Re: [Ql-Users] UQLX

2019-10-22 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Tue, 22 Oct 2019, at 11:07 AM, desin via Ql-Users wrote: > hello > > there is a annoying bug in the screen handling with UQLX 2018(a) > it only manifests if zoom is to 2 eg ./qm -z 2 > > when using pointer programs like QPC2 Files and QD > the cursor jumps to the middle of the upper left co

Re: [Ql-Users] UQLX and QD

2018-12-31 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 8:04 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 1:12 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote: > > > get the sd_demo.win from marcel > > > > > > edit the .uqlxrc > > > > >

Re: [Ql-Users] UQLX and QD

2018-12-31 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 1:12 PM, Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users wrote: > > > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote: > > get the sd_demo.win from marcel > > > > edit the .uqlxrc > > > > start uqlx(qm,qx,qm_x86-32) -b "lrun win1_boot" > > press space > > ex qd;"win1_boot" >

Re: [Ql-Users] UQLX and QD

2018-12-31 Thread Graeme Gregory via Ql-Users
On Mon, 31 Dec 2018, at 12:31 PM, desin via Ql-Users wrote: > get the sd_demo.win from marcel > > edit the .uqlxrc > > start uqlx(qm,qx,qm_x86-32) -b "lrun win1_boot" > press space > ex qd;"win1_boot" > move the cursor > move the mouse outside the QD window > try to get back to QD > > the sa

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx and TCP/IP stack documentation

2017-03-06 Thread Derek Stewart
On 05/03/17 20:13, Peter Graf wrote: Dilwyn Jones wrote: I've created a new page in the Documents part of my website, dedicated to information about the TCP/IP stack included with emulators such as QPC2, uQLx, SMSQmulator and QemuLator. Thank you. Just for clairifcation: There is no TCP/IP sta

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx and TCP/IP stack documentation

2017-03-05 Thread Dilwyn Jones
documentation on the QL scene I have found! The correction will filter its way into my articles, just bear what Peter says in mind until then. Thanks, Peter. Dilwyn Jones -Original Message- From: Peter Graf Sent: Sunday, March 05, 2017 8:13 PM To: ql-us...@q-v-d.com Subject: Re: [Ql-Users

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx and TCP/IP stack documentation

2017-03-05 Thread Peter Graf
Dilwyn Jones wrote: > I've created a new page in the Documents part of my website, dedicated > to information about the TCP/IP stack included with emulators such as > QPC2, uQLx, SMSQmulator and QemuLator. Thank you. Just for clairifcation: There is no TCP/IP stack included with any of these emula

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-22 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 09:29 PM, Derek Stewart wrote: > On 21/02/17 17:18, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote: > >> On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote: > >>> On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote: > > > On Tue, 21 Feb 2017

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Derek Stewart
On 21/02/17 17:18, Graeme Gregory wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote: On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote: On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote: A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQL

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 04:16 PM, Derek Stewart wrote: > On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote: > > On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote: > >> > >> > >> On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > > A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) > > is n

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Derek Stewart
On 21/02/17 15:38, Derek Stewart wrote: On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote: A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now available. Great news! Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in t

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Derek Stewart
On 21/02/17 15:23, Graeme Gregory wrote: On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote: A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now available. Great news! Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file? Tim? Graeme? Help... Grud

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Graeme Gregory
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, at 03:09 PM, Dilwyn Jones wrote: > >> A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now > >> available. > > Great news! > > > > Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file? > Tim? Graeme? Help... > Grudammit I did not spot

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Dilwyn Jones
A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now available. Great news! Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file? Tim? Graeme? Help... Dilwyn ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Urs Koenig (QL)
Dilwyn wrote: > A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now > available. Great news! Is it only me or is the 32-bit binary qm_x86-32 missing in the ZIP file? ___ QL-Users Mailing List

