En/Je/On 2011-12-09 14:48, Marcel Kilgus escribió / skribis / wrote :
Marcos Cruz wrote:
I see a contradiction here, Marcel:
George's proposal sounds reasonable to me too, but you say probably there
won't be any more paid upgrades, what means the actual end of QPC2's
commercial life.
En/Je/On 2011-12-07 16:28, Marcel Kilgus escribió / skribis / wrote :
Geoff Wicks wrote:
I would guess that not many copies, if any, of QPC2 will be sold in
the future. That being so, it might be worth while offering Marcel a
sum of money in place of these. This could be attractive to
Marcos Cruz wrote:
I see a contradiction here, Marcel:
George's proposal sounds reasonable to me too, but you say probably there
won't be any more paid upgrades, what means the actual end of QPC2's
commercial life. If there's no comercial life left for QPC2, then I think
there's no reason
En/Je/On 2011-12-08 15:43, Malcolm Lear escribió / skribis / wrote :
I really can't believe we are still
stuck with this out of date ridiculous licence that's killing any
chance of a future for SMSQ/E.
In my opinion, that's the main point we must be conscius of: There's no future
this way.
From: Marcos Cruz
- Beside my personal use, I see no motivation for writing software for a
- commercial system (SMSQ/E) that people actually and practically cannot
use.
- There are too many free alternatives out there...
I think, the problem is, that a few very good programmers have given us
En/Je/On 2011-12-07 10:48, Daniele Terdina escribió / skribis / wrote :
You can use SMSQ/E with Q-emuLator,
I know, but you have to purchase it (the Gold Card version). Am I right?
That's what I meant. Thanks to the QLPAK format, currently Q-emuLator is more
suitable than QPC2 for distributing
If the License is too restrictive and doesn't carry with today's fast paced
information age, then what is there stopping people to go back to the
current license holder and ask it it could be changed?
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Marcos Cruz q...@programandala.net wrote:
En/Je/On 2011-12-07
Where's the like button :-) . I really can't believe we are still stuck
with this out of date ridiculous licence that's killing any chance of a
future for SMSQ/E. Surely it can be renegotiated?
On 08/12/2011 13:19, Marcos Cruz wrote:
En/Je/On 2011-12-07 10:48, Daniele Terdina escribió /
On 08/12/2011 16:43, Malcolm Lear wrote:
Where's the like button :-) . I really can't believe we are still
stuck with this out of date ridiculous licence that's killing any
chance of a future for SMSQ/E. Surely it can be renegotiated?
On 08/12/2011 13:19, Marcos Cruz wrote:
En/Je/On
En/Je/On 2011-12-05 17:53, George Gwilt escribió / skribis / wrote :
If QPC2 were freely available at no cost the difficulties of the
demo version would, of
course, disappear.
A complete freely available QPC2 (even if it will remain propietary software)
would (partly) solve the problem to
Geoff Wicks wrote:
I would guess that not many copies, if any, of QPC2 will be sold in
the future. That being so, it might be worth while offering Marcel a
sum of money in place of these. This could be attractive to Marcel
if he reckoned that it was worth more than he would get from the
Something similar would happen with a free unlimited version of Q-emuLator
(and the QLPAK format is perfect for that), but SBASIC could not be used,
because of SMSQ/E.
You can use SMSQ/E with Q-emuLator, but even in a hypothetical world where a
free Q-emuLator runtime existed, there would be
George Gwilt is having problems with his emails to this group. They appear to
be disappearing in cyberspace. I promised him I would forward this on his
behalf:
From: gdgqler
Sent: Monday, December 05, 2011 3:20 PM
To: Geoff Wicks
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] A runtime version of QPC2?
If QPC2 were freely available at no cost the difficulties of the demo
version would, of
course, disappear. How could a free version of QPC2 be possible?
I would guess that not many copies, if any, of QPC2 will be sold in the
future. That being so,
it might be worth while offering Marcel a sum
-Users] Fw: A runtime version of QPC2?
If QPC2 were freely available at no cost the difficulties of the demo
version would, of
course, disappear. How could a free version of QPC2 be possible?
I would guess that not many copies, if any, of QPC2 will be sold in the
future. That being so
15 matches
Mail list logo
