Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-25 Thread Bob Spelten
Op Sun, 24 Sep 2006 17:23:14 +0200 schreef Dilwyn Jones  
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 In terms of platform, the (Super) Gold Card is common to the QL and
 Aurora, which blurs the lines a little. In terms of obtaining a
 version of SMSQ/E for your system,

When the Aurora came out there was a patch program to link the graphics  
driver into the then current version of SMSQ/E but very soon the new  
versions of SMSQ_GOLD included this driver.
So only one version is needed for QL and Aurora with GC or SGC.
But only Aurora  SGC will exploit the higher resolutions.
According to the Aurora manual the GC can only be used in the standard  
resolutions.

This will bring down the number of OS's a bit.

Now A Question.
When running SMSQ/E on a QXL in high colour mode, this takes up a lot of  
extra memory and is very slow in screen operations. The Aurora suffers  
less from this compared to running in mode 4.
Would a QXL mode 256 option give back some memory and speed?

Bob

-- 
Gemaakt met Opera's revolutionaire e-mailprogramma:  
http://www.opera.com/mail/
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-25 Thread Jérôme Grimbert
Bob Spelten scripsit::

 Now A Question.
 When running SMSQ/E on a QXL in high colour mode, this takes up a lot of  
 extra memory and is very slow in screen operations. The Aurora suffers  
 less from this compared to running in mode 4.
 Would a QXL mode 256 option give back some memory and speed?

If the screen I/O are compressed to be aware of mode 256, I would
say yes (passing 1 byte instead of 2 is still a good bandwith's
gain, as well as needing less memory for the screen map)

But you need the PC-program to be aware of that mode.

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-25 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Bob Spelten wrote:
 When running SMSQ/E on a QXL in high colour mode, this takes up a lot of
 extra memory and is very slow in screen operations. The Aurora suffers
 less from this compared to running in mode 4.
 Would a QXL mode 256 option give back some memory and speed?

Probably. Actually I thought about that, too, but after a brief look
at the protocol and the PC side of things I decided that I won't touch
that code with a long stick.

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-25 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], P Witte 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes

Rich Mellor wites:


 So that gives us the following hardware platforms:

Thanks Rich and Per.

This would make an excellent article for either QL Today ( Toady), and 
Quanta magazine.

Are you able to write this up, Rich ?

-- 
Malcolm Cadman
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread George Gwilt

On 20 Sep 2006, at 21:49, hitchies wrote:


 What am I to make of Bill's Q40,Q60, QPC2, Aurora and SGC ?
 and
 George's Atari  Aurora  Gold Card  Q40/60  QXL

Bill's five are in fact only four. The new arrival to this set of  
Operating Systems is Aurora which is almost identical with the Gold  
Card. There is only one operating system for the Q40 and Q60. The Q40/ 
Q60 operating system is for the Q40 machine and for the Q60 machine.  
In fact my Q40 and Q60 stand on top of my Super Gold Card machine  
which has aurora inside and, if it worked, would probably take the  
aurora operating system. Here the Super Gold Card machine is the  
platform for the Q40 and Q60.

Clear?

George
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 George Gwilt wrote:
 Bill's five are in fact only four. The new arrival to this set of
 Operating Systems is Aurora which is almost identical with the Gold
 Card.

 Just my few EuroCents here, but I think the Aurora version is really
 just an added graphics driver, not a new operating system platform.
Exactly what are the Aurora version requirements? Does the Aurora 
SMSQ/E graphics driver work with Gold Card AND Super Gold Card (my 
MinisQL Aurora has SGC), or is Super Gold Card the only one which 
would allow the new colour modes to work on Aurora?

In terms of platform, the (Super) Gold Card is common to the QL and 
Aurora, which blurs the lines a little. In terms of obtaining a 
version of SMSQ/E for your system, you can buy two separate versions 
though (well, OK, I know you have been giving away copies of the 
Aurora driver version).

Do you consider the QPC2 SMSQ/E to be a separate version in its own 
right, or in terms of code is it a standard 680x0 implementation 
interpreted by the 68K emulation?

Speaking purely in terms of how many different SMSQ/E's you may need 
ot consider for your various systems (leaving aside the original 
discussion about platforms), am I correct in summarising as follows:

SMSQ/E for QL + (Super) Gold Cards

SMSQ/E for Aurora + (Super) Gold Cards (same as above apart from 
graphics driver)

SMSQ/E for Atari ST-QL systems

SMSQ/E for QXL cards

SMSQ/E for Q40/Q60 (same or different versions for both machines?)

