was throwing me a curve. Jake was right on the mark.
At your suggestion I don't use VQAdmin to add or remove users. CLI
It all appears to be back to normal.
Eric Shubert wrote:
You need to be more specific, including how you did what.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I sent an e mail to maill
I have been reading until my eyes bleed, but it's nice to have someone
to bounce a question off from time to time. Especially when you think
you finally understand what's going on only to find you're still in the
dark. DNS on it's own is enough to keep anyone occupied full time and
never really
Is the queue_repair logged? If so I can forward it to you. Tell me
what file you want.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Thanks Lucian.
We still don't know for sure how the queues became borked. Nothing in
that area has changed that we know of.
At any rate, if anyone experiences delayed deliveries
Can you use 192.168.0.1/12 in the whitelist_ip file?
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers Consulting Group offers Qmailtoaster support and installations.
It was just an example. Can you use CIDR notation in Spamdyke?
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 27.09.2009 17:05, Maxwell Smart pisze:
Can you use 192.168.0.1/12 in the whitelist_ip file?
12 bit netmask for this host? Look at RFC-1918 and RFC-1466
can't imagine what your problem might be.
Can you show an example of spamdyke's smtp log blocking message?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, I must have missed it or not got that far yet.
I am getting a lot of rDNS refusals including the qmail-toaster
list. It works great, but the toaster list and my
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shubert wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
W dniu 25.09.2009 14:28, Constantin IOAJA pisze:
*No need
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The activity I see when I tail -f /var/log/qmail/smtp/current is what
I mean.
Is there someplace I can see a flow chart of a default setup? and
how to follow the mail through the system? This would be extremely
helpful.
I can get you all
like. Please include as much
detail (and links) as you can about them.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other features could be included in the qtp. I
know of three that I use on my servers.
Webmin (QMT ISO option is a very old version)
Fail2ban
QSSEC IDS
Eric Shubert wrote
10:59:07
simscan:[27234]:RELAYCLIENT:0.0197s:-:192.168.0.2:c...@yother.com:c...@yother.com
09-25 10:59:07 tcpserver: end 27234 status 0
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This would
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
symptoms. It's still
there.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
Win95 days. :)
Eric Shubert wrote:
Hey Max,
I'm working this with someone else who appears to have the same
like it.
Please report the output of the queue_repair.py command. I think
you'll see some errors fixed there.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Sounds good.
FWIW I just did a telnet to my IMAP and it worked as expected with no
delays.
It's actually CJ Eric, Maxwell Smart is an alias that just stuck from
correct?
Would there be any benefit to running the queue_repair weekly, monthly
as a maintenance procedure?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Nope. Usually operator error. ;)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
BTW, I'll answer to either. :)
Did you find out what caused the queue to get hosed?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Ok
of an archive. It can be helpful on occasion. I
don't know if it's worth the time though since a simple request to you
or on the list would probably suffice.
Have a good weekend.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am not sure what operator error could have caused this. The fact
Sounds good. Not quite up to speed with the yum thing yet. I usually
just download and install from source tarballs. I have only started to
use CentOS with the QMTISO. I am used to SuSe which is a bit different.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
If you're asking what other
Some additional information that may help. If I start and stop my
toaster the mail is delivered immediately.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am still having delays of up to 20 minutes for e mail to be
delivered. Here is a snip of a header sent from the mail server to
the same mail server
Peter,
Anyway to confirm BIND has been compromised?
CJ
Peter Tan wrote:
I had this problem before. Bind was compromised and I switched to
djbdns. Works for me so far...
On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com
mailto:c...@yother.com wrote:
Some additional
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
OK, I have been watching the log with tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current I don't see anything out of the
ordinary. Look at the times
different messages.
Let's back up a little bit. Please explain again what you're seeing
that's leading you to conclude that there are delays.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
I don't see any highlighting.
Please post to the list. There are many more eyes there. :)
Maxwell Smart wrote
:9836
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.86?) (c...@yother.com@192.168.0.2)
by laetitia.area510.net with ESMTPA; 24 Sep 2009 23:30:58 -
Message-ID: 4abc0132.3010...@yother.com
Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:30:58 -0700
From: Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11
just don't know how to authenticate
using Telnet so I cannot complete the transaction.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Here is the header.
