I have a customer who is looking for a 2nd hand QL in good condition - think he will pay around 45 pounds for it if anyone in the UK has one for sale.
Please contact him direct:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks a lot everyone.
Rich Mellor
RWAP Software
7 Common Road, Kinsley, Pontefract, West
I couldn't find my version so that is a lucky break.
Sorry.
Norman.
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
On 8 Apr 2002, at 23:00, Dexter wrote:
On Mon, 8 Apr 2002, Malcolm Cadman wrote:
Wow ! ... I guess everything in Texas is big then :-)
I don't know about that, but they say that George W. Bush is half
human, half texan.
Wolfgang
On 8 Apr 2002, at 19:59, Phoebus Dokos wrote:
Seriously now, between what I saw Wolfgang and Marcel achieving with QPTR
and EasyPTR respectively... I agree that at least ONE PTR toolkit (either)
should be in one's arsenal :-)
Oh but Marcel had the idea, not me.
It's just a question of
On 8 Apr 2002, at 14:34, Joachim Van der Auwera wrote:
-not done via a Website or FTP.
Not a safe way, sourceforge does not (always) use either, but it uses CVS.
To make this safer, change it to not done electronically, with the
exception of email or something similar.
OK, I'll do that,
On 8 Apr 2002, at 17:25, Dexter wrote:
If you resent that comment, I didn't explain it properly.
Or I didn't understand it.
Yes, Tony will make a little money from SMSQ. I doubt the resellers will -
they'll probably cover costs. I was trying to say that some of the money
should stay with
On 8 Apr 2002, at 15:47, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
probably wrong. It indicates that the provisorial license was so badly
formulated that everyone found his loophole in it and was happy.
Yes, that's another way of looking at it -so I was overly optimistic,
then.
the point is that with a
On 8 Apr 2002, at 15:52, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
don't say it will be open source then - it won't.
True.
Forget those
who have seen this as a great chance for SMSQ.
I still see it as such. You can still get the code, you can still make
changes, you can still dustribute your changes
Dilwyn Jones writes:
take on this task. I myself would be willing to do something for the
(English) manual, if wanted.
A note of caution: when I last spoke to him he said he had no English
manual for it!
I definitely have a comprehensive English manual! If Albin doesnt have one
anymore,
Wolfgang Uhlig writes:
As far as I know, Marcel will try to get in contact with Albin in order
to get him to correct
and improve some things. But even so, if there is a possibility to do
things, I am willing to
contribute in any way I can. Concerning the german comments, if there are
I've had problems with both -
never understood QPTR at all, docs were cr4p to say the least. Still got it
somewhere - unused and as far as I can see, unusable. Even some of the demos
(sprite editor) just give a no-entry pointer and hang. Not very helpful.
As for DifficultPTR, well, Dilwyn knows
-Original Message-
From: P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] EasyPtr
Fear not! The Brits can have it in the only foreign language they
understand: English!
Q. What do you call someone who speaks 3 languages ?
A. Tri-lingual.
Q. What do you call someone who
I always think the right answer was : French
-Message d'origine-
De : Norman Dunbar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 9 avril 2002 11:32
À : '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Objet : RE: [ql-users] EasyPtr [OT]
-Original Message-
From: P Witte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Subject: Re:
Nah, when I was in Paris, my wife did all the talking - she speaks it quite
well - but everyone just said 'it's ok, we speak English' :o)
Norman.
-
Norman Dunbar
Database/Unix administrator
Lynx Financial Systems Ltd.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289
...
Then there was the C68 interface - again, too 'strange' for
me to figure
out.
Maybe I'm too thik to be a programmer :o)
Nah, it's just the windows concept of programming. I never got to grips
with Windows programming on PCs or X-Windows. And as for C++ and Object
Disorientated
As
always Sir Clive was a precursor : others take advantage of his
technology.
Mergetwo C5 (4 wheels) and add a motor and you
get something that can earn money ;-)
-Message d'origine-De: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Envoyé: mardi 9 avril 2002
14:27À: [EMAIL
Hi all,
I am turning to the list for any ideas...
As you might have guessed at last I have a working (well sort of) Aurora
setup...
However I experience a couple of problems, mainly with resolutions.
Specifically, I give DISP_SIZE 640, 480 but nothing happens (still 512x256).
My Aurora is
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002 at 11:04:48, ZN wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On 09/04/02 at 14:31 Claude Mourier 00 wrote:
Clive Sinclair working for the French??
I know that Sir Clive's skills lay in other places other than
marketing, but has he sold out to the french I wonder??
Just that I saw a
On 09/04/02 at 17:49 Tony Firshman wrote:
Clive Sinclair working for the French??
Just that I saw a TV advert last night for a Citreon C5
Citroen C5 has nothing to do with Sinclair, though I am sure their
marketing department must have been caugh unaware by the history of that
'name' in the
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, ZN wrote:
The service outlets are it's biggest enemy and
they are expensive, so people just keep driving on...
Yeah!
A suspension sphere cost 44 pounds back in the days I had citroens.
Changing them was no tougher than changing an oil filter - same skills
required
At 02:03 ìì 9/4/2002, you wrote:
On Tue, 9 Apr 2002, ZN wrote:
The service outlets are it's biggest enemy and
they are expensive, so people just keep driving on...
Yeah!
A suspension sphere cost 44 pounds back in the days I had citroens.
Changing them was no tougher than changing an oil
Wolfgang Lenerz writes:
Seriously now, between what I saw Wolfgang and Marcel achieving with
QPTR
and EasyPTR respectively... I agree that at least ONE PTR toolkit
(either)
should be in one's arsenal :-)
Oh but Marcel had the idea, not me.
It's just a question of what you're used to.
Does anybody know if SMSQ for the Aurora can be ROMed?
Also does anybody know which is the last Aurora version? (I have 2.91)
Phoebus
Ok,
As many of you know, I have been away for some time, and am freshly back
in the fold :o)
I've been working on the Qeyboard, and pushing for ethernet hardware to be
available, so we can help John Dent finish his TCP/IP stack - which I
suspect will do more for the QL than most realise.
ZN writes:
computing in a better way, with Citroen you get to preach that there are
better ways to drive around on 4 (and actually, even 3 - some will work
without one rear) wheels!
Dont I know! Once, driving with a friend in his ancient Citroen D model in
Africa somewhere, I saw this
There are much later versions of SMSQ/E for Aurora, but they all have various problems, mainly coping with DD disks!! I still stick with v2.91
Rich Mellor
RWAP Software
7 Common Road, Kinsley, Pontefract, West Yorkshire, WF9 5JR
TEL: 01977 614299
http://hometown.aol.co.uk/rwapsoftware
At 05:21 ìì 9/4/2002, you wrote:
There are much later versions of SMSQ/E for Aurora, but they all have
various problems, mainly coping with DD disks!! I still stick with v2.91
That's okay... the only DD disks in the house are either
1. Archimedes games
2. QLT cover disks :-)
S which
For on-topicness, has anyone ever used a QL in a mobile
configuration, in,
say, a car?
Dave
A nice British policeman objected when he saw me trying to use a QL
while driving ;-)
Seriously though, I've used a laptop with QPC2 via a voltage inverter
in a car (thanks Darren). Worked OK while
However, I've been away for a very long time, and have forgotten most
of
my QL-related programming knowledge, having become fat and lazy with
my
bash shell and gcc compiler. Therefore, I'm asking you what tools you
think I should take advantage of and what tools to avoid. I have to
build
a
29 matches
Mail list logo
