Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-16 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes taking the picture as is was taken using Urs Digital camera, which was quite unique in that it took 3.5 floppies - yes, floppies in the camera :-( Floppies in a camera??? Must be Swiss or something :-) Seriously, 1.4MB and the

Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-16 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 20:45:17 +0100, Malcolm Cadman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes taking the picture as is was taken using Urs Digital camera, which was quite unique in that it took 3.5 floppies - yes, floppies in the camera :-(

Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-13 Thread Dilwyn Jones
Now there you should *REALLY* be using PNGs which are far better than GIFs (and they're not covered by an insane Patent either) As for your scanner it's because you failed to Deposit 1 into the slot to your right. Funds will be wired directly to Digital Precision Ltd. offshore accounts -

Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-13 Thread Roy wood
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes snip the arms on which the scanner head moves had gone dry and dirty, so the gear mechanism (little plastic cogs and a belt like a caterpiller track) were slipping. Stole some of my wife's Vaseline (she uses it for dry lips in

Re: Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-13 Thread merlinch
-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord) In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes snip the arms on which the scanner head moves had gone dry and dirty, so the gear mechanism (little plastic cogs and a belt like a caterpiller track) were slipping. Stole

Re: [ql-users] Rogue page (plus some teasers re QWord)

2003-09-12 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos ( . )
On Fri, 12 Sep 2003 20:07:38 +0100, Dilwyn Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Phoebus, send me any you think are sufficiently bad for the page!!! I will as soon as I am done with some ermmm... delayed graphics work for somebody *COUGH*Rich *COUGH*COUGH*Mellor ;-) (Actually this is the packaging