This certainly looks as if it could be of interest. The issue I see is working out what modifications would be required to allow the output to be generated as (or converted to) the SROFF format used under QDOS/SMSQ for object files.
If that was done it would probably be quite trivial to adapt c68 to be able to use this as one of the possible target 68k assemblers (it already understands as68 and the GNU assembler). Dave -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jan Palenicek Sent: 23 February 2007 07:25 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [ql-users] QL hardware and stuff >From: Stephen Usher >I'm sure assembling SMSQ/e on a 2GHz Athlon 64 box would be a darn sight >faster than any QL derivative. Once you have SMSQ/e compiled and onto a >suitable bootable media you can then start copying all the other applications >across on the target system, as it's now running the new OS. I am using AS by Alfred Arnold. It is open source multiplatform (windows, dos, linux, epoc...) multiprocessor (mototola, zilog, intel...etc) macroassembler. I am using it quite frequently for Z80 and 68k. AS supports 68k up to 68040. And the best thing is that it runs on Psion PDAs. This assembler might be easily ported to QDOS/SMSQ. It is plain C, compiling under C68 should work. http://john.ccac.rwth-aachen.de:8000/as/ _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm _______________________________________________ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
