On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, at 11:07 AM, desin via Ql-Users wrote:
> hello
>
> there is a annoying bug in the screen handling with UQLX 2018(a)
> it only manifests if zoom is to 2 eg ./qm -z 2
>
> when using pointer programs like QPC2 Files and QD
> the cursor jumps to the middle of the upper left co
hello
there is a annoying bug in the screen handling with UQLX 2018(a)
it only manifests if zoom is to 2 eg ./qm -z 2
when using pointer programs like QPC2 Files and QD
the cursor jumps to the middle of the upper left corner
the versions 2012 and 2017 are ok
but the sources of 2017 are no longe
hello
there is a annoying bug in the screen handling with UQLX 2018(a)
when using pointer programs like QPC2 Files and QD
the cursor jumps to the middle of the upper left corner
the versions 2012 and 2017 are ok
but the sources of 2017 are no longer on github
any solutions ?
Greetings from Swi
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 8:04 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 1:12 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote:
> > > get the sd_demo.win from marcel
> > >
> > > edit the .uqlxrc
> > >
> >
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 1:12 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote:
> > get the sd_demo.win from marcel
> >
> > edit the .uqlxrc
> >
> > start uqlx(qm,qx,qm_x86-32) -b "lrun win1_boot"
> > press space
> > ex qd;"win1_boot"
>
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote:
> get the sd_demo.win from marcel
>
> edit the .uqlxrc
>
> start uqlx(qm,qx,qm_x86-32) -b "lrun win1_boot"
> press space
> ex qd;"win1_boot"
> move the cursor
> move the mouse outside the QD window
> try to get back to QD
>
> the sa
get the sd_demo.win from marcel
edit the .uqlxrc
start uqlx(qm,qx,qm_x86-32) -b "lrun win1_boot"
press space
ex qd;"win1_boot"
move the cursor
move the mouse outside the QD window
try to get back to QD
the same procedure
with no zoom eg -z 0 or 1
works ok
i have tried QD A,07,B.02,B.04,B,05
A further update of uQLx emulator for Linux systems is now available to
download from the Emulators page on my website at
http://www.dilwyn.me.uk/emu/index.html#uQLx_for_Linux_etc.. This is version
2018a.
In cases of difficulty remember it is also available from the backup site at
Greybeardz.
On 05/03/17 20:13, Peter Graf wrote:
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I've created a new page in the Documents part of my website, dedicated
to information about the TCP/IP stack included with emulators such as
QPC2, uQLx, SMSQmulator and QemuLator.
Thank you. Just for clairifcation: There is no TCP/IP sta
documentation on the QL scene I have found!
The correction will filter its way into my articles, just bear what Peter
says in mind until then.
Thanks, Peter.
Dilwyn Jones
-Original Message-
From: Peter Graf
Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 8:13 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> I've created a new page in the Documents part of my website, dedicated
> to information about the TCP/IP stack included with emulators such as
> QPC2, uQLx, SMSQmulator and QemuLator.
Thank you. Just for clairifcation: There is no TCP/IP stack included
with any of these emula
I've created a new page in the Documents part of my website, dedicated to
information about the TCP/IP stack included with emulators such as QPC2, uQLx,
SMSQmulator and QemuLator.
Personally, I found it hard to come across the information and examples of how
to use the facilities from QL BASIC,
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 09:29 PM, Derek Stewart wrote:
> On 21/02/17 17:18, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote:
> >> On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote:
> >>> On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017
On 21/02/17 17:18, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote:
On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote:
On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQL
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote:
> On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote:
> > On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> > A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017)
> > is n
On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote:
On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017)
is now
available.
Great news!
Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in t
On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
available.
Great news!
Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file?
Tim? Graeme? Help...
Grud
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
> >> A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
> >> available.
> > Great news!
> >
> > Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file?
> Tim? Graeme? Help...
>
Grudammit I did not spot
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
available.
Great news!
Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file?
Tim? Graeme? Help...
Dilwyn
___
QL-Users Mailing List
Dilwyn wrote:
> A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
> available.
Great news!
Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file?
