This is in response to your email about the loss of
email ghost.
First of all, fuck you and the horse you road in on.
This guy is asking for help, not to be harassed.
Second, you demonstrated your own incompetence; your
lack of understanding basic rules of security is quite
obvious in
This is in response to your email about the ?loss of
email ghost.?
[rantings snipped]
*ring*
*ring*
- Hello, Joe's Car Service. How may I be of service?
- Ah yes, it's my car. It doesn't start
- Ah, I see. What make is it?
- Oh well, I'm afraid I can't tell you that
- Uhmm...why not?
-
Roger Arnold wrote:
Someone tried (I think) to send email through their virtual domain,
which qmail won't allow (again I think) probably due to the relaying
rules.
This has created a process which can't be completed and I need to know
how to stop qmail trying.
Now I know that I may be barking up
Hi!
We have about to five million mailboxes and we are wondering if there is any
project that includes qmail under Solaris with LDAP authentication.
We know it works, but we want to know about its performance.
If someone have worked with a similar implementation please tell us how it work.
arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... I still need to
know how to stop a process
Look at the man page for the kill command (man kill).
If you are asking for something else please give more information.
In case you didn't read the Qmail FAQ have a look at
Roger Arnold wrote:
Thanks Frank,
You have helped a lot by pointing me to relevant information. with good
links as well.
I am very much obliged for your help
Regards
Roger
Frank Tegtmeyer wrote:
arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... I still need to
know how to stop a process
Look at
Hi,
how can i delete the mail queue in qmail? pls help i really need it.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:26:03AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is in response to your email about the loss of
email ghost.
[rant]
Why make a public discussion out of this?? A private mail to Socha is
probably more efficient and definitely more polite.
I can understand Socha
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:48:10PM +0800, KIM wrote:
how can i delete the mail queue in qmail? pls help i really need it.
There are several tools mentioned on ''the qmail home page''[1] but
I prefer to make it reach the queuelifetime by touching the relevant
queue/info file. It will then be
hello friends,
i m using a redhat 7.1 system, with qmail installed on it. qmail is working
perfectly.
The pop3 clients like outlook express takes a long time to
connect and respond. also when i telnet to this server on port 110 or 25 or
to port 23 it takes a long time for the prompt to appear.
Qmail [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
my DNS is working correctly. The reverse resolution is also correct.
I doubt the second. Do you need names in the log? If not, use
-Hl yourhostname for your tcpserver setup. Then delays will go away
even if reverse resolution doesn't work.
-R is also worth to
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:09:31PM -0400, Roger Merchberger wrote:
[...]
My main concern is rejecting real email using RBL... I recall hearing
folks having problems with that in the past. Has RBL improved on the false
positives problem?
There is no such thing as an RBL false positive; any
Hello!
I have a question about setting up pop3 access for
virtual domains.
For example, suppose I have 2 virtual domains on my
server = vdomain1.com and vdomain2.com
I need to set up the following email addresses, each
one will be accessed by a DIFFERENT person through
POP3
(i.e. with MS
A A [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
and set up 2 linux system users with the names
vdomain1_user and vdomain2_user
and in each user's home directory put .qmail-support
and .qmail-webmaster
... that forward to the real system users then.
How will the pop3 program access the email? My test
user
Hello group!
I have qmail with ldap and it run correctaly, but when ezmlm work, i
receive the next message:
@40003b331d5614525ea4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40003b331d7414e67c9c starting delivery 118: msg 145786 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
@40003b331d7414e6ab7c status: local 1/10
Hello,
I have a unique problem that doesn't seem to be covered by the
documentation.
I have a shell account on a system (not root). I would like to setup qmail
as an SMTP server on port 2525. It would only be used for outgoing mail,
not incoming mail.
Does anyone know how I might go about
Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
Hi!
We have about to five million mailboxes and we are wondering if there is any
project that includes qmail under Solaris with LDAP authentication.
We know it works, but we want to know about its performance.
