RFC 2821 and 2822

2001-04-25 Thread Scott Gifford
Hadn't seen this mentioned here, and thought it might be of general interest. RFCs 2821 and 2822 were published today, obsoleting the venerable RFCs 821 and 822, covering SMTP and the Internet Message Format, respectively. They're available from the usual places, including:

Re: RFC 2821 and 2822

2001-04-25 Thread Matthew Patterson
I'm not very good at reading RFCs, so I can't be sure myself. Can anyone confirm that qmail 1.3 with the BigDNS and queuevar patches will be compliant with whatever standards may come out of RFCs 2821 and 2822? I'm sure that there will be some schmuck member of management will hear about

Re: RFC 2821 and 2822

2001-04-25 Thread Mike Jackson
Matthew Patterson wrote: I'm not very good at reading RFCs, so I can't be sure myself. Can anyone confirm that qmail 1.3 with the BigDNS and queuevar patches will be compliant with whatever standards may come out of RFCs 2821 and 2822? It could literally take years for RFCs to become

Re: RFC 2821 and 2822

2001-04-25 Thread Chris Garrigues
From: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 01:49:24 +0300 Matthew Patterson wrote: I'm not very good at reading RFCs, so I can't be sure myself. Can anyone confirm that qmail 1.3 with the BigDNS and queuevar patches will be compliant with whatever standards may

Re: RFC 2821 and 2822

2001-04-25 Thread James Stevens
standards (evil grin) We'd just need a catchy name for it.. --JT Original Message On 4/25/01, 4:08:13 PM, Chris Garrigues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote regarding Re: RFC 2821 and 2822: From: Mike Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2001 01:49:24 +0300 Matthew Patterson wrote