-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 05/05/2013 11:28, Barry Rowlingson ha scritto:
On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 1:06 PM, Nathan Woodrow
madman...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm starting to wonder if anything becoming a OGC is a good
thing.
What impact would this have on QGIS?
For QGIS it
Rather then making it a plugin I would prefer to see it built in like the
Python console. You can still leave it in Python but just load it like we
do with the Python console by using QgsPythonRunner and calling the module.
sounds good to me. Anyway, the code is there, so please you or
Hi Borys
(sorry for the lag - I have been on holiday last week)
Not sure how far you got with the implementation, but for the record I
would surely choose the solution 2. It is generally a good idea to
keep core structures separated from Qt model - ideally the model
should be acting just as an
Hi all,
I got a crash when I did this:
fields = layer.dataProvider().fields()
f = QgsFeature()
f.setFields(fields)
for field in fields:
f[field.name()] = QVariant(1)
Using QVariant or not.
What did I (again) did wrong
Greetings,
Denis
___
hi denis I dont have the new api completely in mind, but maybe this [0]
can help you.
[0]
http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/qgis-developer/2013-February/024278.html
Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http://opengis.ch
On May 6, 2013 11:27 AM, Denis Rouzaud denis.rouz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I got
Hi Marco,
Thanks for your reply.
I think this is suposed to work since __setitem__ is defined in the sip
file [0]
[0]
https://github.com/qgis/Quantum-GIS/blob/master/python/core/qgsfeature.sip#L62
On 05/06/2013 11:47 AM, Marco Bernasocchi wrote:
hi denis I dont have the new api
Hi All,
Last week, i could specify if a composer item had a transparent background
or not.
Today, I only have a color option for background with a alpha band value.
I couldn't have it opaque . Does alpha value works?
I think alpha tuning must be used by powerusers only. 90 % user don't know
Just a complement. I did get transparency work with alpha band, but it needed
a full refresh of composer to start working correctly.
Could we simply rename Alpha channel to Alpha channel (transparency) in
color picker, so that beginners know where to search for new forms of 1.8
options?
Régis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 06/05/2013 12:26, Régis Haubourg ha scritto:
Just a complement. I did get transparency work with alpha band, but
it needed a full refresh of composer to start working correctly.
Could we simply rename Alpha channel to Alpha channel
Yes actually I've been doing some work on the SVG library, and removed some
of the symbols I though were looking a bit amateur or old-fashioned.
But it may be that I've been too drastic, and if anyone feels we should
keep them, I'm OK with it too !
2013/5/5 Tim Sutton li...@linfiniti.com
Hi
Not sure how far you got with the implementation, but for the record I
would surely choose the solution 2. It is generally a good idea to
keep core structures separated from Qt model - ideally the model
should be acting just as an adapter to the core data structure. If we
decide to change the
Hello all,
Using Size scale field does not seam to be working with centroid fill,
both in 1.8 and master. Is this intended?
Does anyone know if there is a feature\bug ticket for it? I could not find
one.
Alexandre Neto
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Alexandre,
Might be linked to this issue: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7738 -- centroid
fill always use map unit even when set to millimetres.
Mathieu
On 6 May 2013 18:09, Alexandre Neto senhor.n...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Using Size scale field does not seam to be working with centroid
Hi Mathieu,
thanks for your answer.
I don't think it's the same problem (although I have noticed it too), as
that issue only affect master, whether the issue I'm talking about affect
both 1.8 and master, but only in centroid fill (in polygon layers), in
point layer it works well.
Not sure if
Paolo Cavallini wrote
Maybe better Transparency (Alpha channel).
All the best.
Agreed. ticket filed here: http://hub.qgis.org/issues/7771
if someone has some time to take it, that would save me lots of efforts in
the hotline period after 1.8 to 2.0 switch.
régis
--
View this message in
Yeah can we have those back. People are free to remove the svgs if they
don't like but I wouldn't remove them unless there is technical reason.
- Nathan
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Olivier Dalang olivier.dal...@gmail.comwrote:
Yes actually I've been doing some work on the SVG library,
I was asking that question on this thread :
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Ideas-on-the-SVG-symbols-library-td5040508.html#a5046486
Maybe I didn't emphasize enough on the deletion of symbols...
IMO, the most elegant solution is to keep only the good-looking symbols so
we provide a simple
Hi,
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
package from 'http://qgis.org/debian'. Reasons are following:
1. Currently there are many installation sources for the same Ubuntu
platform which is
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
package from 'http://qgis.org/debian'.
Recommended: ok.
Only: why?
I don't see the
On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged version and
package from
On 05/06/2013 07:40 AM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended and only one repository
for QGIS 2.0 on Ubuntu instead of distribution packaged
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Alex Mandel tech_...@wildintellect.comwrote:
On 05/06/2013 07:40 AM, Ivan Mincik wrote:
On 05/06/2013 03:50 PM, Jürgen E. Fischer wrote:
Hi Ivan,
On Mon, 06. May 2013 at 14:58:55 +0200, Ivan Mincik wrote:
I wonder if ubuntugis PPA could be a recommended
Hi
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Olivier Dalang olivier.dal...@gmail.com wrote:
I was asking that question on this thread :
http://osgeo-org.1560.x6.nabble.com/Ideas-on-the-SVG-symbols-library-td5040508.html#a5046486
Maybe I didn't emphasize enough on the deletion of symbols...
IMO, the
Ivan wrote:
Ubuntu distribution packages stick with 1.7 version which is
obsolete.
Alex:
That's a function of inheriting official packages from
upstream Debian.
which is a function of nobody providing the Debian packages
there..
Get newer versions into Debian and it trickles down.
I am completely on Tims side..
Cleaning up the house for 2.0 is very important - probably we would not get
any chance that soon anymore..
So I would also suggest that those old symbols can be provided as a
download somewhere for people that would really like to use old symbols
(or have to) ..
Hi All
There is an opportunity for paid work in Washington with the World
Bank Global Facility for Disaster Reduction. See original message from
World Bank below:
-
We are starting the search for a QGIS expert to join the core WB-GFDRR
team. I'm sharing a
Greetings all,
As we are fast approaching the day QGIS v2.0 will be release, I thought it
might be useful to create a public pool of nice maps showcasing some of the
new features that'll be available in v2.0. That should help writing release
notes (as visual examples of features will be readily
I think it's a great idea, hence why I have already added a map of my own :)
This could also come in handy for local user groups to do Map Walls by
having some images to pick from, full credits given of course.
I would ask though that no one upload screens shots of the application
itself. Keep
Yep, Nathan's right, let's keep this to rendered maps (via Save image
as... or the Composer). There's plenty to show there :)
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
I think it's a great idea, hence why I have already added a map of my own
:)
This could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 07/05/2013 06:46, Nathan Woodrow ha scritto:
I think it's a great idea, hence why I have already added a map of my own :)
Great initiative.
Am I right that without logging in, only one map can be seen?
All the best.
- --
Paolo Cavallini -
30 matches
Mail list logo