___
QL-Users Mailing List
On 20/02/17 22:36, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
uQLx 2017
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
available.
Graeme Gregory has "brutalised" (as he puts it on github) the sources to
bring them up to date. New binaries are available for 32- and 64-bit x86
systems, as well
uQLx 2017
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now
available.
Graeme Gregory has "brutalised" (as he puts it on github) the sources to
bring them up to date. New binaries are available for 32- and 64-bit x86
systems, as well as ARM (6/7/8). Includes binaries r
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
>> End of 2013 Peter Graf sent me a work-in-progress version of uQLx with
>> QL_BDI support (uqlx-src-peter-17-11-2013.zip). He stated that this works on
>> his (then) recent Debian 32-bit.
>
> It doesn't work on my 64 bit linux.
The point might be 32 bit, not so much how r
Hi,
(...)
>
>
> End of 2013 Peter Graf sent me a work-in-progress version of uQLx with
> QL_BDI support (uqlx-src-peter-17-11-2013.zip). He stated that this works on
> his (then) recent Debian 32-bit.
>
It doesn't work on my 64 bit linux.
>
> Is it only me or is it true that all the old uQ
Hi QLers,
the only three Linux machines I own are my NAS, a SubNotebook and my
Raspberry Pi. While the NAS has its job to do, the SubNotebook gets dust on
a shelf, the Raspi gets at least fired up whenever I want to test a new
version of QL/E.
At work the situation is completely different, at lea
Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote:
>>in QDisk.c for the lines (around line 295) containing 'WA', 'A5' & 'B5'
>>as part of a switch statement. If your processor is a big endian one,
>>the code should work; however, if it is little endian (like the x86
>>processors), then the tests will definit
>in QDisk.c for the lines (around line 295) containing 'WA', 'A5' & 'B5'
>as part of a switch statement. If your processor is a big endian one,
>the code should work; however, if it is little endian (like the x86
>processors), then the tests will definitely fail - changing them to
>'AW', '5A'
I have some slightly modified code, and have included my working notes
below, a few tips though, use a version 3.x of the gcc compiler thats the only
way i get non segfaulting binaries, before u compile export/setenv (depending
on your shell) CC="gcc-3.x.x -m32", most versions of linux i know st
Am Donnerstag, den 24.02.2011, 13:21 -0600 schrieb Mark Martin:
> Does anyone have any patched source more recent than the publicly
> available source for uQLX at sourceforge? I've pulled that down and
> built for x64 ubuntu with GCC 4. I've fixed some trivial compilation
> issues as I went, but
Does anyone have any patched source more recent than the publicly
available source for uQLX at sourceforge? I've pulled that down and
built for x64 ubuntu with GCC 4. I've fixed some trivial compilation
issues as I went, but haven't spent more than 1 hour doing this --
ending up with a non-workin
It should be possible to install a version of Linux with UQLX on an USB stick
so it either starts up with an icon so UQLX starts in Minerva with a
reasonable size screen or boots up directly in that form.
For ease of use the TK2 toolkit should be patched so that you can Lrespr at
any time.
__
In message <4a011edb.4060...@dokos-gr.net>, Phoebus R. Dokos
writes
Hi Phoebus,
I am sure that you are the person to do something with it ... but as you
say it about having the time.
Anyway ... interesting times we live in ... :-)
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
The problem is that making a runtim
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Evening Phoebus,
>
>
Hi Norman,
QT would be a good choice for the higher level as would GTK (Qt though
just got stable bindings for mono... therefore I vote GTK -for the time
being-). Of course porting the graphics part is the least of one's
worries when porting to Windoze
Evening Phoebus,
> The proper solution for uQLx is for the graphics parts to be abstracted
> and maybe use SDL or something along the same lines, something that will
> enable native compilation under Windoze, MacOS etc.
That would most likely be QT - in my opinion of course, other opinions
are ava
Malcolm Cadman wrote:
The problem is that making a runtime version of cygwin is not entirely
straightforward as it used to be in the old days :-(
I am sure that If I sat down, I could probably find the way, but to be
honest with you I didn't have enough time as it were and didn't want to
mess with
Id be interested in such a package. Had a go with Cygwin/uQLx some
time ago but had only limited success. Getting rid of the debris was a
pain, iirc.
