On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Dinesh Punjabi wrote:
Is there any documentation or a sample/example
on how to setup a pop client with tcpserver.
I am specifically looking for eudora qpopper
example.
/usr/local/bin/tcpserver 0 110 /usr/local/bin/popper
Handle any logging you have enabled in qpopper
qmail Digest 14 Dec 1999 11:00:00 - Issue 849
Topics (messages 34296 through 34330):
Re: qmail dying on Solaris
34296 by: Robin Bowes
deny access from users
34297 by: Mark Maggelet
34298 by: John P. Looney
34299 by: Denis Voitenko
34300 by: Petr
Hi
I am unable to apply the path mentioned in
http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1999/10/msg01093.html
to scanmails.in?
I get this messages:
patching file scanmails.in
Hunk #4 FAILED at 900.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file scanmails.in.rej
The
Hello all
Is there any way to tell if and when a secondary MX has been in use? Log
files? Does qmail-send/remote log any specific messages to indicate the
message was recieved/delivered because the primary MX was not available?
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 14 Dec 99, at 10:28, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there any way to tell if and when a secondary MX has been in use?
Do you need to care?
Log
files? Does qmail-send/remote log any specific messages to indicate the
message was
Is there any way to tell if and when a secondary MX has been
in use? Log files? Does qmail-send/remote log any specific
messages to indicate the message was recieved/delivered
because the primary MX was not available?
If you're logging mail transactions, just look at that log and
"Alvaro Escobar" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is qmail full y2k compliance ?
For what it's worth, we saw no problems with qmail on our Y2K test
network.
-Dave
Add to that the fact that some viruses are designed to "clog" mail servers
by sending huge amounts of e-mail. You certainly wouldn't want to make
matters worse by doubling the amount of e-mail sent.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Haar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
Frank,
I don't know of any particular problems with this setup...but first and
foremost, this does not appear to be a qmail issue. It appears to be a
Macintosh DNS problem. ("because no answer was returned by
DNS")e.g., the Mac thinks it's a DNS server for the zone which your
qmail machine
Yeah, it'll help size spec out the server requirments. Right now running
2 qmails, one on a big box, 2nd on a smaller one. It would seem useless
to have a duplicate server 'just in case'.
Before everyone with unlimited budgets says it a good idea I don't
believe that's the most effective
I use tcpserver -q -h so I don't get alot of tcpserver/qmail chatter.
Paul Farber
Farber Technology
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ph 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Greg Owen wrote:
Is there any way to tell if and when a secondary MX has been
in use? Log files? Does
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:16:33AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify, I want the queues to be 'cascading'. The first queue has
extremely short timeouts and retries set to 0. Upon failure to deliver from
the first queue, the message is then
Well, I recently rebooted my machine (don't ask why, long story), and all of
the sudden, there's no logging, and qmail-start is listed as a
defunct/zombie process if I ps ax | grep qmail as root.
Any ideas what's going on here? I'm running under supervise.
Dustin
-Original Message-
I've set up an alias to allow mail to be sent to all the people in our
office. I would like to protect this alias from the 'outside'...
Would there be any problems with just doing a simple check ala
if [ $HOST != freestyleinteractive.com ]
go away
else
everything is cool and go ahead
Check the ip-chains howto to disable access from the outside to the SMTP port.
--Bobby
Patrick Berry wrote:
I've set up an alias to allow mail to be sent to all the people in our
office. I would like to protect this alias from the 'outside'...
Would there be any problems with just doing a
Patrick Berry [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've set up an alias to allow mail to be sent to all the people in our
office. I would like to protect this alias from the 'outside'...
Would there be any problems with just doing a simple check ala
if [ $HOST != freestyleinteractive.com ]
go away
"Dustin Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, I recently rebooted my machine (don't ask why, long story), and all of
the sudden, there's no logging, and qmail-start is listed as a
defunct/zombie process if I ps ax | grep qmail as root.
Any ideas what's going on here? I'm running under
On 14-Dec-1999 Dave Sill wrote:
Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 11:16:33AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to clarify, I want the queues to be 'cascading'. The first queue has
extremely short timeouts and retries set to 0.
Hi:
Is /var/qmail/control/defaultdomain the only mechanism to inform
QMAIL programs what domain name to tack on any unqualified address? Is
there instead a way to specify this either via command line args to
qmail-smtpd, or maybe via an environment variable (possibly set by
TCPSERVER)?