If someone have worked with a similar implementation
I have a shell account on a system (not root). I would like to setup
qmail
as an SMTP server on port 2525. It would only be used for outgoing mail,
not incoming mail.
In general, it is a strange idea to set up a mail gateway without
notifying the root (even if it is for outgoing mails
Hi,
does anyone have good tips on how to install
smtp-auth for qmail? I want to allow a few
clients with dynamic IP-adresses to relay
over my server. I tried out a few patches.
But it doesn't work correctly. I use Outlook
Express to test it. When I deactivate
Server needs authentification qmail
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:25:52PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
speed. However, why should this number be prime, why not have 12 or 16
directories?
Because it's a hash. If your hash isn't prime, you fill your hash
buckets unevenly.
I think we are spreading urban legends here.
AFAIK,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Tanuj Shah wrote:
I would have thought, just install qmail somewhere in your home and use
tcpserver for the listening on port 2525.
Thanks; you solved part of the puzzle for me. On a test system where I
have root access, I was able to run qmail as a send-only SMTP server
Title: ¨¤¨º
My GOD I hate this
list
-Pa¡ãL
-Opprinnelig melding-Fra: cool dragon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sendt: 19. juni 2001
03:39Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Emne: Please help me, a
problem in qmail!!
Dear Sir,I am very sorry to
taste your time with such problem.
Title: ¨¤¨º
Imposible for me to
get out of
-Pa¡ãL
My ISP does not suport RETURN-PATH ...!!!
-Pa°L
So, anyone!?? tell me how I get out of this list...
here is my headder:
Received: from be.wise.no ([194.143.56.137]) by wtmail1.wt with SMTP
(Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
id NNQWM0DP; Fri, 22 Jun 2001 14:45:13 +0200
Received: (qmail 4453 invoked from
I am helpless !!!
My girlfriend SUCKS anyone that helps me out of thisqmail-list...I am
pissed
-Pa°L
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: peter green [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 18. juni 2001 14:22
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Rewrite (.*)@foo.com to \\[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Pa°L
-Opprinnelig melding-
Fra: Henning Brauer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sendt: 21. juni 2001 12:05
Til: Qmail Mailing List
Emne: Re: qmailanalog
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 08:22:46PM -0600, Charles Cazabon wrote:
This script may have
bash-specific constructions,
s_year=`date -d
First of all, fuck you and the horse you road in on.
This guy is asking for help, not to be harassed.
Please leave the poor horse out.
Kirti
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:42:52AM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Tanuj Shah wrote:
I would have thought, just install qmail somewhere in your home and use
tcpserver for the listening on port 2525.
Thanks; you solved part of the puzzle for me. On a test system where I
Jost Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are spreading urban legends here.
AFAIK, the primality is for double hashing in conflict resolution.
Nothing of that kind is going on here.
You're right. The hashing used here is a simple modulo. From
fmtqfn.c:
i = fmt_ulong(s,id %
Philip Mak writes:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Tanuj Shah wrote:
I would have thought, just install qmail somewhere in your home and use
tcpserver for the listening on port 2525.
Thanks; you solved part of the puzzle for me. On a test system where I
have root access, I was able to run qmail
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Chris Johnson wrote:
What is a send-only SMTP server? qmail-smtpd receives mail from the
Internet and queues it; it doesn't send mail anywhere.
By send-only, I mean that this SMTP server is not intended for receiving
e-mail to be delivered to local users. It will only be
You Wrote:
I am helpless !!!
Send an email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], just as
it stated in the informational message you received when you subscribed...
--
Roger Walker
Tier III Messaging/News Team
Internet Applications, National Consumer IP
TELUS Corporation 780-493-2471
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You Wrote:
I am helpless !!!
Send an email to mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED], just as
it stated in the informational message you received when you
subscribed...
In case there is a problem figuring out exactly which address is
subscribed, look at the headers for a line
Hi,
I have been using qmail for the last year and a
half and have been closely following the mailing list at securepoint, and didn't
find anything related to my query, hence I took the liberty of posting
it.
