Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 1.22 - Java VM Launcher Error

2013-11-10 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: OK the java 6 version actually has some files in it compiled for java 7. try to redownload 6122 now. Downloaded and tested - now works as expected. Thanks. John ___ QL-Users Mailing List

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 1.22 - Java VM Launcher Error

2013-11-09 Thread John Hall
When I try to run SMSQmulator V1.22 (Java 6) I get the following Java Virtual Machine Launcher error message: Could not find the main class: smsqmulator.SMSQmulator. Program will exit My previous version (V1.20) works as expected. Has anyone else had this problem? John

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator 1.13

2013-03-19 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: Hi all, I've released v. 1.13 of SMSQmulator. Some bugfixes, SMSQmulator can now handle QXL.WIN files on read only devices. You should upgrade. Have fun. Wolfgang A small bug: on start-up, the new warning sub-menu item is always ticked, regardless of the setting in

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-02-13 Thread John Hall
Hi, Wolfgang. 1) The Time Correction item seems to invoke the Double Window Size routine. Fixed in 1.04. Confirmed. 2) The WIN drive warnings settings in the .INI file are not reflected in the state of the Warnings sub-menu items. Fixed (due to change from QXL to win) Yes, the

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator

2013-02-12 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang, There seem to be some problems with the Config menu of the final version of V1.03: 1) The Time Correction item seems to invoke the Double Window Size routine. 2) The WIN drive warnings settings in the .INI file are not reflected in the state of the Warnings sub-menu items. 3) The

Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator DATE$

2013-01-23 Thread John Hall
I can confirm that for V1.01 of SMSQmulator the SMSQ/E time matches the XP Pro time. Thanks! John - Original Message - From: Wolfgang Lenerz w...@scp-paulet-lenerz.com To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 1:17 PM Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] SMSQmulator DATE$ During

[Ql-Users] SMSQmulator DATE$

2013-01-22 Thread John Hall
Has anyone else noticed a time offset between the host OS time and the SMSQ/E time? My SMSQ/E time is +2 hours (running on XP Pro SP3 with JRE6 Update 32 as a limited user)... John ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [Ql-Users] C68 from 1994?

2010-12-16 Thread John Hall
Peter Graf wrote: does someone still have C68 binaries and libs from around 1994? A private email with ZIP-file(s) would be great. ... or better: Does someone still have the PDQ C compiler? I have a PDQ-C floppy which seems to still be readable. The files are dated 30/09/1989 and QPC2 was

Re: [Ql-Users] QXL.WIN internal format?

2008-04-25 Thread John Hall
Hi, Norman. Ok, 0-1-2-3 but when we get to C-D-E-F-$. What's going on here? Is this sequence telling me that the map groups (of 4 sectors each) 0 through $F are all linked in a chain belonging to whichever file has file_id 1 and that block group $10 is the final one in the file? Almost

Re: [Ql-Users] News Editor

2008-04-16 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: At this weekend's Quanta AGM, I was voted onto the committee and have been asked to be News Editor. Hmm... should we offer our congratulations or our commiserations? :-) Watch out for those committee meetings! John ___

Re: [Ql-Users] Archive protection

2007-07-27 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: Anybody know how to unlock or convert the object program to allow it to be loaded into standard Archive and saved as a _prg file? A special version of Archive was supplied as part of the Run Time Module package that provides some additional features (like the m/c interface

Re: [ql-users] QLer ages

2006-09-14 Thread John Hall
Malcolm Cadman wrote: Another one approaching the big 60 ... now the new 50 ... :-) 43, going on 21 :-) Looking forward to Byfleet... John ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

[ql-users] QPC2 V3.31 Pointer Problem

2006-02-08 Thread John Hall
Help! The QPC2 pointer (via both the mouse and the cursor keys) on my Windows XP desktop has become v... e... r... y... sluggish! Since the QL2005 show I've been using QPC2 exclusively on my Windows 2000 laptop without any problems. However, yesterday I needed to run one of my little SBasic