We are
Curtis Generous [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is /var/qmail/control/defaultdomain the only mechanism to inform
QMAIL programs what domain name to tack on any unqualified address? Is
there instead a way to specify this either via command line args to
qmail-smtpd, or maybe via an environment variable
/var/qmail/rc:
exec env - PATH="/var/qmail/bin:$PATH" \
qmail-start ./Maildir/ multilog t /var/log/qmail
/service/qmail/run:
*symlinked to /var/qmail/rc*
/etc/rc.d/rc.local:
[snip]
supervise /service/qmail
[snip]
Here are the processes running once the whole shebang starts up (these same
I've been attempting to setup qmail with AMaViS, and I just wanted to say
thanks to Dustin Miller and Christopher Seawood for their extremely useful
posts.
Basically everything is working perfectly, except I don't want mail with
virus attachments to be bounced back to the user. I've tried this
On Tue, Dec 14, 1999 at 03:42:29PM -0600, Dustin Miller wrote:
Well, the scanmails script is responsible for calling qmail-remote-real and
qmail-local-real and sending a number of messages. If you want to change or
remove a particular mail (sender, recipient, or virusalert), simply edit
that
Chris L. Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've already made some changes to the email that is sent regarding the
virus alerts, and that works fine. The problem is the actual queued
message being processed. In the case of a non-virus email, the real
qmail-remote program is run, and if it
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Hans Sandsdalen wrote:
patching file scanmails.in
Hunk #4 FAILED at 900.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file scanmails.in.rej
Well, others have mentioned problems with that patch even though I use it
in my rpms. I think the problem is with the line
At 17:15 14.12.99 -0500, Christopher Seawood wrote:
On Tue, 14 Dec 1999, Hans Sandsdalen wrote:
patching file scanmails.in
Hunk #4 FAILED at 900.
1 out of 5 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file scanmails.in.rej
Well, others have mentioned problems with that patch even though I use it
in my
Good day everyone. I have a question. I am assuming from what I have
read this is impossible, but I thought I would pass it by all of you
before I gave up.
Is there a way for qmail to not only reply to incorrect e-mail
addresses with an NDN but also send a copy of the message to a local
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Tim Hunter wrote:
In my queue I have 9 messages with attachments for hotmail.com, I noticed
the problem about a week ago, it has probably been longer. Any ideas for
contacting hotmail and letting them know how upsetting this makes us Admins?
I sent mail to every damn
Monte Mitzelfelt wrote:
On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Tim Hunter wrote:
In my queue I have 9 messages with attachments for hotmail.com, I noticed
the problem about a week ago, it has probably been longer. Any ideas for
contacting hotmail and letting them know how upsetting this makes us Admins?
I just switched from MAPS RBL to MAP RSS. Seems to hit a little bit
better without taking away too much real stuff.
Then I had a customer complain that someone, could not send him mail and
was getting an open relay message. So I connected to the offending host in
my log and tried a few simple
I find it easier to do something like
echo "@hotmail.com" /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
That doesn't clean out your queue of outgoing crap, or did I miss
something there? Easier is nice when it works, but I tend to prefer
effective over easy. This way they get complaints about your
I have concurrencyremote as default (20). My remote queue is full
(over 2000 messages) - only a few qmail-remotes running at any given time.
I usually see about 3-5 running at any given moment.
Any ideas why I don't see 20?
Thanks,
Reece
Monte Mitzelfelt writes:
MAIL FROM:spamtest
250 ok
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
553 Sorry, you can't relay through me (#5.7.1)
RSET
250 flushed
MAIL FROM:
250 ok
RCPT TO:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
250 ok
DATA
354 go ahead
(message body)
250 ok 945215583 qp 29881
Does anyone
Monte Mitzelfelt writes:
I find it easier to do something like
echo "@hotmail.com" /var/qmail/control/badmailfrom
That doesn't clean out your queue of outgoing crap, or did I miss
something there? Easier is nice when it works, but I tend to prefer
effective over easy. This way
I've just installed qmail on SuSE Linux 6.3. I followed the instructions
in the how-to, as well as reading the various install files, man pages,
etc., but it's not working.
After executing startup commands, the only process showing up after 'ps
x' is the supervise process, and executing 'echo
35 matches
Mail list logo
