Ive had a hell of a time recently. My W2k installation crashed at the most
inopportune time possible and nothing would induce it to run again. I
couldnt even repair or re-install Windoze, although checking the disk on
another machine didnt reveal any problems. I didnt want to wipe the disk for
Dilwyn Jones writes:
>> You could always download the headers of all messages without
>> downloading
>> the bodies. (The pop3 TOP command sends the message header along
>> with the
>> first n (specified) lines of the message - if specified as 0, only
>> the
>> header is sent.)
> This is actually
Geoff seems to be painting a picture of me burning the midnight oil every
night at the keyboard. This may be true on odd occasions but as a general
thing, this is not the case. I receive great support from all sorts of
people, some known to you - John Mason is and has been a great pillar of
str
I shall watch the show calendar with renewed interest Geoff. I wonder if
Quanta will pay committee expenses if one decides to attend?
John Gilpin.
- Original Message -
From: "gwicks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 9:46 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-u
OK, I changed the updates390m_doc slightly in the zipfile to reflect
what Marcel has just said.
I've also sent a copy to Ralf to use if and when further updates
occur.
Please note that Ralf has issued a small update to S_Edit again.
S_Edit is now at v2.26 release 63.
Dilwyn Jones
> | Unfortu
>>Quanta has noted both the quality of the site and its great
>>features.
>>Congratulations.
> My main problem with the Quanta site is that every time I have
> looked on
> it, mainly for future events I think, it has been out of date, often
> by
> over a year.
>
> I have simply given up looking
> A good way of getting rid of spam if you are getting a lot of it,
> although after the event, is to use a webmail service to look at
> what
> your ISP has waiting for you on their email server.
>
> You can then delete it there, before you download.
>
> I have found that to be effective. Althoug
> You could always download the headers of all messages without
> downloading
> the bodies. (The pop3 TOP command sends the message header along
> with the
> first n (specified) lines of the message - if specified as 0, only
> the
> header is sent.)
This is actually not too difficult to do from
Again, Tony, points noted. The Quanta site IS being worked on, but then so
are other things considered to be just as important.
John Gilpin.
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Firshman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-
- Original Message -
From: "David Tubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Today 20 years ago...
> To the King of Ur
>
> Great web page, most informative and comprehensive.
>
> Quanta should learn !
>
A fair com
Hi Geoff,
> This raises the point that I raised in my last personal statement. Two
> members of the present committee are retiring and unless Quanta gets new
> blood on the committee - and there are only 10 nomination days left - then
> it could be too small to be viable.
Seems to be the most imp
On this subject I have had good experiences using Norton anti-spam. In
December I received almost 70 spam emails a day. Norton correctly identified
over 95% of these and put them in a spam folder. It is only very rarely that
a genuine email ends up in the spam file.
I don't know how these progr
Hi Malcolm,
I also find it better to get *every* email. Better as get it rejected from
the ISP.
Cheers...Ralf R.
- Original Message -
From: "Malcolm Cadman"
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 6:08 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Dodgy Email
> A good way of getting rid of spam if you are get
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Dilwyn Jones
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes
>>Email seems to work so well for the greater part one hesitates to
>>blame the
>>system.
>Do they pattern match emails (i.e. look at it, that's spam, add it to
>the list and stop every copy of that email) or simply decide
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 at 05:46:20, Tony Firshman wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>On Thu, 19 Jan 2006 at 10:30:35, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>
>
>
>>How do these ISP spam filterings work?
>
>My main strategy though is to regularly Google for "firshman.co.uk"
Whoops - I was
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 at 14:41:06, Robert Newson wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Dilwyn Jones wrote:
>
>> One of my contacts using freeserve,co,uk is having terrible trouble.
>> Approximately 50% of her emails get filtered out somewhere in transit.
>
>That is curious. My old email address[1] w
On Sat, 21 Jan 2006 at 09:47:54, John Gilpin wrote:
(ref: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
>Quanta has noted both the quality of the site and its great features.
>Congratulations.
My main problem with the Quanta site is that every time I have looked on
it, mainly for future events I think, it has been out of
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
...
> There is an issue in particular with NTL which is causing havoc.
> The root cause is spam, and many ISPs inept efforts at pre-filtering.
>
> I remember chaos at Demon a few years ago, when someone decided to put
> them on a blacklist because one of their customers had an
Quanta has noted both the quality of the site and its great features.
Congratulations.
John Gilpin.
Quanta Treasurer.
- Original Message -
From: "David Tubbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 21, 2006 2:01 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Today 20 years ago.
19 matches
Mail list logo