SMSQ/E as in QPC2

Oo-er...the more I think about this the more I relaise what a job 
people like Marcel and Wolfgang have in keeping all this in good 
order!

-- 
Dilwyn Jones



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 22/09/2006

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Dilwyn Jones
 What am I to make of Bill's Q40,Q60, QPC2, Aurora and SGC ?
 and
 George's Atari  Aurora  Gold Card  Q40/60  QXL

 Bill's five are in fact only four. The new arrival to this set of
 Operating Systems is Aurora which is almost identical with the Gold
 Card. There is only one operating system for the Q40 and Q60. The 
 Q40/
 Q60 operating system is for the Q40 machine and for the Q60 machine.
 In fact my Q40 and Q60 stand on top of my Super Gold Card machine
 which has aurora inside and, if it worked, would probably take the
 aurora operating system. Here the Super Gold Card machine is the
 platform for the Q40 and Q60.

 Clear?

 George
If Quanta editors are listening, there's probably scope for a little 
bit of an article here.

Seems to be the kind of thing most of us on this list would take for 
granted, but Quanta's survey experience with finding the number of 
128K QLs out there exceeded expectations and their surprise at how 
quickly their second hand microdrive cartridges went suggests we do 
need to reinforce the basics a bit every now and then.

I guess a short article on the variants of SMSQ/E and a bit about 
their differences might make a good follow up to an article I sent 
John Gilpin recently. An article about the various SMSQ?E variations 
might be best coming from those closest to it (programmers and 
retailers and registrar) but I'm willing to give it a go if nobody 
else does. Might need someone to check it before publication, that's 
the only thing. Of interest, John?

-- 
Dilwyn Jones



-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.405 / Virus Database: 268.12.8/455 - Release Date: 22/09/2006

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Rich Mellor

 Speaking purely in terms of how many different SMSQ/E's you may need
 ot consider for your various systems (leaving aside the original
 discussion about platforms), am I correct in summarising as follows:

 SMSQ/E for QL + (Super) Gold Cards

 SMSQ/E for Aurora + (Super) Gold Cards (same as above apart from
 graphics driver)

 SMSQ/E for Atari ST-QL systems

 SMSQ/E for QXL cards

 SMSQ/E for Q40/Q60 (same or different versions for both machines?)

 SMSQ/E as in QPC2


Just to muddy the waters further, you can of course run SMSQ/e for the  
(Super) Gold Cards on Q-emuLator or QPC2 on a MAC (using WINE I think its  
called).

So that gives us the following hardware platforms:
QL
QL + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
Aurora + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
QPC2 + PC
QPC2 + MAC (and Windows emulator)
Q-emuLator + PC
Q-emuLator + MAC
Q-emuLator + MAC (and Windows emulator)
Q40
Q60
uQLx for Linux
QLem for the Atari
QLAY for DOS
QLAY for Windows
QLAY  + MAC (and Windows emulator)
QLAY for Linux
QLAY 2
Atari ST with the hardware QL emulator?

Any other platforms I have missed on which we can run QL software ???

We have the following operating systems:
QDOS (various versions)
Minerva
SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card
SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card + Aurora
SMSQ/e for Q40 / Q60
SMSQ/e for QPC2
Now a SMSQ/e can run on Q-emuLator - the Gold Card version.  Has anyone  
tried the Gold Card + Aurora version?
Q-emuLator can now emulate the Q40/Q60 screen modes, however a specially  
adapted version of SMSQ/e for Q40/Q60 would be needed to overcome the  
hardware dependent features.

By my reckoning, that comes to:
18 platforms
6 operating systems (possibly 7)
-- 
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk
URL:http://www.rwapadventures.com
URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk
URL:http://www.internetbusinessangels.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Rich Mellor
Sorry - I missed off the QXL card (another platform) and SMSQ/e for QXL  
(another operating system).

On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 16:44:35 +0100, Rich Mellor [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
wrote:


 Speaking purely in terms of how many different SMSQ/E's you may need
 ot consider for your various systems (leaving aside the original
 discussion about platforms), am I correct in summarising as follows:

 SMSQ/E for QL + (Super) Gold Cards

 SMSQ/E for Aurora + (Super) Gold Cards (same as above apart from
 graphics driver)

 SMSQ/E for Atari ST-QL systems

 SMSQ/E for QXL cards

 SMSQ/E for Q40/Q60 (same or different versions for both machines?)

