Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
the
best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
Thanks
Alok
Any suggestions on what to set up to view a
threaded mailing list archive on the web. Is there anything out there in
php3? There are several php forum packages that could be adaptedhow
easy would this be?
I noticed that ezmlm-web was at 2.0 nowhow
good is this?...and does it do
Alok Bhatt wrote:
Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
the
best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
Thanks
Alok
Well, I use fsav from Data Fellows Corporation,
http://www.DataFellows.com/.
I have to pay for it, but I think
Assuming you have some kind of interface between the mail server
and virus scanner (eg Amavis), we currently find NAI and F-Secure
catch the most viruses while giving the least false positives.
- Original Message -
From: Alok Bhatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Hi,
I've got this problem for few weeks but still got no idea about
thateven I've searched the archive.
This is the qmail 1.03 running on Solaris x86 v2.7. I've tried to use
.qmail to run a vacation program for the users. The .qmail contains the
following 2 lines:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 06:23:39AM +0100, Magnus Bodin wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA? It would be nice if you need to presuiade your boss that
qmail is a great
Alok Bhatt wrote:
Hi, I am working on suse-linux, with qmail-1.03, Can someone tell me
the
best virus scanners for filtering viruses at the mail server itself.
See http://av-linux.w3.to/ or directly
http://www.ce.is.fh-furtwangen.de/~link/security/av-linux_e.txt for a
list of available
Hi,
I'm trying to find an IMAP server for qmail that is capable of Maildir
access and using vchkpw.
What does everyone recommend.
Cheers,
Del.
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:26:05AM +, Derek Smith wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to find an IMAP server for qmail that is capable of Maildir
access and using vchkpw.
What does everyone recommend.
Where did you find vchkpw?
- http://www.inter7.com/vchkpw/
Where do you find a good
Glenn R. Crownover wrote:
Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it" could also be
considered a downside when taking security into consideration. The more
something is used, the more hackers know about it.
When do people stop to make such statements? I would like to repeat my
qmail Digest 9 Feb 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 906
Topics (messages 36922 through 36964):
Amavis and Qmail, how?
36922 by: Erwin van Kroonenburg
36935 by: Roland Pelzer
fetchmail with forcecr option
36923 by: Martin Lesser
multiple qmail instances
36924 by: Jiri
Anand Buddhdev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
120 is a compile-time upper limit imposed on concurrency for
qmail-lspawn and qmail-rspawn. You can raise it to 255 on some systems.
See the file conf-spawn in the qmail source.
There's also a patch, which I use on my list server, to raise the
limit to
I never noticed this before (having relied entirely on Dave Sill's LWQ
for installation), but daemontools 0.61 does not ship with
documentation... Why?!?
--
Allen Versfeld
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
QVANTI CANICVLA ILLE IN FENESTRA
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone tracked this one down and confirmed it to be a bug in Netscape
Messenger's IMAP client.
And the "fix" is to wait for Time/Warner/CNN/AOL/Netscape to release a
working Messenger, and get all 50 million users to install it, rather
than accommodating the bug in
Clifford.,
This sounds like an error I've encountered.. Did you remove all
instances of 'smtp' from your /etc/inetd.conf file? And is smtp listed in
your /etc/services file? Did you restart or kill -HUP inetd after removing
it from inetd.conf? I think I got this error when I tryed running
Hi all, I'm using qmail 1.03 and Majordomo 1.95 on a Linux platform and
I'm having a strange problem. It's probably an easy fix but I can't think
of it yet, so I'm hoping for some help!
All my lists work fine, except sending email to the "owner" of the list,
it seems qmail is tacking an extra
Cyrus format is probably higher performance)
Hm. Good enough. My mail concern is really that of I
have everything set up based around maildirs right now.
It will of course exist happily with qmail; it's just a
matter of using
the right invocation of 'deliver' in .qmail-default.
Allen Versfeld writes:
I never noticed this before (having relied entirely on Dave Sill's LWQ
for installation), but daemontools 0.61 does not ship with
documentation... Why?!?
Because Dan doesn't want to be stuck with obsolete documentation, as
has happened with qmail 1.03. For
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 08:58:07AM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone tracked this one down and confirmed it to be a bug in Netscape
Messenger's IMAP client.
And the "fix" is to wait for Time/Warner/CNN/AOL/Netscape to release a
working Messenger, and get all 50
How about this: while RedHat has serious (I'd guess partly personal)
problems with distributing qmail, it uses qmail as its mailinglist
server; it is lists.redhat.com.
This is probably not the greatest site, but certainly illustrates
qmail's usefullness.
