Hi,
How can i log the messages that are bounced ( like spammer who what to use
me as a rely ) ??
Tanx !
HJ
Herwin Jan Steehouwer
KPMG Management services/KPMG CT
Churchilplein 6
2517 JW Den Haag
(+31)70 338 2 471
Paul Farber wrote:
Yeah, I know. But the binary .cdb file is pretty unreadable, don't you
think?
Paul D. Farber II
Farber Technology
Ph. 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Adam D . McKenna wrote:
That's not a cdb, it's a flat textfile. You need
Cyril Bitterich wrote:
Hi,
I read the archieves but haven't foud anything apropriate.
some of our Customers (we are a small non-profit ISP) come up with a
Problem getting their e-mail via pop3. I use Qmail 1.03 and pop-Server
from the qmail package.
If there's a bigger amount of
A while back, someone was trying to assemble a comprehensive patch list
and archive. I would like to volunteer to host this.
My only request - at least, initially - is that patch authors *only*
submit to me their patches, along with a blurb of what the patch does and
what requirements (outside
Dear All,
How to increase qmail-local performance?
(/var/qmail/control/concurrencylocal seems doesn't work)
Thanks
_Ayip.
--
I THINK MAN INVENTED THE CAR by instinct.
-- Jack Handley, The New Mexican, 1988.
I am setting up a webmail system on top of qmail. I thought once I had a
/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow entry for a user, that would be sufficient
to receive email. This is not the case, unless the user also has a valid
home directory owned by that user, qmail says the user does not exist.
Hi all,
I want to use 'qmail-ldap' and also some 'anti-spam' patches, but if I
aply a second patch to one file I got so many rejects.
What is the way to go??
Bye
Sven
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10 Sep 99, at 11:42, Sven Veckes wrote:
I want to use 'qmail-ldap' and also some 'anti-spam' patches, but if I
aply a second patch to one file I got so many rejects. What is the way to
go??
a. Review the rejected hunks and apply them manually.
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 09:43:29AM +0300, Anand Buddhdev wrote:
.
.
.
.
.
some text
This is a known and confirmed bug in various versions of outlook. To make
things worse, the bug only bites if the last packet contains just dots. To
make a sure way to cause trouble for LookOut ehr..
Hi everybody,
I've installed qmail in a Red Hat 5.1 and I've been noticed
that my server
is used for spamming purposes.
I've tried something in hosts.allow, putting parameters
like
tcp-env: xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx : setenv = RELAYCLIENT
where xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx is the IP or IP range granted to
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Paulo Jan wrote:
Paul Farber wrote:
Yeah, I know. But the binary .cdb file is pretty unreadable, don't you
think?
Paul D. Farber II
Farber Technology
Ph. 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Adam D . McKenna wrote:
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Lyndon Griffin wrote:
A while back, someone was trying to assemble a comprehensive patch list
and archive. I would like to volunteer to host this.
My only request - at least, initially - is that patch authors *only*
submit to me their patches, along with a blurb of
Yeah, I went back, now that you mention it, and I see a lot of work has been
done since I wrote it off as a dead-loss for information months ago. No
offense, Russ, but the presentation of information there is about as good as
any geoshitties site. And yes, that can be taken as an offer to help
Chris McCarthy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
I am setting up a webmail system on top of qmail. I thought once I had a
/etc/passwd and /etc/shadow entry for a user, that would be sufficient
to receive email. This is not the case, unless the
Lyndon Griffin writes:
Of course, if somebody knows of a site already doing this, that URL is
welcome, and I may withdraw my offer.
http://www.qmail.org/top.html#addons . You can argue that it needs
improvement, but it's the canonical list.
--
-russ nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lyndon Griffin writes:
Yeah, I went back, now that you mention it, and I see a lot of work has been
done since I wrote it off as a dead-loss for information months ago. No
offense, Russ, but the presentation of information there is about as good as
any geoshitties site. And yes, that
Kevin Waterson writes:
I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely.
of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later.
I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and var-qmail packages.
Ask redhat to change the dependency from
So, since you think you can do better, what would you do
differently? Split the page up? That would waste people's time.
Add more information? I'm fine with that -- "send code", as they
say.
There's always the approach of "one big page with an index at the top
where the index links point
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 08:42:08AM -0400, Russell Nelson wrote:
Kevin Waterson writes:
I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely.
of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later.
I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and
The jist of the response was, no, I didn't use a plain text file for the
.cbd file in tcpserver.
Thanks.
Paul D. Farber II
Farber Technology
Ph. 570-628-5303
Fax 570-628-5545
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, James Smallacombe wrote:
On Thu, 9 Sep 1999, Paul Farber wrote:
Yeah, I
Russell Nelson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Kevin Waterson writes:
I am putting together a redhat clone and have omitted sendmail entirely.
of course exmh nmh fetchmail etc complain, but that can be remedied later.
