Now there are sources available for SMSQE for Gwass there is no need for Qmac.
Anyway it is easier assembling SMSQE with George's tools than it is using the
official method.
Therefore unless you do not have access to a 68020+ machine or emulator it
only makes life difficult to use Qmac.
So the
It seems far better to improve the
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinclair_QL
than create our own which will not be so easily found.
There is probably plenty of scope to open up specialist pages to elaborate on
the basic information and add extra sections to include an
Well as usual there are two camps here - one that thinks we should have a
centralised QL resource, and one that thinks we should just tag it all
onto the Wikipedia.
I don't really mind which path is followed, so long as plenty of people
are willing to contribute and upload all of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Sadler wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2007 08:52, Tony Firshman wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinclair_QL
Does http://www.rwapadventures.com/ql_wiki/ offer any better features?
Is there any sense it producing two?
Unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rich Mellor wrote:
Well as usual there are two camps here - one that thinks we should have a
centralised QL resource, and one that thinks we should just tag it all
onto the Wikipedia.
Surely the wikipedia *is* the centralised resource. I
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:55:29 +0100, Tony Firshman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
John Sadler wrote:
On Saturday 07 April 2007 08:52, Tony Firshman wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sinclair_QL
Does
At 09:55 14/04/2007, you wrote:
However a Google search for QL wiki already throws up Rich's one as #1
along with our chats here. The first QL wikipedia link is way down
and is The Philips QL, an induction lighting system by Philips is
above Sinclair!
I imagine Google takes date of the page
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
at the
moment, it looks as though I should close down the QL wiki on my own site,
as there have only been contributions by myself, Dilwyn and Jimmy.
And me ! Check out DJToolkit on the Software page, plus DJC and Dilwyn Jones -
I did all of those :o)
(I'll bet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but not many people are coming forward to say which they would
rather use !!
I vote for Rich's new one over Wikipedia. We can keep it relevant and all we
have to do is put an external link on the Wikipedia one at each and every
available opportunity.
Cheers,
Rich,
I don't know why, but the link to Dilwyn's web site on the DJToolkit (software
utility) page is trying to go to a page on the Wiki and not to an external link.
I've looked at the help page - not very helpful at all I'm afraid - is there
something better ?
I like the page format you are
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rich
Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
clip
However a Google search for QL wiki already throws up Rich's one as #1
along with our chats here. The first QL wikipedia link is way down
and is The Philips QL, an induction lighting system by Philips is
above
Re Norman's:
I vote for Rich's new one over Wikipedia. We can keep it relevant and all we
have to do is put an external link on the Wikipedia one at each and every
available opportunity.
I vote for Norman's vote for Rich's proposal.
Or,plainly(!) I concur
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 17:19:22 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rich,
I don't know why, but the link to Dilwyn's web site on the DJToolkit
(software utility) page is trying to go to a page on the Wiki and not to
an external link.
I've looked at the help page - not very helpful at all I'm
I agree . . . it gives the community more control.
hitchies wrote:
Re Norman's:
I vote for Rich's new one over Wikipedia. We can keep it relevant and all we
have to do is put an external link on the Wikipedia one at each and every
available opportunity.
You misunderstand the concept here. Operating systems move on and become
more sophisticated. Most good ones move the software writers along with
them. The users buy new versions which take advantage of the new
facilities and the whole system moves forward.
If you continually make the
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 22:59:50 +0100, Laurence Reeves [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Rich Mellor wrote:
...
Agreed, but not many people are coming forward to say which they would
rather use !!
I thought quite a few people had come forward and most seemed to say
which they would rather use.
I'd
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Laurence Reeves wrote:
Wikipedia mentions me.
Sure does - I bet you put that page in, so that is cheating (8-)#
The new one doesn't. :)
Tony
- --
QBBS (QL fido BBS 2:257/67) +44(0)1442-828255
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://firshman.co.uk
17 matches
Mail list logo
