Hi,
I'm agree with Nathan: merging such large code when we are too close
for release may cause some problems and bugs.
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous. If
it had been in master
Hi
The public repo has
not seen any change in the last two months
There is a raster_resampler branch in the public repo (with no change in
the last two months) and the raster_resampler branch in the mhugent
clone. In the second repo, I continously redesigned the raster layer
class. At the
My major concern with the 1.8 release is getting all the non api breaking
features from master into the 1.8 branch and keeping track of which ones
are in there. master is so fast moving that it's hard to keep
track, especially when the order of commits (and some of the ids) are
different to the
Hi
On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
My major concern with the 1.8 release is getting all the non api breaking
features from master into the 1.8 branch and keeping track of which ones are
in there. master is so fast moving that it's hard to keep
I am happy to do this if we can get a handle on which specific commits
break api (or just add thin wrappers around api breakages if possible)
- though I dont know how simple it will be to do that
Regards
Tim
Sounds like work for a special task force at the hackfest .. :)
It seems I should
Hi
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
Hi,
Could the raster resampling branch be merged for 1.8 ? The public repo has
not seen any change in the last two months so there is no added value of
keeping it apart, maybe it's time to throw it to the
Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous. If
it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if
it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user testing.
What is the performance like with large files? If I remembered correctly
Hi
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:14 PM, Nathan Woodrow madman...@gmail.com wrote:
Merging something that large into 1.8 this late makes me very nervous. If
it had been in master for a couple of months then I would say cool, but if
it's in its own branch there wouldn't have been very wide user
Hi devs,
I have made a few pull requests over on github for nice additions and
fixes to legend and browser dock, gdal and ogr providers as well as
ftools.
Most of it is pretty straightforward (except for the .zip file support
in #109) and it would be great to see in 1.8.
Can this be looked at
Hi
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Etienne Tourigny
etourigny@gmail.com wrote:
Hi devs,
I have made a few pull requests over on github for nice additions and
fixes to legend and browser dock, gdal and ogr providers as well as
ftools.
Most of it is pretty straightforward (except for
Il 21/03/2012 20:18, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
others I guess) but it is time to wrap up 1.8. Some people have asked
that we do release candidates etc and generally take things a little
slower before labelling 1.8 as 'stable'. To that end, I will aim to do
one or more release candidates before
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
8---snip---
There is the nearest thing with Lisbon in its name and GIS related -
http://www.wipo.int/lisbon/en/
Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da Universitaria?
And
Hi
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Paolo Cavallini cavall...@faunalia.it wrote:
Il 21/03/2012 20:18, Tim Sutton ha scritto:
others I guess) but it is time to wrap up 1.8. Some people have asked
that we do release candidates etc and generally take things a little
slower before labelling 1.8
Non-commercial use is authorized, the copyright has to be included
(IPTC's field is enough)
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 10:39:27 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:11 PM, MORREALE Jean Roc
jr.morre...@enoreth.net wrote:
8---snip---
There is the nearest thing with
Hi
Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da Universitaria?
Forget that idea - I realised that probably means 'avenue'...
Tim
--
Tim Sutton - QGIS Project Steering Committee Member (Release Manager)
==
Please do not email me
This could be seen as a reference to a deprecated coding language :)
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 11:17:50 +0200, Tim Sutton wrote:
Hi
Giovanni how about 'Alameda' from the street name Alameda da
Universitaria?
Forget that idea - I realised that probably means 'avenue'...
Tim
Jean Roc [mailto:jr.morre...@enoreth.net]
Enviada: quarta-feira, 21 de Março de 2012 20:12
Para: qgis-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012
Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni
-developer@lists.osgeo.org
Assunto: Re: [Qgis-developer] Feature freeze for 1.8 - 31 March 23h59 GMT 2012
Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I like the name but prefer Jean Rocs pic (actually I already made his
pic into a nice splash).
Regards
Tim
Good Choice
+1 from me as I would have choosen the same ..
Yeah 1.8 is slowly coming ;)
regards
Werner
-BEGIN PGP
Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?
if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)
cheers!
-- Giovanni --
___
Qgis-developer mailing list
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?
if we follow the HF history it should be Lisbon ;)
I thought you
Le 21/03/2012 20:53, Tim Sutton a écrit :
Hi
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Giovanni Manghi
giovanni.man...@gmail.com wrote:
Does anyone have thoughts on a nice name and logo for the 1.8 release?
Candidates might be Lisbon, Zurich, Lyon or something different?
if we follow the HF
22 matches
Mail list logo