I have been looking and reading up on qmail-run and var-qmail packages.
Okay,
I have our smtp running under tcpserver and only machine in the office
can send mail through it. But now, we have people dialing in from
home and wanting to use our smtp server. They can't use the ISPs smtp
server because they want to send mail as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and most people don't
Mr. Christopher F. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 September 1999 at 13:45:29 -0500
Or given a list of valid usernames on one system, forge
email to that user's associates elsewhere. Or spam in
his name, etc...
All of which can be done to anybody who posts in public (like, say,
You make your users use the MSN smtp server, I have several users using our
office mailserver remotely with MSN and no reported problems sending mail
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] through MSN's smtp servers. I *assume* that MSN lets
any of its IP addresses send mail regardless of hostname.
Tim
At
From the presentation of information perspective, the site is not all that
good. Technically speaking, it is very good - fast loading, not a lot of BS
graphics, accessible with all browsers, including the elite few of us who
still use Lynx. I am concerned about the quality and quantity of
Sorry for prolonging this most likely annoying thread, but I completely
disagree with you.
On the currentsite you've got simple access to qmail sources, man pages,
list archives, patches, support, etc and it is well organized.
What do you want animated gifs and sound?
- eric
Lyndon Griffin
What do you want animated gifs and sound?
- eric
Apparently, you neglected to read my previous post. Simply having a link to
the list archive is not helpful.
Lyndon Griffin escribió:
From the presentation of information perspective, the site is
not all that
good. Technically
At 3:01 pm -0400 10/9/99,the wonderful Dave Sill wrote:
Damon Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone use their .qmail files to selectively forward messages to
different addresses? Say "if from=??? or subj=???"
How about passing the messages to a script for processing?
Sure. These are
Sam wrote:
That has been the case at least since 4.0. The problem is that Red Hat's
installer forces a sendmail install no matter what, even if another package
provides smtpdaemon.
Yes, but in this case I have removed the sendmail rpms from the distro
Kevin
David Harris wrote:
If you are going to be installing a bunch of machines, you might invest in
modifying the base package by modifying the installer's package groupings so
that qmail is installed instead of sendmail. You see, sendmail is in the "base"
group which is always installed. If
Lyndon Griffin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 September 1999 at 13:53:56 -0700
Maybe it's subjective, but I disagree - I don't feel that the site is well
organized. Yes, there are sections of seemingly related material, which I
guess is what you deem to be well organized. I do agree with
I think that it would be really useful if qmail.org had an "apps" section
similar to freshmeat.net or linuxapps.com. If I could search through names
and decriptions of apps, that would be *very useful*. For instance, if I
hear about this cool program called "vchkpw", that's an addition for
On Fri, 10 Sep 1999, Dave Sill wrote:
Sam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Anyhow, I realize that giving information "up front" on working
usernames on the system is probably at least a small security risk,
so I'd rather not do that,
I've yet to see anyone make a
I agree with Sam on this one. My experience supports his view. I've
never seen any systematic attempts to grab usernames via SMTP. I've seen
quite a few mailbombs with bounces, though.
Jim Lippard [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.discord.org/
Unsolicited bulk email charge:
Hello everybody,
I have already installed qmail on SuSE Linux 6.2 with Windows clients and it
works really fine.
We have almost 15 clients running Outlook 97/98/2000. Now my question is, if
it is possible to use the groupware function of that MUA with qmail, or are
there any questions to do so
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 07:55:52PM -0400, Sam wrote:
Furthermore, you ignored the rest of my post, which compared whatever
miniscule benefit you get from practicing security through obscurity
weighed against your server now being a willing accomplice in a
denial-of-service attack. The same
On Fri, Sep 10, 1999 at 12:33:28PM -0700, Lyndon Griffin wrote:
From the presentation of information perspective, the site is not all that
good.
imagine that you and Dan Bernstein and countless others want it to be
an even more powerful force.
One simple question. Have you *seen*, as in
What should I use in the way of var-qmail.
My understanding is that it needs to be compiled on each machine, but
as this is a fresh install, but maybe used for upgrades, I am concerned
about
UID's. Should I simply create a .rpm from the source supplied or can
someone
recommend a better method.
Hi folks, my freebsd box (3.2-Stable) running qmail dies over and over,
several about 1/2 times a week. Here is what i get at log:
937023957.591990 alert: oh no! lost spawn connection! dying...
937023957.617105 status: exiting
I decide to trace qmail syscalls, using the utility truss, i got
39 matches
Mail list logo