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx 2017

2017-02-21 Thread Derek Stewart
On 20/02/17 22:36, Dilwyn Jones wrote: uQLx 2017 A newly revised version of the Linux QL emulator uQLx (uQLx 2017) is now available. Graeme Gregory has "brutalised" (as he puts it on github) the sources to bring them up to date. New binaries are available for 32- and 64-bit x86 systems, as well

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx on Linux (various HW platforms, various Linux distributions)

2016-06-17 Thread Peter Graf
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: >> End of 2013 Peter Graf sent me a work-in-progress version of uQLx with >> QL_BDI support (uqlx-src-peter-17-11-2013.zip). He stated that this works on >> his (then) recent Debian 32-bit. > > It doesn't work on my 64 bit linux. The point might be 32 bit, not so much how r

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx on Linux (various HW platforms, various Linux distributions)

2016-06-17 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
Hi, (...) > > > End of 2013 Peter Graf sent me a work-in-progress version of uQLx with > QL_BDI support (uqlx-src-peter-17-11-2013.zip). He stated that this works on > his (then) recent Debian 32-bit. > It doesn't work on my 64 bit linux. > > Is it only me or is it true that all the old uQ

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx

2011-08-30 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Computer Research Centrum, Ltd wrote: >>in QDisk.c for the lines (around line 295) containing 'WA', 'A5' & 'B5' >>as part of a switch statement. If your processor is a big endian one, >>the code should work; however, if it is little endian (like the x86 >>processors), then the tests will definit

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLx

2011-08-30 Thread Computer Research Centrum, Ltd
>in QDisk.c for the lines (around line 295) containing 'WA', 'A5' & 'B5' >as part of a switch statement. If your processor is a big endian one, >the code should work; however, if it is little endian (like the x86 >processors), then the tests will definitely fail - changing them to >'AW', '5A'

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLX -- latest source?

2011-02-25 Thread vince
I have some slightly modified code, and have included my working notes below, a few tips though, use a version 3.x of the gcc compiler thats the only way i get non segfaulting binaries, before u compile export/setenv (depending on your shell) CC="gcc-3.x.x -m32", most versions of linux i know st

Re: [Ql-Users] uQLX -- latest source?

2011-02-24 Thread Tobias Fröschle
Am Donnerstag, den 24.02.2011, 13:21 -0600 schrieb Mark Martin: > Does anyone have any patched source more recent than the publicly > available source for uQLX at sourceforge? I've pulled that down and > built for x64 ubuntu with GCC 4. I've fixed some trivial compilation > issues as I went, but

Re: [Ql-Users] UQLX On A Stick

2011-02-13 Thread John Sadler
It should be possible to install a version of Linux with UQLX on an USB stick so it either starts up with an icon so UQLX starts in Minerva with a reasonable size screen or boots up directly in that form. For ease of use the TK2 toolkit should be patched so that you can Lrespr at any time. __

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-06 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message <4a011edb.4060...@dokos-gr.net>, Phoebus R. Dokos writes Hi Phoebus, I am sure that you are the person to do something with it ... but as you say it about having the time. Anyway ... interesting times we live in ... :-) Malcolm Cadman wrote: The problem is that making a runtim

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-06 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
Norman Dunbar wrote: > Evening Phoebus, > > Hi Norman, QT would be a good choice for the higher level as would GTK (Qt though just got stable bindings for mono... therefore I vote GTK -for the time being-). Of course porting the graphics part is the least of one's worries when porting to Windoze

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-06 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Phoebus, > The proper solution for uQLx is for the graphics parts to be abstracted > and maybe use SDL or something along the same lines, something that will > enable native compilation under Windoze, MacOS etc. That would most likely be QT - in my opinion of course, other opinions are ava

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread Phoebus R. Dokos
Malcolm Cadman wrote: The problem is that making a runtime version of cygwin is not entirely straightforward as it used to be in the old days :-( I am sure that If I sat down, I could probably find the way, but to be honest with you I didn't have enough time as it were and didn't want to mess with

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread P Witte
Id be interested in such a package. Had a go with Cygwin/uQLx some time ago but had only limited success. Getting rid of the debris was a pain, iirc. Per Dilwyn Jones wrote: I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time.

