Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-03 Thread Dave P
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Tony Firshman wrote: The most effective way to avoid this is simply to use a form on your site, but that's clumsy. Why clumsy? You force the person to edit a document within the minimal editing facilities of a web browser, and limit their ability to include attachments.

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-03 Thread Darren . Branagh
: s.q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-03 Thread Dave P
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Tony Firshman wrote: OK - but it is fine for the majority I suspect. That's ok, but you're required by law to make your website accessible to people with disabilities. If you're running a personal website, that's ok, but corporate websites need to invest some time and

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-02 Thread Dave P
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, P Witte wrote: The spammers will soon figure this one out (if they havent already - its too regular). Good idea, though (for collecting email addresses ;) It doesn't matter if they do figure it out. They simply can't be bothered to parse pages for blocks of four

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-01 Thread Robert Newson
Dr Colin F Parsons wrote: +50% of my Spam recieved came from Hotmail, that's why the generic hotmail.com and all its international variants is in my killfile, So your mail may not get through to it's intended recepients!! I think you probably mean 50% of your Spam received allegedly came from

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-01 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Newson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Malcolm Cadman wrote: ... I have found it worthwhile to have a :- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( address ) Mine's [now] called [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The only problem is that there is no filter available for my mail reader to filter on

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-06-01 Thread Dave P
On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, gwicks wrote: My point is that I have to have an email contact on websites. This is how the spammers gain many email addresses. I use hotmail for this contact detail because there is less of a spam problem. I then ask bona fide mailers to use my beeb.net address. You,

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-31 Thread Robert Newson
Jeremy Taffel wrote: I just had a look at my freeserve (wanadoo now) account. I have stopped using it because of the volume of spam. Over 4000 spams since mid-March! About 600 had virus attachments. Many did not even have my email address from what I could tell (how does that work?). Freeserve

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-31 Thread Arnold Clarke
I am using BT Yahoo I have no spam problems at all now. I was using Talk21.com but when I sign up to BT Broadband, BT Yarhoo took over Talk21.com. Arnold - Yahoo! Messenger - Communicate instantly...Ping your friends today! Download

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-31 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Robert Newson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes Jeremy Taffel wrote: I just had a look at my freeserve (wanadoo now) account. I have stopped using it because of the volume of spam. Over 4000 spams since mid-March! About 600 had virus attachments. Many did not even have my

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-31 Thread Robert Newson
Malcolm Cadman wrote: ... I have found it worthwhile to have a :- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ( address ) Mine's [now] called [EMAIL PROTECTED]. The only problem is that there is no filter available for my mail reader to filter on Envelope-to: - it would cut down the number of rules in my spam filter to

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-31 Thread Dr Colin F Parsons
] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs - Original Message - From: Robert Newson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs P Witte wrote: Robert Newson writes: Im trying to get rid of my Tiscali account as Tiscali are obviously

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs

2004-05-30 Thread Jeremy Taffel
Message - From: gwicks [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, May 30, 2004 10:09 AM Subject: Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs - Original Message - From: Robert Newson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs P Witte wrote: Robert Newson writes: Im

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs (was: QPC2 vs Word 97)

2004-05-29 Thread Dilwyn Jones
However, once Ive divested myself entirely of this account, I should be virtually spam-free! (I'll miss the scams, though. Ive always wondered how people who are smart enough to have learned to read can be dumb enough to get caught up in them!) Because the scam authors are usually great con

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs (was: QPC2 vs Word 97)

2004-05-29 Thread Robert Newson
P Witte wrote: Robert Newson writes: Im trying to get rid of my Tiscali account as Tiscali are obviously not interested in my custom. Ive tried a few other ISPs, but they have so far not proved reliable or decent - apart from Freeserve, now Wanado. You must have a different definition of decent

Re: [ql-users]Decent ISPs (was: QPC2 vs Word 97)

2004-05-27 Thread Robert Newson
P Witte wrote: Tony Firshman writes: ... Im trying to get rid of my Tiscali account as Tiscali are obviously not interested in my custom. Ive tried a few other ISPs, but they have so far not proved reliable or decent - apart from Freeserve, now Wanado. You must have a different definition of