Message-
From: Dilwyn Jones [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2002 8:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Norman Dunbar wrote:
Sorry Malcolm,
I don't quite understand the term 'a spare lunchtime'.
What's one of those then ?
I've
: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Malcolm Cadman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 9:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Thanks ... but don't hold
Claus,
it sucks if certain people don't stop to waste / steal my time with
permanently off topic talking
I don't permanaently talk about M$, viruses etc. I contribute quite a lot of
QL stuff too. I'd say about 95% roughly ofmy posts are QL related. If I
wanted to talk M$ permananetly, trust
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 12:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Now boys I think it is time this one was put to bed.
All three lists that I subscribe to go OT at times, one in particular has a
very active
moderator, reads
May I point out that the number of 'is/isn't OT' and 'who reacted in what
way' posts is now approaching a good 30% share in the 80% of OT messages
and is just making things worse. In the past when the list would wander,
going back to QL topics without further bickering has been proven a great
way
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Well, perhaps the person using it actually thought that there is
such a thing as M$ crap - and I presume that a certain number of
people on this list will agree (me, for instance
At 06:45 ìì 8/2/2002 +, you wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Well, perhaps the person using it actually thought that there is
such a thing as M$ crap - and I presume that a certain number of
people
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Geoff Wicks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is clearly a need for a document on virus handling ... when I get
time I will liase with you and we can put out an advice notice. Maybe
on your
Roy Wood Wrote:-
I don't know about the rest of you but I have always seen this list as
the cybernetic equivalent of the chat in the pub after a QL show.
Very much so, I agree totally. Except cybernetic pints don't quite taste
the same ;-))
There
are some groups of people earnestly
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 09:40:31, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Roy Wood Wrote:-
I don't know about the rest of you but I have always seen this list as
the cybernetic equivalent of the chat in the pub after a QL show.
Very much so, I agree totally. Except cybernetic pints don't quite taste
Tony Firshman wrote:-
I don't get cross at a choral concert if someone talks about the
weather. I cannot understand people getting hot under the collar about
all this and stamping feet. There is more to life.
Agreed. Lets all lighten up a bit..
Darren - where have you stashed your 500m
On Wed, Feb 06, 2002 at 09:14:38AM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
Bye bye then Peter.
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
I think your hardware
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
[ND] I think your hardware posts are pretty tedious -
[RZ] but they are on-topic
Yes, I agree
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
[ND] I think your hardware posts are pretty tedious -
[RZ] but they are on-topic
Yes, I agree, and didn't say that they weren't. However, there is a
ql-developers list for hardware ?
So, effectively, all the hardware stuff in ql-users *is* OT
-Original Message-
From: Dave [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 2:22 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Well, hardware *development* has an appropriate group, but general
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ? :o)
Argh, typo! ql-fetish... The way some people go on about the QL it's
At 02:25 ìì 7/2/2002 +, you wrote:
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ? :o)
Probably me (sleep with my Aurora every night - Much to my wife's chagrin...)
Phoebus
-users
Cc: dexter
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set
up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based chat coming soon - much better than the current board...
But then I wouldn't be able to read the messages as they arrive
throughout the day like I can with email. Our web access is monitored.
That would be: better than the board
Can't telnet.
SSH? Please excuse my ignorance of that particular TLA :O)
-Original Message-
From: dexter
Sent: 07 February 2002 14:59
To: ql-users
Cc: dexter
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't telnet.
SSH? Please excuse my ignorance of that particular TLA :O)
SSH is the Secure SHell. It's essentially telnet by SSL... All traffic is
encrypted both ways. Whenever you're telnetting to a Linux machine, SSH
does the same job
At 02:59 ìì 7/2/2002 +, you wrote:
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Web-based chat coming soon - much better than the current board...
But then I wouldn't be able to read the messages as they arrive
throughout the day like I can with email. Our web access is
15:13
To: ql-users
Cc: dexter
Subject: RE: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't telnet.
SSH? Please excuse my ignorance of that particular TLA :O)
SSH is the Secure SHell. It's essentially telnet by SSL...
All traffic
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002 at 14:31:08, Dave wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Norman Dunbar wrote:
Also, if anyone feels any specialist lists should be set up (ql-advocacy,
ql-pubchat, ql-fetist anyone? ;) I run a listserver.
ql_fetist - interesting. What's one of them ?
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 02:10:22PM -, Norman Dunbar wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Richard Zidlicky
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2002 8:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
[ND] I think your hardware
- Original Message -
From: Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is clearly a need for a document on virus handling ... when I get
time I will liase with you and we can put out an advice notice. Maybe
on your website.
Then whenever there is a problem with a virus we can refer to
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:14:38 -
Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
it sucks if certain people don't
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:24:38 +
Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED]
uk, Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
Snipped :-)
END RANT MODE
A lot of your 'rant' needed to said.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:40:28 +
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The I'm not playing anymore attitude is great when you're seven years
old, kinda wears out after that.
Guess what? Some people have grown up, need to go to work and don't have
the full day to filter a grain of ql info out of
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:14:38 -
Norman Dunbar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please don flame proof clothing before reading this !!
BEGIN RANT MODE
I think your attitude sucks (to be quite brutally honest) but you have made
your choice to go, then so be it.
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tel: 0113 289 6265
Fax: 0113 289 3146
URL: http://www.Lynx-FS.com
-
-Original Message-
From: Peter Graf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk
:
owner-ql-users@nSubject: RE: [ql-users]
vg.ntnu.no ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
attitude from some
people that 'only their way is right' gets on my t*ts !
-Original Message-
From: Peter Graf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 05, 2002 9:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [ql-users] ms-users-and-smalltalk-list
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
If the virus has come via the list, then I think it _is_ on topic, and
the information is interesting.
Not only that, it serves as a reminder of why QLs are so great. No
viruses!
BTW: I'm
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Graf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have some off-topic mails on this list now and
then. But in the last weeks there has been a neverending *huge* flood of
absolutely non QL-related traffic.
PC's, Microsoft, the related
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have some off-topic mails on this list now and
then. But in the last weeks there has been a neverending *huge* flood of
absolutely non QL-related traffic.
PC's, Microsoft, the related software and the related viruses and the
related problems will never end,
At 10:41 ìì 5/2/2002 +0100, you wrote:
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have some off-topic mails on this list now and
then. But in the last weeks there has been a neverending *huge* flood of
absolutely non QL-related traffic.
PC's, Microsoft, the related software and the related viruses
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Graf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have some off-topic mails on this list now and
then. But in the last weeks there has been a neverending *huge* flood of
absolutely non QL-related traffic.
PC's, Microsoft, the related software
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002 at 22:41:31, Peter Graf wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi folks,
I find it absolutely OK to have some off-topic mails on this list now and
then. But in the last weeks there has been a neverending *huge* flood of
absolutely non QL-related traffic.
PC's, Microsoft, the
On Tue, 5 Feb 2002, Tony Firshman wrote:
If the virus has come via the list, then I think it _is_ on topic, and
the information is interesting.
Not only that, it serves as a reminder of why QLs are so great. No
viruses!
BTW: I'm still QL-less... Scary huh?
Dave
ql.spodmail.com
40 matches
Mail list logo
