Geoff Wicks wrote:
I think we need to stop looking at which individual printers are compatible,
and look for structural solutions. This is one of the reasons I welcomed
Marcel's article and felt it needed a wider distribution than the German QL
Today. It is worth reading, particularly if
At 07:19 ðì 31/1/2002 +, you wrote:
Don't quote me on this - it's too early in the morning - but
I believe that some progress has been made with some
winprinters under linux. The problem as I understand it is
that unless you are running windows one size definitely does
not fit all as the
Marcel is right... every printer manufacturer does things differently,
the point is though that every manufacturer has a uniform way of
addressing their models line (no point of reinventing the wheel even
for a company the size of Epson), so if we could emulate at least ONE
we would be
: tony
Sent: 31 January 2002 16:27
To: ql-users
Cc: tony
Subject: Re: [ql-users] nenscript - Postscript file format creator
Marcel is right... every printer manufacturer does things
differently,
the point is though that every manufacturer has a uniform way of
addressing their models
Peter Graf wrote:
Reminds my of USB. Not few folks think you just need USB
for SMSQ/E and - voila - you can use all USB devices.
Probably because Windows comes with all sorts of standard drivers so
that many things work out of the box.
[Ghostscript]
Main drawback is that postscript
Damn,
just read Marcels' succint reply..
Tony Gordon
In-Reply-To: Hb5f11edd071.1012496760.ln4p1327.ldn.swissbank.com@MHS
I still have some printers that are pre-Win, so no problem yet
on that score but I would like to know whether the Deskjet range
of printers supports PCLn for some n and what emulations (e.g.
Epson) they do?
Weren't there
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
Marcel is right... every printer manufacturer does things differently, the
point is though that every manufacturer has a uniform way of addressing
their models line (no point of reinventing the wheel even for a company the
size of Epson), so if we could emulate at
- Original Message -
From: Christopher Cave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 31, 2002 5:48 PM
In-Reply-To: Hb5f11edd071.1012496760.ln4p1327.ldn.swissbank.com@MHS
I still have some printers that are pre-Win, so no problem yet
on that score but I would like to know
Has anyone come across a QDOS port of nenscript - a creator
of postscript format files? I believe it has been done.
Tony Gordon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has anyone come across a QDOS port of nenscript - a creator
of postscript format files? I believe it has been done.
None that I now of. The only ASCII-PS converter I know for SMS is
MPS, but then I did this port (there wasn't much to do) myself.
BTW: I thought your
Phoebus R. Dokos wrote:
Theoretically it's possible to use Win printers under SMS if we just knew
what the 1@##!@$$% they were getting from the GDI...
Of course this is possible. You just need to write a different driver
for every printer and hey, we have printer support.
Have fun. ;-)
Marcel wrote:
Theoretically it's possible to use Win printers under SMS if we just knew
what the 1@##!@$$% they were getting from the GDI...
Of course this is possible. You just need to write a different driver
for every printer and hey, we have printer support.
Have fun. ;-)
Reminds my of
13 matches
Mail list logo