Content-Filter: maildrop-toaster
Return-Path: c...@yother.com
Delivered-To: yother.com...@yother.com
Received: (qmail 9496
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl restart on server 1 and it then appeared in server 2's
to
look.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, a little more info.
Both of my servers are experiencing the same delay. I sent an e mail
from server 1 to server 2 I immediately saw it in the tail -f
/var/log/qmail/smtp/current logs, but not in server 2 current logs. I
did a qmailctl
Webmin actually has the features you are wanting. They are in modules
like Usermin and Virtualmin. It is very robust and offers a great deal
of flexibility on what you want your customers to have access to. It
also supports, bandwidth monitoring, webalizer, etc.
Jake Vickers wrote:
this? (I'm guessing quite a bit!)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I think I am getting it sorted. Here is a snip of my named.conf
file. Do I need to allow-query;? Also do I need the forwarders,
ISP's DNS servers since the db.cache is the ROOT SERVERS? From what
I have read it is the recommended
time=7.66 ms
64 bytes from 206.13.28.12: icmp_seq=5 ttl=253 time=7.99 ms
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Thanks Jake,
That's what I was able to glean from the info I read. I am not sure how
I am going to ultimately set this up yet. This is all making me rethink
my entire rack configuration. I have
Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight in the
members of this list, I knew someone has had, is having or can offer
info on where to look.
No on the Spamdyke.
[r...@laetitia tmp]# cat /etc/resolv.conf
nameserver 206.13.30.12
nameserver
to work very well.
I only have spamhaus in my blacklist file.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Anyone get this yesterday?
Jake,
The messages appear to be sent immediately. They don't appear in the
queue.
Actually, I do have a caching nameserver installed. I will move the
127.0.0.1
I have bind installed and it's running. It is mainly a slave server for
my main DNS server. It turns out there was no 127 address like there
should be. I fixed that and put my 127.0.0.1 in the first position.
I'll report back.
Thanks for all your help guys.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell
named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'ns.embratel.net.br/A/IN':
64.168.70.132#53
Sep 22 12:14:20 laetitia named[8777]: FORMERR resolving
'ns.embratel.net.br//IN': 64.168.70.132#53
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I moved the DNS
and restart qmail I get
all the mail.
Ideas on how to begin to troubleshoot? I remember someone on the list a
few days ago experiencing the same issue, but paid little attention then.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Only if they're there. ;)
Your named has a problem.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Should I
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS server(s) before it in the
list are handling
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's ok.
It's not really ok. It's just that the DNS
Eric,
I think I found part of my problem. It was an entry in the forwards of
my DNS server. This should really improve performance. I am not sure
how it even worked.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes
;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1)
;; WHEN: Tue Sep 22 17:18:09 2009
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 287
[r...@laetitia ~]#
I am guessing this is what you were looking for.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Yes, they are there and constant with 127.0.0.1 in the first
position of
my resolv.conf file. If I move it back to the last position it's
ok
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now experiencing delays of several minutes and sometimes
15 or so. What is the cause of this and how can it be resolved. Is
this traffic on the
64.168.70.132
nameserver 127.0.0.1
; generated by /sbin/dhclient-script
no caching nameserver
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I am noticing quite a delay when receiving e mails. I know when the
server sends a notification and it used to be nearly instantaneous
delivery. I am now
not the one you mean, but I can't seem to
find the log your talking about. In the maillog nothing unusual. In
the /var/log/qmail/smtp there are quite a few entries. Is this normal.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Not that your supposed to know. Knowing the level of insight
@40004ab54c802f171784.s @40004ab6dc910d26c494.s
Those are the DNS servers. The 64.168.70.132 is my autoritative DNS server.
The qtp-check-rbls is
[r...@laetitia smtp]# qtp-check-rbls
0.194
2.021
Sending HUP signal to qmail-send.
[r...@laetitia smtp]#
Thanks,
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote
I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1. I did a default
install, but no qtp-menu.
How do I resolve this?
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is sponsored by Vickers Consulting Group
(www.vickersconsulting.com)
Vickers
Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 17, 2009 12:27 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] re: qtp-menu
I am building a test machine using QMT ISO 5.1. I did a default
install, but no qtp-menu.
