On 1/19/22 12:05, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 1/16/22 17:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
32bit so do it for both SLOF and
Hi,
I mainly focus on 'ppc64el' on which Debian 11 installs well.
I'm pretty sure I've not tried Debian 11 on 'ppc64' (i.e. be) with qemu.
Even less on 'powerpc' (i.e. 32b).
Now I know that powerpc has a different bootloader installation process
compared to ppc64* in Debian, but it's converging
On 1/16/22 17:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
This should not cause behavioral change
On Wed, 19 Jan 2022 at 04:03, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/17/22 03:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >>
> >> "PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
> >> "8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined
On 1/17/22 03:45, Peter Maydell wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
This should not cause behavioral
[ Adding Fred ]
On 1/18/22 09:30, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 17/01/2022 14:52, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Initially, I installed a debian11 ppc64 on a QEMU mac99/970 machine.
Something went wrong with the bootloader at installation and I was
stuck with memory boot. I didn't manage to restore a
On 17/01/2022 14:52, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Initially, I installed a debian11 ppc64 on a QEMU mac99/970 machine.
Something went wrong with the bootloader at installation and I was
stuck with memory boot. I didn't manage to restore a decent boot
setup even after that.
Interesting. I had a
On 1/15/22 15:21, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote:
On 14/01/2022 14:12, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Yes, more info here :
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/1458121432-2855-1-git-send-email-lviv...@redhat.com/
mac99+970 only boots with a 64bit kernel. 32bit are not supported because
of
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 at 07:29, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> "PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
> "8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
> 32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
>
> This should not cause behavioral change as SLOF switches to 64bit very
On Fri, 14 Jan 2022, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 1/10/22 03:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 08/01/2022 00:39, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
Alexey
On 14/01/2022 14:12, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
Yes, more info here :
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/qemu-devel/patch/1458121432-2855-1-git-send-email-lviv...@redhat.com/
mac99+970 only boots with a 64bit kernel. 32bit are not supported because
of the use of the rfi instruction which was
On 1/10/22 03:52, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 08/01/2022 00:39, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding
On 1/7/22 14:39, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 01:52:06PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
>
> On 08/01/2022 00:39, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
> > David Gibson wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
> > > >
On 08/01/2022 00:39, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 23:19:03 +1100
David Gibson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
> > Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >
> > > "PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
> > > "8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the
On Fri, Jan 07, 2022 at 12:57:47PM +0100, Greg Kurz wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>
> > "PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
> > "8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
> > 32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
On Fri, 7 Jan 2022 18:24:23 +1100
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> "PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
> "8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
> 32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
>
> This should not cause behavioral change as SLOF switches to 64bit
On 1/7/22 08:24, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
"PowerPC Processor binding to IEEE 1275" says in
"8.2.1. Initial Register Values" that the initial state is defined as
32bit so do it for both SLOF and VOF.
This should not cause behavioral change as SLOF switches to 64bit very
early anyway. As
19 matches
Mail list logo