The objective is to build a high-volumer server
capable of doing mail-merged
Lars Hansson([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.22 12:14:16 +:
PS.
The mailserver is the aforementioned, age-old (around 1998) slackware box
running qmail, UW IMAP (ugh) and some generic POP3 daemon (in.pop3d).
first upgrade your imap mess -- try something different to uw-imap,
it is badly broken
Jörgen Persson writes:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 03:48:10PM +0800, KIM wrote:
how can i delete the mail queue in qmail? pls help i really need it.
There are several tools mentioned on ''the qmail home page''[1] but
I prefer to make it reach the queuelifetime by touching the relevant
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 08:53:07AM +0200, Jesús Arnáiz wrote:
Hi!
We have about to five million mailboxes and we are wondering if there is any
project that includes qmail under Solaris with LDAP authentication.
We know it works, but we want to know about its performance.
If someone have
Hi,
I have been using qmail for the last year and a half and have been closely
following the mailing list at securepoint, and didn't find anything related
to my query, hence I took the liberty of posting it.
The objective is to build a high-volumer server capable of doing mail-merged
email
first upgrade your imap mess -- try something different to uw-imap, it
is badly broken by design, AFAIK.
then upgrade your users ;-)
Well, I would absolutely love to get rid of UW IMAP. I'm no big fan of it
myself, I'd rather use Courier. However, The problem is that I can't, at
least not
Martin Kong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| if echo $SENDER | grep @apedge.com /dev/null 21; then exit 0;
else exit 99; fi
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Hi. This is the qmail-send program at apedge.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
addresses.
This is a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This guy is asking for help, [...]
What the fuck else do you want from the guy? His
passwords, IP range, hours of operation and social
security number?
If we think it's relevant to the problem in question, yes. If he doesn't want
to give that
I am helpless !!!
My girlfriend SUCKS anyone that helps me out of thisqmail-list...I
am pissed
A pleasant an offer as that is, I think both you and her will be more
comfortable with sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The response
email should have all the informatin you need. This
manav writes:
I have been using qmail for the last year and a half and have been closely
following the mailing list at securepoint, and didn't find anything related
to my query, hence I took the liberty of posting it.
The objective is to build a high-volumer server capable of doing
José Ramón Jiménez Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have qmail with ldap and it run correctaly, but when ezmlm work, i
receive the next message:
@40003b331d5614525ea4 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
@40003b331d7414e67c9c starting delivery 118: msg 145786 to local
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Manav. For most of this, one word: ezmlm (www.ezmlm.org). For the
rest...
manav == manav [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1.2 For each blast we want to handle the bounced emails individually (we
would need to update the appropriate table). What do we do for that? We
cannot just set
Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What exactly are you trying to accomplish?
I am trying to setup qmail to send out messages for Listar. When Listar
sends it a message, its job is to relay that message to the remote SMTP
servers of the recipients. That's all.
So use something other
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jost Krieger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think we are spreading urban legends here.
AFAIK, the primality is for double hashing in conflict resolution.
Nothing of that kind is going on here.
You're right. The hashing used here is a simple modulo.
[...]
Pål Fr. Johansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, anyone!?? tell me how I get out of this list...
here is my headder:
[no Mailing-List: header]
Nope, that didn't come from ezmlm. Or you edited it.
Charles
--
---
Charles
Lars Hansson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
*ring*
*ring*
- Hello, Joe's Car Service. How may I be of service?
- Ah yes, it's my car. It doesn't start
- Ah, I see. What make is it?
- Oh well, I'm afraid I can't tell you that
- Uhmm...why not?
- Well, you never know. So many car thieves these
manav wrote:
The objective is to build a high-volumer server capable of doing mail-merged
email blasts to several lists with 10,000 to 1,000,000 users, provide
detailed reports about the status of emails (sent, bounced, bad email
addresses, opened, forwarded), list management (across
Williams, Paul (OTS-EDH) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a list of the environment variables qmail-local sets up and
what they map to?
http://www.lifewithqmail.org/lwq.html#environment-variables
-Dave
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 02:44:27PM +0200, P?l Fr. Johansen wrote:
My ISP does not suport RETURN-PATH ...!!!
