Hi,
Brett Randall wrote:
I'll agree that asking about bulk mailing on this list is a little
suicidial, (especially since www.qmail.org/top.html talks about mailing
lists with ezmlm) but considering how many people don't speak English
natively on this list, I think it is a little rude to go
I use qmail at chem.itb.ac.id. What's the simplest way to reforward
those emails to the right person or to the right place?
I suggest looking into fetchmail and similar programs...we had to use it for
a while (albeit with sendmail, not qmail, but since it works via POP3
retrieval, I would
On 12-Sep-2000 Muhamad A. Martoprawiro wrote:
My question is:
All emails come to X.org ([EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], etc.) are forwarded to me (say, [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I use qmail at chem.itb.ac.id. What's the simplest way to reforward
those
um,
The first email I have ever sent to this list was a few hours ago. and as soon
as I sent it, someone has been spending ALL night trying to connect to my
machine to an IMAP port.
207.155.121.162
207.155.121.170
207.155.121.166
just quit it, I am watching.
thanks
shawn
--
got root?
Is there anybody know the main features different between Qmail and IMAP4(UW).
I know they support different protocol,I want to choose one of them to construct
a mail server.Wish somebody give me some advice.
--
»¶ÓÄúʹÓà °Ù¼ÒÉÌÎñµç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ
You may be interested in knowing that those IP addresses belong to
emumail.net, an email checking web site. I would almost suggest you block
those IP addresses from accessing your machine, since I doubt you will have
any use for email from that site... An insecure site where people expose
their
thanks, but I already checked it out and portsentry has blackholed them
already. the IP that tries the most is running red hat linux, apache 1.3.9, and
qmail. I emailed root@that IP and told them if it doesn't stop then I will
contact their service provider...
thanks guys!
shawn
On Tue, 12
I emailed root@that IP and told them if it doesn't stop then I will
contact their service provider...
A machine that runs qmail and accepts mail for its IP address... Pretty easy
to do, but not many people (AFAIK) do this...maybe this machine is an open
relay? ;)
/BR
Manager
InterPlanetary
actually, the email got bounced back to me so I know it is from this list...
ever since I posted that message, the connections have stopped...
shawn
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, you wrote:
I emailed root@that IP and told them if it doesn't stop then I will
contact their service provider...
A
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:33:29PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anybody know the main features different between Qmail and IMAP4(UW).
I know they support different protocol,I want to choose one of them to construct
a mail server.Wish somebody give me some advice.
well, it's
qmail Digest 12 Sep 2000 10:00:01 - Issue 1121
Topics (messages 48387 through 48454):
list down ?
48387 by: Jens Georg
48388 by: "Próspero, Esteban"
Reject it during the SMTP dialogue
48389 by: J.J.Gallardo
48393 by: Dave Sill
48421 by:
hi all
can i use my domain as my adress
eg..
my host: omni.arc.itb.ac.id
i want my adress like this [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what should i do..?
i am sorry if my english bad cause english not my native..:)
website : www.fadli.za.net
email : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Olivier M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] [000912 05:31]:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:33:29PM +0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there anybody know the main features different between Qmail and
IMAP4(UW). I know they support different protocol,I want to choose
one of them to construct a mail
"French, Michael" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I try to telnet to port 25, I
get a connection refused message. Checked the qmail logs and in the smtpd
log, I get a message that says"tcpserver: error in loading shared
libraries:libc.so.6.1:failed to map segment from shared object:Cannont
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11 Sep 2000, at 12:03, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
Pointing to CNAMEs is close to forbidden.
ok, I can't resist:
"WHY" ?
1. Because the law (RFC) says so.
2. You also want some logic? Because you'd have to start over
again resolving the
"Olivier M." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But you can use UW-IMAP or Courier-IMAP with qmail if you want.
The first one only with Mailbox-type boxes, and the second with
Maildirs.
There's a patch to make UW-IMAP work with maildirs. Cyrus is another
IMAP server that can work with qmail. It uses its
ryan p bobko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
and finally, my virtualdomains:
Y:bronco15
mail.Y:bronco15
My understanding is that all mail to Y or mail.Y will go to user bronco15. However,
when I send mail to ryan@Y, I get the following message:
Hi. This is the
Hey All,
I was doing some research on
linux files systems. and ran across?
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developer/opensource/jfs/
Is anyone out there running Qmail on JFS for
linux?? How is it running? Whats the pros/cons?
