On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 03:33:54PM +1000, Oliver White wrote:
We're in a similar situation at the moment. However, we want to send out
100,000 UNIQUE emails per day, expanding to 500,000 or more in the near
future. Also, our send window is only actually a couple of hours.
Is that for your
We're in a similar situation at the moment. However, we want to send out
100,000 UNIQUE emails per day, expanding to 500,000 or more in the near
future. Also, our send window is only actually a couple of hours.
That shouldn't be too hard. With a Pentium 233 (not a P-II, a regular
Hi folks,
I'm new to managing bounces, so please bear with me. I've had a very tough
time finding any good documentation which could guide me to building some
scripts to parse through my bounces and semi-automate them. I do fairly
large mailings at a time, and I'd like to properly manage my
Hi,
my ISP has changed the mailsystem so that I have to change my
configuration too. They sent me an email in which they tell me to send my
user-id and password when sending mail. They call it ESMTP.
So far I used
/usr/local/bin/maildirsmtp ~alias/pppdir alias-ppp- sendmail.neubert.com
$IPADDR
Hi all:
I use vpopmail+mysql+sqwebmail,and have installed vopopmail+mysql. i think it is
ok.
then there is some problem when i install sqwebmail.
i run ./configure --enalbe-authvchkpw --without-authpam
Tobias Neubert a écrit :
/usr/local/bin/maildirsmtp ~alias/pppdir alias-ppp- sendmail.neubert.com
$IPADDR
to send my mail. But if I try this now, I get the following error:
maildirserial: info: new/963816027.832.chakoty bounced: 209.231.49.20
said: 553 To send mail, first check your mail
Hello,
i have a problem i didn't find in the archive.
I run qmail on solaris 2.6 and it works fine with one
restriction. Every message sent with qmail or recieved with qmail
gets a:" content length: 0" as body. I think the problem lies in the rc file
i use but i can't find the mistake
My rc
qmail Digest 17 Jul 2000 10:00:00 - Issue 1065
Topics (messages 44836 through 44854):
Re: Announcing qmail-autoresponder version 0.90
44836 by: Russ Allbery
Re: Domain forwarding]
44837 by: Henry Baragar
Qmail is *NOT* reliable with ReiserFS
44838 by: Jedi/Sector
Hi all
I'm running the qmail package for some time now and I got now a special
error when sending a message to a user in my virtualdomains (vpopmail):
"
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at turkey.rogatec.ch.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is
Hi all
I'm trying to use vpopmail to allow user that autenticate via pop3 the
user of smtpd.
I create a user with vadduser e vaddpasswd then i try to connect
to the qmail-pop3d telnet localhost pop-3 i insert:
user prova or user prova%virtualdomain
pass prova
-ERR this user has
- Original Message -
Hi all
I'm trying to use vpopmail to allow user that autenticate via pop3 the
user of smtpd.
I create a user with vadduser e vaddpasswd then i try to connect
to the qmail-pop3d telnet localhost pop-3 i insert:
user prova or user prova%virtualdomain
pass
wolfgang zeikat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|/var/qmail/alias/autorespond 1 100 /var/tmp/autor.txt
/var/tmp/autorespond/no-mailbox
(that is one line, no matter how your email client wrapped it here)
Actually, your e-mail client wrapped it. Mine doesn't wrap, and it
came in on two lines.
Try vpopmail in www.inter7.com for virtual accounts. All your accounts are
reached through one entry in /etc/passwd
Esteban Javier Próspero
-Original Message-
From: çééí äìôøï [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2000 11:36 AM
To: Paul Jarc; Qmail
Subject:
I recently started monitoring qmail-smtpd's activity via "tcpserver -v",
and at the moment it's burning through a steady 15-20 concurrencies,
scrolling by beyond readability.
Meanwhile, as I "tail -f maillog" for qmail-send's activity, it sits
predominantly idle, with an occasional message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail server is accepting mails for unknown users, users who do not exists
on my mail server ( users whose entries r not there in my LDAP
directory server )
[...]
i cant understand why to accept mail for unknow users ( just to
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound. How much disk will be
sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
I'm just grasping here to figure out the best solution, so bear with me...
What if I only needed a 1GB queue,
In other words you'll need to pump out 5+ megabits per second, which
means a connection of around double that, say 10 Mbits per second.
Is that what you have available?
In theory, yes. In practice... remains to be seen.
I did some similar calculations and came up with a similar
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound. How much disk will be
sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
I'm just grasping here to figure out the best
Hi everyone,
Anyone know where there's a list of standard MTA bounce messages? I have
70,000 bounced messages which have been sitting on an imap account and
gathering dust over the past 2 months. My job: to sort these through and
get an approximate picture of which are fake, which are due to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi, I'm using qmail 1.03 on a Debian 2.1 system with the
vchkpw/vpopmail programs. Whenever I try to send mail to
user@localhost, qmail interprets this as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
which is not in the DNS at all. Is there a way to fix this?
"localhost"
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:29:03AM -0500, Austad, Jay wrote:
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound.
Ahhh... someone who gets it.
How much disk will be sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
What if you did
I overlooked that when I posted this message; I totally forgot about the
write penalty. Sorry about that.
-Original Message-
From: John White [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 14, 2000 7:08 PM
To: qmail mailing list
Subject: Re: questions about performance and setup
On
Quoting Thomas Duterme ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I'm new to managing bounces, so please bear with me. I've had a very tough
time finding any good documentation which could guide me to building some
scripts to parse through my bounces and semi-automate them. I do fairly
large mailings at a time,
I have a question about the qmail-date-localtime patch written by John
Saunders.