Complain to your ISP.
Lars Hansson wrote:
I am helpless !!!
My girlfriend SUCKS anyone that helps me out of thisqmail-list...I
am pissed
A pleasant an offer as that is, I think both you and her will be more
comfortable with sending an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] The response
email should have all the
Chris Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You'll never be able to install and run qmail without root access because it
requires installing qmail-queue setuid, and it requires running various other
programs as users other than yourself. As a regular, non-root user, you can't
create a setuid program
Hi Mike, Russ,
I really appreciate you took some time out to reply. Thanks.
Yes, I do have three of my production servers co-located with an ISP in the
US that promises unlimited bandwidth, with a 99.9% uptime. All these
production boxes have a SCSI Disk with hardware alarms to indicate any
Hi,
I have problem:
i install qmail-103 in /usr/local/qmail
and i have virtual POP3 users in /usr/local/qmail/users
i have /usr/local/qmail/users/assign with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ti-an:888:888:/usr/local/qmail/users/ti-an:::
and i use Maildir format.
home for ti-an have ./Maildir/ directory by
Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I know. You have to give out enough info to get help.
But some people are a little more cautious than others. Remember,
they DON'T know YOU. And with all the inflated news propaganda
about the Internet and how people can steal you blind, we
manav writes:
I really appreciate you took some time out to reply. Thanks.
And not flame you? :-) Not everybody on the list is a flamer, and
besides you supplied us with all the necessary information. You *did*
confuse us by mentioning 10 lakh recipients and 128kbps in the same
paragraph,
Bill Andersen writes:
I know, I know. You have to give out enough info to get help.
But some people are a little more cautious than others. Remember,
they DON'T know YOU. And with all the inflated news propaganda
about the Internet and how people can steal you blind, we should
at
manav wrote:
Hi Mike, Russ,
Hi !
We are running the alpha phase right now (with whatever current
implementations we have), and I have serious doubts about the stability and
scalability of the system. The maximum load that I've put on my production
boxes is 250,000 emails so far and
manav([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2001.06.22 21:17:26 +:
Yes, I do have three of my production servers co-located with an ISP in the
US that promises unlimited bandwidth, with a 99.9% uptime. All these
wow, daring. my contract with my isp ensures 100mbit/fdx ethernet with
99.87something%
Andrei Tihonov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i have /usr/local/qmail/users/assign with
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:ti-an:888:888:/usr/local/qmail/users/ti-an:::
That looks bogus to me. The first field is supposed to be the local part of
the address -- no @, no domain.
You want to use virtualdomains for
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 09:33:34AM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
I am trying to setup qmail to send out messages for Listar. When Listar
sends it a message, its job is to relay that message to the remote SMTP
servers of the recipients. That's all.
Why don't you use your Web Host's MTA?
--Adam
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Charles Cazabon wrote:
Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, I know. You have to give out enough info to get help.
But some people are a little more cautious than others. Remember,
they DON'T know YOU. And with all the inflated news propaganda
about
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:21:32AM -0500, Bill Andersen allegedly wrote:
And then there are these two conversations that took
place in Dallas, Texas. Late 1999.
First call:
*ring*
Hello, Joe's Car Service. How may I be of service?
Ah yes, I need someone to pick up my Chevy Suburban
at
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:11:00PM -0400, Russell Nelson allegedly wrote:
How to know which is reliable? Watch this mailing list, and see
who's been around longest (has the most established reputation to
protect), and who's name begins with R.
If you say so Russ.
Heh heh.
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:26:03AM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What the fuck else do you want from the guy? His
passwords, IP range, hours of operation and social
security number?
