* difflib.get_close_matches()
* difflib.get_scored_matches()
Determine if docstrings are
Changes by Zachary Ware zachary.w...@gmail.com:
--
stage: - patch review
versions: -Python 2.7
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
___
Zachary Ware added the comment:
Russell Ballestrini wrote:
Determine if docstrings are enough to document the new function.
No, Doc/library/difflib.rst will need an update.
(Btw, I removed 2.7 from versions because 2.7 is not open to new features, bugs
and security-critical enhancements
Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, haypo, pitrou, yselivanov
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21340
___
Changes by Brian Kearns bdkea...@gmail.com:
--
files: test_itertools_typos-py27.patch
keywords: patch
nosy: bdkearns
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: typos in test_itertools.py
type: enhancement
versions: Python 2.7
Added file:
Guido van Rossum added the comment:
Looks like there is a bug in CoroWrapper -- when the assert in __init__ fails,
__del__ gets called imediately after and that triggers this traceback.
However I'm not sure what causes the assert to fail -- it looks like this is
coming from sleep(), which
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21342
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Changes by Ned Deily n...@acm.org:
--
nosy: +sbt
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21345
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
New submission from Zachary Ware:
Fixed, thanks for the patch!
changeset 90450:1beb3e0507fa 2.7
Issue #21346: Fix typos in test_itertools. Patch by Brian Kearns.
changeset 90451:901b9afc918e 3.4
Issue #21346: Fix typo, make message consistent in test_itertools. Pointed out
by Brian Kearns.
Sreepriya Chalakkal added the comment:
Hi Maciej,
I am travelling now and it might take some delay for me to work on this! I got
to know that you are working on RFC 6532. You might take this up and fix it as
this is related to your work and I don't want to create delays.
--
New submission from akira:
*Popen([something], shell=True)* works but it is similar to
*Popen([something, arg], shell=True)* that passes arg to /bin/sh on POSIX
systems instead of something.
It is best to always use a string if `shell=True` is necessary.
It is a common confusion #20344,
Changes by Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com:
--
nosy: +tim.peters
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
___
___
stoyanov added the comment:
Alternative temporary solution
def enum_types(mimedb):
try:
ctype = ctype.encode(default_encoding) # omit in 3.x!
except UnicodeEncodeError:
pass
except Exception: #--
pass#--
else:
yield ctype
--
nosy: +quick.es
Changes by Russell Ballestrini russell.ballestr...@gmail.com:
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file35023/difflib-patch-to-save-scores-in-get-close-matches.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
Claudiu.Popa added the comment:
I have updated the previous patch, by documenting the new class method.
--
versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35027/issue9731.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
Roundup Robot added the comment:
New changeset d84a69b7ba72 by Ethan Furman in branch 'default':
Issue8297: module attribute lookup failures now include module name in error
message.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/d84a69b7ba72
--
nosy: +python-dev
Changes by paul j3 ajipa...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35028/format_usage.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11874
___
Changes by paul j3 ajipa...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30941/format_usage.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11874
___
New submission from Cris:
I have Windows 8 64bit and Python 64bit (installed from here:
https://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7/python-2.7.amd64.msi)
I also installed pywin32-214.win-amd64-py2.7 (from here
Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:
--
resolution: - fixed
status: open - closed
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8297
___
William Tisäter added the comment:
I played around with different file and chunk sizes using attached benchmark
script.
After several test runs I think 1024 * 16 would be the biggest win without
losing too many μs on small seeks. You can find my benchmark output here:
Ethan Furman added the comment:
Yay, 'resolved' !
--
stage: patch review - resolved
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue8297
___
___
Changes by Brian Kearns bdkea...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35030/fix_winreg_setvalueex-py27.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21349
___
Changes by Brian Kearns bdkea...@gmail.com:
--
files: fix_winreg_setvalueex-py27.patch
keywords: patch
nosy: bdkearns
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: crash in winreg SetValueEx with memoryview
type: crash
versions: Python 2.7
Added file:
Changes by Brian Kearns bdkea...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35031/fix_winreg_setvalueex-py27.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21349
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file35032/newsmerge.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18967
___
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:
Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file35011/newsmerge.py
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue18967
___
akira added the comment:
count and blocksize are completely different.
*count* specifies how many bytes at most socket.sendfile should sent overall.
It may change the result i.e., it may not be necessary that the file is read
until EOF.
It has the same meaning as *nbytes* parameter for
Antoine Pitrou added the comment:
I'm -1 about adding count *and* blocksize parameters. blocksize alone
is good enough IMO and considering what I've just described it
is a better name than count.
I'm confused. Why is blocksize necessary at all?
using os.path.getsize(file.name) looks
Changes by Russell Ballestrini russell.ballestr...@gmail.com:
Removed file:
http://bugs.python.org/file35024/difflib-patch-to-save-scores.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
Russell Ballestrini added the comment:
Ok, this patch is ready for review.
--
Added file:
http://bugs.python.org/file35033/diff-lib-get-scored-matches-tests-and-docs.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue21344
Tim Peters added the comment:
I wonder whether this new function would attract any users, given that the user
already has control over the smallest ratio that will be accepted, and over the
maximum number of close matches returned. That's always been sufficient for me.
What useful thing(s)
Steve added the comment:
Indeed, but not defining _DEBUG for debug compiling is not realistic. Too many
dependencies. I am not even sure it would work, because if we bind with the
debug libraries, but build with the release headers, it might break. In any
case it is not an option we have
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
The link in the first message does not work. This should:
https://docs.python.org/devguide/documenting.html
The section under discussion, which pydev controls, as opposed to the full .rst
doc at http://docutils.sourceforge.net/rst.html, is
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
There are no versions for the devguide. There is another misplaced role:
:
option
A command-line option of Python. The leading hyphen(s) must be included. If
a matching cmdoption directive exists, it is linked to. For options of other
programs or scripts,
Russell Ballestrini added the comment:
At some point I plan to write a web API that accepts a word, 'doge' and returns
a list of possible suggestions and scores. Later a did you mean dog style
suggestion could be implemented on top.
We compute the scores, and it is computationally taxing, we
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
With respect to editing final peps, I think this issue should be closed. The
current PEP 1 statement accurately describes what we do, which is that in
general we do not edit final peps. Moreover, Chris has not submitted a patch
and I doubt anyone else knows
Terry J. Reedy added the comment:
The only change is that '25' is now '28'.
A possible solution, without changing Sphinx, is to reduce the headers to a
couple of words and put the question under the header, possibly in italics.
*Q. How do I do this difficult thing?*
A. Do 2 pushups, sleep 3
paul j3 added the comment:
This patch adds a ReGroupHelpFormatter class, which regroups positional
arguments in the usage line as discussed before. It builds on the reworked
usage formatter in bugs/python.org/issue11874 (which keeps usage as a list
longer).
For a complicate parser, usage
paul j3 added the comment:
This is a testing script for this patch. It is not a unit test.
Example:
p = argparse.ArgumentParser()
p.formatter_class = argparse.ReGroupHelpFormatter
p.add_argument('foo')
p.add_argument('arg1',nargs='?')
p.add_argument('arg2',nargs='?')
a
75 matches
Mail list logo