How do I resolve
to the public. If you have a decent
firewall you
should be ok. We use shorewall and they have a lot of good
protection and
features. Taking good security practices in the httpd.conf and php.ini
should keep you fairly safe.
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com] Sent
This is more an Apache question, but I know that most everyone on this
list with the exception of me knows the answer.
How do I setup my webserver not to answer to requests to my ip? I have
been reading that this can be very dangerous and mine currently answers
to my default page served up by
stop apache. Or... if you wanna view pages locally, but block
outsiders:
In httpd.conf :
Directory /
Order Deny,Allow
Deny from all
Allow from 127.0.0.1
/Directory
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 6:14 PM, Maxwell Smart c...@yother.com wrote:
This is more an Apache question, but I
is to use .htaccess
Deny from All
Allow from 192.168.1.0/24
-Original Message-
From: Maxwell Smart [mailto:c...@yother.com]
Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 6:14 PM
To: qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
Subject: [qmailtoaster] Re: OT default apache ?
This is more an Apache question
Rajesh,
Why don't you try it like this.
206.53.144.0/20:allow,CHKUSER_ALLOW_SENDER_CHAR3/
CJ
Rajesh M wrote:
sir,
i understood what you say, but if i use it in the last line then it would
mean the whole server and i did not want that.
on the safe side i just applied it to only the
Eric,
I am running the QMT ISO CentOS 5.0. That worked perfectly, all
updated now :)
What exactly was the cause?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Which distro/version?
Have you tried yum clean all?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone
This is not really a qmail-toaster issue, but I am sure someone on this
list can help me.
I am trying to update my toasters and I have updated all of the packages
except one on one server. I cannot get the python to update. Here is
the error message. I am not really sure what the dealio
The RFC actually requires abuse, postmaster, and webmaster if memory
serves me correctly.
PakOgah wrote:
Aleksander Podsiadly wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
[...] Most admins no longer set up abuse@ addresses (since they
get spammed anyway, or are so full they never check them - like me
:( ).
CBL usually means you have a spammer in your midst, have been hacked or
victim of malware, or are an open relay.
Gary Bowling wrote:
I keep getting listed on the CBL list. I have been through all the
recommendations for checking my server, but can't seem to find
anything wrong. I'm sure it's
Ole,
I set mine up the way you suggested and had one attempt today also. It
ended on the 4th try, but I didn't receive my notification. Everything
appears to be working correctly except the notification.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello friends,
Just let you know.
My previous email about
Ole,
That would be great. You can just send it directly to me if you like.
c...@yother.com
I did compare the syntax to the other jail entries and it looked
correct. I'll check it again.
CJ
ole.johan...@cryonix.no wrote:
It notified me, perhaps you typed in wrong email adress/typo error?
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and restore. Server moved to a new ip
address and domain. I am having an issue with one domain
to be
a type A record (not a cname).
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Have you done a dig to find out what the DNS is reporting?
# dig mail.example.com
or
# dig example.com ANY @your dns server address.
CJ
Sean Humphries wrote:
Hi
Moved a server using qtp-backup and restore. Server moved to a new ip
address
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban, but
must not have it set up correctly to block the harvesters after 3
attempts. If anyone can shed some light on how to set this up it would
be greatly appreciated.
Here is my vpopmail logwatch
Anyway to drop their connection after 3 tries?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
These look like script kiddies (lame crackers) to me, not harvesters.
They're simply a nuisance.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban
in more detail, I expect you'd find that these
attempts are coming from limited IP address ranges. You could block
them with iptables.
I don't think these are worth being concerned about though.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Anyway to drop their connection after 3 tries?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote
I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up on it?
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban
I found out what was happening. My notifications were being blocked by
my SpamDyke. :(
CJ
Constantin IOAJA wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I do use OSSEC. Do you have a particular page that discusses this and
how to set it up for blocking? or at least where I can read up on it?
CJ
Nope
-alfa.ro]
*Sent:* 28. august 2009 21:40
*To:* qmailtoaster-list@qmailtoaster.com
*Subject:* Re: [qmailtoaster] re: harvesting
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Greetings fellow Qmailers,
I am trying to find a way to block harvesters. I am using Fail2ban,
but must not have it set up correctly to block
)
root (hd0,0)
kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5 ro root=LABEL=/
initrd /boot/initrd-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5.img
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Perfect.