Re: [ql-users] QPC2 V3.31 Pointer Problem

2006-02-08 Thread John Hall
Per Witte wrote: John Hall writes: Help! The QPC2 pointer (via both the mouse and the cursor keys) on my Windows XP desktop has become v... e... r... y... sluggish! The only time I get this behaviour is when Windoze is printing to the parallel port. Then Qpc2 becomes unusable

Re: [ql-users] The QL is an adult computer conference

2005-11-01 Thread John Hall
John Gilpin wrote: Thanks Tarquin for your thoughts on the weekend, you've set the ball rolling. Has anyone else any comments to make? If it's been said before, then say it again so we know who feels which way about it. I personally enjoyed every minute of it - Great pictures Tony -

Re: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software/Undelete

2005-05-22 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: Tony Tebby did at one stage provide a couple of qxl.win checking and recovery programs written in SBASIC (drvlink and drvcheck or some such names) don't know if those are still supplied and indeed if they work on current systems. DRVLNK (the one that performs various

Re: RE: [ql-users] Digital Precision Software

2005-05-17 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: Stuart - I could probably get a free WANTED ad into QL Today magazine for you (if publisher Jochen Merz agrees and space permits) to see if anyone wishes to sell their copy of the DP bundle. Let me know if you'd like to try this. Of course, anyone who did sell or

Re: [ql-users] Hove Show and AGM

2005-04-19 Thread John Hall
John Southern wrote: Off the top of my head, that's most of what I can remember, anyone else remember anything else important to mention? Not important, but I also stood down from the Quanta committee and Sarah Gilpin became the secretary of Quanta ;-) ... and both special resolutions

Re: [ql-users] Hove Workshop

2005-04-10 Thread John Hall
Roy Wood wrote: Re. the flyer for Hove, what (if anything) is happening on Saturday 16th? Nothing is planned as such but Jochen, Bernd and Marcel will arrive on Saturday so I could arrange a meal of some kind. Need to know how many people would like to attend a meal so I can book. Ah,

[ql-users] Hove Workshop

2005-04-09 Thread John Hall
Re. the flyer for Hove, what (if anything) is happening on Saturday 16th? John ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] Quanta AGM

2005-04-01 Thread John Hall
Geoff Wicks wrote: I was surprised that there had been no comment re. the special resolutions - I think that the new clauses 5.3 - 5.6 are a very bad idea and will be voting against the resolution. (If I was a conspiracy theorist I might read something into the fact that they are not

Re: [ql-users] Fw: RE:Quanta AGM

2005-03-31 Thread John Hall
John Gilpin wrote: Special Resolution Number 1. Cutting out the wording regarding how the various paragraphs will be renumbered, this resolution boils down to in order to improve the balance between continuity and refreshment of the Quanta committee it is suggested that no member shall

Re: [ql-users] Quanta AGM

2005-03-29 Thread John Hall
Tarquin Mills wrote: Questions. 1. What would Geoff Wicks do differently as leader? 2. Why should I approve Special Resolution 2 when they can have enough members by co-opting? 3. Why should I approve SP1 when it stops the top posts changing democratically (new clause 5.3), and the

Re: [ql-users] Pointer Environment and TK II

2005-01-22 Thread John Hall
Roy Wood wrote: I have just done a little test here with a standard QL, twin floppies and a Gold Card. No software loaded. Without TKII MAKE_DIR FLP1_TEST gives bad name - nothing happens. Load TKII from the Gold Card MAKE_DIR FLP1_TEST creates a directory I would say that is

Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-12 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: How do you find this string? Have you tried finding the command string from a QLibbed prog other than with the QLib internal CMD$ command? The problem is that once you get to the stage where your keyword will be invoked, A5 will point to who knows what (in fact, the

Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-12 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: I look forward to it, and I don't really care how it's written as long as my little new programs can do something like: Careful, Dilwyn - that's the sort of attitude that made Windows what it is today! One of the advantages of SMS* being under the control of one person was

Re: Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-12 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: Aarrgghhh. Forget I ever said that Said what? :-) John ___ QL-Users Mailing List http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm

Re: [ql-users] I'm home, dear.

