Chris Green wrote at 2023-10-28 17:08 +0100:
>I am using the python3 smbus module, but it's hard work because of the
>lack of documentation. Web searches confirm that the documentation is
>somewhat thin!
>
>If you do the obvious this is what you get:-
>
>>>> import smbus
>>>> dir (smbus)
>
OK. I've been doing some reading and that you should avoid regex to check email
addresses. So what I was thinking was something like this:
if type(email_recipient) != email.message.Message:
I just don't know why that particular line isn't working.
Thank you!
--- Original Message ---
On
Hi,
I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a question. I've been
doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check if an email message is valid.
Using regex sounds like a bad idea to me and the other options I found required
paying for third party services.
Could someone push me i
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to find out
> if a string is a valid email address.
There is only one way to know that a string is a valid email address,
and that's to send
On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> wrote:
>> Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to
>> find out if a string is a valid email address.
>
> There is only one way to know that a
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 06:02, Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to
> >> f
On 11/1/23 05:35, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
OK. I've been doing some reading and that you should avoid regex to check email
addresses. So what I was thinking was something like this:
To be a little more specific, Avoid Rolling Your Own RegEx. It's very
tricky, and you w
On 2023-11-01, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 11/1/23 05:35, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>> OK. I've been doing some reading and that you should avoid regex to check
>> email addresses. So what I was thinking was something like this:
>
> To be a little more specif
On 2023-11-01, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
> I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a
> question. I've been doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check
> if an email message is valid.
Send an e-mail using it? If the right person gets the
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
wrote:
> Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly require at least one '.'
> after the '@'.
No guarantee that there'll be a dot after the at. (Technically there's
no guarantee of an at sig
On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
> wrote:
>> Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly require at least one '.'
>> after the '@'.
>
> No guarantee that there&#x
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:52, Grant Edwards via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
> > wrote:
>
> >> Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly
On 11/1/23 04:09, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a question. I've been
> doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check if an email message is
> valid. Using regex sounds like a bad idea to me
On 01Nov2023 14:08, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2023-11-01, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a
question. I've been doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check
if an email message is valid.
[...]
Could someone push
On 2023-11-01 17:17, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
wrote:
Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly require at least one '.'
after the '@'.
No guarantee that there'll be a dot after the at. (
See https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9585?page=0,0
On 01/11/2023 17:09, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
Hi,
I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a question. I've been
doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check if an email message is valid.
Usi
universities that were densely
connected to others got lots of traffic. In that scenario, validity had
another meaning.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of D'Arcy Cain via Python-list
Sent: Wednesday, November 1, 2023 9:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Checking if
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
> of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
> some status being sent back such as DELIVERABLE or NO SUCH
>
> On 2023-11-01, Simon Connah via Python-list [email protected] wrote:
>
> > I'm building a simple project using smtplib and have a
> > question. I've been doing unit testing but I'm not sure how to check
> > if an email message is valid.
>
On 02Nov2023 17:04, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being sent back such as
>
>
> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to find
> > out if a string is a valid email address.
>
>
> There is only one way to
>
> On 2023-11-01, Chris Angelico [email protected] wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 05:21, Simon Connah via Python-list
> > [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > Could someone push me in the right direction please? I just want to
> > >
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:47, Simon Connah wrote:
>
> My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could just send
> email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it from the database.
> Thing is I'm not sure how close to a real email address an email has to be in
> ord
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 17:47, Cameron Simpson via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 02Nov2023 17:04, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
> > wrote:
> >> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
> >> mess
>
>
> See https://www.linuxjournal.com/article/9585?page=0,0
>
That looks painful to maintain!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Thursday, November 02, 2023 at 6:46, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
Re: Checking if email is valid (at least in part)
>My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could just send
>email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it from the database.
That fu
> Agreed.
>
> However, with names that are frequently misspelled or which are
> commonly-spelled slightly differently, the 'trick' is to anticipate
> problems and set up aliases which forward messages to the correct address*.