 SMSQ/E as in QPC2


 Just to muddy the waters further, you can of course run SMSQ/e for the
 (Super) Gold Cards on Q-emuLator or QPC2 on a MAC (using WINE I think its
 called).

 So that gives us the following hardware platforms:
 QL
 QL + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 Aurora + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 QPC2 + PC
 QPC2 + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q-emuLator + PC
 Q-emuLator + MAC
 Q-emuLator + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q40
 Q60
 uQLx for Linux
 QLem for the Atari
 QLAY for DOS
 QLAY for Windows
 QLAY  + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 QLAY for Linux
 QLAY 2
 Atari ST with the hardware QL emulator?

 Any other platforms I have missed on which we can run QL software ???

 We have the following operating systems:
 QDOS (various versions)
 Minerva
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card + Aurora
 SMSQ/e for Q40 / Q60
 SMSQ/e for QPC2
 Now a SMSQ/e can run on Q-emuLator - the Gold Card version.  Has anyone
 tried the Gold Card + Aurora version?
 Q-emuLator can now emulate the Q40/Q60 screen modes, however a specially
 adapted version of SMSQ/e for Q40/Q60 would be needed to overcome the
 hardware dependent features.

 By my reckoning, that comes to:
 18 platforms
 6 operating systems (possibly 7)



-- 
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk
URL:http://www.rwapadventures.com
URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk
URL:http://www.internetbusinessangels.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Bill Waugh

- Original Message - 
From: Marcel Kilgus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, September 24, 2006 12:07 PM
Subject: Re: [ql-users] Platforms  OSs (was month number)


 George Gwilt wrote:
 Bill's five are in fact only four. The new arrival to this set of
 Operating Systems is Aurora which is almost identical with the Gold
 Card.

 Just my few EuroCents here, but I think the Aurora version is really
 just an added graphics driver, not a new operating system platform.

Yep I knew the Aurora was graphically different ( still have one somewhere )
Unfortunately I have little time for computers of any description at present 
apart from email and Ebay ( buying dubious parts for present old motor bike 
project ).
But retirement looms in a couple of years, so I'm hoping you all continue 
until the time I can get back to tinkering, meanwhile all my stuff needs 
upgrading, might get around to that this winter.

All the best - Bill ( passive lurker ) 

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread P Witte
Rich Mellor wites:


 So that gives us the following hardware platforms:
 QL
 QL + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 Aurora + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 QPC2 + PC
 QPC2 + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q-emuLator + PC
 Q-emuLator + MAC
 Q-emuLator + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q40
 Q60
 uQLx for Linux
 QLem for the Atari
 QLAY for DOS
 QLAY for Windows
 QLAY  + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 QLAY for Linux
 QLAY 2
 Atari ST with the hardware QL emulator?

 Any other platforms I have missed on which we can run QL software ???

Atari Mono (IIRC this runs without the hardware modification)
Atari hardware emulator 1 (built by that Norwegian computer shop)
Atari hardware emulator 2 (Improved version by JMS)
QVME, the ultimate hardware emulator (actually a graphics card,I seem to 
recall) for Atari ST, STe, Mega, and possibly others
(Ive had all of them, but have now sadly forgotten the details..)

QXL I  II
Amiga
Milan
Thor16 etc
Futura?
OPD
??

 We have the following operating systems:
 QDOS (various versions)
 Minerva
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card + Aurora
 SMSQ/e for Q40 / Q60
 SMSQ/e for QPC2
 Now a SMSQ/e can run on Q-emuLator - the Gold Card version.  Has anyone
 tried the Gold Card + Aurora version?
 Q-emuLator can now emulate the Q40/Q60 screen modes, however a specially
 adapted version of SMSQ/e for Q40/Q60 would be needed to overcome the
 hardware dependent features.

QDOS Classic for Amiga and Qx0
freeQDOS or was that PhreeDOKOS ;o)
SMSQ/E for Milan

 By my reckoning, that comes to:
 18 platforms
 6 operating systems (possibly 7)

Too early to start counting!