Mate
Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
Glenn R. Crownover wrote:
Just as an aside, the phrase "everyone else is using it"
could also be considered a downside when taking security
into consideration. The more something is used, the more
hackers know about it.
When do people stop to make such
Can someone possible show me an example script in perl that puts a message
into the queue using qmail-queue directly? I'm trying to experiment with
ways to deliver mail at fair and low overhead kind of way.
Thanks
-jeremy
It will of course exist happily with qmail; it's just a
matter of using the right invocation of 'deliver' in
.qmail-default.
Could you expand upon this please? Is there a global
.qmail-default somewhere, or would each user have to
have this? Isn't .qmail-default only for
Hi there,
we are running Qmail and Spammers are using our SMTP as a relay. We've
configured our sistem as it is at:
http://www.palomine.net/qmail/selectiverelay.html,
where we have on tcp.smtp :
[root@correos /etc]# cat tcp.smtp
194.179.87.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
195.76.4.:allow,RELAYCLIENT=""
On Tue, Feb 08, 2000 at 05:22:33PM -0600, Barry Smoke wrote:
I know the author of vmailmgrd is working on that very thingand I
believe was close to finishingdue to be released in the next version.
Yes, I am. In fact, I've written the code but haven't had time to test
it yet. I'll put
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA?
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list archives:
OneList
Yahoo
egroups
InterNIC
RIPE (European research
At 11:55 AM 2/9/00 -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote or quoted:
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list archives:
OneList
Yahoo
egroups
InterNIC
RIPE (European research organiziation, I believe)
xoom.com (heavily modified)
USA.net
MatchLogic
Algonet (Sweedish ISP
It's funny how you often manage to solve problems you've been haunted by
for days just after you've mailed the proper mailing list about it,
isn't it? Well, this time I managed to be one step ahead, but as I had
already written most of the message when I realised the solution, I
guess I might as
Hi is there a script based administration interface that takes some of the
drudgery out of setting up new users on Qmail?
Roy Kerwood
Network Administrator
Cityxpress.com
604-638-3800
Local 311
info msg 25541042: bytes 492 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 686 uid 412
starting delivery 102: msg 25541042 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 2/10 remote 2/20
delivery 102: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
status: local 1/10 remote 2/20
The user's Maildir is there, it's intact
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 11:55:04 -0600 , Bruce Guenter writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:02:17PM +0800, Michael Boman wrote:
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA?
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:19:56PM -0500, Doug McClure wrote:
info msg 25541042: bytes 492 from [EMAIL PROTECTED] qp 686 uid 412
starting delivery 102: msg 25541042 to local [EMAIL PROTECTED]
status: local 2/10 remote 2/20
delivery 102: deferral: Unable_to_chdir_to_maildir._(#4.2.1)/
status:
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list archives:
OneList
Yahoo
egroups
InterNIC
And Network Solutions, of course.
RIPE (European research organiziation, I believe)
xoom.com (heavily modified)
USA.net
USA.net is not
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:52:55PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list archives:
OneList
Yahoo
egroups
InterNIC
And Network Solutions, of course.
I think he meant those :)
Barry Smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 9 February 2000 at 02:10:18 -0600
Any suggestions on what to set up to view a threaded mailing list archive on the
web. Is there anything out there in php3? There are several php forum packages that
could be adaptedhow easy would this be?
I
At 10:51 AM 2/9/00 , Greg Owen wrote:
[snip]
Security by obscurity is NO solution to security problems. It
keeps people thinking they are secure when they really aren't.
The argument is not security through obscurity. The argument is
that attackers spend more time cracking a package
-Original Message-
From: Dave Sill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 10:53 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Big and/or famous sites using qmail?
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the
Hello,
I am interested in more verbose/debugging logging under qmail. Currently I
just get the default processing messages logged to /var/log/maillog. I
would like to get incomming connection messages with the full smtp
conversation. I looked at the following URLL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And Network Solutions, of course.
Not something to be proud of, as 2 days ago Jon Rust claimed
in message v0421013fb4c4c040b1e4@[209.239.239.22] that
Network Solutions runs an open relay.
It's no longer an open relay.
I expect unsophisticated users like myself to
OK all
For the record. USA.Net uses qmail for all of our outbound traffic.
Very happy with it and not planning on changing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 01:52:55PM -0500, Dave Sill wrote:
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just compiled a list of these
With control/badmailfrom i can refuse mail send from emailaddresses list
in this file.
Is it possible to refuse mail for emailaddresses list in this file ore
some file ,send by local users?
greetings
marco leeflang
let's take a step back for a moment too and remember that this is Network
Solutions we're talking about here, who seem to have an amazing ability to
screw up anything they get their hands on.
shag
- Original Message -
From: Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed 9
clifford thurber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How do I record all incoming SMTP traffic?
