Hello,
Whenever my qmail server sends someone an email, the
following line appears in the header:
Received: from mail.mydomain.com
(old_name.mydomain.com [216.216.216.216] (may be
forged))
However, recently I changed my server name from
old_name.mydomain.com to new_name.mydomain.com.
Is there
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:31:19PM -0700, A A wrote:
Hello,
Whenever my qmail server sends someone an email, the
following line appears in the header:
Received: from mail.mydomain.com
(old_name.mydomain.com [216.216.216.216] (may be
forged))
However, recently I changed my server name
I modified the server name of the machine itself by
altering the following 2 files:
(1) /etc/hosts
(2) /etc/sysconfig/network
--- Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 11:31:19PM -0700, A A wrote:
Hello,
Whenever my qmail server sends someone an email,
the
Thanks for your help Uwe and Robin. I found Robins mail also funny until
he made fun of me. Yes, it's true I should have read the FAQ and should
have stated my OS (Redhat Linux 7.0 i386) and logging tool (multilog). I
just thought this is kind of standard. What I don't understand why Robin
cannot
Hi Brett,
Thanks for the reply.
I am exploring ezmlm right now, so I believe I'd have to trouble the people
on the ezmlm mailing list for queries on that :-)
For tracking forwarded emails, I have a hidden IMG tag which then calls a
servlet. When the user opens the email for the first time, the
Paras pradhan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been using qmail for about 3 month and it was running very fine. But
now though it is running fine when I check the log it was giving this
message
Jun 23 10:38:22 god qmail: 993272002.377762 warning: unable to stat
mess/6/3709
[...]
When I
A A [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I modified the server name of the machine itself by
altering the following 2 files:
(1) /etc/hosts
(2) /etc/sysconfig/network
The other servers are getting your host's name by a reverse lookup in DNS.
You'll have to have your DNS information updated to the new
Roland Mathis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What I don't understand why Robin cannot write something like: check the FAQ
for answers about how to archive all incoming and outgoing mail and second I
cannot help you if you don't tell me your OS and logging tool.
Because if we did this for every
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 06:25:13PM +0800, Roland Mathis wrote:
Yes, it's true I should have read the FAQ and should
have stated my OS (Redhat Linux 7.0 i386) and logging tool (multilog). I
just thought this is kind of standard.
Standard?? ok, using multilog is quite common. The unix running
Use a sensefull subject please.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 11:02:17AM +0530, Paras pradhan wrote:
Hello dear friends,
I have been using qmail for about 3 month and it was running very fine. But
now though it is running fine when I check the log it was giving this
message
Jun 23 10:38:22
I have qmail installed with both the qamil-103.patch, and QMAILQUEUE patch
(for qmail-scanner) installed. I am still having problems with the CName
Lookup Failure problem. Is the big-dns patch mentioned here the same as
the qmail-103.patch? If not, can someone forward me a copy of the
Is there any way to prevent email accounts or forwards from showing up in
the web admin interface in sqwebmail?
I don't want to disable the qmail admin web interface completely, I just
want certain accounts not to show up in the web interface. Is this
possible?
Brendan
Hi there,
I have configured a mail-server (uhm.. a sort of) using qmail.
My system is a RedHat 7.0.
During the tests, I had some trouble connecting to my smtp server...
It takes very long time to wake up (up to 8 sec.) and the connection was very slow.
Connecting top my pop server, instead,
Rick Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have qmail installed with both the qamil-103.patch, and QMAILQUEUE patch
(for qmail-scanner) installed. I am still having problems with the CName
Lookup Failure problem. Is the big-dns patch mentioned here the same as
the qmail-103.patch? If not,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I've tryied to remove the tcp-env -R from the script for running qmail
So now xinetd (yes, i use it..) execute only qmail-smtp. Doing this trick
the connection works much better, but now i want to know if tcp-env is
strictly necessary or if I
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 06:11:51PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
During the tests, I had some trouble connecting to my smtp server...
It takes very long time to wake up (up to 8 sec.) and the connection was very slow.
Connecting top my pop server, instead, there wasn't any problem.
Once
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 10:21:56AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
Jörgen Persson writes:
I prefer to make it reach the queuelifetime by touching the relevant
queue/info file. It will then be bounced after one more delivery
attempt.
That works, but it would be better if Dan had
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 06:25:13PM +0800, Roland Mathis wrote:
Thanks for your help Uwe and Robin. I found Robins mail also funny until
he made fun of me.
Translation: I saw how Robin treated people who posted messages that made it
obvious that they had not done any research on their own, but
Jörgen Persson writes:
The ''destroy mail'' option is a neat idea but I fail to see a valid
need for such a feature.
It's handy if one of your users has sent out a bunch of spam.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://russnelson.com
Crynwr sells support for free software | PGPok |
521
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 12:01:05PM +, Jost Krieger wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 02:25:52PM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
speed. However, why should this number be prime, why not have 12 or 16
directories?
Because it's a hash. If your hash isn't prime, you fill your hash
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 04:04:27PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
Dave Sill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the input numbers are not fairly random, then a modulo hash is not
a choice.
Not a *good* choice.
Unix file system inode numbers are not truly random. Therefore, it's
wise to choose a
Hi there,
I'm trying to configure my serverto answer
"non existent user" or something at the rcptto level during a SMTP session with
wrong addresses or non local usesrs in that field.
I would like qmail to check the rcpt to email
addrress before accepting the mail so as to avoid bandwidth
Giancarlo De Menna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to configure my server to answer non existent user or something
at the rcptto level during a SMTP session with wrong addresses or non local
usesrs in that field.
Stock qmail cannot do this, because qmail-smtpd (the program which actually
I have a setup with two qmail servers on different machines (call them
machine 1 and machine 2). Machine 1's qmail has to send all its mail to
machine 2's qmail, which delivers the messages to their final destination.
If machine 1 is disconnected from the network, its qmail has to hold the
Philip Mak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have a setup with two qmail servers on different machines (call them
machine 1 and machine 2). Machine 1's qmail has to send all its mail to
machine 2's qmail, which delivers the messages to their final destination.
If machine 1 is disconnected from the
Hello Friends,My domainname is myname.com
and I don't want to deliver any message fromsomeuser of other domain say [EMAIL PROTECTED] to myname.com domain at
all.How can I stop that pls suggest me.Thank you for you kind
co-operation.Rupak
On Sun, Jun 24, 2001 at 10:41:37AM +0530, Rupak wrote:
My domainname is myname.com and I don't want to deliver any message from
someuser of other domain say [EMAIL PROTECTED] to myname.com domain at all.
How can I stop that pls suggest me.
Put [EMAIL PROTECTED] in
Hello,
this isn't entirely qmail related, but since courier-imapd is only qmail
users...
I want to switch from POP3 to IMAP (finally). That means I'll have to do
filtering on the server, like I do locally now with procmail.
My problem is that IMAP folders aren't separate Maildirs. So how do I
What I did is the same thing. I have two systems in a cluster that forwards
all mail to another system. On system 1 remove everything for the locals
file, then make a file called smtproutes and put this in it:
system1.com:system2.com
My MX records have system 1 as primary and system 2 as
29 matches
Mail list logo
