On Tue, 16 Mar 2004 at 18:31:04, wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Personally, the lack of Internet access for the QL/Q40 is not an issue
for me. I have
a PC for most of my Internet use (dial up) and use the system at work
for larger
downloads (T-1).
I look at the QL as a nice hobbiest
Bill Cable wrote:
I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could possibly
work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under the GPL
or pay Peter to release his work under GPL for QDOS Classic or Minerva.
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not want any money
for my work.
A person who does not want money must want something more valuable. ;)
Dave
On 17 Mar 2004 at 9:37, Dave P wrote:
A person who does not want money must want something more valuable. ;)
Value, like beauty, lies in the eyes of the beholder...
Wolfgang
Rich Mellor wrote:
In a message dated 17/03/2004 15:17:06 GMT Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Bill Cable wrote:
I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could possibly
work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under the GPL
or pay Peter to release his
Mind you the 300bps acoustic coupler modem is a bit limiting (8-)#
It was Z88 like, but with a great keyboard, but poor screen.
Acoustic coupler? Is that a modem that plays the sound through the
telephone handset rather than plug into the phone line? I remember
reading about that kind of thing
Aftera recent comment on this list, I again tried (and failed) to get
blobs and patterns to work in Easyptr programs.
Anyone had any success and able to hint at where I might be going
wrong? Files seem to get saved OK (I seem to be able to produce blobs
and patterns) but things go wrong when I
I would also be willing to chip in some $$ also and it could
possibly
work in one of 2 ways. Either buy the rights to put SMSQ/E under
the GPL
or pay Peter to release his work under GPL for QDOS Classic or
Minerva.
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not want any
money
This looks like a fundamental misunderstanding. I do not want any money
for my work.
All the best
Peter
Sorry about that. I am always hoping for that elusive web capability for the
QL one way or another. I have several computer related projects at home but
none could possibly be done on
This means that Quanta would have a sum of about £1,000 each year to
spend
on QL development. How should they spend this money?
In fact Quanta would have two possible ways of financially
stimulating QL
development. Major projects (SGC successor?) could be financed out
of the
capital. These
- Original Message -
From: Jeremy Taffel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You have said that Quanta is heading towards a £1000 a year structural
profit. I am also interested in how much Quanta has in realisable assets.
The reason I ask, is that as has been pointed out, the pond is now a
puddle
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
SNIP
Alternatively, instead of forcing money he doesn't want onto Peter
Graf, an alternative approach might be to buy into Q60 SMSQ/E
maintenance, i.e. whoever is building and releasing the new SMSQ/E
gets paid to produce a Q60
In a message dated 17/03/2004 20:40:47 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In
message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Dilwyn Jones
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writesSNIPAlternatively, instead of forcing money he
doesn't want onto PeterGraf, an alternative approach might be to buy
into Q60
In a message dated 17/03/2004 18:31:38 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Aftera
recent comment on this list, I again tried (and failed) to getblobs and
patterns to work in Easyptr programs.Anyone had any success and able
to hint at where I might be goingwrong? Files seem
In a message dated 16/03/2004 18:54:50 GMT Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I had
looked at your browser efforts briefly as I was looking for a Help
solution for QDT (haven't found one yet) and am still interested.
Still would be interested in using it with some added
On Wed, 17 Mar 2004 at 18:21:03, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
(ref: [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Mind you the 300bps acoustic coupler modem is a bit limiting (8-)#
It was Z88 like, but with a great keyboard, but poor screen.
Acoustic coupler? Is that a modem that plays the sound through the
telephone handset
On 17 Mar 2004 at 18:28, Dilwyn Jones wrote:
How much of SMSQ/E for Qx0 is modular and how much inbuilt (i.e. has
to be rewritten every time a new SMSQ/E is released)?
Nothing has to be rewrittenfor the Q60 (or any other machine) every time a new
SMSQ/E is released, unless some changes are
On 17 Mar 2004 at 23:37, Tony Firshman wrote:
(...)
You had to dial manually, listen for the tones, and fit the coupler.
... and the 'monitor' was a wide carriage IBM golfball printer.
Those were the days (8-)#
May they never come back!
Wolfgang
18 matches
Mail list logo