If I use the qmailtoaster-plus to install Spamdyke, do the default
config settings work for starters
kernel-2.6.18-128.1.10.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.13.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.2.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-128.4.1.el5
kernel-2.6.18-92.1.22.el5
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
Everything worked as expected.
Glad to hear it.
However, I have a second mail server that I just updated
there was some reason it might fix something. This definitely sounds
like a grub misconfiguration issue. (duh)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
The /boot/grub/grub.conf file reads the same. The other 2 are both
symlinks as expected.
It has been rebooted and is still loading the old kernel. I also
removed
including Spamdyke.
I will likely set up this server as a back up or retire it as I have
enough hardware (primary and backup) up and running with my new config
to suit my current needs.
Thanks for all you help.
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Clean install on formatted drive. Only QMT ISO installed
I didn't partition it that way. It's a default QMT install with a
mirrored drive.
Eric Shubert wrote:
I wonder if there isn't a separate boot partition that's not being
mounted.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Strange indeed.
Tried remotely, no go. I removed the server from the rack, only to find
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I haven't
played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Thanks guys.
But i still have a hard time to actual get the QMT
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after the
sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while since
I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it works after
.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been fixed?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Although while it works great when it works after the second update I
performed qtp-newmodel broke and I had to upgrade manually. I
haven't played with it since.
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Ole
sandboxes have always worked for the
lastest releases though.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I can try it again and give you the error message. It failed after
the sandbox was created. I don't recall the error, it's been a while
since I used it.
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
What was the problem? Has it been
Eric,
OK, it worked.
How do I upgrade the qtp to the latest version?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Just say no. (that will let you select a new list)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
I just tried, but it thinks that there are updates that need to be
done that have been done manually. It says
Ole,
The default QMT ISO install should already have this feature implemented.
CJ
Ole N.Johansen wrote:
Hello,
Is there any possibilities to make spamassassin/qmail to automatical
move all incoming emails who is tagged as SPAM to ”spam folder” in
Squirrelmail/Horde?
Tips and
Eric,
While were on the subject. Does SpamDyke use an IP blacklist?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
amit IKF wrote:
Hi Everyone,
Whenever i go qtp-install-spamdyke from qtp-menu, I use to see below
message. Is this mean spamdyke is not installed on my server or not
getting update. How do I
I am having authentication problems that I cannot seem to figure out.
It always seems to happen with Thunderbird on Windows systems. I
cannot get the outgoing SMTP server to authenticate. It always comes up
with an error, cannot connect to server. I am sure it's a problem with
:04:37 schrieb Maxwell Smart:
I am having authentication problems that I cannot seem to figure out.
It always seems to happen with Thunderbird on Windows systems. I
cannot get the outgoing SMTP server to authenticate. It always comes up
with an error, cannot connect to server. I am sure it's
I know how to use telnet, but I don't activate it on my servers because
it's insecure. I'll take a look at it later. It's not that pressing
since it's only on my wifes machine! :)
Jake Vickers wrote:
Philip wrote:
Maxwell
try testing the authentification with a telnet session
from your
# telnet mailhost 25
to any email transport server, so long as there is connectivity.
(Perhaps you're thinking of ssh??)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I know how to use telnet, but I don't activate it on my servers
because it's insecure. I'll take a look at it later. It's not that
pressing since it's only
OK, that did it. It answers to port 587 but not 25. My guess is that
SBC is blocking port 25. I will change the port on my wifes system and
see what happens. I just checked, and see that my desktop is set to use
port 587.
Many thanks,
CJ
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Doh! I don't know why I
)
What goes here?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
You don't have to have telnet on the server. It's a client app. You can
# telnet mailhost 25
to any email transport server, so long as there is connectivity.
(Perhaps you're thinking of ssh??)
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I know how to use telnet, but I don't
. If
we don't have it on the wiki yet, google for it, learn it, then add it
to the wiki. TLS is particularly tricky because you need to encode
what you send. There's a web site that'll do the encoding for you
though, and you can simply cut'n'paste it.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Eric,
The wiki doesn't
Or you have been blacklisted because of excessively high unusual traffic?
