quot;Erik
> > Skultety" , "Alex Bennée" ,
> > "Wainer Moschetta" ,
> > "QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> > , "Willian Rampazzo"
> > , "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe
> >
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 04:41:38PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/27/20 4:28 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:51:36 +0200
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/27/20 7:12 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:28:21 +0200
> > > > Philippe
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 16:41:38 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/27/20 4:28 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >
> > What I mean is: would you blame such a developer for *not* having a
> > machine himself/herself that he/she can try to reproduce the
> > failure? And would you consider a "Raspberry
On 4/27/20 4:28 PM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:51:36 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
On 4/27/20 7:12 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:28:21 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
[...]
In some cases custom runners are acceptable. These runners won't be
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 12:51:36 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 4/27/20 7:12 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:28:21 +0200
> > Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> [...]
> >> In some cases custom runners are acceptable. These runners won't be
> >> "gating" but can post
On 4/27/20 7:12 AM, Cleber Rosa wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 23:28:21 +0200
Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
[...]
In some cases custom runners are acceptable. These runners won't be
"gating" but can post informative log and status.
Well, I have the feeling that some people maintaining those
On Mon, 2020-04-27 at 01:24 -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:57:46 +0200
> Erik Skultety wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 11:28:21PM +0200, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
> > wrote:
> > > Thanks to insist with that point Daniel. I'd rather see every
> > > configuration reproducible,
t; ,
> > > "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , "QEMU
> > > Developers" , "Willian Rampazzo"
> > > , "Alex Bennée" ,
> > > "Eduardo Habkost" Sent: Thursday, April 23,
> > > 2020 1:13:22 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH
gt; > > Skultety" , "Alex Bennée"
> > > > > , "Wainer Moschetta"
> > > > > , "QEMU Developers"
> > > > > , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> > > > > , "Willian Rampazzo"
> > &
"QEMU Developers" ,
> >>> "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta" , "Willian
> >>> Rampazzo" , "Cleber Rosa"
> >>> , "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" ,
> >>> "Eduardo Habkost" Sent: Tuesday, April 21,
> >
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 18:50:47 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 18:37, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > We're already using the shared x86 runners, but with a different
> > goal. The goal of the "Gating CI" is indeed to expand on non-x86
> > environments. We're in a "chicken and egg"
On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:30 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> > > To: "Cleber Rosa"
[...]
> > Hi Daniel,
> >
> > We're already using the shared x86 runners, but with a different goal. The
> > goal of the "Gating CI" is indeed to
> > "Beraldo Leal" , "Erik Skultety" ,
> > "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
> > , "Wainer Moschetta" , "Markus
> > Armbruster" , "Wainer dos
> > Santos Moschetta" , "QEMU Developers"
> > , "Wil
> > > "QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos
> > > > Moschetta" , "Willian Rampazzo"
> > > > , "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe
> > > > Mathieu-Daudé" , "Eduardo
> > > > Habkost&
uot;Erik
Skultety" , "Alex Bennée" , "Wainer
Moschetta" ,
"QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
, "Willian Rampazzo"
, "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé"
, "Eduardo
Habkost"
Sent: Tuesday, April 21,
On Thu, 23 Apr 2020 at 18:37, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> We're already using the shared x86 runners, but with a different goal. The
> goal of the "Gating CI" is indeed to expand on non-x86 environments. We're
> in a "chicken and egg" kind of situation, because we'd like to prove that
> GitLab CI will
dé"
> , "Wainer Moschetta" , "Markus
> Armbruster" , "Wainer dos
> Santos Moschetta" , "QEMU Developers"
> , "Willian Rampazzo"
> , "Alex Bennée" , "Eduardo
> Habkost"
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2020
quot;Erik
> > Skultety" , "Alex Bennée" ,
> > "Wainer Moschetta" ,
> > "QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> > , "Willian Rampazzo"
> > , "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe
> >
ot; ,
> "QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> , "Willian Rampazzo"
> , "Cleber Rosa" , "Philippe
> Mathieu-Daudé" , "Eduardo
> Habkost"
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2020 8:53:49 AM
> Subject: Re: [
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020 at 16:33, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
> > I think we should start by getting the gitlab setup working
> > for the basic "x86 configs" first. Then we can try adding
> > a runner for s390 (that one's logistically easiest because
> > it is a project machine,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2020 at 05:33:01PM +0100, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Peter Maydell writes:
>
> > On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >>
> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:29:32AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> > Ah, I see. My assumption was that this was all stuff that you were
>
