Would it be possible for someone to post a compiled version of Python 2.3.5
for Windows CE? I have been having difficulties downloading eMbedded Visual
C++ 4.0.
--
Jeffrey Barish
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
Hi.
I'm having the same troubles.
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
I've always had a complete nightmare everytime I've tried to compile
something from source.
I'm sure lots of people who are competant in Python are lost in the
world of makefiles and such-like so I would like to vote for always
keeping an up-to-date binary available.
Andy Baker
On 1/6/06,
I'm sure that the pythonce project will be one of the most exiting
things happening in the future of mobile devices. I hate java, so i will
support python till the end.
But as Andy Baker just said lots of people who are competent in Python
are lost in the world of makefiles and I must say that
I'm not sure what you are trying to say. In an earlier message you replied
to my announcement of the Python 2.3.5 release, but now you seem to be
asking for a binary release. If so, have you tried the release?
Rodrigo and Jeffrey, I also invite you to download the binaries mentioned in
my
Andy Baker [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Regarding the Win32 extensions...
Is there a document that lists:
1. What does work.
2. What wont work because it's not relevant to WinCE
3. What could work given some extra work
I am particularly interesting in Win32.com.client which as I
understand
tienes razón Rodrigo!
The SF project doesn't have a home page. Perhaps one of the current
developers, bkc, kashtan, pfalcon can make it happen or delegate the
job to one of us (I can help). Do we get a space on SF to create the
home page, or do we have to host it elsewhere? If so, I note that
If you are not at all familiar with SourceForge then I can imagine that you
might have missed the binary releases. First go here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=104228
Under the package pythonce you will see a number of releases, including:
Python-2.3.5-20051223
On 1/6/06, Luke Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the web page, I agree that it would be nice to have something there
but writing web pages is not really my area of expertise or interest, so you
are welcome to write something yourself. I would prefer a wiki for the main
documentation so
SourceForge provides hosting with nice features like scripting and MySQL,
documented here:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=4297group_id=1
Alternatively, a project administrator can change the Home Page link to
point to another site.
It's not obvious to me how to edit the
That would be very useful, Steward...
I'm very interested in helping, too.
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
On 1/6/06, Luke Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's not obvious to me how to edit the MurkWorks wiki but hopefully editing
is just disabled temporarily.
I see on the 'contributors' page on the Murkworks site the following comment:
Please ask Brad for setting your username and password if you
I apologize to the developers. I've just found the CAB file.
But I will keep my ideas about the lack of human-friendlyness of the
project.
One of the important things about a future homepage is that we all users
of pythonce will be able to post samples and code in order to make the
thing more
I know CPython 1.5.2 is deprecated, but does anyone have a PythonCE
version 1.5.2 compiled for XScale processors?
--
http://www.peter.dembinski.prv.pl
___
PythonCE mailing list
PythonCE@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/pythonce
On 6 Jan 2006 at 9:59, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
tienes razón Rodrigo!
The SF project doesn't have a home page. Perhaps one of the current
developers, bkc, kashtan, pfalcon can make it happen or delegate the
job to one of us (I can help). Do we get a space on SF to create the
home page,
I think one of the issues that really hurts PythonCE is the fact that
it's not part of the mainline, so its availability and status is
always questionable.
A few weeks ago on the core python-dev mailing list, Guido weighed in on this:
My reason for wanting people to contribute ports back is that
On 6 Jan 2006 at 10:09, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
Either would be fine by me. The wiki at murkworks is already set up
and specific to this project, so easier to start with. I note however
that the last entry there was 3 years ago. Brad Clements, the wiki
admin, is one of the pythonce
Thank you for the additional information. The description of
PythonCE-2.3.5-20051223-setup.exe in the release notes says that the program
registers the .cab file and allows easy installation, but doesn't mention
that it includes the binary. Maybe that's obvious to people who know Windows
CE
On 6 Jan 2006 at 10:37, Stewart Midwinter wrote:
I see on the 'contributors' page on the Murkworks site the following
comment: Please ask Brad for setting your username and password if
you want participate.
So it seems that there is a manual process for getting approved to
edit that wiki.
On 6 Jan 2006 at 14:30, Tim Lesher wrote:
Just my opinion, but I don't think PythonCE will get much traction
unless and until someone decides to clean up the build and contribute
it back to the core. -- Tim Lesher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For sure,
and a few years back I started down that road.
On 1/6/06, Brad Clements [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Older versions of Windows CE have big incompatibability issues.
New ones, too. :-) Especially on non-PocketPC devices.
Anyway.. it would be great to get our changes back into the mainline code,
but I
don't think it's a simple problem to
Tim Lesher wrote:
I think one of the issues that really hurts PythonCE is the fact that
it's not part of the mainline, so its availability and status is
always questionable.
This is indeed the big issue. When I did the original PythonCE port
of 2.3.4 one of my big objectives was to do it as a
Hi, David:
I'm new to the list, but I'm paying a lot of attention to every message
and I must say that today the discussion got very spicy.
Can you explain a little what dealing with the political issues of
getting integrated with the mainline development means?
The Nokia implementation of
On 6 Jan 2006 at 19:06, Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich wrote:
I'm new to the list, but I'm paying a lot of attention to every
message and I must say that today the discussion got very spicy. Can
you explain a little what dealing with the political issues of
getting integrated with the mainline
This is just conjecture on my part, but having been elbow-deep in the
Python 2.3.4 code, I don't think multi-platform was much of a concern
for Python in the early days. When you don't have a multi-platform
(in this case Multi-OS) architecture in place early-on, the code slowly
becomes less and
Hello,
Thomas Heller wrote:
I cannot answer these questions, but I'll try to get comtypes working.
Are there 'interesting' COM objects on a Pocket PC 2003 to experiment
with?
I would _love_ to get COM access from inside PythonCE because I want to
be able to control Pocket Outlook. Here's an
Hi, I've been lurking on the list and playing a little with PythonCE.
Very cool stuff here. Thanks to all the developers, many thanks. I'm
not a very talented coder, yet, but am willing to do the footwork of
getting an SF page for the project. It seems to me that everyone would
want this. Are
- Original Message -
From: Stewart Midwinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: pythonce@python.org
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:49 AM
Subject: Re: [PythonCE] Tkinter in pythonce...
Rodrigo, no desesperes!
Where do you have your python
Sorry, I was mistaken about one thing though: python23.zip\\lib-tk is not in
sys.path by default (only Lib\\lib-tk is, but the Tkinter files are in the
zip so that doesn't help).
Luke
- Original Message -
From: Stewart Midwinter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luke Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Rodrigo Contreras Köbrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pythonce@python.org
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 3:28 AM
Subject: [PythonCE] Tkinter in pythonce...
Hi.
I installed the CAB file in my PDA.
The first thing I wanted to test was the GUI capabilities, so I
- Original Message -
From: Duane Blanchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pythonce@python.org
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: [PythonCE] PythonCE Digest, Vol 30, Issue 6
Hi, I've been lurking on the list and playing a little with PythonCE.
Very cool stuff here. Thanks to
31 matches
Mail list logo