Sean Truman[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.prodigysolutions.com/
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 September 2000 at 21:14:31 -0600
The favorite is always:
Q: I would like to do "XYZ"
A: WHY do you want to do "XYZ"
Who cares why? STOP trying to think for me, ok? If I want to do XYZ,
On which note, it is quite useful to create your newsletter in HTML on a
website, and then make a mailing list that simply gives the major headings
and points back to that website for the actual newsletter (many large
newsletters do this to save bandwidth and create a nicer looking
newsletter).
"Scott D. Yelich" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Understand? There's just, what I perceive, as a growing tendency for
people to answer a question with what they want, regardless of what they
were asked.
I agree that this is "no biggy". This list is a completely free,
voluntary and open forum, and
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
Pointing to CNAMEs is close to forbidden.
ok, I can't resist:
"WHY" ?
1. Because the law (RFC) says so.
but why was the "law" put in place? perhaps...
2. You also want some logic? Because you'd have to start over
again resolving the CNAME
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12 Sep 2000, at 11:11, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
2. You also want some logic? Because you'd have to start over
again resolving the CNAME chain. There were fears of efficiency.
AH! Someone once thought it might not be as efficient.
Well,
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 12 September 2000 at 10:12:15 -0600
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes on 10 September 2000 at 21:14:31 -0600
The favorite is always:
Q: I would like to do "XYZ"
A: WHY do you
Ok I'm running a qmail server for a few months
without problems. But since I'm not a very
experienced UNIX admin I want to make sure
everything keeps working as it should.
Now I hear people talking about daemonstools,
how it restarts the service when it dies.
At the moment I simply run a small
btw: this isn't flame bait... if it's too off topic, since no one else
is participating, I'd be happy to discuss these things in private
emails.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
Well, Fortran's rules for indexing come from the same teapot.
Yes, and we all know how much attention every
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 11:11:48AM -0600, Scott D. Yelich wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Petr Novotny wrote:
Pointing to CNAMEs is close to forbidden.
ok, I can't resist:
"WHY" ?
1. Because the law (RFC) says so.
but why was the "law" put in place? perhaps...
2. You also want
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 17:47:37 +0200, Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Peter The real trick to high mailinglist performance is only
Peter injecting a message once. qmail is excellent at high-rate
Peter delivery of one message to 20.000 recipients.
Peter It sucks at handling 20.000 separate
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 02:05:27PM -0400, Chris Shenton wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2000 17:47:37 +0200, Peter van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Peter The real trick to high mailinglist performance is only
Peter injecting a message once. qmail is excellent at high-rate
Peter delivery of one message
here's my summary of this issue that scott has been preseverating on for
the past year and a half or so:
-the RFC says MX records can't point to CNAMEs
-scott thinks that is silly and doesn't understand why it should be
-others point out that this was originally due to fears of efficiency
Shhh, don't tell. If he's stupid enough to ask for advice, he
might
just be stupid enough to put his real email address in...
I'll agree that asking about bulk mailing on this list is a little
suicidial, (especially since www.qmail.org/top.html talks about mailing
lists with ezmlm)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12 Sep 2000, at 20:10, Peter van Dijk wrote:
I don't know if it sucks more than sendmail. Sendmail doesn't have a
todo queue, and it often has several processes spawning at once,
because of it's nature.
However, sendmail (by default) also has
On Mon, Sep 11, 2000 at 01:53:20PM -0700,
Christopher Taranto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Jamie,
My post of a couple of days ago has a similar problem - but no one has
responded to my message.
I don't think I have the answer to your problem, but one thing you
should be aware of is that
regarding INSTALL.ctl
There's one big exception. You MUST tell qmail your hostname. Just run
the config-fast script:
# ./config-fast your.full.host.name
config-fast puts your.full.host.name into control/me. It also puts it
into control/locals and control/rcpthosts, so that qmail will accept
* Fadli Syarid [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
can i use my domain as my adress eg.. my host: omni.arc.itb.ac.id i
want my adress like this [EMAIL PROTECTED] what should i do..?
/var/qmail/doc/FAQ: 1.1. How do I set up host masquerading?
--
Robin S. Socha http://socha.net/
* Scott D Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
Scott D. Yelich [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[Asking for XYZ when everyone knows XYZ is a dumb thing to do]
Very often, people new to an area get really dumb ideas. I've done it
myself. Sometimes wanting
* Frans Haarman [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Should I start using daemontools ?
Absolutely. You'll probably like multilog, too. And while you're at it,
also install ucspi-tcp. Basically, install everything written by DJ
Bernstein - the man is a living programming marvel.
--
Robin S. Socha
this got sent incomplete the first time so
disregard the first one - oops
regarding INSTALL.ctl
which states:
"There's one big
exception. You MUST tell qmail your hostname. Just runthe config-fast
script: # ./config-fast
your.full.host.nameconfig-fast puts your.full.host.name
Did I mention
I did this:
IV. QMail and PINE
If you are using pine,
put:
sendmail-path=/usr/sbin/sendmail
-t
inbox-path=$MAIL into /usr/lib/pine.conf.