He's asking for FREE ADVICE. No problem, but for CORRECT advice DETAILS are
needed. If he needs secrecy or
Charles Cazabon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Nope. If you're running a mail server, you should have enough technical
knowledge to not be vulnerable to mass hysteria about technology.
Otherwise,
go back to your stone knives and raw mastodon meat.
However, you are making the assumption the
Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Then don't ask a public mailing list for help. Instead, go to one of
the suppliers of commercial support. How to know which is reliable?
Watch this mailing list, and see who's been around longest (has the
most established reputation to protect),
* Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 13:13]:
Your philosophy says, if you're not technically knowledgeable, you
have no business trying to learn how to use a mail server. How the
heck do you become technically knowledgeable then?
http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html
And just for the record:
--IPiIw4QAe+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're right. The hashing used here is a simple modulo.
[...]
I can't see that primality
* Bill Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010622 13:22]:
Russell Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Then don't ask a public mailing list for help. Instead, go to one of
the suppliers of commercial support. How to know which is reliable?
Watch this mailing list, and see who's been around
Bill Andersen writes:
Russ, I'm not saying they shouldn't give us the information needed
to help them. I'm just of the opinion we shouldn't jump down every
newbie's throat just because they are a little over cautious.
We don't jump down every newbie's throat. Just every fifth one, to
It would like to install patch WILDMAT_0.3 to prevent the Spam, but when I
apply patch as the instructions of README I receive this error:
qmail-smtpd.c:417: warning: return type of `main ' is not `int '
make: *** [ qmail-smtpd.o ] Error 1
I am trying to apply patch in qmail-1.03 blank, use
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--IPiIw4QAe+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Description: message body text
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
etc.
Argh. Forgot about my Emacs' broken MIME. Here's the program:
#include stdio.h
#include stdlib.h
#include math.h
main(int
Robin S. Socha writes:
I'd buy your support any day, Russel. And I mean it.
Once, just once I'd like to see people mis-spel my name as Rusell.
Just once. Why does anybody think that a trailing 'L' is optiona?
You don't ever see your name spelled Robi Socha, do you? Huh?
Betcha don't, do ya?
I apologize for being slightly off topic. The qmail server is also my pop
server. (RH 7.1) I'd like to give my users the ability to manage their own
passwords (IMO, a sysadmin shouldn't know his/her users passwords). In
truth, its a switched network, so I'm not too worried about sniffing, but
I have qmail up and running. Sending and recieving works fine as an open
relay (briefly). So I tried to use tcp.smtp to add a relay client. Here's
what I did.
/etc/tcp.smtp:
MY_IP:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
then ran:
tcprules /etc/tcp.smtp.cbd /etc/tcp.smtp.tmp /etc/tcp.smtp
then :
svc -h
Ian Lance Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the input numbers are truly random, then a modulos hash will
distribute well whether or not the hash size is prime.
However, if the input numbers are not truly random, then a modulos
hash may pick out some regularity in the input, and preferentially
I'm sure someone's father out there used that approach when they
were a child. Maybe it's why they always do the same to other
people...
Agree.. 1G %
Kirti
-Original Message-
From: Bill Andersen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 10:55 AM
To:
hey... is it ok if we only use Rus ;) j/k
so Russell... thanks for all your input here at the list
Terius
PS: And just to make you happy : Rusell :D
- Original Message -
From: Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: qmai maiing ist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:09 PM
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The first thing I did was Google for hash prime modulo even
distribution. That turns up many repetitions of Charles' assertion,
without proof or explanation.
[...]
Being a ``Profile, don't speculate'' kind of guy, I decided to write a
little program to
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the input numbers are not fairly random, then a modulo hash is not
a choice.
Not a *good* choice.
Unix file system inode numbers are not truly random. Therefore, it's
wise to choose a prime conf-split.
BTW, I modified my modhash program to read numbers
Erik Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/etc/tcp.smtp:
MY_IP:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
[...]
But I am still getting the 553 error. Any suggetions on something I missed
in the FAQ?
