[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see, so even though pth1_ seems to be a list of
separate directories, it doesn't fully work like that, therefore
if an application asks for where to look for it's data, you can't just
use pth1_
expecting the application to see all the data even if you've setup
Dave Walker wrote:
In terms of using quotes around the filename, I get into the habit of doing
this as it allows for characters that would not be valid if used without
quotes.
If you put quotes around the file names etc in S*Basic you are effectively
defining a string variable. If you
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more question, anyone tried to develop QL apps on PC? For example
have you tried Easy68k? Currently I'm using macroassembler AS (by Alfred
Arnold).
Spookily enopugh, I donloaded Easy68K just two days ago. Haven't had a chance
to do anything with it though. It
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jan,
I also found fabulous source of documentation in QDOS Internals page.
Greets to author.
And greets to you to. Unfortunately, QDOS Internals (as featured in Linux
Format magazine number 87 I think!) is far from finished. :o(
One day soon, I hope to do more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
- Original Message -
From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
- Original Message
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007 00:18:27 -, Stephen Usher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Well,
However, it is not the fault of SMSQ/e that only commercial assemblers
can
compile it. George Gwilt has done a sterling job with GWASS and
converting smsq/e sources (and the compiler in some aspects) to
On 22 Feb 2007, at 21:34, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I want to present kind of demo for QL on the retro-computing
competition called Forever see: http://forever.zeroteam.sk
I did some graphics already on PC and it looks good (looks cool in
fact
:-). But, I need to write special screen hadler with
On 22 Feb 2007, at 21:48, Rich Mellor wrote:
The only other way would be to find someone to volunteer to convert
the
smsq/e sources (which were originally written using QMAC) so that they
could be compiled with another assembler. However, GWASL is the only
public domain assembler so
On 23 Feb 2007, at 08:58, Rich Mellor wrote:
However, the problem is that in order to do this, you need someone
with in
depth knowledge of QMAC and the new assembler to be used, and
someone who
can follow the original smsq/e sources to ensure that they are all
converted correctly.
A
This certainly looks as if it could be of interest.The issue I see is
working out what modifications would be required to allow the output to be
generated as (or converted to) the SROFF format used under QDOS/SMSQ for
object files.
If that was done it would probably be quite trivial to adapt
I have now looked at the documentation for this assembler, and it states
there that the assembler is not capable of generating linkable code. This
would I fear make it non-viable as an option for assembling SMSQ/E and also
for use with v68. A shame that as for a moment it looked exciting.
No, you don't ned smsqe to compile smsqe.
True, you need a dev device - but look no firther than Phil Borman's
SUB
device, which you can use for that.
It's on Dilwyn's website somewhere.
Yes, www.dilwyn.uk6.net/tk/index.html
SUB and DEV can both be renamed, in other words, a DEV_USE flp
Thanks for mentioning that. I also found fabulous source of
documentation in QDOS Internals page. Greets to author.
There are some useful routines in Quanta's software library,
including
a nice little routine which sets a mixed mode display...
That was one of my objectives as well. Can I
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry, John, but you are missing the point. In this case Quanta should
not
I have passed this suggestion to Committee for IMMEDIATE consideration.
John G.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:51 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff
In a message dated 23/02/2007 00:58:08 GMT
Thanks for the advice Tony,
Are you suggesting that I just leave out the brackets? Like this, or do I
have to set up something else in OE if so what?
Is there a convention to follow as regards where the reply goes? Sometimes I
get replies at the top of the original email, sometimes individual
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Gilpin wrote:
Thanks for the advice Tony,
Are you suggesting that I just leave out the brackets? Like this, or do I
have to set up something else in OE if so what?
Yes indeed. I have long since removed OE, but it *does* default the way
you
Here is a little conundrum for you.
I have a zip file which was sent to me by Jim Hunkins with QDT v 1.01 on
it. It has sat on my downloads directory for ages since v1.02 is the
current one. I was recently asked for a copy of it because the user had
only v1.00 and you have to go through v1.01
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], John Gilpin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message -
From: Wolfgang Lenerz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Comment from the Traditional QUANTA Committee
gwicks wrote :
Sorry,
Roy wood schreef:
Here is a little conundrum for you.
I have a zip file which was sent to me by Jim Hunkins with QDT v 1.01 on
it. It has sat on my downloads directory for ages since v1.02 is the
current one. I was recently asked for a copy of it because the user had
only v1.00 and you
Hi,
To be fair about this discussion - see John's reply to my question about
whether Quanta could buy out the copyright on QMAC
Duncan
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Have finished upgrading the hardware on my PC for the moment.
Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz, 1Gigabyte RAM, SATA hard disk, Windows XP.
QPC2 3.13 achieves 141.6 bogomips (7 jobs running at time of assessment),
compared with Q60 which got 156.06 bogomips ( 17 jobs
-Message d'origine-
De : QL2K [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : samedi 24 février 2007 00:17
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : RE: [ql-users] Need for Speed
Hi Duncan,
I got a similar machine Core 2 Duo 6600 (2.4 Ghz), 2 GB of RAM - DDR2 667
And I got 149.33 at the bogomips test under
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], François Van Emelen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
I think the signal extension has to be installed before unzipping with
the 'unzip' version found on the QDT cd.
I had some problems with it and I had to modify 'qdtinst_bas too.
François Van Emelen
The signal extension is
24 matches
Mail list logo