Per 
___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Rich Mellor
On Sun, 24 Sep 2006 20:32:55 +0100, P Witte wrote:

 Rich Mellor wites:

 
 So that gives us the following hardware platforms:
 QL
 QL + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 Aurora + Super Gold Card / Gold Card
 QPC2 + PC
 QPC2 + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q-emuLator + PC
 Q-emuLator + MAC
 Q-emuLator + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 Q40
 Q60
 uQLx for Linux
 QLem for the Atari
 QLAY for DOS
 QLAY for Windows
 QLAY  + MAC (and Windows emulator)
 QLAY for Linux
 QLAY 2
 Atari ST with the hardware QL emulator?

 Any other platforms I have missed on which we can run QL software ???

 Atari Mono (IIRC this runs without the hardware modification)
 Atari hardware emulator 1 (built by that Norwegian computer shop)
 Atari hardware emulator 2 (Improved version by JMS)
 QVME, the ultimate hardware emulator (actually a graphics card,I seem  
 to recall) for Atari ST, STe, Mega, and possibly others
 (Ive had all of them, but have now sadly forgotten the details..)

Great yes I had forgotten that there were 2 Atari emulators even before  
QVME.

I never saw Atari Mono version.

 QXL I  II
 Amiga
 Milan
 Thor16 etc
 Futura?
 OPD

OPD was not capable of running QL software as far as I know although it  
was based on the QL's hardware its operating system was incompatible.   
Alas there are so few OPDs still around.

I know nothing of the Milan.

THOR and THOR XVI

Futura was never produced.


 We have the following operating systems:
 QDOS (various versions)
 Minerva
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card
 SMSQ/e for (Super) Gold Card + Aurora
 SMSQ/e for Q40 / Q60
 SMSQ/e for QPC2
 Now a SMSQ/e can run on Q-emuLator - the Gold Card version.  Has anyone
 tried the Gold Card + Aurora version?
 Q-emuLator can now emulate the Q40/Q60 screen modes, however a specially
 adapted version of SMSQ/e for Q40/Q60 would be needed to overcome the
 hardware dependent features.

 QDOS Classic for Amiga and Qx0
 freeQDOS or was that PhreeDOKOS ;o)
 SMSQ/E for Milan


Ah - I never thought about QDOS Classic (sorry Simon).

I don't think freeQDOS ever saw the light.
As I say I know nothing about the Milan - is there an SMSQ/e version for  
it?

Do we count SMS for QXL as a separate operating system.
If so we should also probably differentiate between the SMSQ/e with colour  
drivers and SMSQ/e without.
What about SMS2 - was that ever released ??


-- 
Rich Mellor
RWAP Services
URL:http://www.rwapsoftware.co.uk
URL:http://www.rwapadventures.com
URL:http://www.rwapservices.co.uk
URL:http://www.internetbusinessangels.com

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm


Re: [ql-users] Platforms OSs (was month number)

2006-09-24 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
 Exactly what are the Aurora version requirements? Does the Aurora
 SMSQ/E graphics driver work with Gold Card AND Super Gold Card (my 
 MinisQL Aurora has SGC), or is Super Gold Card the only one which 
 would allow the new colour modes to work on Aurora?

No idea whether there are any hardware limitations with plain GC.

 In terms of platform, the (Super) Gold Card is common to the QL and 
 Aurora, which blurs the lines a little. In terms of obtaining a 
 version of SMSQ/E for your system, you can buy two separate versions 
 though (well, OK, I know you have been giving away copies of the 
 Aurora driver version).

Not only copies, the sources for the Aurora driver are freely
available now.

 Do you consider the QPC2 SMSQ/E to be a separate version in its own
 right, or in terms of code is it a standard 680x0 implementation
 interpreted by the 68K emulation?

Not sure what you exactly mean here. But QPC2's SMSQ/E is definitely a
separate version in its own, as most device drivers are QPC specific.

 Speaking purely in terms of how many different SMSQ/E's you may need 
 ot consider for your various systems (leaving aside the original 
 discussion about platforms), am I correct in summarising as follows:

All in all that looks correct. Though there were some other more minor
versions, the ByteBox for example. But only a handful of people have
probably ever seen that one.

 SMSQ/E for Q40/Q60 (same or different versions for both machines?)

Same.

Marcel

___
QL-Users Mailing List
http://www.q-v-d.demon.co.uk/smsqe.htm