Re: [Python-projects] "maximum recursion depth exceeded" messages

2010-02-17 Thread Sylvain Thénault
On 16 février 02:07, Edward K. Ream wrote: > QQQ > I haven't seen any updates on the "maximum recursion depth exceeded" bug > recently. Any word on whether the developers have reproduced it or when it > might be fixed? > > It's still broken in pylint 0.19.0 and logilab-astng 0.19.3 with python >

Re: [Python-projects] pylint #18860: warn on assert( a, b ?)

2010-02-17 Thread Sylvain Thénault
On 17 février 01:38, Fletcher Johnson wrote: Hi, > I'm looking into fixing this bug, but I don't have a very good > understanding of where I should start tackling this bug. Can any > body recommend a file or a set of files in the source where I should > concentrate my efforts? that's rather a new

[Python-projects] pyreverse raises “AttributeE rror: 'Subscript' object has no attribute 'infer_lhs'”

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello And another bug report. The following cut-down version of a larger script raises “AttributeError: 'Subscript' object has no attribute 'infer_lhs'” in pyreverse. As in my previous bug report, this script wouldn't work on its own, but it reproduces the error. A complete backtrace can be found

[Python-projects] pyreverse raises “KeyError : '~'”

2010-02-17 Thread Michael Hanselmann
Hello The following cut-down version of a larger script raises “KeyError: '~'” in pyreverse. As in my previous bug report, this script wouldn't work on its own, but it reproduces the error. A complete backtrace can be found at the end of this e-mail. --

[Python-projects] The Leo and Pylint Google Group

2010-02-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
Friends, It has been a pleasure to meet you all in the last few days. I do feel that we are becoming true friends, united in our interest in programming tools, and especially the supremely important tool named pylint :-) Yesterday and early this morning I have been wondering why my energy level

Re: [Python-projects] Questions and ideas about pylint

2010-02-17 Thread Nicolas Chauvat
Hello Edward, Thank you for joining forces on developing pylint. On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 05:13:01AM -0600, Edward K. Ream wrote: > I'd like to continue the discussion began in the "friendly fork" > thread, but I'd like to forget the word "fork" :-) > > Here is the link to the bzr repository for

[Python-projects] Questions and ideas about pylint

2010-02-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
I'd like to continue the discussion began in the "friendly fork" thread, but I'd like to forget the word "fork" :-) Here is the link to the bzr repository for my pylint experiments: https://code.launchpad.net/~edreamleo/+junk/new-pylint Anyone can get this branch with bzr branch lp:~edreamleo/+ju

Re: [Python-projects] Heads up: a friendly fork of pylint?

2010-02-17 Thread David Douard
Le mercredi 17 février 2010 12:00:36, Edward K. Ream a écrit : > On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Emile Anclin wrote: > > I am since november working on a branch called 'rebuild' which indeed > > creates our own nodes so that monkey patching should eventually > > disappear. > > I see a link to t

Re: [Python-projects] Heads up: a friendly fork of pylint?

2010-02-17 Thread Mads Kiilerich
On 02/17/2010 12:00 PM, Edward K. Ream wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Emile Anclin wrote: I am since november working on a branch called 'rebuild' which indeed creates our own nodes so that monkey patching should eventually disappear. I see a link to this branch at http://www.logila

Re: [Python-projects] Heads up: a friendly fork of pylint?

2010-02-17 Thread Edward K. Ream
On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 8:04 AM, Emile Anclin wrote: > I am since november working on a branch called 'rebuild' which indeed > creates our own nodes so that monkey patching should eventually > disappear. I see a link to this branch at http://www.logilab.org/cgi-bin/hgwebdir.cgi/logilab/astng/bra