Hello,
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 10:28:48AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
using tcpserver that
You're right -- there's no doubt that the TXT record is useful (or was
;-) ). But my point is that the lookups (according to the spec) were to be
done on A records, and the TXT records fetched if you wanted that
description. This is two lookups, so no qmail person would settle for that
- Original Message -
From: "Mate Wierdl" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
That would not allow for the rapid changes necessary in a blackhole
list. Imagine you are an
On Thu, Aug 17, 2000 at 06:34:21PM -0400, Michael T. Babcock wrote:
The best approach to this is to have rblsmtpd use A records, as it should
have from the beginning (that's what you get for optimising solely for
speed, not for correctness).
But then the TXT record is really useful: it does
Thx for Chris J. for explaining why rblsmtpd stopped working with
relays.mail-abuse.org.
Such emergencies I think just really show the necessity to simplify
"rbl" lookups. Namely, I think rblsmtpd/rbldns should work in such a
way that any mail administrator should be able to set up a local
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
BTWY, I know many people are attached to using DNS for rbl lookups,
but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
using tcpserver that would just lookup an IP number in a .cdb database
of IP numbers, and send
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 09:55:53AM -0500, Ben Beuchler wrote:
On Wed, Aug 16, 2000 at 07:08:28AM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote:
BTWY, I know many people are attached to using DNS for rbl lookups,
but would not it be relatively simple to implement a server software
using tcpserver that would
