On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:31:54AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:51:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
Dec 10 01:02:49 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6 166.84.147.
124:3687 206.26.89.202:25 L=1064 S=0x00 I=46413 F=0x T=64 (#37)
Dec 10 01:02:55
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:51:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
Dec 10 01:02:49 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6 166.84.147.
124:3687 206.26.89.202:25 L=1064 S=0x00 I=46413 F=0x T=64 (#37)
Dec 10 01:02:55 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6 166.84.147.
124:4396
qmail Digest 10 Dec 2000 11:00:01 - Issue 1209
Topics (messages 53802 through 53809):
Re: ezmlm response
53802 by: Charles Cazabon
big-concurrency.patch
53803 by: Federico Edelman Anaya
53804 by: Charles Cazabon
53805 by: Sean Reifschneider
all mail
Hi,
I have been looking for a solution for our mail server
problem on net and after reading lots of sendmail and
qmail documents I am totally confused :)
My requirements are :
1. We have a domain name on net www.machsim.com, the
hosting company provides pop boxes but no SMTP
service. We need
Roger Arnold wrote:
Sorry if these are stupid questions or is already covered in a how-to,
if it is perhaps someone can point me to it please.
I need to know is how to setup qmail to work with multiple servers with
a mix of IP and Name based virtual domains on 2 or more servers i.e.:
Server
Alex Kramarov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am new to this list, but i am a diligent reader, and after reading all
documentation on q-mail i couldn't find two things i need a lot , after I
successfully installed a qmail server and put it instead of my old exchange,
which was giving me a lot of
At 01:31 AM 12/10/00 -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:51:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
Dec 10 01:02:49 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6
166.84.147.
124:3687 206.26.89.202:25 L=1064 S=0x00 I=46413 F=0x T=64 (#37)
Dec 10 01:02:55 meg kernel:
Steve Manes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 December 2000 at 10:31:24 -0500
At 01:31 AM 12/10/00 -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:51:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
Dec 10 01:02:49 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6
166.84.147.
124:3687
Roger Arnold [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 11 December 2000 at 02:05:41 +1100
Roger Arnold wrote:
Sorry if these are stupid questions or is already covered in a how-to,
if it is perhaps someone can point me to it please.
I need to know is how to setup qmail to work with multiple
At 08:47 AM 12/10/00 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
Your output rule for port 25 is definitely the problem. Contrary to your
belief, it is filtering outbound traffic on eth0. Personally, I don't think
that's such a good idea - my firewall allows everything outbound, and only
filters inbound. Try
* Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001210 10:19]:
1. Is it possible to copy every bounce message generated to any user to
another user (in this case - me : i want to know when my users do not
succeede sending, or someone from the outside is sending mail to a wrong
address in my domain)
* Steve Manes [EMAIL PROTECTED] [001210 12:06]:
At 08:47 AM 12/10/00 -0800, Phil Oester wrote:
Your output rule for port 25 is definitely the problem. Contrary to your
belief, it is filtering outbound traffic on eth0. Personally, I don't think
that's such a good idea - my firewall allows
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:16:47PM +, Mark Delany wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 10:09:17AM -0800, Jon Rust wrote:
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 11:47:32AM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
And did the address you were sending to have any characters needing
quoting in it?
You going
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Steve Manes wrote:
I know what port 25 is and, no, it's not blocking incoming connections. It
seems to be blocking outgoing connections. But if you look at the script
you'll see that port 25 is open both ways:
# SMTP server (25)
#
ipchains -A
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
# SMTP server (25)
#
ipchains -A input -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp \
--source-port $UNPRIVPORTS \
-d $IPADDR 25 -j ACCEPT
ipchains -A output -i $EXTERNAL_INTERFACE -p tcp ! -y \
-s $IPADDR
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Peter Green wrote:
Most likely, you have a rule in the output chain that has a higher
precendence that is blocking the outgoing traffic. By adding a rule like:
Or a 'default' REJECT rule is catching it because the ACCEPT higher up is
too specific.
/sbin/ipchains -I
Peter Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|grep -q MAILER-DAEMON exit 99
Shouldn't this use ``||'' instead of ``''? If he wants to see only the
bounces...
Actually, I meant to type 'grep -qv', but changing either would work.
Also, it might be a good idea to use the mess822 package to only
On 09/12/00 at 3:21 PM Federico Edelman Anaya wrote:
A few days ago .. I post on the list many question about
big-concurrency.patch ...
I was reading other list about Qmail and I get this solution about the
problem with the FD ..
The solution was:
echo "65536" /proc/sys/fs/inode-max
echo
Thank you all for this advice, and it did seem a good idea, until I somehow
brought my server to his knees (good thing it is after work hours) just by
recompiling and running "make setup check" - I was unable to start qmail
with the "alert: cannot start: unable to read controls" messages in the
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 10:31:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
I know what port 25 is and, no, it's not blocking incoming connections. It
seems to be blocking outgoing connections. But if you look at the script
you'll see that port 25 is open both ways:
Ahh, I didn't notice the output rule.
Am Sonntag, 10. Dezember 2000 09:39 schrieb Timothy Legant:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 01:31:54AM -0700, Sean Reifschneider wrote:
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 02:51:24AM -0500, Steve Manes wrote:
Dec 10 01:02:49 meg kernel: Packet log: output REJECT eth0 PROTO=6
166.84.147. 124:3687
I have been lurking here for quite a while learning
whilst I spend the evenings reading various qmail docs
so
that when I do get my new box configured and running
qmail I hopefully won't need to ask anything.
BUT I did get a message today from the list daemon that
said:
snip ==
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 09:54:11AM +1100, Rod... Whitworth wrote:
I have been lurking here for quite a while learning
whilst I spend the evenings reading various qmail docs
so
that when I do get my new box configured and running
qmail I hopefully won't need to ask anything.
BUT I did
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:03:57 -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
This isn't qmail, it's ezmlm. ezmlm waits a week after the first
bounce to send a warning note by default.
Sad! I'd have to fix that if I ran it, but thanks for the info.
What happens with plain qmail in a similar circumstance? I suppose
On Mon, Dec 11, 2000 at 11:11:51AM +1100, Rod... Whitworth wrote:
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000 18:03:57 -0500, Alex Pennace wrote:
This isn't qmail, it's ezmlm. ezmlm waits a week after the first
bounce to send a warning note by default.
Sad! I'd have to fix that if I ran it, but thanks for the
Devrim,
I have been looking for a solution for our mail server
problem on net and after reading lots of sendmail and
qmail documents I am totally confused :)
Top tip: Sendmail bad. qmail good (particularly on this list... ;-)
My requirements are :
1. We have a domain name on net
What kind of service is *.tnt.city.state.da.uu.net, or for example
1Cust147.tnt7.fort-lauderdale.fl.da.uu.net?
SPAM from these addresses is not being blocked by DULS. traceroute
suggests to me an above.net colo at uu.net? (my guess)
We're running the collected SPAMPATCH patches. Does it
TNT usually refers to the equipment, I believe
it is a large-scale access hardware made by
Ascend. The TNT line is for carriers and takes
in multiple T1 or PRI lines. I'm not sure if
those .da.uu.net or exclusively dial-up addresses,
you might end up blocking their co-lo customers
or someone
Your output rule for port 25 is definitely the problem. Contrary to your
belief, it is filtering outbound traffic on eth0. Personally, I don't think
that's such a good idea - my firewall allows everything outbound, and only
filters inbound. Try changing your SMTP output rule to this:
29 matches
Mail list logo