>
> eg Kelvin -> Kevlin
>
> Niel, Neal, Neale (etc) -> Neil
>
>
On 2023-11-02, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 2023-11-01 17:17, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
>> On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Grant Edwards via Python-list
>> wrote:
>>> Make sure it has an '@' in it. Possibly require at least one '.'
>>
Chris Angelico writes:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test
> message sort of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient
> but merely results in some status being sent bac
On 2023-11-02, dn wrote:
> On 02/11/2023 19.46, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>> [...]
>> My goal is to make a simple mailing list platform. I guess I could
>> just send email to an address and if it bounces then I can remove it
>> from the database. Thing is I
I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
PATH.
There's still both /usr/bin/pip and /usr/bin/
On 2023-11-02 02:04, Chris Angelico via Python-list wrote:
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being
> Please re-read.
> Discussion is about "closeness".
> Thus, what you might expect from email servers and Admins, NOT what you
> should do. That part should be quite evident by now!
>
My apologies for making a mistake.
Simon.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
https://ma
via Python-list
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 2:05 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Checking if email is valid
On Thu, 2 Nov 2023 at 15:20, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
>
> Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message
sort
> of like an ACK th
Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
> ...
>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
`pip list -o` will tell you for which packages there are upgrades
available.
`pip install -U ...` will upgrade packages.
Be c
Hello,
I would like to develop Mobile Applications using the Kivy Python Framework
but I am having difficulty and these are the errors I am finding "
C:\WINDOWS\system32>python3 --version Python was not found; run without
arguments to install from the Microsoft Store, or disable this shortcut
from
On 2023-11-02 00:18, AVI GROSS via Python-list wrote:
Yes, it would be nice if there was a syntax for sending a test message sort
of like an ACK that is not delivered to the recipient but merely results in
some status being sent back such as DELIVERABLE or NO SUCH USER or even
MAILBOX FULL.
It
On 2023-11-02, Simon Connah wrote:
> Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
> standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
Yes. Almost nobody actually implements "the standard" as in RFC 2822
section 3.4.1 (which can contain, for example, non-printab
On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
>> ...
>>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
>
> `pip list -o` will tell you for which packages there are upgrades
> available.
>
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
> python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
> finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
>
> So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
> PATH.
On 11/2/23 00:42, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
> Basically I'm writing unit tests and one of them passess in a string
> with an invalid email address. I need to be able to check the string
> to see if it is a valid email so that the unit test passess.
If you truly have mana
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
> > Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
> >> ...
> >>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
> >>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
> >
> > `pip list -o` will tell you for which packages
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> > I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
> > python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
> > finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
> >
> > So they now have only python3 and there is n
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
>> > I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
>> > python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
>> > finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
>> >
>> > S
On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2023-11-02, Dieter Maurer wrote:
>> > Chris Green wrote at 2023-11-2 10:58 +:
>> >> ...
>> >>So, going on from this, how do I do the equivalent of "apt update; apt
>> >>upgrade" for my globally installed pip packages?
>> >
>> > `pi
On 11/2/23 04:58, Chris Green via Python-list wrote:
I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
finally eliminated all dependencies on python2.
So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable
If i wanted an email verifier I would look at open source frameworks and see
how they do it. Django comes to mind.--(Unsigned mail from my phone)
Original message From: Michael Torrie via Python-list
Date: 3/11/23 07:23 (GMT+10:00) To:
[email protected] Subject: Re
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 07:17, Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 2023-11-02, Simon Connah wrote:
> > Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
> > standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
>
> Yes. Almost nobody
recognize most of them properly? That trained
algorithm could be shared and incorporated into your programs either as the
only method, or one you use in special cases.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Mike Dewhirst via Python-list
Sent: Thursday, November 2, 2023 6:31 PM
To
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
> My guess is that a first test of an email address might be to see if a decent
> module of that kind fills out the object to your satisfaction. You can then
> perhaps test parts of the object, rather than everything at onc
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> > Jon Ribbens wrote:
> >> On 2023-11-02, Chris Green wrote:
> >> > I have a couple of systems which used to have python2 as well as
> >> > python3 but as Ubuntu and Debian verions have moved on they have
> >> > finally eliminated all depe
On 2023-11-03, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
> wrote:
>> My guess is that a first test of an email address might be to see if
>> a decent module of that kind fills out the object to your
>> satisfaction. You can then p
E bad addresses.