What files does this patch modify exactly?
I have a rpm based install, and would like to see if it's possible to
just replace the files that this patch modifies..
any help would be appricaited
thanks
Grant
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 12:56:25PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Hi, I'm using qmail 1.03 on a Debian 2.1 system with the
vchkpw/vpopmail programs. Whenever I try to send mail to
user@localhost, qmail interprets this as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
which is not in the DNS at all. Is there a way to fix
On Sun, Jul 16, 2000 at 06:55:21PM +0200, Jedi/Sector One wrote:
ReiserFS does not commit link() synchronously (mounting with "sync"
doesn't change anything). Therefore, if there is a power outage during
the Maildir delivery or if qmail-smtpd answered the final "queued"
message without
Hello,
I want to write a simple script to check if
mails are queued in /var/qmail/alias/pppdir/new
to decide, wheter the PC should go online or not.
Is there a spezial command like 'qmail-queue' to
decide if the computer should dial (isdn) to the
provider and send the queued mails using
It is DJB's view that all directory operations (creating, removing,
linking, etc.) sould be synchronous, just like BSD does.
For the record, FFS with soft-updates does not guarantee synchronous
directory operations; you have to open and fsync() the file you just
moved to be sure the operation
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 07:31:22PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a question about the qmail-date-localtime patch written by John
Saunders.
What files does this patch modify exactly?
exactly the one www.qmail.org states; date822fmt.c
$ grep "^+++" qmail-date-localtime.patch
+++
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 03:59:00PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
It is DJB's view that all directory operations (creating, removing,
linking, etc.) sould be synchronous, just like BSD does.
For the record, FFS with soft-updates does not guarantee synchronous
directory operations; you have to
Apologies for not catching this in my first reply to Bruce's message.
There is also the discussion of ordered meta-data updates (OMDU) vs
unordered (UMDU). Linux (with the exception of newer journalled
file systems) does UMDU. With OMDU, the file meta-data (inode,
indirect blocks, etc) is
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 12:07:52AM +, Thomas Duterme wrote:
Hi everyone,
Anyone know where there's a list of standard MTA bounce messages? I have
70,000 bounced messages which have been sitting on an imap account and
gathering dust over the past 2 months. My job: to sort these through
The 'sane' response would be to buy high-end power protection equipment
and use redundant drive configurations (RAID) and only worry about whether
the kernel writes out data consistently or not (and good journalling takes
care of many performance issues here).
Reliability of gigabytes per minute
For the record, FFS with soft-updates does not guarantee synchronous
directory operations; you have to open and fsync() the file you just
moved to be sure the operation has been committed to disk. See
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/current-users/2000/06/19/0011.html for a
little more
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 04:39:01PM -0400, Greg Hudson wrote:
Which to me seems to be a more logical mode of operations: if you
want the file data sync'd to disk, call fsync on the file; if you
want the directory, fsync the directory.
Perhaps. There are arguments for either model being
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 09:51:22AM -0700, John White wrote:
(I can put 2GB of ram in the box)? Linux has support for making a disk in
memory, putting a filesystem on it and mounting it. Wouldn't this take care
of I/O problems?
I'd read up on ramdisks first. They aren't instant i/o.
"Steven M. Klass" wrote:
Does anyone know how I can test a vpopmail installation. I know this may
probably be trivial, but I like DJB's instructions, especially since he
always allows provisions for testing..
Thanks
Steven M. Klass
Physical Design Engineering Manager
Andigilog Inc.
Is there a way that you can setup of the server to allow the user to
check all of thier messages and then go to another location and then
check them again? What I would like to happen is this.. A person sends
me an e-mail when I check it that message stays on the server. If I were
to check it
"Steven M. Klass" wrote:
Hey all
I just started working with vpopmail and I am in need of answers.
1. The install guide recommends that all domains be set up as virtual
domains. In the qmail/control/locals file I have my domain already
defined. How can I convert that to a
Most mail packages have the ability to let a user log in when sending mail.
(Outlook for example.) I was looking at this and had a couple of
questions...
Is this part of the SMTP standard?
Can this be used to let authorised people relay through a server?
Thanks
Martin
Martin Searancke
CommSoft
--- Martin Searancke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most mail packages have the ability to let a user
log in when sending mail.
(Outlook for example.) I was looking at this and had
a couple of
questions...
Is this part of the SMTP standard?
No.
Can this be used to let authorised people relay
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound. How much disk will be
sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
It's not so much a matter of disk size (I don't think you'll have a 1 gig
queue!), but of throughput.
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:04:26AM +1200, Martin Searancke wrote:
Most mail packages have the ability to let a user log in when sending mail.
(Outlook for example.) I was looking at this and had a couple of
questions...
Is this part of the SMTP standard?
It is not part of the original
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 10:24:53PM -0600, Steve Wolfe wrote:
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound. How much disk will be
sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
It's not so much a matter of disk size (I
Steve Wolfe wrote:
With all of the emails I recieved, I get the impression that I'm going to
I/O bound instead of processor or memory bound. How much disk will be
sufficient for the queue? 1GB? More?
It's not so much a matter of disk size (I don't think you'll have a 1 gig
queue!),
45 matches
Mail list logo