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-05 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message , Dilwyn Jones writes I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time. I think this is the point - without help it can't be got running if you don't know about Cygwin environment. As only 6 files are needed, su

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I'm wondering if cygz11-6.dll is in a developer version or in in an archived file which has to be user-expanded after download or something? Actually, the mailing list archive shows a message from Stephen Meech on this list back in 2004 with this exact problem. If Stephen is still on the list,

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Stephen
On 04/05/2009 17:29, Dilwyn Jones wrote: I'm wondering if cygz11-6.dll is in a developer version or in in an archived file which has to be user-expanded after download or something? Actually, the mailing list archive shows a message from Stephen Meech on this list back in 2004 with this exact

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Dilwyn Jones
You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like environment: www.cygwin.com Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to install as I found to my cost...oh to know what I'm doing with Linux and Cygwin :-(( Downloading everything by the sound of it! ... Go on,

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time. I think this is the point - without help it can't be got running if you don't know about Cygwin environment. As only 6 files are needed, surely it would make more sense to just p

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Norman Dunbar
Norman Dunbar wrote: > Ok, Cygwin as far as I remember gives you the opportunity to do a > download only and to save the files in a given location. That is the > best option. It doesn't install anything. Ok, I'll try again! Once downloaded, yo can then run the installer again and tell it (but it

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Malcolm Cadman
In message , Dilwyn Jones writes Hi Dilwyn, I did get an earlier version running once, of uQLx-Win32, on a WIN98 machine, with the help of Phoebus at that time. These days this would be a good candidate for being put onto a CD ROM or a Memory Stick, if the Cygwin is able to be distributed

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-04 Thread Norman Dunbar
Evening Dilwyn, >> You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like >> environment: www.cygwin.com >> Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to >> install as I found to my cost...oh to know what I'm doing with Linux >> and Cygwin :-(( Downloading everything by

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I've put the latest version of uQLx for 32-bit Windows from Phoebus Dokos onto my website. You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like environment: www.cygwin.com Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to install as I found to my cost...oh to know what

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx-win32

2009-05-03 Thread Dilwyn Jones
I've put the latest version of uQLx for 32-bit Windows from Phoebus Dokos onto my website. You'll need the Cygwin distribution to provide the Linux-like environment: www.cygwin.com Be careful, it can be a huge download of 50MB with 6,478 files to install as I found to my cost...oh to know what

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx for mac

2008-07-16 Thread Jerome Vernet
Michael Grunditz a écrit : Hello That's great ! Do you want to share the source ? Yes, I will make a tar for it and put it somewhere. Tested only on an Intel Macbook under 10.5 Jerome /Michael Grunditz 2008/7/14, Jerome Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Hi, Just to say that i was able to

Re: [Ql-Users] uqlx for mac

2008-07-16 Thread Michael Grunditz
Hello That's great ! Do you want to share the source ? /Michael Grunditz 2008/7/14, Jerome Vernet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi, > > Just to say that i was able to build, from the latest sources, a uqlx > version that seems to run on my MacBook under 10.5. > I have the QL screen, I can type 10 PRINT

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-25 Thread Jeremy Taffel
Works fine on Mandriva LE2005. The version I installed from scratch (after much trouble and reinstalling the old c compiler from mandrake 8.2) needs X to work with 16 bits to get the right colours. This version worked fine with X set to 24/32 bit colour. Jeremy Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: > Seg

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-22 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Wolfgang Lenerz wrote: > Why don't we all lobby MArcel so that he makes a version od QPC > under Linux. That's all I'm waiting for to make the switch. For the whole 10 people who want this, 3 if which are prepared to pay for it? Sure, I'm right on it ;-) Wine is getting better by the day, I'd say

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-22 Thread Omar Valenti
Knoppix 4 : segmentation fault Ciao Omar > I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site www.bixio60.org > one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux. > > Let me know if it works . > > Ciao > > Fabrizio > > > > > > > __

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-21 Thread Wolfgang Lenerz
On 21 Mar 2006 at 16:31, David McCann wrote: > I tried Fabrizio Diversi's compiled version (thanks for making it > available, Fabrizio) of UQLX, but still no luck. Attempting to run qm > just gave the error message "segmentation fault". It looks as if I shall > have to get Wine and try QEmulator.