Answer: This answer assumes that you are running qmail-smtpd under
tcpserver, using tcpserver 0.84 or above, with tcpserver's
connection messages being sent to syslog.
Simply insert recordio before
Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not something to be proud of, as 2 days ago Jon Rust claimed in message
v0421013fb4c4c040b1e4@[209.239.239.22] that Network Solutions runs an
open relay.
I think he was saying that they were on ORBS instead, wasn't he? There
are lots of things on ORBS that
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:22:20AM -0800, kevin olson wrote:
sorry to throw such primitive questions inbetween all
these expert posts, but
a.does tinydns/dnscache run on solaris? if so does
anyone here use it on a sparc?
I'm using the dnscache server on a sparc, but I compiled
stevenma [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
All my lists work fine, except sending email to the "owner" of the list,
it seems qmail is tacking an extra "-" onto the
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" address, so instead of
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" I get
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" why is it adding the "-" after the
real owner
Roy Kerwood [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi is there a script based administration interface that takes some of
the drudgery out of setting up new users on Qmail?
What all are you doing to set up a new user? For the default
installation, I don't believe you have to do anything at all.
--
Russ
Would it be possible to lmit the number of spawns that tcpserver can make from one ip
address concurrently to
preven one ip spawning up to the limit of concurrent daemons and denying access to
that daemon? I can't think
of a way to do it from what i've read of the docs but it seems like quite
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 10:26:39AM -0800, Roy Kerwood wrote:
Hi is there a script based administration interface that takes some of the
drudgery out of setting up new users on Qmail?
If you want to let you users administer they own domains, you may
have a look at the oMail project :
Would it be possible to lmit the number of spawns that
tcpserver can make from one ip address concurrently to
preven one ip spawning up to the limit of concurrent daemons
and denying access to that daemon? I can't think
of a way to do it from what i've read of the docs but it
I don't
TAG writes:
Is it possible to set a databytes file for a specific user that will
overide the system wide databytes file??
Only if that user has a fixed IP address.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok | "Ask not what your
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:06:59PM -0500, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
Can someone possible show me an example script in perl that puts a message
into the queue using qmail-queue directly? I'm trying to experiment with
ways to deliver mail at fair and low overhead kind of way.
Check out my virus
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 18:05:02 +0100, Henrik Öhman wrote:
The correct solution was of course to change ~/testlist/inlocal and
~/testlist/outlocal from user-testlist to saying just testlist.
The correct solution is to set up the list with the correct name right
away. If you don't then the list
Hello! I know this is probably more appropriate in a Cyrus
mailing list, but I wrote this so qmail users can deliver
to their own mailbox in a secure fashion.
The script is explained in the comments. Please review
it and let me know of any security holes that may be present
as well as ways to
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:57:22AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
Bruce [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not something to be proud of, as 2 days ago Jon Rust claimed in message
v0421013fb4c4c040b1e4@[209.239.239.22] that Network Solutions runs an
open relay.
I think he was saying that they were
petervd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:57:22AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I think he was saying that they were on ORBS instead, wasn't he? There
are lots of things on ORBS that aren't open relays; this is one of them
(to my knowledge Network Solutions isn't actually
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:20:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
petervd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:57:22AM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
I think he was saying that they were on ORBS instead, wasn't he? There
are lots of things on ORBS that aren't open relays; this
Dave Sill writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone tracked this one down and confirmed it to be a bug in Netscape
Messenger's IMAP client.
And the "fix" is to wait for Time/Warner/CNN/AOL/Netscape to release a
working Messenger, and get all 50 million users to install it, rather
than
petervd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 02:20:37PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
petervd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have seen false positives on ORBS, but only due to cluelessness:
ORBSing the insertion point of a relay-abusable setup instead of the
machine that actually
Hello List,
In order to support an unlimited number of virtual domains (and
consequently lots of users), does anyone know of a way to utilize qmail
w/ cyrus imap over a more than one server architecture?
I'm keen on having front end qmail servers accepting mail and
smtproute'ing it to back-end
I am aware of that fact as I have read the man page. But I appreciate the effort. :-)
Oh and I am subscribed so I don't need you to add me to the to: list.
On Wed, 09 Feb 2000 15:44:26 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would it be possible to lmit the number of spawns that
tcpserver can make
In order to support an unlimited number of virtual domains (and
consequently lots of users), does anyone know of a way to utilize qmail
w/ cyrus imap over a more than one server architecture?
