On 10 Jan 2013, at 12:29, Geoff Wicks wrote:
>
> It is not just on your articles I would like feedback. There has been more
> emphasis on hardware in the last couple of years. Is this what people want?
> More recently we have had more coverage on games - a largely forgotten area
> in the maga
I concur, as well as any QL related articles, feedback positive or
otherwise gives atleast an indication of something that has prompted
people in to a response. Norman, I read your Black Hole article with
interest on the DVD collection last year and likewise there are articles
about machine code,
--
From: "Norman Dunbar"
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:55 AM
To:
Subject: [Ql-Users] Quick QL Today Survey
As an author of a couple of articles in QL Today over the past 16 volumes
(That's 16.5 years - my first article was "The Black Hole
--
From: "Norman Dunbar"
Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2013 10:40 AM
To:
Subject: [Ql-Users] QL Today Website
I know I'm complaining, but I'm trying to be constructive. There is plenty
of criticism of the Quanta web people for having out of date
On 10/01/13 11:33, Tony Firshman wrote:
It is great that this very good programming keeps being done, even if
only you and George understand (8-)#
Trust me, if it wasn't for George, I wouldn't understand it either! ;-)
Cheers,
Norm.
--
Norman Dunbar
Dunbar IT Consultants Ltd
Registered addre
Norman Dunbar wrote, on 10/Jan/13 10:55 | Jan10:
Norman/
As an author of a couple of articles in QL Today over the past 16
volumes (That's 16.5 years - my first article was "The Black Hole" in
Volume 1, Issue 2 in July/August 1996!) I'm wondering, who (other than
George) actually reads my stuff?
Yes, it's me!! I always read it why I do the layout. And of course, I
find it interesting and amusing ... and I somehow miss the times where I
had time to write machine-code.
I wonder if I could do it, over 10 years without practice.
So, reading the code refreshes my mind, as I still understan
As an author of a couple of articles in QL Today over the past 16
volumes (That's 16.5 years - my first article was "The Black Hole" in
Volume 1, Issue 2 in July/August 1996!) I'm wondering, who (other than
George) actually reads my stuff?
Anyone?
Is it useful? Do you make use of it? What cou
Morning Jochen, Bruce,
On 10/01/13 10:50, Jochen Merz wrote:
Dear Norman,
not going into details here as I cannot change the qltoday website ...
Bruce took care of it but he was very busy for quite some months.
I understand fully. Running a business has to take priority over
voluntary activiti
Dear Norman,
not going into details here as I cannot change the qltoday website ...
Bruce took care of it but he was very busy for quite some months.
The MAJOR difference here compared to Quanta is that Bruce does it for
free, work and site hosting.
Current info can be found on my website
http
Morning all,
I know this is a PITA - it is to me when someone tells me my web site is
out of date - but the QL Today web site (www.qltoday.com) appears to be
quite out of date.
The latest issue page is showing Volume 16, Issue 3 March-May 2012.
The updates page appears to have 11th December
11 matches
Mail list logo
