Andreas Röhler andreas.roeh...@online.de writes:
started a Blueprint delivering the reasons for the kind of proceeding
tried currently
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-mode/+spec/pymacs
Think such a Blueprint might be a good place for listing pros and cons.
Using Make has it's
Andreas Röhler andreas.roeh...@easy-emacs.de writes:
[...] we should let the user decide, what features to use: ipython or
not, pdbtrack or pydb, which completion, refactoring, which checks and
tests etc.
As a general principle, users should have full control. However, if a
user did not
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
How do I invoke pdbtrack from python-mode?
It's really easy. You still insert 'import pdb; pdb.set_trace()' at the spot
in your code where you want to break. Then run your code from a shell buffer.
When you hit the break point, you'll drop into pdb.
Deniz Dogan deniz.a.m.do...@gmail.com writes:
Unfortunately, that breaks yet another convention, which is that C-c
letter are for users and should not be bound to anything in any
external mode.
Doing `C-h m' while visiting a Python file, I currently see two
culprits:
C-c c
François,
Hah! So funny for you to bring up *that* specific post from
Barry. It's been sitting in my inbox as msg #1 for the past
couple years. Even though I copied it to my org notes, I've
always had it there. So when your email arrived, my reader
threaded it back to Barry's 2-year-old post.
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:03 PM, François Pinard wrote:
C-x n d py-narrow-to-defun
Is this one a problem? Shouldn't narrow-to-defun be mode-sensitive? (Also,
it doesn't sit on C-c letter.)
-Barry
___
Python-mode mailing list
On Jan 26, 2012, at 10:12 PM, Jeff Bauer wrote:
Hah! So funny for you to bring up *that* specific post from
Barry. It's been sitting in my inbox as msg #1 for the past
couple years. Even though I copied it to my org notes, I've
always had it there. So when your email arrived, my reader
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org writes:
On Jan 26, 2012, at 11:03 PM, François Pinard wrote:
C-x n d py-narrow-to-defun
Is this one a problem? Shouldn't narrow-to-defun be mode-sensitive? (Also,
it doesn't sit on C-c letter.)
Sorry, I misread! Strike this line out in my message!
Am 27.01.2012 03:27, schrieb François Pinard:
Andreas Röhlerandreas.roeh...@online.de writes:
started a Blueprint delivering the reasons for the kind of proceeding
tried currently
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/python-mode/+spec/pymacs
Think such a Blueprint might be a good place for
Am 27.01.2012 04:12, schrieb François Pinard:
Andreas Röhlerandreas.roeh...@easy-emacs.de writes:
[...] we should let the user decide, what features to use: ipython or
not, pdbtrack or pydb, which completion, refactoring, which checks and
tests etc.
As a general principle, users should have
Am 27.01.2012 05:44, schrieb François Pinard:
Andreas Röhlerandreas.roeh...@online.de writes:
(add-to-list 'load-path d:/somewhere)
(autoload 'python-mode python-mode Python Mode. t)
make sure python-mode.el is earlier in path than python.el
Does add-to-list do that?
Good question.
11 matches
Mail list logo