Thanks,Rick Uphttp://updegrove.nethttp://linuxpeople.cc
I'm missing the message where Scott said to ignore the RFC. He may have
several times said the RFC was irrelevant, or hinted at that, but never said
(to my reading) that it should be ignored. In fact, I understood him to be
saying it should be changed.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
How does a different filesystem, like ReiserFS help? Hypothetically?
- Original Message -
From: "Petr Novotny" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 12 Sep 2000, at 20:10, Peter van Dijk wrote:
I don't know if it sucks more than sendmail. Sendmail doesn't have a
todo queue, and it often has
I have got a question about qmailand pine...
I have qmail running on Slackware Linux 7 and it works fine, however, when I
use pine, I have to put localhost in inbox path : {localhost/pop3}
I never installed sendmail on installation of slack so the last posting about
qmail and pine won't work.
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 04:06:16PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
How does a different filesystem, like ReiserFS help? Hypothetically?
Basically, ext2fs sucks and FreeBSD FFS rocks (especially with
softupdates). I hear good things about ReiserFS. Now only if it was
stable. (don't come saying
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you're serious, the answer is that some people view that adherance
to standards is important even if it seems to temporarily hamper
interoperability. "Temporarily"? I'm talking the long-term view
of the Internet not the next couple of
Does anyone have a program that does the checks rblsmtpd does, except that
it allows the modification of the message header instead of blocking the
mail?
I've mentionned this before, but after trying some things, didn't manage to
get it to work right.
Basically:
- incoming message from server
I'm aware of how qmail currently handles receipts, but am wondering if it
would be possible (of course ;-) to (by adding a header?) request that
qmail-remote or qmail-local generate a return-receipt-verified E-mail once
they succeeded?
It doesn't seem that difficult to return a confirmation
Is this the correct reply address? [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If so this step doesn't work or offer any suggestions on what to do if it
does not.
Has anyone experienced this step not working?
3. Local-local test: Send yourself an empty message. (Replace ``me''
with your username. Make sure to
* Michael T Babcock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does anyone have a program that does the checks rblsmtpd does, except
that it allows the modification of the message header instead of
blocking the mail?
Procmail, preferably in conjunction with rblcheck:
[root@www log]# tail -f maillog
Sep 12 17:13:51 www qmail: 968804031.708313 delivery 35: deferral:
/bin/sh:_dot-forward:_command_not_found/
Sep 12 17:13:51 www qmail: 968804031.710696 status: local 0/10 remote 0/20
Sep 12 17:14:43 www qmail: 968804083.883235 starting delivery 36: msg 86907
to
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:18:09PM +0200, Petr Novotny wrote:
On 12 Sep 2000, at 20:10, Peter van Dijk wrote:
I don't know if it sucks more than sendmail. Sendmail doesn't have a
todo queue, and it often has several processes spawning at once,
because of it's nature.
However, sendmail
When I try step 5 in TEST.deliver
5. Local-remote test: Send an empty message to your account on another
machine.
% echo to: me@wherever | /var/qmail/bin/qmail-inject
qmail: new msg 53
qmail: info msg 53: bytes 246 from me@domain qp 20372 uid 666
qmail:
Hi friends...
I need setup the number max of rcpt than qmail can send.
For example :
I have a client remote than send 600 messages into a issue of a
only e-mail,
I'd like than my users only could send 100 messages max by e-mail
or 100 messages max by hour.
Is it possible?
Thanks
Is this offsubject?
Note that the algorithm to delete irrelevant RRs breaks if LOCAL has
a alias and the alias is listed in the MX records for REMOTE. (E.g.
REMOTE has an MX of ALIAS, where ALIAS has a CNAME of LOCAL). This
can be avoided if aliases are never used in the data
Hi folks.
I've got ucspi-tcp-0.88 with rblsmtpd and qmail-1.03 on FreeBSD 4.0.
We recently had some problems where a large part of our area network was
working fine, but our link to the outside world was having problems and
periodically went down. This meant that when an smtp connection was
Hi All,
well being the newbie on this list and new to qmail I figure I would start
off with the typical how do I question and see what kind of experts we have
on here. :)
So far qmail has been easy to install with the exception of the pop service.
I have the 110 port open and it does function
I was considering setting up qmail on a Solaris8 x86 machine until I stumbled upon
DJB's notes regarding publicfile's performance
(http://cr.yp.to/publicfile/performance.html)
"publicfile achieves similar results under other operating systems, except Solaris.