Per
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98
machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.
In message , Dilwyn Jones
writes
I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98
machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.
I think this is the point - without help it can't be got running if you
don't know about Cygwin environment.
As only 6 files are needed, su
I'm wondering if cygz11-6.dll is in a developer version or in in an
archived file which has to be user-expanded after download or something?
Actually, the mailing list archive shows a message from Stephen Meech on
this list back in 2004 with this exact problem. If Stephen is still on
the list,
On 04/05/2009 17:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
I'm wondering if cygz11-6.dll is in a developer version or in in an
archived file which has to be user-expanded after download or something?
Actually, the mailing list archive shows a message from Stephen Meech on
this list back in 2004 with this exact
You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like
environment: www.cygwin.com
Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to
install as I found to my cost...oh to know what I'm doing with Linux
and Cygwin :-((
Downloading everything by the sound of it!
...
Go on,
I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98
machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.
I think this is the point - without help it can't be got running if you
don't know about Cygwin environment.
As only 6 files are needed, surely it would make more sense to just p
Norman Dunbar wrote:
> Ok, Cygwin as far as I remember gives you the opportunity to do a
> download only and to save the files in a given location. That is the
> best option. It doesn't install anything.
Ok, I'll try again!
Once downloaded, yo can then run the installer again and tell it (but it
In message , Dilwyn Jones
writes
Hi Dilwyn,
I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98
machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.
These days this would be a good candidate for being put onto a CD ROM or
a Memory Stick, if the Cygwin is able to be distributed
Evening Dilwyn,
>> You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like
>> environment: www.cygwin.com
>> Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to
>> install as I found to my cost...oh to know what I'm doing with Linux
>> and Cygwin :-((
Downloading everything by
I've put the latest version of uQLx for 32-bit Windows from Phoebus Dokos
onto my website.
You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like environment:
www.cygwin.com
Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to install
as I found to my cost...oh to know what
l me what I'm doing wrong...
--
Dilwyn Jones
- Original Message -
From: "Phoebus R. Dokos"
To:
Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 2:02 PM
Subject: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32
Hi all,
just dropping a line to say that I found some time to fiddle with
uQLx-win32 and although I did not manage t
Hi all,
just dropping a line to say that I found some time to fiddle with
uQLx-win32 and although I did not manage to recompile it with the newest
cygwin, I was however perfectly able to boot it properly (again TCP/IP
is not working but I guess after Richard releases the newest version of
the sourc
Hi,
I didn't suceed to make it work on my PPC iBook. But work on Intel Mac.
If anyone have any interest to it, I can send you my XCode Project.
Just ask ;)
Jerome
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm
Michael Grunditz a écrit :
Hello
That's great ! Do you want to share the source ?
Yes, I will make a tar for it and put it somewhere. Tested only on an
Intel Macbook under 10.5
Jerome
/Michael Grunditz
2008/7/14, Jerome Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi,
Just to say that i was able to
Hello
That's great ! Do you want to share the source ?
/Michael Grunditz
2008/7/14, Jerome Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> Just to say that i was able to build, from the latest sources, a uqlx
> version that seems to run on my MacBook under 10.5.
> I have the QL screen, I can type 10 PRINT
Hi,
Just to say that i was able to build, from the latest sources, a uqlx
version that seems to run on my MacBook under 10.5.
I have the QL screen, I can type 10 PRINT "HELLO", save and load it.
But I wasn't able to run any software with lrun.
I do not have to change things in the sources, exc
Does anyone have a current email address for either Phoebus Dokos or
James Weatherley - I have a query from someone who is looking to
update the Mac version of uQLx if he can possibly get hold of the
sources. We have the emulator itself, but the current version only
seems to work on one particu
Works fine on Mandriva LE2005. The version I installed from scratch
(after much trouble and reinstalling the old c compiler from mandrake
8.2) needs X to work with 16 bits to get the right colours. This version
worked fine with X set to 24/32 bit colour.