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Chris Angelico via Python-list
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2023 1:43 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Checking if email is valid
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
> My guess is that a fi
Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:35:43PM - schrieb Jon Ribbens via Python-list:
Regardless of ...
> Because pip barely plays well by itself, let alone with other package
> managers at the same time.
... being true ...
> > I do only install a few things using pip.
>
> Are the
Karsten Hilbert wrote at 2023-11-3 14:47 +0100:
> ...
>> Are they not available in your system's package manager?
>
>... this clearly often answers to "no" for applications of
>any complexity.
>
>Is there a suggested proper path to deal with that (Debian is
>of interest to me here) ?
Complex appli
On 2023-11-02, Michael Torrie via Python-list wrote:
> On 11/2/23 00:42, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>
>> Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
>> standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
>
> You'll have to
>
>
> On 11/2/23 00:42, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>
> > Basically I'm writing unit tests and one of them passess in a string
> > with an invalid email address. I need to be able to check the string
> > to see if it is a valid email so that the
On 11/3/2023 6:51 AM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
On 2023-11-03, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
wrote:
My guess is that a first test of an email address might be to see if
a decent module of that kind fills out the object to your
>
> On 11/3/2023 6:51 AM, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>
> > On 2023-11-03, Chris Angelico [email protected] wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, 3 Nov 2023 at 12:21, AVI GROSS via Python-list
> > > [email protected] wrote:
> > >
> >
>
>
> On 2023-11-02, Simon Connah [email protected] wrote:
>
> > Valid as in conforms to the standard. Although having looked at the
> > standard that might be more difficult than originally planned.
>
>
> Yes. Almost nobody actually implements "the standard" as in RFC 2822
>
On 11/4/23 02:51, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
> Wow. I'm half tempted to make a weird email address to see how many websites
> get it wrong.
>
> Thank you for the link.
Nearly all websites seem to reject simple correct email addresses such
as [email protected]
Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:07:33PM -0600 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
> >So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
> >PATH.
>
> FWIW, for this you install the little stub package python-is-python3.
> Especially if you
> want to kee
On 2023-11-03, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 09:35:43PM - schrieb Jon Ribbens via Python-list:
>
> Regardless of ...
>
>> Because pip barely plays well by itself, let alone with other package
>> managers at the same time.
>
> ... being true
On 2023-11-04, Michael Torrie via Python-list wrote:
> On 11/4/23 02:51, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>
>> Wow. I'm half tempted to make a weird email address to see how many
>> websites get it wrong.
In my experience, they don't have to be very weird at all
On 2023-11-05 00:39, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
Definitely. Syntactic e-mail address "validation" is one of the most
useless and widely broken things on the Interwebs. People who do
anything other than require an '@' (and optionally make you enter the
same @-con
newsletters and much more. Some are inadvertent but the reality is she
stopped using that email as it is now mostly full of SPAM as the others ...
-Original Message-
From: Python-list On
Behalf Of Grant Edwards via Python-list
Sent: Sunday, November 5, 2023 12:39 AM
To: python-list
On 11/5/23 05:32, D'Arcy Cain via Python-list wrote:
On 2023-11-05 00:39, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
Definitely. Syntactic e-mail address "validation" is one of the most
useless and widely broken things on the Interwebs. People who do
anything other than requ
On 2023-11-05, D'Arcy Cain via Python-list wrote:
> On 2023-11-05 00:39, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
>> Definitely. Syntactic e-mail address "validation" is one of the most
>> useless and widely broken things on the Interwebs. People who do
>> any
On 2023-11-05, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 2023-11-05 00:39, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
>> Definitely. Syntactic e-mail address "validation" is one of the most
>> useless and widely broken things on the Interwebs. People who do
>> anything other than req
On 2023-11-03, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:07:33PM -0600 schrieb Mats Wichmann via
> Python-list:
>> >So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
>> >PATH.