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
Is it possible your provider is blocking port 25?
Ok, having serious problems...
This morning I discovered that our email server was pegging out our
T1. I
have no idea why. After a while
Pardon my ignorance. What exactly does the softlimit do?
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Phil Leinhauser wrote:
You said this started a couple weeks after you did a newmodel. I
think I smell a softlimit problem. Are you running x64 OS? You
might need to bump the SMTP softlimit back up. You
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
All mail is scanned unless you create an exclusion in your
I think just the clarification that it goes /dev/null whether it's
checked or not. The pertinent information for me is it's not going to
make it to the POP3 client regardless if it's ticked or not.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
OK
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does the SPAM go if the tick is not checked?
If it scores above your threshold in simscan
understand the scoring and it currently works very well. I don't plan
on modifying anything. I just want to know how it works. It is
currently correct 98% of the time and that's pretty good IMHO.
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way
need to filter POP3 email, that has to be done by the client.
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So, if I am understanding this correctly. There is no way to filter it
and have it make it to the POP3 Inbox marked as SPAM?
Eric Shubert wrote:
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
So where does
Got it.
I was able to set up Thunderbird as an IMAP client and it works
perfectly including the Sent and SPAM folders. Are there advantages to
one over the other?
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Yes, but it gets moved to a Spambox that can only be accessed via
webmail. I am
client from virtually anywhere. Do you need to
share your email account between your desktop and notebook? No problem.
Would you like to pull up your email on your blackberry? Again, not a
problem (and pretty slick if you ask me).
Get the picture?
Maxwell Smart wrote:
Got it.
I was able
Hey thanks for all your help. I have a much better understanding of the
setup and the difference between IMAP and POP3.
Using Thunderbird for IMAP was a snap and I can now view all folders on
the server in my client including the SPAM folder.
know it exists.
I personally don't use any MS product and only suggest Firefox, Opera,
or Thunderbird. I had been old school up until today. I check it from
my home and leave the mail on the server and my office client removes it
from the server.
CJ
Jake Vickers wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote
Great news.
Glen Vickers wrote:
Problem solved.
And yes, I bought yet another Tee shirt. My fricken router blew!!!
So it happened to be something rather simple. Got the RMA today and
all is fine.
Glen
Yea, there's only so much you can do remotely. At this point a local
You need to check the tick if you want the mail filtered. If you do not
check the tick the mail will go un filtered. Once you check the tick
there will be a SPAM folder created in your squirrelmail interface(once
SPAM is found) that houses the SPAM that is filtered out. It cannot be
checked
OK, now I'm confused.
Does this mean that if the box is not ticked that SPAM mail will make
it to your POP3 inbox marked as SPAM?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
spambox doesn't have anything to do with scanning messages, it only
takes effect during delivery after a message has been scanned and
Check to see that the IP address your sending mail from hasn't been
blacklisted.
Glen Vickers wrote:
Hello all,
I’m having an issue I have yet to figure out. About a week or so ago my
server stopped accepting incoming connections to send mail. I checked
my router/firewall/port
Firewall related question.
If I execute
r...@myconsole# iptables -A INPUT -s 10.10.10.10 -j DROP
Does this amend the existing table? Does it add the entry to the top or
bottom of the file?
CJ
-
Qmailtoaster is
Eric,
OK, that's exactly how I do it on all counts. I was just wondering if
there was an easier way. :)
What's the diff between service iptables restart and iptables-restore
/etc/sysconfig/iptables?
CJ
-
I have two qmailtoaster installations that exhibit the same behavior. I
am wondering if this is normal or can be fixed.
I have my outgoing SMTP/POP3 mail server (using Thunderbird) on my
office desktop set to use my toaster as a relay
(http://mail.example.com) which works fine, but if I try
and it authenticated and sent the
mail properly.
I guess the real question is does Thunderbird have a cache for passwords
and a password file? Can the password file be edited to clear passwords?
CJ
Eric Shubert wrote:
Maxwell Smart wrote:
I have two qmailtoaster installations that exhibit the same
301 - 400 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