I'm keen on having front end qmail servers accepting mail and
smtproute'ing it to back-end cyrus imap
I have a few questions along the same lines.. I have tcp server set to
limit to 900 as indicated below. However I've had several sites in the
past month who send mail with stray linfeeds..it's becomming alot more
common lately unfortunately. But the problem I have is qmail kills the
connection
When I try and send external mail I get the following message:
[Mail not sent: sorry, that domain isn't in my list of allowed rcpthosts
(#5]
I sending mail from Pine.
Thanks
Vivian Lal
Hi there,
Barry Smoke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 9 February 2000 at
02:10:18 -0600
Any suggestions on what to set up to view a threaded mailing list
archive on the web. Is there anything out there in php3? There are
several php forum packages that could be adaptedhow easy would this
Here's what I would do.
I'd run a different process on each IP...in bash pseudocode:
for i in $(ifconfig | perl -ne '/inet addr:\d+(\.\d+){3}/ print "$1 "'); do
tcpserver opts $i port proggie
done
I'm sure there are some sed/awk gurus that can run that command a whole
lot faster than
I'm sorry if I haven't made myself clear on this occasion.
I meant that I wish to limit spawnings per remote ip eg if a remote machine is logged
in to the popserver they
cannot log in a second time
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 21:30:08 -0600 (CST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's what I would do.
I'd
Life is full of risks, Craig. On an active mail server, a crash might
cause one out of a billion email messages to be lost (assuming a crash
ten times per year, a 1/30 chance of losing a file in each crash, and
a million messages a day). That's 99.999% reliability, and those
estimates
I had the same problem a couple of months back. After repeated attempts to
contact the admins of the broken servers (one of which was within
Microsoft), I patched qmail-smtpd.c to reject messages from servers sending
bare lfs. I've attached the patch.
I've tried blocking the broken servers via
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 12:44:16PM +, Blaine Lefler wrote:
For the record. USA.Net uses qmail for all of our outbound traffic.
Could you clarify what you mean by "outbound traffic"?
Thanks.
--
Bruce Guenter [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://em.ca/~bruceg/
Try adding:
/usr/local/bin/setlock -nx Maildir/.poplock
between checkpassword and qmail-pop3d in your tcpserver command line. For example:
tcpserver 0 pop-3 qmail-popup your.mail.host /bin/checkpassword /usr/local/bin/setlock
-nx Maildir/.poplock
qmail-pop3d Maildir
This will limit each
On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 11:55:04AM -0600, Bruce Guenter wrote:
Wouldn't it great if there was a list of big/famous sites that uses qmail
as their MTA?
I just compiled a list of these from searching through the qmail mailing
list archives:
I've made a web page out of this. Check out
Thanks..has someone built an rpm for ezmlm+idx 4.0 yet?
I currently have ezmlm-idx-std-0.53.324-1.i386.rpm
Barry Smoke
-Original Message-
From: Marc-Adrian Napoli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, February 09, 2000 8:02 PM
Subject: Re:
I guess its my turn to put some egg on my face. The patch that I had included earlier
also had some ETRN related changes in it. Below is the relevant portion of the patch:
--- qmail-smtpd.c.orig Fri Nov 12 23:08:08 1999
+++ qmail-smtpd.c Wed Dec 8 23:01:18 1999
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
void
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We are presently Qmail 1.03. We added a virtual domain. To route the mail
to the virtual domain users, we had to add an alias for each user. We're
actually routing the mail for that domain to a specific mail server. Is
there a way to route that email w/o
I must appologizelooks like I'm going to be reloading a server here
soon.:-)
I have 2 servers set up almost identical...but with different histories.
One was a fresh RedHat 6.0 install upgraded to 6.1
the other was a RH 4/5.2/6.0/6.1 upgraded server.
I've had problems with 2 rpm's
Sam writes:
So yeah, Linux does seem to be able to lose mail. On the other hand,
there were only four pieces of email lost in about fifty reboots.
Most people have the good sense to run Linux on reliable hardware and
then it never crashes.
This should not happen on orderly
On Thu, Feb 10, 2000 at 04:32:59AM +, Robert Sanderson wrote:
Try adding:
/usr/local/bin/setlock -nx Maildir/.poplock
I extended this idea a little for my site, to allow per-ip limits.
Suppose I only want to allow up to 3 connections from 1.2.3.4, I make a
wrapper around qmail-smtpd,
On Feb 02 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello all qmailers!
I'm new to qmail, so I'm still getting my sea legs. One question that has
come up is how does qmail handle delivery problems and what schedule does it
use?
I think I've found the retry schedule...
t(0) = start time [secs]
79 matches
Mail list logo