Solaris adds an incredible amount
I'd like to know why to choose Qmail or IMAP4(UW).
What's their merit and disadvantage?
--
»¶ÓÄúʹÓà °Ù¼ÒÉÌÎñµç×ÓÓʼþϵͳ http://www.email.com.cn
Welcome to E-mail business system
Better OS gurus than I can comment on exactly how Solaris bloats
network processes.
All I'll say is that qmail still performs admirably on the Solaris
latform.
However, I question the decision to use Solaris x86. I'm not aware
of any advantage there is over something like Linux or xBSD.
John
jfs for linux is not yet stable.
try reiserfs if you want a journaling fs for linux now.
-makatao
"It is insufficient to protect ourselves with laws,We must protect
ourselves with mathematics."
- Original Message -
From:
Sean C Truman
To: QMail List
Sent: Tuesday,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:07:59PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need setup the number max of rcpt than qmail can send.
For example :
I have a client remote than send 600 messages into a issue of a
only e-mail,
I'd like than my users only could send 100 messages max by e-mail
or 100
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
is the line in inetd.conf
but I have no
var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
file
I am supposed to?
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:11:32PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
So far qmail has been easy to install with the exception of the pop service.
I have the 110 port open and it does function however it states this user
has no $HOME/Maildir when in fact the Maildir does exist in the /home/user
Thanks for the help Chrishere is what I have...
In the inetd.conf file I have
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
mail.mydomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I will research the dot-qmail...What I am trying to accomplish is having
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:37:17PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
In the inetd.conf file I have
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
mail.mydomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I hardly use inetd for anything, so I'm no expert, but I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
is the line in inetd.conf
but I have no
var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
file
I am supposed to?
Yes it should be there along with quite a few other files. You can
'Chris Johnson' wrote:
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 08:37:17PM -0600, James Shelby wrote:
In the inetd.conf file I have
pop-3 stream tcp nowait root/var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup
mail.mydomain.com /bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin/qmail-pop3d Maildir
I hardly use inetd for
Thanks Dale, still no luck...same error message. Here is a little more
information that might tell someone that I have it configured wrong...
Say I have a user called johnd in /home/johnd I have a Mail and Maildir
directories along with a Mailbox file. In /var/spool/mail I have a johnd
link
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 07:06:47PM -0500, Chris Hardie wrote:
-If rblsmtpd can't talk to the RBL server, what sort of error does it
issue to the connecting server? Temporary or permanent? Is it just the
default 60 second timeout?
From http://cr.yp.to/ucspi-tcp/rblsmtpd.html:
There are
I get this a lot on the logs
delivery 27: deferral: /bin/sh:_dot-forward:_command_not_found/
Please tell me where it comes from it might solve all my problems with
qmail
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:23:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smtpstream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
is the line in inetd.conf
but I have no
var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
file
I am supposed to?
If you've installed qmail,
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 09:35:07PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get this a lot on the logs
delivery 27: deferral: /bin/sh:_dot-forward:_command_not_found/
Please tell me where it comes from it might solve all my problems with
qmail
You are delivering mail to a .qmail-file that
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 08:56:35AM +0800, Brian Baquiran wrote:
I was considering setting up qmail on a Solaris8 x86 machine until I stumbled upon
DJB's notes regarding publicfile's performance
(http://cr.yp.to/publicfile/performance.html)
"publicfile achieves similar results under other
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:22:02PM -0700, John White wrote:
Better OS gurus than I can comment on exactly how Solaris bloats
network processes.
All I'll say is that qmail still performs admirably on the Solaris
latform.
However, I question the decision to use Solaris x86. I'm not aware
http://www.securityfocus.com/focus/linux/articles/qmail.html
Replacing your MTA with qmail
Jeremy Rauch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, Aug 28 2000
... By taking a modular approach, and running with the lowest possible
privileges, qmail is able to markedly improve the security stance of
machines it
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: smtp stream tcp nowait qmaild /usr/bin/tcp-env tcp-env
/var/qmail/bin/qmail-smtpd
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 05:23:21PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
smtp
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 10:51 PM
Subject: actually it is a standard install following the directions even
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September
OK...I haven't been following this thread, but two things:
1. Could you PLEASE turn off request for read receipt...it is getting very
annoying
2. Another annoying thing is how, in the same thread, you keep changing
subjects. For people reading archives later, and even people following this
On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 10:53:35PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you've installed qmail, yes.
[root@www /root]# ls -l /var/qmail/bin
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root qmail 8 Jan 11 1980
/var/qmail/bin -
/usr/bin
This is a truly non-standard qmail install. You are
78 matches
Mail list logo
