On 2014/12/12 23:07, Andre Joost wrote:
Installing from Ubuntugis-unstable for trusty 14.04 will give you gdal
1.11 with the desired EPSG:6148. For Ubuntu Utopic 14.10, there is
currently qgis, but no gdal package available.
I'm hoping to get gdal-bin current/latest on my ubuntu 12.04
Am 15.12.2014 um 13:17 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
On 2014/12/12 23:07, Andre Joost wrote:
Installing from Ubuntugis-unstable for trusty 14.04 will give you gdal
1.11 with the desired EPSG:6148. For Ubuntu Utopic 14.10, there is
currently qgis, but no gdal package available.
I'm hoping to get
On 2014/12/15 18:03, Andre Joost wrote:
Am 15.12.2014 um 13:17 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
On 2014/12/12 23:07, Andre Joost wrote:
Installing from Ubuntugis-unstable for trusty 14.04 will give you gdal
1.11 with the desired EPSG:6148. For Ubuntu Utopic 14.10, there is
currently qgis, but no gdal
I did check the code for crssync and it appears that only the gdal csv and
wkt files are what is checked. This makes the situation on my machines
confusing as the reference to ESPG:6148 is absent from the gdal 1.9 and yet
it is present in the srs.db on the same machine. How it got there is
Hi,
I have a fresh install of QGIS 2.6 on ubuntu 14.04.1 desktop from the
qgis.org/debian trusty main repository (installed a day or two ago)
When I set the 'filter' on Project-Properties-CRS to 6148 nothing
comes up.
On my Windows based QGIS 2.6, ETRS89 / NTM zone 8 EPSG:6148 comes up.
Am 12.12.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
Hi,
I have a fresh install of QGIS 2.6 on ubuntu 14.04.1 desktop from the
qgis.org/debian trusty main repository (installed a day or two ago)
When I set the 'filter' on Project-Properties-CRS to 6148 nothing
comes up.
On my Windows based QGIS 2.6,
On 2014/12/12 17:28, Andre Joost wrote:
Am 12.12.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
Hi,
I have a fresh install of QGIS 2.6 on ubuntu 14.04.1 desktop from the
qgis.org/debian trusty main repository (installed a day or two ago)
When I set the 'filter' on Project-Properties-CRS to 6148 nothing
Am 12.12.2014 um 16:41 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
On 2014/12/12 17:28, Andre Joost wrote:
Am 12.12.2014 um 15:21 schrieb Zoltan Szecsei:
Hi,
I have a fresh install of QGIS 2.6 on ubuntu 14.04.1 desktop from the
qgis.org/debian trusty main repository (installed a day or two ago)
When I set the
On 2014/12/12 18:09, Andre Joost wrote:
Hmmm... I remember I got and older version when I had the ubuntugis
repository, so I uninstalled that and then apt-get installed from the
qgis.org repository.
You should look for ubuntugis-unstable, 2.6.1 is from Sun, 30 Nov 2014
22:07:45 +0100
OK -
I have two debian Wheezy systems. One with 2.4 and the other with 2.6.1.
In the 2.4 instance 6148 is present and in the 2.6.1 instance it is not
Runing /usr/lib/qgis/crssync does not solve the issue. It updates various
files including
/usr/share/qgis/resources/srs.db
On the box with 2.4 there
On both boxes, the file compdcs.csv does not contain a record for
EPSG:6148. The gdal version is 1.9, not 1.11 for Wheezy and I assume the
same for Ubuntu.
EPSG:6148 is not listed on both boxes in any files in /usr/share/gdal/1.9/
on both of my machines (one with QGIS 2.4 listing 6148, one with
Am 12.12.2014 um 21:29 schrieb Trevor Wiens:
On both boxes, the file compdcs.csv does not contain a record for
EPSG:6148. The gdal version is 1.9, not 1.11 for Wheezy and I assume the
same for Ubuntu.
Installing from Ubuntugis-unstable for trusty 14.04 will give you gdal
1.11 with the desired
Andre I believe you misunderstood what I'm saying. The version of gdal does
not appear to affect the presence of EPSG:6148 in srs.db
Box 1:
debian wheezy
QGIS 2.4
gdal 1.9
ESPG:6148 in the srs.db
ESPG6148 NOT in gdal csv files
Box 2:
debian wheezy
QGIS 2.6.1
gdal 1.9
ESPG:6148 NOT in srs.db
Am 12.12.2014 um 22:14 schrieb Trevor Wiens:
Andre I believe you misunderstood what I'm saying. The version of gdal does
not appear to affect the presence of EPSG:6148 in srs.db
Box 1:
debian wheezy
QGIS 2.4
gdal 1.9
ESPG:6148 in the srs.db
ESPG6148 NOT in gdal csv files
Box 2:
debian wheezy
I don't understand it either; I'm not in any way suggesting it makes sense.
I'm simply describing how it is.
The confusing state of my machines suggests that crssync may do other
things than just use the GDAL sources to populate srs.db. Is that mistaken?
I haven't looked at the source for
15 matches
Mail list logo
