Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] MacPython v2.5 on OS 10.5 yet?

2009-06-30 Thread David Warde-Farley
On 30-Jun-09, at 9:16 PM, Leonardo Santagada wrote: I remember that Google App Engine had troubles with default python on osx. Also there was probably a reason for python versions 2.5.2, 2.5.3 and 2.5.4 be released (and you could look on the changelog). I would say that if none of the bugs

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] MacPython v2.5 on OS 10.5 yet?

2009-06-30 Thread Leonardo Santagada
On Jun 30, 2009, at 7:13 PM, DavidW wrote: On http://www.python.org/download/mac/ we read Python comes pre-installed on Mac OS X, but due to Apple's release cycle, it's often one or even two years old. The overwhelming recommendation of the "MacPython" community is to upgrade your Pytho

[Pythonmac-SIG] MacPython v2.5 on OS 10.5 yet?

2009-06-30 Thread DavidW
On http://www.python.org/download/mac/ we read Python comes pre-installed on Mac OS X, but due to Apple's release cycle, it's often one or even two years old. The overwhelming recommendation of the "MacPython" community is to upgrade your Python by downloading and installing a newer versio

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Cameron Simpson
On 30Jun2009 10:11, Dan Ross wrote: | I'm not sure I understand what you mean. | I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't | think availability of packages is a concern. | Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"? Yeah. You mean "package" == "python module", y

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread genemartin
Thanks but I do not want MacPorts or fink, I want to do it myself with only the tools of mac os x -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Fink-vs-MacPorts-vs-Framework-tp24271594p24278207.html Sent from the Python - pythonmac-sig mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Leonardo Santagada
On Jun 30, 2009, at 2:50 PM, genemartin wrote: My experience shows me that using fink or macports with python framework create problems with version mismatches and library duplication. So now, I only use the framework because i want to learn. With a little patience and trying a lot (wit

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Trying to use appscript need some help

2009-06-30 Thread has
Jan Erik Moström wrote: I'm trying to learn how to use appscript but I don't understand what I'm missing. I want to read photo info from iPhoto and have things working ... partly [...] # set ptitle to date of item 1 of the selection # app(u'iPhoto').selection.items[1].date.get() pri

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread genemartin
My experience shows me that using fink or macports with python framework create problems with version mismatches and library duplication. So now, I only use the framework because i want to learn. With a little patience and trying a lot (with the help of google), I gradually install what I want,

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Dan Ross
That makes a great deal of sense. I tried to mess with pygame at one time, but as you stated, it was such a pain to build I gave up. Leonardo Santagada wrote: On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can certainly add any packages I like to my

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Kevin Walzer
Leonardo Santagada wrote: On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't think availability of packages is a concern. Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"? Pygame for

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Bill Janssen
Dan Ross wrote: > I currently use a Framework of 2.6.2 for my Python work but I always see a > lot of posts about using Fink or MacPorts builds. > > Could anyone shed some light on why they use these rather than a Framework? > > Advantages/disadvantages? I think the big reason is that they are

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Installing Pygame

2009-06-30 Thread Bill Janssen
Dav Clark wrote: > On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:07 PM, Bill Janssen wrote: > > > I don't see any pygame downloads for 10.4, so I wouldn't try to use it > > till I had some understanding of how to build it from scratch. > > From Macintosh section on http://pygame.org/download.shtml > > "These are pack

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Leonardo Santagada
On Jun 30, 2009, at 12:11 PM, Dan Ross wrote: I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't think availability of packages is a concern. Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"? Pygame for example, that is a pain

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Dan Ross
I'm not sure I understand what you mean. I can certainly add any packages I like to my Framework build so I don't think availability of packages is a concern. Unless I'm misinterpreting the term "packages"? On Tue, June 30, 2009 8:11 am, Alexandre Quessy wrote: > Hi ! > Seems to me there are a l

Re: [Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Alexandre Quessy
Hi ! Seems to me there are a lot of python packages that are available through the MacPorts. In the built-in framework, there are only a few basic packages. Fink gives the same benefits than MacPorts, but there might be fewer packages available though it than through MacPorts. That's why I use MacP

[Pythonmac-SIG] Fink vs MacPorts vs Framework

2009-06-30 Thread Dan Ross
I currently use a Framework of 2.6.2 for my Python work but I always see a lot of posts about using Fink or MacPorts builds. Could anyone shed some light on why they use these rather than a Framework? Advantages/disadvantages? Thanks, Dan ___ Pythonm