Peter Maydell writes:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:29:32AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> > Ah, I see. My assumption was that this was all stuff that you were
>> > working on, so that I would then be able to test that it worked correctly,
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 14:13, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:29:32AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > Ah, I see. My assumption was that this was all stuff that you were
> > working on, so that I would then be able to test that it worked correctly,
> > not that I would need to do
On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 09:29:32AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 04:59, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> > Yes, that did the trick and I can now see the configuration. What I can
> > *not* see is any "Specific Runner" configured. So maybe:
> >
> > 1) The documentation I included is
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 04:59, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> Yes, that did the trick and I can now see the configuration. What I can
> *not* see is any "Specific Runner" configured. So maybe:
>
> 1) The documentation I included is not clear enough about the fact that
> setup steps need to be done on a
"QEMU Developers" , "Wainer dos Santos Moschetta"
> , "Willian Rampazzo"
> , "Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" , "Eduardo
> Habkost"
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 10:57:30 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI
>
> On Mon, 16
On Mon, Mar 16, 2020 at 4:24 PM Alex Bennée wrote:
>
>
> Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:36:11PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >> The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
> >> summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
> >> simpler
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 12:26, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> About the runners and the fact that the job is stuck without them,
> the message seems straightforward enough, but I can't get to the
> project configuration to look at the registered runners with my
> current permissions (set as "developer").
Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:36:11PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>> The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
>> summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
>> simpler version should be attempted first.
>>
>> Changes from the RFC
quot;
> , "Thomas Huth" , "Wainer dos Santos
> Moschetta" , "Erik
> Skultety" , "Willian Rampazzo" ,
> "Wainer Moschetta"
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 8:12:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI
>
> On Mon,
, "Erik Skultety"
> , "Wainer Moschetta" , "Wainer dos
> Santos Moschetta"
> , "Willian Rampazzo" , "Philippe
> Mathieu-Daudé" ,
> "Beraldo Leal"
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 8:38:07 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEM
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 03:36:11PM -0400, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
> summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
> simpler version should be attempted first.
>
> Changes from the RFC patches[2] accompanying the RFC document:
On Mon, 16 Mar 2020 at 12:04, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> A few possible reasons come to my mind:
>
> 1) It usually takes a few seconds after the push for the pipeline to
>
> 2) If you've pushed to a repo different than gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu,
>you'd have to tweak the project ID
quot;
> , "Thomas Huth" , "Wainer dos Santos
> Moschetta" , "Erik
> Skultety" , "Willian Rampazzo" ,
> "Wainer Moschetta"
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 8:26:46 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI
>
>
>
>
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 22:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> The quick answer is:
>
> $ git push g...@gitlab.com:qemu-project/qemu.git my-branch:staging
So I did this bit...
> Once that push happens, you could use:
>
> $ contrib/ci/scripts/gitlab-pipeline-status --verbose --wait
...but this script
quot;
> , "Thomas Huth" , "Wainer dos Santos
> Moschetta" , "Erik
> Skultety" , "Willian Rampazzo" ,
> "Wainer Moschetta"
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 7:57:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] QEMU Gating CI
>
> O
On Fri, Mar 13, 2020 at 01:55:49PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 22:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:00:42PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > > OK, so my question here is:
> > > * what are the instructions that I have to follow to be
> > > able to
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 22:16, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:00:42PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > OK, so my question here is:
> > * what are the instructions that I have to follow to be
> > able to say "ok, here's my branch, run it through these tests,
> > please" ?
>
> The
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 10:00:42PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 19:36, Cleber Rosa wrote:
> >
> > The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
> > summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
> > simpler version should be attempted first.
>
On Thu, 12 Mar 2020 at 19:36, Cleber Rosa wrote:
>
> The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
> summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
> simpler version should be attempted first.
OK, so my question here is:
* what are the instructions that I have to
The idea about a public facing Gating CI for QEMU was lastly
summarized in an RFC[1]. Since then, it was decided that a
simpler version should be attempted first.
Changes from the RFC patches[2] accompanying the RFC document:
- Moved gating job definitions to .gitlab-ci-gating.yml
- Added info
41 matches
Mail list logo