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-20 Thread John Sadler
Suse 8.0 gave [EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ man gcc gcc is gcc-2.96 uqlx/qm: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.3' not found (required by uqlx/qm) However your source compiled and ran! - Original Message - From: "Fabrizio Diversi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, March 1

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-19 Thread Kjartan Geble Olsen
Seg fault on suse 10.0 -- Kjartan On Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:19:02 +0100, Fabrizio Diversi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have uploaded pre-compiled UQLX zip files on my web site > www.bixio60.org > one for 386 Linux and one for Q60 Shoestring Linux. > > Let me know if it works . > > Ciao > > Fa

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-13 Thread Kjartan Geble Olsen
On Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:22:00 +0100, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: >> That produced a number of similar error messages, after removing 'regp1' >> from the reported lines it will compile but not run: > > Tried issuing "make clean" before "make config" and "

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-12 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: > That produced a number of similar error messages, after removing 'regp1' > from the reported lines it will compile but not run: Tried issuing "make clean" before "make config" and "make"? Marcel ___ QL-Users Mailing List h

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-12 Thread Kjartan Geble Olsen
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:17:59 +0100, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: >> QL_files.c:1005: error: conflicting types for `WriteMdvControl' >> QL68000.h:430: error: previous declaration of `WriteMdvControl' >> make: *** [QL_files.o] Error 1 > > Strange. Perhaps t

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-12 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: > QL_files.c:1005: error: conflicting types for `WriteMdvControl' > QL68000.h:430: error: previous declaration of `WriteMdvControl' > make: *** [QL_files.o] Error 1 Strange. Perhaps try removing "REGP1" in line 430 of QL68000.h Marcel __

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-12 Thread Kjartan Geble Olsen
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 03:30:40 +0100, Marcel Kilgus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jeremy Taffel wrote: >> I didn't have any problems until I switched from distributions using >> Xfree86 to more recent ones that use Xorg. > > Version 10/22/02 seems to compile and work out of the box on my Gentoo > s

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-11 Thread Marcel Kilgus
Jeremy Taffel wrote: > I didn't have any problems until I switched from distributions using > Xfree86 to more recent ones that use Xorg. Version 10/22/02 seems to compile and work out of the box on my Gentoo system (gcc 3.3.6, Xorg X11 6.8.2). Marcel _

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-10 Thread Φοίβος Ρ. Ντόκος
Την Fri, 10 Mar 2006 19:51:21 -0500,ο(η) Jeremy Taffel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε: > Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: >> I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0 >> >> -- >> Kjartan >> >> >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> I've just tried

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-10 Thread Jeremy Taffel
Kjartan Geble Olsen wrote: > I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0 > > -- > Kjartan > > > On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc version 3.4.2 under Fedora 3. >> The only result was was a 90KB er

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-10 Thread Kjartan Geble Olsen
I've never been able to build uqlx with gcc>3.0 -- Kjartan On Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:49:29 +0100, David McCann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just tried to compile UQLX using gcc version 3.4.2 under Fedora 3. > The only result was was a 90KB error log! I know there are people out > there usi

Re: [ql-users] UQLX

2006-03-10 Thread Fabrizio Diversi
I compiled it under Slackware 10.1 and gcc 3.3.4 without any problem. I am not sure that I have the standard distribution of uqlx, if I remember well Richard sent me an updated one some time ago. If you want I can send you the qm bin file by mail. Btw if you post the same message in ql-developers