Hi All
The economics of this is very interesting.
As a community, we want to give something to our fellow members that they
need. It allows for our creativity in scratching an itch, and sharing that
solution. However, we can break the mold and work out a novel way to
deliver. The open-source
Hi Nyall,
First, thank you for all that you have done over the years. You have helped
me a number of times in answering questions. Open source software is an
interesting beast. There is so much donated time without compensation yet
people need to feed themselves. My first QGIS plugin was in 2016
Hi Greg,
This is a highly subjective conversation, and I am sure we can all agree on
that.
But in answer to you question about separating plugin developers from:
Core Code Developers: I guess Plugin Developers see an opportunity that is
outside core GIS Functionality - eg LandXML from Victoria
Nyall Dawson via QGIS-Developer writes:
> I wanted to kick start a (hopefully!) civil, THEORETICAL discussion about
> the role of a paid plugin marketplace for QGIS plugins.
>
> - Yes, I'm aware that plugins must be GPL, and that this makes paid plugins
> a little trickier in that they're
Join us for the biggest QGIS event of the year!
QGIS User Conference 2024 site is up: https://uc2024.qgis.sk/
We are happy to announce that the QGIS User Conference will take place 9-10
September 2024 in Bratislava, Slovakia! The conference will take place at
the Faculty of Civil Engineering at
Hi to all,
why not have a similar approach to SLYR Community Version and a "Paid"
Version?
Nyall what is your experience of managing your plugin in both ways?
Other tools as lastools and whitetoolbox have similar model, they give open
core tools in their plugins and then if you want to use them