2005-01-11 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: There has been some talk on this list about some form of currrent directory or home directory for programs that are being executed. As far as I understand it, the purpose of such a directory is to give the program the name of the directory from which the file was

Re: [ql-users] Colour Mode from QPC2

2005-01-04 Thread John Hall
Malcolm Cadman wrote: Yes, that is the logic of it. It clears the existing screen first - which is 800x600. Then reduces the windows to a next to nothing size - which meant to prevent a crash. Then sets a 'High Colour' mode ( relatively speaking as it only has 256 colours ). Then makes

Re: [ql-users] Launchpad-was Q60 Blues

2005-01-03 Thread John Hall
Malcolm Cadman wrote: At present I have configured Launchpad to be extremely useful on my QPC2 system. Could you please tell me how to find the be extremely useful configuration option in Launchpad (and, indeed, in all my other software)? :-) OK ... you got me there, John. Explain

Re: [ql-users] Resolutions

2005-01-03 Thread John Hall
Roy Wood wrote: And, of course, the QUBIDE firmware was based on the Rebel code, albeit heavily modified by Phil Borman... I had mentioned that and that was why I wanted the other information. I had a browse through my QL Product Information file this morning (while listening to the cricket

Re: [ql-users] Colour Mode from QPC2

2005-01-03 Thread John Hall
Malcolm Cadman wrote: 100 REMark boot_colour for Win - Malcolm Cadman - update January 2005 120 REMark Set up for High Colour mode 130 REMark Set Ink colour White and Paper colour Black for 3 QL Window channels 140 icol=7 : pcol=0 150 INK#0,icol : INK#1,icol : INK#2,icol 160 PAPER#0,pcol

Re: [ql-users] Resolutions

2005-01-02 Thread John Hall
Roy Wood wrote: I do have a second request for information for the second article in the series. This will deal with Hard drives and their uses. I have a series of questions : 1. when did the Rebel Hard drive come out and what was it? 2. When did the Falkenberg Interface come out ? Does

Re: [ql-users] Launchpad-was Q60 Blues

2005-01-02 Thread John Hall
Malcolm Cadman wrote: At present I have configured Launchpad to be extremely useful on my QPC2 system. Could you please tell me how to find the be extremely useful configuration option in Launchpad (and, indeed, in all my other software)? :-) John

Re: [ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2005-01-01 Thread John Hall
Marcel Kilgus wrote: 1) The empty device name loose items in the Source/Destination Directory window are solid black rather than a white/green stipple That's the Shaded area colour. Hmm... when I change things via QCoCo, it appears to pick up the App Win paper colour instead! 2) The

Re: [ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2005-01-01 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: If there will be other applications using these two, I will update QCoCo. One (small) thing I've noticed while messing about with the palette colours - if you hit the SAVE_TH item and then ESCape from the File Select window, the item text changes to save. Also, the About

Re: [ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2005-01-01 Thread John Hall
Marcel Kilgus wrote: Hmmm, doesn't look like shaded area can be separately set in QCoco. Probably because this QPAC2 menu is the only application that made ever use of it. Yes, I'd come to the same conclusion after saving and comparing a couple of before and after palettes. However, when I

Re: [ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2005-01-01 Thread John Hall
Wolfgang Uhlig wrote: No, I'm not talking about QCoCo but the QPAC2 action confirmation window, which is a little bit more buried and complicated. Okay, I confused the writer of this (also had a long night last night ;:) But even so, John could set the two colours to something he likes

[ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2004-12-31 Thread John Hall
Has anyone else tried to set up the system palette to mimic the old black/green colourway? I have created what seems like a sensible theme using QCoCo but when I load it, Files V1.26 (QPac2 V1.42) exhibits the following behaviour: 1) The empty device name loose items in the Source/Destination

Re: [ql-users] QPac2 Colourways vs System Pallete

2004-12-31 Thread John Hall
John Hall wrote: Has anyone else tried to set up the system palette to mimic the old black/green colourway? Oops! Before someone sets off on a wild goose chase, I've now checked my old QPCII set-up and reminded myself that what I'm actually trying to achieve is the equivalent

Re: [ql-users] Detecting GD2 - revisited

2004-12-21 Thread John Hall
Marcel Kilgus wrote: My fault. 3.08 was QPC only (as, so far, is 3.09, which is not been released yet). So 3.07 should actually be the current version. I was wondering why 3.08 had not appeared on the web-site :-) How will 3.08 (and 3.09 if it remains QPC-only) be treated in the version

Re: [ql-users] Whither or Wither ?

2004-12-13 Thread John Hall
John Taylor wrote: The EMC directive failed to determine what levels were acceptable and which were not. If a complaint was lodged then the courts would decide based on that one item only. ie. The acceptable level would be related to what use would be made of the item, so that a

Re: [ql-users] Whither or Wither ?

2004-12-12 Thread John Hall
Tony Firshman wrote: There is no requirement to certify for Brussels. Self-certification is fine, for CE specifically. Was the rumour around at the time, emissions compliance. Sorry - do not understand the question. What rumours? Self-certification for CE is build into the rules. Nothing

Re: [ql-users] Trump Cards and FORMAT

2004-12-10 Thread John Hall
Nasta wrote: Someone said that there is a source of the GLUE20 logic floating around, I would certainly like to see it!!! As I mentioned last week, Keith gave me a copy at a semi-recent workshop (Hove, probably) which I can send if required... John

Re: [ql-users] The hardware

2004-12-03 Thread John Hall
Re. the SGC INGOT sources, Marcel Kilgus wrote: He did type them up, though I'm not sure whether it was already 100% complete back then. Perhaps somebody could ask Keith? I don't have his address. Keith gave me a copy at a semi-recent workshop (Hove, probably) which I can send if required

Re: [ql-users] Proforma Filter

2004-11-29 Thread John Hall
Per Witte wrote: Please keep talking! :-) Sadly, neither of the above will work as described in /this/ case as, as someone already pointed out, the trap stores the calling job's PC, and the matching rte scribbles over any PC value set in the JCB (blithly supported by the scheduler). I

Re: [ql-users] Proforma Filter

2004-11-26 Thread John Hall
John Hall wrote: I think you'll find that the JCB is only updated when a task switch occurs... When a TRAP#n is executed, the PC and SP are saved on the supervisor stack, hence WL's earlier comment... Oops! PC and SR, of course :-) In supervisor mode, the job's SP is in the USP... Now I

Re: [ql-users] The committee

2004-11-20 Thread John Hall
Duncan Neithercut wrote: I do not want to dismiss anyone's ideas, all are welcome to me. To refine my response, the issue is not just the ideas but what comes next. Without a next any ideas no matter how good will wither. I considered your response a next without focus. Success needs a firm

Re: [ql-users] QDOS

2004-10-14 Thread John Hall
Dilwyn Jones wrote: The only other QDOS I've ever heard of was an old PC operating system, a predecessor to CPM I think, called Quick and Dirty Operating System. Don't know if that was the official name or just something someone made up about it in the same way as QDOS in Qludged early QLs

Re: [ql-users] AGM Workshop 2004

2004-04-15 Thread John Hall
Tony Firshman wrote: It was a pity the last Quanta was so incomplete (8-(# I think that's being a bit unfair to the acting editor. Pages 23 24 seem to have all the relevant info. John ___ QL-Users Mailing List