>>
>> FWIW, for this you install the little stub package
On 2023-11-05, Chris Green wrote:
> Jon Ribbens wrote:
>> On 2023-11-03, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>> > Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:07:33PM -0600 schrieb Mats Wichmann via
>> > Python-list:
>> >> >So they now have only python3 and there is no python execut
which python version is better to be used and how to make sure it works on my
window 10 because i downloaded it and it never worked so I uninstall to do that
again please can you give me the steps on how it will work perfectly
from
Kenny
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
On 11/5/23 10:34, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
Indeed. There is a tiny but brightly burning kernel of hate in my
heart for web sites (and their developers) that refuse to accept
credit card numbers entered with spaces _as_they_are_shown_on_the_card_!
I've concluded that usin
On 2023-11-05, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2023-11-05, D'Arcy Cain via Python-list wrote:
>> On 2023-11-05 00:39, Grant Edwards via Python-list wrote:
>>> Definitely. Syntactic e-mail address "validation" is one of the most
>>> useless and widely brok
Jon Ribbens wrote:
> On 2023-11-03, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > Am Thu, Nov 02, 2023 at 04:07:33PM -0600 schrieb Mats Wichmann via
> > Python-list:
> >> >So they now have only python3 and there is no python executable in
> >> >PATH.
> >>
> &g
Am Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 05:26:06PM +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
> Karsten Hilbert wrote at 2023-11-3 14:47 +0100:
> > ...
> >> Are they not available in your system's package manager?
> >
> >... this clearly often answers to "no" for applications of
> >any complexity.
> >
> >Is there a suggested p
Am Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:53:32PM - schrieb Jon Ribbens via Python-list:
> >> Are they not available in your system's package manager?
> >
> > ... this clearly often answers to "no" for applications of
> > any complexity.
> >
> > Is ther
Am Sun, Nov 05, 2023 at 03:00:41PM + schrieb Chris Green via Python-list:
> > * contact every single maintainer of every single one of the packages
> > that needs updating and persuade them to update their packages and
> > reassure them that you are getting all
On 2023-11-05, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> Am Fri, Nov 03, 2023 at 01:53:32PM - schrieb Jon Ribbens via Python-list:
>
>> >> Are they not available in your system's package manager?
>> >
>> > ... this clearly often answers to "no" for applic
On 2023-11-05 06:48, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
Sometimes I think that these sorts of stupid, wrong, validation are the
fault of idiot managers. When it's apostrophes though I'm suspicious
that it may be idiot programmers who don't know how to prevent SQL
injection attac
Karsten Hilbert wrote at 2023-11-5 23:19 +0100:
> ...
>do you happen to know where to read up on how to fit a pip
>constraint file into a Debian package creation workflow ?
I have only rudimentary `apt` knowledge.
I know it is quite flexible, e.g. it used to handle `flash`
in a special way. I exp
> I can see how the truley dim-witted might forget that other countries
> have phone numbers with differing lengths and formatting/punctuation,
> but there are tons of sites where it takes multiple tries when
> entering even a bog-standard USA 10-0digit phone nubmer because they
> are completely f
On 11/6/23 01:57, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
The thing I truly hate is when you have two telephone number fields. One for landline and one for mobile. I mean who in hell has a landline these days?
People who live in places with spotty, or no, mobile coverage. We do exist.
--
https
On 2023-11-06, D'Arcy Cain wrote:
> On 2023-11-05 06:48, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
>> Sometimes I think that these sorts of stupid, wrong, validation are the
>> fault of idiot managers. When it's apostrophes though I'm suspicious
>> that it may be idi
Hello,
I would like to know how to detect (e.g. via a linter) typos in function
names imported from another module.