Yes. Don't obscure your IP address, hostname, etc., when you ask for help.
I've got a good idea what your
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Once, just once I'd like to see people mis-spel my name as Rusell.
Just once. Why does anybody think that a trailing 'L' is optiona?
Blame Randal Schwartz...or his parents.
Or maybe this guy:
http://www.absolutearts.com/portfolios/r/russram/
-Dave
Hi folks,
Does Procmail work with Qmail maildir format?
Thx
Fábio Gomes
--
@_{2**2..6*6}=split//,áiGsDDbooe eoin m-IsvveoF Tenlmt;print
values%_,\n
Erik Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/etc/tcp.smtp:
MY_IP:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
[...]
But I am still getting the 553 error. Any suggetions on something I missed
in the FAQ?
I did the same procedure earlier today and it worked fine for me. The only
thing I can think of is that you
The real tcp.smtp file says:
66.12.153.158:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
dsl.gtei.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
this is what I am trying right now with no success
-Erik
- Original Message -
From: Charles Cazabon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 1:05 PM
Subject:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Erik Logan wrote:
The real tcp.smtp file says:
66.12.153.158:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
dsl.gtei.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
this is what I am trying right now with no success
dsl.gtei.net is an invalid host. Did you mean dsl.gte.net perhaps?
Take a look at your mail log
Fábio Gomes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does Procmail work with Qmail maildir format?
Newer versions of procmail have Maildir support built-in, but they don't
adhere to djb's naming convention -- you could run into problems.
You'd be better off to use maildrop, or if you must use procmail, use
Erik Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The real tcp.smtp file says:
66.12.153.158:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
dsl.gtei.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
this is what I am trying right now with no success
Are you connecting from localhost? If so, you'll need to add 127. to that
file above.
Charles
--
Hello
66.12.153.158:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
dsl.gtei.net:allow,RELAYCLIENT=
:allow
the secondary MX should be enabled as RELAYCLIENT
tcpserver -H -R -v -p -x /etc/tcp.smtp.cdb -u 503 -g 502 0 smtp recordio
^^
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
Well, I figured out how to run qmail as a non-root user. I am posting my
experiences here in the hopes that it will help someone in the future.
Thanks to those who helped point me in the right direction, and also those
who said it couldn't be done, which sort of encouraged me to do it. :)
WHY
Ok now i am confused WTF is Robin? Male? Female? 86 Year Old Hermaphidite
east Dallas Whore? Throw me a bone here please.
Thanks Russell Russ Rus Russel or whatever it is for all your help.
Jps
Whoa,calm down there big guy, yer scaring me!
Jeff Palmer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
P.S. this was just a comment to lighten the mood.
Please don't even reply to it (praises/flames not needed.)
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Russell Nelson wrote:
Robin S. Socha writes:
I'd buy your support any
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 05:31:42PM -0400, Philip Mak wrote:
Well, I figured out how to run qmail as a non-root user. I am posting my
experiences here in the hopes that it will help someone in the future.
Thanks to those who helped point me in the right direction, and also those
who said it
Henning Brauer wrote:
Use of dig is depreciated (sp? me too...). Use dnsq/dnsqr instead ;-))
sorry, couldn't resist.
I wasn't aware of this. Everyone rants DIG! USE DIG! on the BIND
mailing lists. Anyone point me to some good reading I can toast them all
with? :-)
--
Nick (Keith) Fish
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 07:29:31PM +, Nick (Keith) Fish wrote:
Henning Brauer wrote:
Use of dig is depreciated (sp? me too...). Use dnsq/dnsqr instead ;-))
sorry, couldn't resist.
I wasn't aware of this. Everyone rants DIG! USE DIG! on the BIND
mailing lists. Anyone point me to
Hi,
I installed qmail, and can send emails to the world,
and can get emails from an external POP3 mail service at kornet.net.
The email address of mine is [EMAIL PROTECTED], which then relays the emails
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am using a cable modem, so the IP is dynamic.
And I have a domain,
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