Jeremy
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
> Seg
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote:
> Why don't we all lobby MArcel so that he makes a version od QPC
> under Linux. That's all I'm waiting for to make the switch.
For the whole 10 people who want this, 3 if which are prepared to pay
for it? Sure, I'm right on it ;-)
Wine is getting better by the day, I'd say
Knoppix 4 : segmentation fault
Ciao Omar
> I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site www.bixio60.org
> one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux.
>
> Let me know if it works .
>
> Ciao
>
> Fabrizio
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __
On 21 Mar 2006 at 16:31, David McCann wrote:
> I tried Fabrizio Diversi's compiled version (thanks for making it
> available, Fabrizio) of UQLX, but still no luck. Attempting to run qm
> just gave the error message "segmentation fault". It looks as if I shall
> have to get Wine and try QEmulator.
I tried Fabrizio Diversi's compiled version (thanks for making it
available, Fabrizio) of UQLX, but still no luck. Attempting to run qm
just gave the error message "segmentation fault". It looks as if I shall
have to get Wine and try QEmulator.
___
QL-Use
ED]>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2006 9:19 AM
Subject: [ql-users] UQLX
> I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site www.bixio60.org
> one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux.
>
> Let me know if it works .
>
> Ciao
>
> Fabrizio
>
>
>
>
Seg fault on suse 10.0
--
Kjartan
On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:19:02 +0100, Fabrizio Diversi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site
> www.bixio60.org
> one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux.
>
> Let me know if it works .
>
> Ciao
>
> Fa
I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site www.bixio60.org
one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux.
Let me know if it works .
Ciao
Fabrizio
___
Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:22:00 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
>> That produced a number of similar error messages, after removing 'regp1'
>> from the reported lines it will compile but not run:
>
> Tried issuing "make clean" before "make config" and "
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
> That produced a number of similar error messages, after removing 'regp1'
> from the reported lines it will compile but not run:
Tried issuing "make clean" before "make config" and "make"?
Marcel
___
QL-Users Mailing List
h
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:17:59 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
>> QL_files.c:1005: error: conflicting types for `WriteMdvControl'
>> QL68000.h:430: error: previous declaration of `WriteMdvControl'
>> make: *** [QL_files.o] Error 1
>
> Strange. Perhaps t
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
> QL_files.c:1005: error: conflicting types for `WriteMdvControl'
> QL68000.h:430: error: previous declaration of `WriteMdvControl'
> make: *** [QL_files.o] Error 1
Strange. Perhaps try removing "REGP1" in line 430 of QL68000.h
Marcel
__
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 03:30:40 +0100, Marcel Kilgus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jeremy Taffel wrote:
>> I didn't have any problems until I switched from distributions using
>> Xfree86 to more recent ones that use Xorg.
>
> Version 10/22/02 seems to compile and work out of the box on my Gentoo
> s
Jeremy Taffel wrote:
> I didn't have any problems until I switched from distributions using
> Xfree86 to more recent ones that use Xorg.
Version 10/22/02 seems to compile and work out of the box on my Gentoo
system (gcc 3.3.6, Xorg X11 6.8.2).
Marcel
_
Την Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:51:21 -0500,ο(η) Jeremy Taffel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
>> I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0
>>
>> --
>> Kjartan
>>
>>
>> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I've just tried
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote:
> I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0
>
> --
> Kjartan
>
>
> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc version 3.4.2 under Fedora 3.
>> The only result was was a 90KB er
I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0
--
Kjartan
On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc version 3.4.2 under Fedora 3.
> The only result was was a 90KB error log! I know there are people out
> there usi
-developers I am sure that you will
have an answer .
Ciao
Fabrizio
- Original Message -
From: "David McCann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 10, 2006 6:49 PM
Subject: [ql-users] UQLX
> I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc versi
I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc version 3.4.2 under Fedora 3.
The only result was was a 90KB error log! I know there are people out
there using UQLX, so what am I doing wrong? I tried to email the author,
but the address on the web site no longer exists.
_
71 matches
Mail list logo