Let's assume this given Python code snippet.
import foo
foo.baR()
The package "foo" do contain a function named "bar()" (all lower case
letters). The function "baR()" does not
On 2023-11-06, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> On 11/6/23 01:57, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
>> The thing I truly hate is when you have two telephone number fields.
>> One for landline and one for mobile. I mean who in hell has a
>> landline these days?
>
> People who
[email protected] wrote at 2023-11-6 12:47 +:
>I would like to know how to detect (e.g. via a linter) typos in function
>names imported from another module.
One option is a test suite (--> Python's "unittest" package)
with a sufficiently high coverage (near 100 %).
--
https://mail.python.org/
Dieter Maurer via Python-list ezt írta (időpont:
2023. nov. 6., H, 19:13):
> [email protected] wrote at 2023-11-6 12:47 +:
> >I would like to know how to detect (e.g. via a linter) typos in function
> >names imported from another module.
>
> One option is a test suite (-
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 02:05, Jon Ribbens via Python-list
wrote:
> That was another thing that I used to find ridiculous, but seems to have
> improved somewhat in recent years - website error pages that said "please
> contact us to let us know about this error". I'm sorry
On 11/6/23 08:23, Jon Ribbens via Python-list wrote:
On 2023-11-06, Mats Wichmann wrote:
On 11/6/23 01:57, Simon Connah via Python-list wrote:
The thing I truly hate is when you have two telephone number fields.
One for landline and one for mobile. I mean who in hell has a
landline these days
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 07:10, Mats Wichmann via Python-list
wrote:
> Suggests maybe labeling should be something like:
>
> * Number you want to be called on
> * Number for texted security messages, if different
>
> Never seen that, though :-)
>
My responses would be:
*
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 01:17:11AM - schrieb Jon Ribbens via Python-list:
> >> >> Are they not available in your system's package manager?
> >> >
> >> > ... this clearly often answers to "no" for applications of
> >> > any
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 08:58:00AM +0100 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
> I know that debian packagers create debian packages
> from Python distributions not using the approach sketched above
> and likely they have their reasons.
>
> You might want to discuss this on an `apt` related mailing list.
Yeah,
On 11/6/23 14:28, Karsten Hilbert via Python-list wrote:
I had just hoped someone here might have a handy pointer for
how to deal with modules having to be installed from pip for
use with an apt-installed python-based application.
That just shouldn't happen - such packages are supposed
On Sun, Nov 5, 2023 at 1:23 PM office officce via Python-list <
[email protected]> wrote:
> which python version is better to be used and how to make sure it works on
> my window 10 because i downloaded it and it never worked so I uninstall to
> do that again please can you gi
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:43:47PM -0700 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
> >I had just hoped someone here might have a handy pointer for
> >how to deal with modules having to be installed from pip for
> >use with an apt-installed python-based application.
>
> Th
On 11/6/2023 5:04 PM, Karsten Hilbert via Python-list wrote:
Am Mon, Nov 06, 2023 at 02:43:47PM -0700 schrieb Mats Wichmann via Python-list:
I had just hoped someone here might have a handy pointer for
how to deal with modules having to be installed from pip for
use with an apt-installed
On 7/11/23 7:45 am, Mats Wichmann wrote:
Continuing with the example, if you have a single phone number field, or
let a mobile number be entered in a field marked for landline, you will
probably assume you can text to that number.
But if the site can detect that you've entered a mobile number
On 6/11/23 6:34 pm, rbowman wrote:
We've found even if you directly ask the user often the answer is 'I
dunno' or some mythology they have constructed to explain the problem.
This seems to apply to hardware issues as well. Louis Rossmann has
a philosophy of "Never believe what the customer tell
On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at 10:11, Greg Ewing via Python-list
wrote:
>
> On 7/11/23 7:45 am, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> > Continuing with the example, if you have a single phone number field, or
> > let a mobile number be entered in a field marked for landline, you will
> > probabl
2301 - 2400 of 5863 matches
Mail list logo
