As an example of my email earlier, I am grateful to Dilwyn Jones (all of
them!) for bring my attention to John Taylor's observation of the
unfortunate error which occurred in the March edition of the QUANTA
Magazine Volume 28 Issue 2 where the account's Income and Expenditure
account has been
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents will
be made available at
Dilwyn Jones wrote:
There is very little we can do to correct this error in time for
the
AGM except that the eMag versions have now been corrected (which
has
delayed their despatching to those members who have opted to take
their Magazine in this format). Extra copies of these documents
will
On 22/03/2011 12:52, John Gilpin wrote:
out 6 years, hoping that a person would volunteer to take on this very
exacting role - literally jumped into the deep end early in February
and (with a little assistance) produced a very creditable issue, only
to find that she had so much material left
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the
AGM - it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those members who normally
receive a
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members before the AGM
- it will need to be posted unfortunately, to those
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to
approve the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be circulated to members
before the AGM - it
On 22/03/2011 15:13, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 14:59, Rich Mellor wrote:
On 22/03/2011 14:51, gdgqler wrote:
On 22 Mar 2011, at 13:04, Rich Mellor wrote:
There is more of an issue here - as one of the resolutions will be to approve
the accounts, the balance sheet HAS to be
On 22 Mar 2011, at 15:17, Rich Mellor wrote:
I do tend to agree with this point, as it does allow for the dismissal of
directors - however, the constitution is silent, and this should form part of
the discussion about the constitution at the AGM.
Clause 8.13 of the QUANTA Constitution
Rich Mellor wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national
election?
It doesn't matter who you vote for or against in national elections.
A government always gets in ;-)
Dilwyn Jones
___
QL-Users Mailing List
At 15:26 22/03/2011 +, you wrote:
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
You can, it's called tactical voting
I am unlikely to see the agenda for the AGM, is there an item :-
When and in which brewery to hild the next piss0up
--
From: Rich Mellor r...@rwapservices.co.uk
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2011 3:17 PM
To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com
Subject: Re: [Ql-Users] QUANTA Magazine Error.
Wouldn't it be nice if you could vote against MPs in a national election?
One part
12 matches
Mail list logo
