Dear All
I have a query regarding the way qmail (?incorrectly?) handles time zones. I
have done various tests on this, the relevant portion of header of one test
email below. Essentially I sent a mail out from a client on my internal
network to qmail on my gateway machine, which forwarded to
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Chris Jackman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
We noticed that there is no delivery 2: success message, nor is there
ever for any other email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
If we kill all the alias processes first, and then kill the rt process
* Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010512 20:57]:
Chris Garrigues writes:
As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's
not because of the newbies).
I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a
day. It's kind of handy, because I can see the
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 08:19:27AM +0200, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
[snip]
I have already read previous (heated) discussions on this topic on the list
archive but could not discern a clear answer apart from some people saying
qmail works as designed - why? It seems to be the only mail
Patrick Starrenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
people saying qmail works as designed - why?
Because it makes debugging easier.
It seems to be the only mail server that does so.
So what? Is that a problem?
Received: (qmail 1266 invoked from network); 11 May 2001 21:22:45 -
Received:
qmail Digest 13 May 2001 10:00:01 - Issue 1363
Topics (messages 62348 through 62363):
Re: config for stand-alone box
62348 by: john gennard
62349 by: john gennard
62351 by: Charles Cazabon
Re: reason for problem found: connection reset after 1 minute
62350
Hi List,
I have installed the qmail-analog software
(http://cr.yp.to/qmailanalog.html). This has been a great help as I can
now find out information on active users on my system.
Is there a simple command to identify a users details? I would like a
simple report which gives me information on a
Charles Cazabon wrote:
There's other tricks as well, but with the above list you should easily be
able to handle 1M deliveries a day on decent hardware. I'm afraid I'm not
familiar with the Netra you mention.
Netra's are little 1U pizza box style 'servers'. They are meant for
telecom
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
I sent the mail from the client at 19:22 GMT +0200 (western Europe summer
time) it arrived back to me about a minute later and displays on my client
MUA as being received at **23:23** hours, i.e. four hours in the future!
[...]
The client PC
Russell Nelson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.12 21:54:32 +:
Chris Garrigues writes:
As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's not because
of the newbies).
I send qmail list traffic into its own mailbox, and read it once a
day. It's kind of handy, because I
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail uses - because it is the receiving MUA's task to display the
date in the format the user desires. If your MUA is unable to do so,
complain to the MUA author.
It does, pls check my original mail. You will see that the MUA fully and
correctly
Patrick Starrenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
people saying qmail works as designed - why?
Because it makes debugging easier.
? I was meaning works as designed putting (possibly) incorrect timestamps
on emails. Are you meaning debugging times or debugging qmail? If the former
then that is
Mike Jackson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.05.13 13:46:29 +:
Netra's are little 1U pizza box style 'servers'. They are meant for
telecom operators, etc. I use one for a qmail/courier imap server for a
few hundred users, and it's ok. I definitely would not consider it a
'high end' solution. Yes,
Help!
I have sent three blank emails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in an attempt to unsubscribe three times
without any apparent effect. Anyone got a better idea?
Thanks, Jim Darrough
Jim Darrough, ARS KI7AY
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.ki7ay.com
Dear All
OK, sigh... I was hoping to avoid the religious OS wars and I intend to
stick to the facts, I hope everyone else can also. I need to give you some
further details on the setup. Also I have done a further test and I still
see a problem with qmail.
I have a network (for purposes of
Is [EMAIL PROTECTED] the address you subscribed with?
Jim == Jim Darrough [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Help!
I have sent three blank emails to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] in an attempt to
unsubscribe three times without any apparent effect. Anyone
got a better idea?
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
qmail uses - because it is the receiving MUA's task to display the
date in the format the user desires. If your MUA is unable to do so,
complain to the MUA author.
It does, pls check my original
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
[snip]
*Linux box*
[root@linuxbox patrick]# date
Sun May 13 17:02:55 GMT+2 2001 - Check
Yes.
*W2K box*
C:\date
The current date is: Sun 13/05/2001 - European date format naturally
C:\time
The current time is:
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 05:47:46PM +0200, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
Code bloat?? Doesn't seem like an excuse to me to (**possibly** we haven't
determined this yet) have a fundamental error in a system because someone
doesn't feel like adding code to internationalise something.
Why do you
Your problem is almost certainly not qmail related.
First off you may want to learn how Unix/Linux keeps time. Believe it
or not, Unix/Linux don't know anything about timezones. They all keep
time internally in UTC (nee GMT). Yes, every Unix server on the planet
current has the same time. To
Patrick Starrenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
(as it is summer and for once the sun is shining in Holland) with
daylight saving it is GMT +02:00. So...
I repeat: there must something wrong with your Linux setup. Qmail uses
system calls of the underlying operating system to generate the
Patrick,
Seens to me that qmail is doing the right thing. Below is the headers from
a message sent by you to qmail list and all date fields inserted by qmail
are using the correct time:
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun May 13 14:40:22 2001
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 06:28:53PM +0200, Patrick Starrenburg wrote:
% *Linux box*
% [root@linuxbox patrick]# date
% Sun May 13 17:02:55 GMT+2 2001 - Check
Your clock seems to be set wrong. According to Solaris and at least
one web page I dug up, http://www.bsdi.com/date, GMT+2 is a posix
time
From: Robin S. Socha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 13 May 2001 10:18:45 +0200
* Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010512 20:57]:
Chris Garrigues writes:
As it is, I consider unsubscribing several times a week (and it's
not because of the newbies).
I send qmail list traffic into its
Thus spake Patrick Starrenburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
=
*Test email*
Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: (qmail 6078 invoked from network); 13 May 2001 **18:56:24** -
[[[ Where does 18: come from ??]]]
Received: from
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 09:10:12PM +0200, Felix von Leitner wrote:
[snip]
The date 18:56:24 - is equivalent to the date 16:56:24 +0200, so
there is no error whatsoever here. The MTA prints the date as GMT,
which actually is a feature, because it allows easy comparison of dates
by
Thanks to Adrian Ho and Mark Jefferys explanations for the solution. Adrian
you were halfway there with your first reply and Mark's link pointed me in
the right direction to track down the problem. The TZ setting was GMT +2
which apparently means actually the box was calculating GMT **minus 2
maybe this is a stupidly easy question but I cant find where do I find out
about the format of .alias files, and other documentation on them?
Neil
Neil Grant wrote:
maybe this is a stupidly easy question but I cant find where do I find out
about the format of .alias files, and other documentation on them?
Neil
`man dot-qmail`
or if you didn't put qmail's man files in one of your MANPATH directories:
`man -M /var/qmail/man
Hi,
Thanks for all the people who replied
to my questions earlier!!
But can anyone here tell me how I can
resend individual message?
Besides, if I don't have a legitimate domain name, there is no
way for me to test if the incoming messages from remote addresses work,
right?
Again,
I apologize if this is a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure out how
to set up a default forwarding address for virtual domains. In other words,
if an email is sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], it will be forwarded to a
preset address.
Maybe it has something to do with the setup I'm using, which
Hi,
There is no mail arrival notice while
the message would show up in $HOME/Mailbox! What seems to be the
problem? Thanks a lot!!
CY Wang
Check Man page for qmail-send - virtualdomains. You may
also need to use an alias (man dot-qmail).
Hope this helps,
~~Moose~~
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Peter Janett wrote:
I apologize if this is a dumb question, but I can't seem to figure out how
to set up a default forwarding address for
33 matches
Mail list logo
